Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
7.7 Years
100 Following
23.3K+ Followers
12.4K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Why investors are starting to pull back before altcoin season
If it had been a little slower, the market picture at this moment could have been very different. At that time, $BTC traded around the 95–96k region, while Ethereum was around 3,300 USD.
From the outside, the market still seems relatively positive: prices are high, supporting information appears frequently, and the story of 'altcoin season' is widely mentioned. However, signals on larger time frames indicate a more cautious perspective.
From the outside, the market still seems relatively positive: prices are high, supporting information appears frequently, and the story of 'altcoin season' is widely mentioned. However, signals on larger time frames indicate a more cautious perspective.
Plasma – Native chain for stablecoins in the RWA era?
When talking about RWA, I often see stablecoins regarded as a layer that has 'done its job'. Everyone uses it, everyone understands it, so the narrative quickly jumps to tokenized bonds, on-chain stocks, or digital investment funds.
But the more closely I observe, the more I see that stablecoins are actually the largest RWA that has truly operated at a global scale, and also the place where infrastructure begins to reveal its clearest limits.
From that perspective, the question of whether @Plasma is the native chain for stablecoins in the RWA era is not merely a slogan, but hits on a very real issue.
Bitcoin Analysis Enters a New Phase: Liquidity, Safe-Haven Role, and Reversal Expectations
I focus on monitoring liquidity. There are two price zones that I am really interested in and ready to significantly increase my buying scale at $BTC the 75–80k zone, and in a more negative scenario, a retest of the EMA200 line around 60–65k.
From a trading perspective, Bitcoin is gradually being positioned by the market as a safe-haven asset, with its price behavior increasingly resembling that of traditional commodities.
I believe the likelihood of a reversal phase occurring within the next 2–4 months is high.
From a trading perspective, Bitcoin is gradually being positioned by the market as a safe-haven asset, with its price behavior increasingly resembling that of traditional commodities.
I believe the likelihood of a reversal phase occurring within the next 2–4 months is high.
Vanar Chain vs Ethereum: The core differences you need to know
I was browsing Square and saw quite a few people discussing @Vanarchain with Ethereum; the interesting point is not to start from throughput or fees, but from the initial assumptions of each system.
Ethereum is built as an open platform for all types of behavior: DeFi, NFT, DAO, financial experimentation. Vanar is not. It starts from a narrower question: how to make high-interaction applications run smoothly.
The first difference lies in data handling. Ethereum keeps almost everything on-chain to ensure composability and neutrality, while $VANRY accepts layer separation: on-chain retains what is needed for integrity, off-chain handles heavy and continuously changing data. In return, it provides faster responses and more stable costs for end users.
From my perspective, the second difference is the prioritization of experience. Ethereum accepts friction as a consequence of an open system. Vanar tries to make that friction disappear, especially in games and entertainment.
In my opinion, Vanar does not replace Ethereum. It exists for use cases that Ethereum, due to its own philosophy, does not prioritize, so each project has its own strengths, my friends.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
I was browsing Square and saw quite a few people discussing @Vanarchain with Ethereum; the interesting point is not to start from throughput or fees, but from the initial assumptions of each system.
Ethereum is built as an open platform for all types of behavior: DeFi, NFT, DAO, financial experimentation. Vanar is not. It starts from a narrower question: how to make high-interaction applications run smoothly.
The first difference lies in data handling. Ethereum keeps almost everything on-chain to ensure composability and neutrality, while $VANRY accepts layer separation: on-chain retains what is needed for integrity, off-chain handles heavy and continuously changing data. In return, it provides faster responses and more stable costs for end users.
From my perspective, the second difference is the prioritization of experience. Ethereum accepts friction as a consequence of an open system. Vanar tries to make that friction disappear, especially in games and entertainment.
In my opinion, Vanar does not replace Ethereum. It exists for use cases that Ethereum, due to its own philosophy, does not prioritize, so each project has its own strengths, my friends.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
A monitored scenario: BTC could adjust to the 32,000 USD level if it repeats the cycle pattern
Today,
there has been a significant drop, many long holders were liquidated for more than 800M$ last night
I am recording a scenario to monitor, not to make certain predictions:
there could be a large correction, and if the market continues to follow the pattern of 'deep drop after peak' like in previous cycles, then the ~32,000$ level is a point that many people are talking about.
The reason is looking back at history, BTC has had very strong declines after reaching cycle peaks:
there has been a significant drop, many long holders were liquidated for more than 800M$ last night
I am recording a scenario to monitor, not to make certain predictions:
there could be a large correction, and if the market continues to follow the pattern of 'deep drop after peak' like in previous cycles, then the ~32,000$ level is a point that many people are talking about.
The reason is looking back at history, BTC has had very strong declines after reaching cycle peaks:
Plasma's potential ranks in the top 10 chains for stablecoin balance
@Plasma is a high-performance Layer 1, EVM-compatible. If ranking stablecoin balance, and wondering where Plasma stands, with stablecoins, the determining factor for ranking is not TPS, but where people leave their money when they don't have to think about it.
Plasma, in my opinion, has a clear advantage as it was designed around stablecoins from the beginning.
Blockspace, fee mechanism, and experience all serve to hold and transfer stable value. This helps Plasma attract capital flows during high payment demand periods, especially with USDT.
However, holding money is harder than attracting it. Stablecoin balance is only sustainable when users believe they can withdraw at any time, with predictable costs and time.
Plasma needs to prove this not only when the network is calm, but also when the system is under pressure.
From my perspective, the potential is there, but whether Plasma can consistently replicate usage habits to turn that potential into a stable position is something we will have to wait for in the future, my friends.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
@Plasma is a high-performance Layer 1, EVM-compatible. If ranking stablecoin balance, and wondering where Plasma stands, with stablecoins, the determining factor for ranking is not TPS, but where people leave their money when they don't have to think about it.
Plasma, in my opinion, has a clear advantage as it was designed around stablecoins from the beginning.
Blockspace, fee mechanism, and experience all serve to hold and transfer stable value. This helps Plasma attract capital flows during high payment demand periods, especially with USDT.
However, holding money is harder than attracting it. Stablecoin balance is only sustainable when users believe they can withdraw at any time, with predictable costs and time.
Plasma needs to prove this not only when the network is calm, but also when the system is under pressure.
From my perspective, the potential is there, but whether Plasma can consistently replicate usage habits to turn that potential into a stable position is something we will have to wait for in the future, my friends.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Bitcoin is again rejected at 90,000 USD: Waiting for a breakthrough at 93,000 USD
I see Bitcoin being rejected at the 90,000 USD mark, and this time it feels not because the market is 'afraid' but because the push isn't clean enough to break through the technical and psychological barriers.
The recovery momentum before the FOMC meeting on Wednesday stalled quite predictably: it hit a strong resistance area, ETFs haven't pumped in new demand, so the price was pulled back to the accumulation area.
Since January 20, $BTC has been almost stuck in the 86,000–90,000 USD range. I've noticed that the 86,000–87,000 USD area is where prices have returned to test multiple times, and a notable point lies around the 100-week moving average of about 87,500 USD.
The recovery momentum before the FOMC meeting on Wednesday stalled quite predictably: it hit a strong resistance area, ETFs haven't pumped in new demand, so the price was pulled back to the accumulation area.
Since January 20, $BTC has been almost stuck in the 86,000–90,000 USD range. I've noticed that the 86,000–87,000 USD area is where prices have returned to test multiple times, and a notable point lies around the 100-week moving average of about 87,500 USD.
Institutional cash is leaving, how is Bitcoin reacting?
I am looking at Bitcoin through the lens of ETF cash flow, and this signal is quite interesting, even though it is not loud.
In the past 7 days, Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a net outflow of about 1.86 billion USD, while the price continues to adjust. If we only look at the number, it is very easy to conclude that institutions are selling.
But what catches my attention more is how the price reacts: it decreases, but does not break; the volatility is controlled; there are no signs of widespread panic.
In the past 7 days, Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a net outflow of about 1.86 billion USD, while the price continues to adjust. If we only look at the number, it is very easy to conclude that institutions are selling.
But what catches my attention more is how the price reacts: it decreases, but does not break; the volatility is controlled; there are no signs of widespread panic.
Why Bitcoin Could Rise Faster than Gold, Even Though Its Scale Is Still Small?
Bitcoin is often called 'digital gold', but upon closer inspection, these two operate very differently, and it is precisely these differences that sometimes create room for $BTC to accelerate more strongly (in percentage terms), even though its current scale is still much smaller than gold.
In the past 12 months, $BTC has been significantly outperformed by gold in terms of performance (according to data cited in the article): Bitcoin dropped about 13.25% while gold increased nearly 100%. The question is: if gold has already run ahead, does BTC have a chance to 'catch up'?
In the past 12 months, $BTC has been significantly outperformed by gold in terms of performance (according to data cited in the article): Bitcoin dropped about 13.25% while gold increased nearly 100%. The question is: if gold has already run ahead, does BTC have a chance to 'catch up'?
The potential of RWA + AI on Vanar: Market predictions for 2026
If you ask me, 'What will RWA + AI on
look like in 2026?', I think the answer does not lie in a price spike or a new narrative being pumped up, but in how the market begins to use blockchain as a serious infrastructure layer for real assets.
RWA is not like early-stage DeFi, where everything could be permissionless and flexible to the point of chaos. When real-world assets enter on-chain, everything must be tied to data, compliance, and responsibility. And this is the context in which Vanar is trying to position itself.
Plasma in the increasingly centralized context of L2
If you look at the current L2 landscape of Ethereum, I think there is a quite clear feeling but rarely expressed directly: L2 is becoming more centralized, not less. Centralized sequencer, centralized governance, centralized upgrade roadmap, even many operational decisions leaning more towards 'off-chain trust' than 'on-chain guarantee'.
This is not necessarily bad, but it raises an important question: in that context, where does Plasma stand, and why is it being mentioned again?
This is not necessarily bad, but it raises an important question: in that context, where does Plasma stand, and why is it being mentioned again?
BTC Dominance touches long-term resistance: Is the altcoin season about to return?
I am paying attention to the story of 'BTC.D being rejected' because this is often a quite early signal for the money flow that may shift to altcoins.
Currently, Bitcoin's dominance ratio is approaching the long-term resistance trendline — if pushed down in this area, altcoins often have more 'stage' in the short term.
In 2021, I remember BTC.D also touched the trendline and then turned strongly, and shortly after that was an explosive altcoin season: many coins rose quickly and outperformed compared to $BTC .
Currently, Bitcoin's dominance ratio is approaching the long-term resistance trendline — if pushed down in this area, altcoins often have more 'stage' in the short term.
In 2021, I remember BTC.D also touched the trendline and then turned strongly, and shortly after that was an explosive altcoin season: many coins rose quickly and outperformed compared to $BTC .
@Vanarchain The initial Chain was not created with the ambition of becoming an AI-powered blockchain. Previously, it was known as Virtua, a project focused on the metaverse, NFTs, and digital content.
At that stage, Virtua addressed the problem of IP ownership and digital experiences but was still limited by the narrative of content: growth depended on market tastes and attention cycles.
The turning point occurred when the team realized that the core issue was not in creating more content but in the underlying infrastructure. Virtua gradually restructured into Vanar $VANRY , shifting its focus to data processing capabilities, low costs, and an almost imperceptible blockchain experience.
The integration of AI is not aimed at telling new stories but to optimize content distribution, personalize experiences, and automate operational flows on-chain.
In my view, Vanar is not pursuing the AI trend, but because they want to become the foundational layer for entertainment and data applications in the future.
When AI needs a transparent environment to record ownership and distribute value, blockchain is no longer a plus but a prerequisite. Vanar is positioning itself right at that intersection.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
At that stage, Virtua addressed the problem of IP ownership and digital experiences but was still limited by the narrative of content: growth depended on market tastes and attention cycles.
The turning point occurred when the team realized that the core issue was not in creating more content but in the underlying infrastructure. Virtua gradually restructured into Vanar $VANRY , shifting its focus to data processing capabilities, low costs, and an almost imperceptible blockchain experience.
The integration of AI is not aimed at telling new stories but to optimize content distribution, personalize experiences, and automate operational flows on-chain.
In my view, Vanar is not pursuing the AI trend, but because they want to become the foundational layer for entertainment and data applications in the future.
When AI needs a transparent environment to record ownership and distribute value, blockchain is no longer a plus but a prerequisite. Vanar is positioning itself right at that intersection.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
If Ethereum is congested, how does Plasma respond?
Crypto enthusiasts are certainly familiar with the scene of Ethereum congestion. I often use @Plasma because the fees are cheap, transferring money is also simple, and there is no need to prepare native tokens to pay fees like on the main chain.
But to be honest, whenever the network gets busy, the downsides become clear: long wait times and high fees to push through. There have been times when I needed to withdraw quickly, and the congestion made it frustrating and anxious.
Therefore, if you often trade on DeFi, I think it's better to use both networks in parallel to avoid congestion. Usually, transactions run smoothly on Plasma $XPL , but when you need to secure a transaction or handle something important, switching back to Ethereum when the network is less busy will be easier.
As for my personal experience, Plasma is quite stable: it runs smoothly and is less congested even with many users. I'm not making any guarantees, but during this cycle, Plasma is a choice worth trying for you, at least to avoid the frustration of congestion and high fees during peak hours.
DYOR, everyone
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Crypto enthusiasts are certainly familiar with the scene of Ethereum congestion. I often use @Plasma because the fees are cheap, transferring money is also simple, and there is no need to prepare native tokens to pay fees like on the main chain.
But to be honest, whenever the network gets busy, the downsides become clear: long wait times and high fees to push through. There have been times when I needed to withdraw quickly, and the congestion made it frustrating and anxious.
Therefore, if you often trade on DeFi, I think it's better to use both networks in parallel to avoid congestion. Usually, transactions run smoothly on Plasma $XPL , but when you need to secure a transaction or handle something important, switching back to Ethereum when the network is less busy will be easier.
As for my personal experience, Plasma is quite stable: it runs smoothly and is less congested even with many users. I'm not making any guarantees, but during this cycle, Plasma is a choice worth trying for you, at least to avoid the frustration of congestion and high fees during peak hours.
DYOR, everyone
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Price $XAU has increased to 5k6 this morning creating ATH, silver also rose sharply alongside gold.
At this level, we are just waiting for $BTC digital gold to pump, truly every season the flow of money is different.
At this point, holding altcoin waiting for a pump is really hard while the market volume is mostly focused on silver, hopefully there will soon be a BTC wave for us.
$XAU
At this level, we are just waiting for $BTC digital gold to pump, truly every season the flow of money is different.
At this point, holding altcoin waiting for a pump is really hard while the market volume is mostly focused on silver, hopefully there will soon be a BTC wave for us.
$XAU
Gold Sets New Highs, Bitcoin Goes Sideways: Historical Data Suggests an Upcoming Turning Point
There is a noteworthy development happening between gold and Bitcoin, but not everyone is paying attention to it.
The majority of the market is focused on Bitcoin trading in a sideways state, while gold prices continue to set new highs. From a surface perspective, this can easily create a feeling that tangible assets are outperforming, while cryptocurrencies are temporarily lagging behind.
However, I am seeing another pattern worth watching when comparing historical data. In many previous cycles, Bitcoin has tended to react later than gold, with a delay of about 6 months. In other words, significant movements in gold are often 'mimicked' by Bitcoin afterward.
The majority of the market is focused on Bitcoin trading in a sideways state, while gold prices continue to set new highs. From a surface perspective, this can easily create a feeling that tangible assets are outperforming, while cryptocurrencies are temporarily lagging behind.
However, I am seeing another pattern worth watching when comparing historical data. In many previous cycles, Bitcoin has tended to react later than gold, with a delay of about 6 months. In other words, significant movements in gold are often 'mimicked' by Bitcoin afterward.
WILL ETH CREATE ATH IN THIS CYCLE?
Look at the chart
at this moment, I see the shadow of "history" repeating itself. About 8 years ago, Ethereum also had a price compression just like this before making a leap from 56 USD to over 1,100 USD.
However, the current context has many important differences. The current accumulation process is taking place over a longer period, reflecting the participation of large capital flows and a cautious trend.
at this moment, I see the shadow of "history" repeating itself. About 8 years ago, Ethereum also had a price compression just like this before making a leap from 56 USD to over 1,100 USD.
However, the current context has many important differences. The current accumulation process is taking place over a longer period, reflecting the participation of large capital flows and a cautious trend.
Gold Approaches Cycle Peak, Bitcoin Prepares for New Growth Phase?
Gold is often considered a less attractive asset in terms of yield compared to Bitcoin. However, historical data shows a more intriguing relationship.
During the periods of 2016 and 2021, gold prices recorded significant increases while Bitcoin entered a prolonged correction phase. Notably, after gold formed a peak, Bitcoin entered subsequent strong growth phases.
Whether one calls this a rotation of capital or merely a coincidence according to macro cycles, the reality is that these two assets often take turns leading profit expectations. When one side peaks and begins to weaken, the other side often becomes the new focal point of the market.
During the periods of 2016 and 2021, gold prices recorded significant increases while Bitcoin entered a prolonged correction phase. Notably, after gold formed a peak, Bitcoin entered subsequent strong growth phases.
Whether one calls this a rotation of capital or merely a coincidence according to macro cycles, the reality is that these two assets often take turns leading profit expectations. When one side peaks and begins to weaken, the other side often becomes the new focal point of the market.
Ethereum Mainnet Signals Recovery as Transaction Fees Hit Historical Lows
Ethereum is showing notable signals of the Mainnet's return to a central role.
Transaction fees on Ethereum L1 are currently very low compared to historical averages, creating a rare favorable environment for deployment and experimentation. Notably, this trend does not reflect a decrease in demand; on the contrary: the number of smart contracts deployed on the Mainnet is reaching an all-time high.
Transaction fees on Ethereum L1 are currently very low compared to historical averages, creating a rare favorable environment for deployment and experimentation. Notably, this trend does not reflect a decrease in demand; on the contrary: the number of smart contracts deployed on the Mainnet is reaching an all-time high.
Login to explore more contents