Hello!
This is a very deep and important question.
The idea of a world without wars, or 'peace in the world', is something humanity has aspired to throughout its history. There are different opinions on this matter.
On one hand, many believe that a complete renunciation of wars is possible. Proponents of this idea argue that wars are not an inevitable part of human nature, but rather a consequence of certain social, economic, and political conditions. For example, competition for resources, territorial disputes, ideological disagreements, or simply a thirst for power. If these causes are eliminated, a more just and peaceful society can be built. Successful examples of diplomacy, international cooperation, the work of international organizations like the UN, and disarmament initiatives show that humanity is capable of resolving conflicts peacefully.
On the other hand, there are those who believe that wars, unfortunately, are an inevitable part of our reality. They point out that aggression and the struggle for survival are deeply rooted in human nature, and disagreements among nations, cultures, and states will always exist. From this perspective, the main goal is not the complete elimination of wars, but their minimization and control, so that they do not escalate into global catastrophes.
Ultimately, complete peace in the world remains more of an ideal to strive for than an achievable reality. But even if it is unattainable, it does not mean that it is not worth trying. Every initiative aimed at conflict resolution, every campaign for peace and mutual understanding, and every expression of empathy is a step in the right direction.
