What I like about YGG is the realism of their model. A project that does not promise big dreams.
It solves an operational problem in the gaming world - the cost of entry issue.
The concept of the digital guild is very smart. Instead of having players unable to access games due to the cost of NFTs, they can borrow assets and enter and start earning.
The economic model is practical. It treats digital assets as tools for work, not just collectibles. This is a radical shift in thinking.
The modular design with SubDAOs is managerial wisdom. It allows each community or region to develop its own system while maintaining connection to the main network.
The challenges they might face:
· Relying on the success of Web3 games
· The difficulty of managing culturally diverse communities
· Competing with traditional gaming platforms
But the project's practical history gives confidence. They have proven capable of adapting to market fluctuations.
The multi-asset treasury is a smart strategy. Instead of relying on a single game, diversification reduces risks.
I see that YGG is a project building a real gaming economy. It's not just a platform, but infrastructure for digital work.
Focusing on real utility instead of speculation is commendable. Value comes from player activity, not from market noise.
Inclusion in the model is beautiful. It opens opportunities for players from countries that may have limited financial capabilities.
In the end, YGG is a practical project that connects the digital world with the economic reality. It creates real job opportunities through gaming.
