copilot

一、编程真的被"解决"了吗？
2026 年 5 月，在 AI Ascent 峰会上，Claude Code 的创造者 Boris Cherny 分享了他的工作状态：
"自去年 10 月、11 月左右开始，模型已能够编写我 100% 的代码，进入 2026 年以来，我没有亲手写过一行代码。"
这句话在开发者社区引发了巨大反响，很多人感叹：编程问题，真的被解决了。
但仔细想想，有一个问题被忽略了：他用的是 Claude Pro，每月 $25，而且需要翻墙。
对于国内开发者，这不是"解决"，是"门槛"。
真正的"解决"，不应该只是 "AI 能写代码"，而是"人人都能用 AI 写代码"。
二、2026 年 AI 编程的真实格局
先看看现在的市场格局。
根据最新的横评文章，2026 年 AI 编程工具形成了"三足鼎立"：

有篇横评的标题说得很直白：Claude Code 是"最强王者 - 但也是最烧钱的"。
这三个工具都很强，但都有一个共同点：贵 + 需要翻墙。
对于国内开发者，这不是 "AI 编程时代已来"，是 "AI 编程时代对别人来了"。
三、国产替代的真正价值
很多人说国产工具是"平替" - "也能用，但不如原版强"。
但这个逻辑忽略了一件事：门槛本身就是一种能力限制。
一个工具再强，如果你用不了，对你来说就是零。
免费 API 的"降维打击"
2026 年，国产大模型的免费额度已经到了"离谱"的程度：

这不是"平替"，是"降维打击"。
智谱的 GLM-4.7-Flash，完全免费，200K 上下文，编程能力 SWE-Bench 59.2%，你不需要花一分钱，就能获得接近 Claude Sonnet 的编程能力。
这才是"编程问题真正解决"的样子 - 不是 AI 能写代码，是人人都能用 AI 写代码。

四、oh-my-coder：让 "AI 编程"真正普及
这就是我们做 oh-my-coder 的初衷。
不是为了做一个 "Claude Code 的国产版"，而是让每个国内开发者都能零门槛使用 AI 编程。
它能做什么？
31 个专业 Agent：Architect、CodeWriter、Reviewer、Tester、Debugger……比 Claude Code 还多6 个生产模型 + Ollama：GLM-4.7-Flash（完全免费）、DeepSeek-V4、Kimi、豆包、百川……开箱即用：一条命令安装，配置一个免费 API Key 就能开始无需翻墙：所有模型国内直连本地运行：代码不上传，数据安全
和 Claude Code 对比

五、实际场景：从"说一句话"到"任务完成"
说个实际场景。
想象一下：你需要重构一个老项目的用户模块，加个第三方登录。
用 Claude Code：
开 Claude Pro 订阅（$25 / 月）配置代理翻墙打开终端，说："帮我重构用户模块，加第三方登录"等待完成
用 oh-my-coder：
pip install oh-my-coder
配置 GLM API Key（免费）打开终端，说：omc run "帮我重构用户模块，加第三方登录"等待完成
效果一样，成本为零。
这就是我们说的"编程问题真正解决" - 不是 AI 能写代码，是人人都能用 AI 写代码。
六、结语：编程问题真正解决的那一天
Claude Code 创始人说"编程问题已解决"，他说的是技术层面 - AI 已经能写代码了。
但还有一个层面没解决：普及层面。
真正的"解决"，是：
不需要月费订阅不需要翻墙不需要配置代理不需要担心数据上传海外
是每个国内开发者，打开终端，说一句话，就能让 AI 帮他写代码。
oh-my-coder 正在让这一天到来。
快速开始
如果你想试试"零成本 AI 编程"：

然后去泡杯咖啡，等它通知你验收。
GitHub：
https://github.com/VOBC/oh-my-coder
如果你觉得这个工具有价值：
⭐ 给个 Star，让更多人看到🔄 转发给身边写代码的朋友🐛 遇到问题提 Issue
开源的意义：大家一起让它变得更好，然后大家一起用。

#OhMyCoder #claude_code #Copilot #deepsee

你关心的 OpenSea 内容
浏览 | 创建 | 购买 | 出售 | 拍卖

收藏关注 OpenSea 币安频道
掌握最新资讯

Australia’s competition regulator, the ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission), has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Australia and its U.S. parent company, accusing the tech giant of misleading millions of customers by integrating AI Copilot into Microsoft 365 Personal and Family subscriptions — while raising prices and failing to clearly present cheaper alternatives.

The Hidden “Classic” Plan
According to the lawsuit, after October 31 last year, Microsoft informed customers with auto-renewal that they had only two options:

Accept the new, more expensive Microsoft 365 plan with Copilot included, or

Cancel their subscription entirely.

However, the ACCC says that was not true.

There was a third option — the so-called “Classic” Microsoft 365 Personal and Family plans, which retained all original features without Copilot and at the previous lower prices.
The regulator claims Microsoft intentionally omitted any mention of these cheaper “Classic” plans in its customer communications.

Users could only discover them by entering the account management section, clicking “Cancel subscription,” and proceeding far enough into the cancellation flow to reveal the hidden option.
“Following our investigation, we will allege in court that Microsoft deliberately withheld information about the Classic plans to push more consumers toward the higher-priced Copilot-integrated versions,” said Gina Cass-Gottlieb, Chair of the ACCC.

2.7 Million Customers Potentially Misled
The case could affect more than 2.7 million Australian subscribers, who may have been misled about their options, according to the ACCC.

The regulator argues this conduct violated consumer law, as Microsoft failed to transparently disclose all available choices.
The investigation was launched after consumer complaints and online discussions — including on Reddit, where users shared step-by-step guides showing how to find the hidden “Classic” option.

The ACCC is seeking:

🔹 Financial penalties

🔹 Court orders prohibiting similar conduct

🔹 Public declarations of wrongdoing

🔹 Compensation for affected consumers

🔹 Reimbursement of legal costs

Legal Experts Call for Transparency
Legal analysts say the case underscores the need for tech companies to clearly present all subscription options, including cheaper or AI-free versions.
“Simply making an option technically available — such as hiding it deep within account settings or the cancellation process — is not enough,” said Even Alex Chandra, a partner at IGNOS Law Alliance.

“Companies must prominently display all material choices so consumers can make informed decisions.”

Microsoft Faces Pressure in the U.S. as Well
The Australian lawsuit comes as Microsoft faces separate legal challenges in the United States.

Earlier this month, a group of ChatGPT Plus subscribers filed a class action lawsuit, claiming Microsoft’s exclusive 2019 Azure deal with OpenAI limited computing resources for ChatGPT, artificially inflating subscription prices and giving Microsoft an advantage for its own AI products — including Copilot.

What Comes Next
If the court upholds the ACCC’s findings, the case could set a global precedent for how tech companies handle AI integrations and subscription changes without clear user consent.
The regulator emphasized that its goal is not to hinder AI innovation, but to ensure consumers are not misled or forced into more expensive plans.


#Microsoft , #AI , #Copilot , #ArtificialInteligence , #lawsuit

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“