Schemas defining rules turns identity into something programmable and actionable

I used to think digital identity was enough.

If a system could verify who you are, value would follow.

It didn’t.

Most identity layers stay separate.
Created once. Rarely used.

That’s where Sign Protocol shifts the model.

Not identity as a feature.
Identity as part of the transaction.

Attestations turn claims into usable inputs.
Schemas define the rules.
Applications read and act on them.

So a transaction isn’t just value moving.
It carries context. Authority. Conditions.

It makes sense.

But the real test is simple.

Are these attestations reused across systems?
Or do they just sit there?

That’s the difference between a registry and infrastructure.

That’s the line I’m watching.
@SignOfficial
$SIGN
#SignDigitalSovereignInfra