Let me be real with you first: I didn’t look at Vanar Chain again because the price is exciting. It isn’t. The chart has been rough, and holding it hasn’t been fun.
I went back to it because I noticed something strange. Most people still talk about VANRY like it’s just another “gaming chain” or “AI chain” or “random L1.” But when you actually look into it, that’s not really what Vanar is trying to be.
Vanar is trying to sell itself like a service. Think of it more like cloud hosting than a hype blockchain. Something you can use, budget for, and plan around. In a market like this, that kind of thinking feels less exciting—but maybe more realistic.
Before forming an opinion, I did some basic homework. I checked the price and drawdowns on Binance, looked at supply and market cap on CoinMarketCap and Coingecko, and read through their site and docs, especially about fees. So this isn’t just a random feeling—it’s based on what’s actually there.
Why people are talking about Vanar again
It’s not because the price is flying. It’s mostly because of exposure.
Vanar has some offline events coming up in places like Dubai and Hong Kong. Whenever small-cap projects do this, attention usually comes back for a while. People start talking again, content gets pushed, and trading activity increases. Sometimes that leads to real interest, sometimes it’s just short-term noise. But either way, eyes return to the project.
So when you see Vanar being mentioned more, it’s more about attention than about the chart suddenly looking good.
Where VANRY stands right now
Let’s keep this simple:
The price is around $0.006
It’s down a lot over the past months
Around 2.29 billion tokens are already in circulation, with a max of 2.4 billion
Market cap is still small, in the tens of millions
In normal words: the market has pretty much given up on this coin for now.
Because most of the supply is already out, there’s no “unlock hype” story left. If VANRY ever does well again, it won’t be because of token tricks. It will have to come from real usage and real demand.
And yes, because the price fell so much, most people just ignore it. But sometimes, that’s exactly where surprises come from—if the project actually builds something useful. Big “if”.
The one idea that makes Vanar different
Vanar’s main idea is about fees.
Most blockchains work like this: when the network is busy, fees go crazy. When it’s quiet, fees are cheap. That’s fine for normal users, but it’s terrible for apps, bots, or AI systems that need to make lots of small transactions. You can’t plan costs. You can’t budget. You can’t run a serious business on top of that.
Vanar is trying a different approach:
They use fee tiers
Simple actions like transfers, swaps, NFTs, staking, etc. are in the cheapest tier
That cheapest tier is roughly around $0.0005 per action (according to their docs)
So instead of “fees change every minute,” they want something more predictable, more like software pricing.
The idea is simple:
> Use the chain like a cloud service. You should be able to plan your costs, not guess them.
That might sound boring, but boring is often what actually works in business.
But does this help the VANRY token?
This is the important part.
A lot of chains have super cheap fees… and their tokens still don’t do well. Why? Because the token doesn’t really capture the value. The chain gets used, but the coin doesn’t benefit much.
Vanar is trying to make VANRY more than just “gas”:
Fees are meant to work more like a settlement currency inside the ecosystem
They’re also pushing toward tools and services with subscriptions and products
If they succeed, demand for VANRY wouldn’t come only from traders. It would come from people who actually need it to run things.
I’m not saying this will definitely work. But as a concept, it makes more sense than just yelling “we have high TPS.”
The real risks (let’s be honest)
There are big risks here:
1. It’s a small project
Small market cap means it can be ignored for a long time, especially in bad market conditions.
2. It’s not a hype story
“Infrastructure, billing, subscriptions” doesn’t create fast pumps. This is slow, boring, and easy for the market to overlook.
3. Execution is hard
Making fixed or tiered fees work in the real world is not easy. Price changes, network load, security, spam—these things test the system. The idea sounds good. Only real usage will prove it.
That’s why I’m not rushing into anything. I’m just watching:
Are real users and transactions growing?
Are they actually improving the fee system over time?
So… is VANRY worth watching?
Here’s a simple way to think about it:
If you believe the future of blockchains is about selling blockspace like a service with predictable costs, then Vanar is at least worth keeping on your radar.
If you only want fast hype, quick pumps, and trend coins, then this will probably feel slow and frustrating.
My honest take
VANRY is not a coin I would shout about on social media.
But it is the kind of project I’m okay keeping on my watchlist and checking from time to time.
In simple words:
First, let’s see if they can turn their pricing idea into real revenue and real usage. If they do, the market will notice sooner or later.
