onboarding

Se c'è una verità universale nel GameFi, è che l'hype è inevitabile, ma la sostenibilità si guadagna. Chiunque abbia trascorso più di pochi mesi in questo spazio ha assistito al ciclo dei lanci improvvisi, dei pump esplosivi dei token, delle ondate di creatori che parlano della prossima grande novità, delle gilde #Onboarding a iperveloce, e poi, altrettanto rapidamente, alla fase di raffreddamento in cui la realtà si stabilizza. Navigare in questi cicli non è semplicemente una questione di tempismo del mercato, ma riguarda la comprensione della psicologia sottostante, dell'economia e dei modelli comunitari che li plasmano. E poche organizzazioni comprendono questo meglio di @Yield Guild Games (YGG), che ha sopportato più cicli di hype di molti altri ed è emersa ogni volta con una comprensione più acuta.

The evolution of the scholar contract is one of the most defining chapters in the history of blockchain gaming a journey that mirrors the rise, correction, and maturation of the entire #GameFi ecosystem. What began as a simple handshake agreement between asset owners and players has now transformed into a sophisticated economic relationship built on sustainability, incentives, and long-term alignment.

In the earliest days of GameFi, scholar contracts were designed around speed. The goal was #Onboarding get players into the game quickly, distribute in-game assets just as fast, and grow guild participation at scale. @Yield Guild Games (YGG) became a pioneer of this model, connecting people who had never touched crypto to opportunities in virtual economies. At the time, the contract structure didn’t need complexity revenue sharing was enough because demand far exceeded supply. As token prices surged, efficiency and throughput mattered more than sustainability.

But every economic experiment hits its breaking point. As emissions increased and market dynamics shifted, token-based game economies faced pressure. The fixed-share model once celebrated began to show limitations. Scholars felt the squeeze as rewards thinned, and guilds realized that purely performance-based agreements weren’t adaptable to volatile market conditions. The industry needed a new framework.

This was the catalyst for the next phase of evolution. Instead of treating scholars as short-term yield generators, leading guilds like YGG began viewing them as long-term participants in an emerging digital workforce. The contract model shifted from extraction to empowerment. It no longer focused solely on how much a player could earn, but how much value they could create.

Today’s scholar contracts increasingly reward deeper engagement such as participating in tournaments, contributing to strategy, testing early game features, and supporting community-building initiatives. The modern scholar is not just a player but a collaborator. As a result, the reward structure has become more flexible, taking into account skill, consistency, loyalty, and game-specific contribution.

This evolution also reflects the rising sophistication of game economies themselves. Developers now understand that player incentives must be balanced with economic sinks, asset scarcity, and community health. Scholar contracts have adapted to align with these new design philosophies. Instead of encouraging players to extract tokens as quickly as possible, many agreements now promote reinvestment upgrading NFTs, supporting guild-owned assets, or participating in multi-stage gameplay loops.

YGG’s approach has been central in shaping this shift. By focusing on education, responsible onboarding, and player development, the guild helped redefine what a scholar contract represents in #Web3 . It’s no longer just a distribution mechanism it’s a framework for shared growth and long-term ecosystem resilience.

The result is a model that feels less like a financial contract and more like a partnership one where scholars, guilds, and game developers all share aligned incentives. The scholar contract has matured, and with it, the entire philosophy of Web3 gaming has evolved from rapid expansion to sustainable, meaningful participation.

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Ogni volta che le persone entrano nel mondo di @Yield Guild Games for la prima volta, una delle cose che tende a confonderle è la struttura di YGG e dei suoi SubDAO. E onestamente, quella confusione ha senso all'inizio. Si sentono termini come gilda principale, SubDAO, DAO regionale e gilda specifica della comunità, ed è facile pensare che siano tutte la stessa cosa che indossa abiti leggermente diversi. Ma più tempo trascorri nell'ecosistema YGG, più chiare diventano le differenze e quelle differenze rivelano perché questa struttura è una delle maggiori forze di YGG.

Quando guardi Linea oggi, il suo ecosistema attivo, il suo crescente numero di transazioni quotidiane e la sua forte comunità, è facile presumere che l'adozione da parte degli utenti sia avvenuta naturalmente perché è un zkEVM supportato da una tecnologia forte. Ma l'ascesa di Linea non è stata accidentale. La rete ha messo una notevole quantità di pensiero e strategia nel modo in cui ha onboardato gli utenti, come li ha educati e come ha abbassato le barriere che di solito fermano le persone dall'esplorare nuove catene. A dire il vero, questa è una delle ragioni principali per cui @Linea.eth è diventato così accessibile e in rapida crescita #Layer2 nell'ecosistema di Ethereum.

If you had asked me two or three years ago what a scholar was in Web3, I probably would have given you a simple answer someone who borrows #NFTs plays a game, earns tokens, and splits rewards with a guild. That definition wasn’t wrong it was just incomplete.

Watching @Yield Guild Games evolve from the inside, I have learned that the scholar role was never meant to stay static. It was always a starting point. In the early days of YGG, scholars were #Onboarding into something entirely new. Most had never used a crypto wallet before. Many didn’t even think of gaming as something that could generate value beyond entertainment. Yet on-chain, you could already see patterns forming wallets tied to scholarship programs showing consistent activity, regular payouts, and behavior closer to labor participation than speculation.

What changed everything was expectation. As games became more complex and margins tighter, being a scholar stopped being about just logging hours. Performance mattered. Strategy mattered. Understanding in-game economies mattered. Scholars who treated it like free money faded out. Those who treated it like a role grew.

Inside YGG, top scholars began doing things that don’t fit the casual gamer stereotype. They tracked earnings, optimized routes, managed multiple accounts responsibly, and helped onboard new players. Some even contributed feedback to game developers, acting as real-time QA from emerging markets something Web2 studios usually pay heavily for.

From a DAO perspective, this evolution was visible. Reward distributions increasingly favored consistency over spikes. Wallets tied to experienced scholars showed longer retention, lower churn, and better asset utilization. That’s not luck that’s professionalization. The most interesting part, though, was upward mobility.

I have seen scholars become managers. Not because they were loud on social media, but because they understood the ground reality. They knew what burnout looked like. They knew which incentive tweaks worked and which ones broke morale. When YGG subDAOs started forming, many of the strongest contributors weren’t external hires they were former scholars who had earned trust over time.

This is something people outside the ecosystem often miss. YGG didn’t just distribute NFTs; it created career paths inside digital economies. Of course, it wasn’t perfect. Some scholarship models failed. Some games collapsed. Some token incentives didn’t survive market cycles. But even those failures taught scholars how fragile digital economies can be a lesson most retail participants only learn the hard way.

What matters is that the scholar identity matured. Today, being a YGG scholar isn’t about being passive. It’s about adaptability. Scholars now think in terms of risk, opportunity cost, and long-term participation. They ask smarter questions. They move between games. They understand when to scale back and when to double down. And here’s the part I think about most.

If Web3 truly wants to onboard the next billion users, it won’t happen through abstract narratives about decentralization. It’ll happen through roles people can grow into. Scholar was one of the first roles that made sense to everyday users. YGG refined it, stress-tested it, and let it evolve naturally.

That’s why I don’t see scholars as a temporary phase in Web3 gaming. I see them as early contributors in a system still figuring itself out. And if history has taught us anything, it’s this the people who grow with the system often end up shaping it.
@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG