tradelaw
134 visualizzazioni
3 stanno discutendo
Popolari
Recenti
Traduci
🚨 U.S. Supreme Court to Rule on Trump‑Era Tariff Authority 🇺🇸
⚖️ The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in a case challenging the legality of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) during the Trump administration. The court heard oral arguments in early November 2025. �
Wikipedia +1
📌 The case — Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. — asks whether the president had legal authority to levy broad tariffs under IEEPA. �
Wikipedia
📌 Lower federal courts have already ruled that IEEPA does not authorize such tariff powers and blocked enforcement of some tariffs, but the Supreme Court has not yet issued its opinion. �
Wikipedia
📌 If the court rules that IEEPA did not authorize the tariffs, it could affect the legal basis for those specific tariff measures, though other tariffs imposed under different statutes (like Section 301 or Section 232) are not directly part of this case. �
Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer
📌 Legal analysts note that the timing of the decision is not officially announced — it could come in late 2025 or into 2026 — and the Supreme Court’s opinion could clarify limits on presidential trade authority. �
SCOTUSblog
Note: This post reflects current legal proceedings and reporting without price forecasts or speculative trading advice, in line with Binance Square community guidelines.
#USTrade #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #BinanceSquare #TradeLaw
⚖️ The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in a case challenging the legality of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) during the Trump administration. The court heard oral arguments in early November 2025. �
Wikipedia +1
📌 The case — Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. — asks whether the president had legal authority to levy broad tariffs under IEEPA. �
Wikipedia
📌 Lower federal courts have already ruled that IEEPA does not authorize such tariff powers and blocked enforcement of some tariffs, but the Supreme Court has not yet issued its opinion. �
Wikipedia
📌 If the court rules that IEEPA did not authorize the tariffs, it could affect the legal basis for those specific tariff measures, though other tariffs imposed under different statutes (like Section 301 or Section 232) are not directly part of this case. �
Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer
📌 Legal analysts note that the timing of the decision is not officially announced — it could come in late 2025 or into 2026 — and the Supreme Court’s opinion could clarify limits on presidential trade authority. �
SCOTUSblog
Note: This post reflects current legal proceedings and reporting without price forecasts or speculative trading advice, in line with Binance Square community guidelines.
#USTrade #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #BinanceSquare #TradeLaw
Visualizza originale
📢 NOTIZIA: LA CORTE SUPREMA DEGLI STATI UNITI DICHIARA I DAZI DI TRUMP ILLEGALI
La Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti ha indicato che i dazi di emergenza di Trump potrebbero essere incostituzionali e illegali, mettendo in discussione la sua autorità di imporre dazi sulle importazioni senza un chiaro consenso del Congresso.
Se confermata, la decisione potrebbe costringere a rimborsi di miliardi di entrate daziarie e ridefinire il potere commerciale presidenziale — un importante cambiamento legale ed economico.
#SupremeCourt #Trump #Tariffs #TradeLaw #BreakingNews
La Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti ha indicato che i dazi di emergenza di Trump potrebbero essere incostituzionali e illegali, mettendo in discussione la sua autorità di imporre dazi sulle importazioni senza un chiaro consenso del Congresso.
Se confermata, la decisione potrebbe costringere a rimborsi di miliardi di entrate daziarie e ridefinire il potere commerciale presidenziale — un importante cambiamento legale ed economico.
#SupremeCourt #Trump #Tariffs #TradeLaw #BreakingNews
Accedi per esplorare altri contenuti