vechainnodemarketplace

Sam Carling is the Baby of the House of Commons – the UK's youngest MP.
He won his North West Cambridgeshire seat aged 22, as part of Labour's landslide victory in 2024.
But despite being part of Sir Keir Starmer's historic win, he was among more than 80 of his party's MPs to call for the prime minister to quit - or set out a timetable for his departure.
Maria Banulus, 39, from Yaxley, says: "He probably should go."
I feel like we've had too many prime ministers that actually haven't gone down with a general election - they've been outed," she adds.
"I don't actually know who the other options are, I heard Angela Rayner, but I really don't know
I know he's been criticised for many things that he's done wrong and things that he's had to back-track on
Jane Maxwell, 59, voted Green in the last general election.
Her message to Starmer is: "I think you should leave and let somebody else be the leader of the country."
She would like the new leader to have "more left views". She does not want them, whoever it is, to allow Trump to use any UK airbases for his conflict with Iran.
"I think he's too close with Trump, and that I don't like at all."
#PEPEATH
#Fatihcoşar
#VeChainNodeMarketplace
#MegadropLista
#GamingCoins

Last week, the U.S. Federal Reserve trimmed the federal funds rate by a quarter point, and markets are now betting that the January Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting delivers no adjustment. Attention has since shifted to the Bank of Japan (BOJ), where expectations are building that the central bank will lift its short-term interbank rate next week.
Japan’s central bank is set to convene its Monetary Policy Meeting (MPM) on Dec. 18–19, 2025, with the decision expected on the second day. Markets are bracing for a possible increase to 0.75% from 0.5%, a move that would formally close the chapter on the world’s last remaining negative interest rate regime. When it comes to interest rates, Japan has long stood apart as a global outlier.
The BOJ has persisted with negative short-term rates and tight control over long-term bond yields through its Yield Curve Control (YCC) framework, even as other major central banks moved on to rate increases. Many analysts believe this marks the definitive end of the “Carry Trade.”
In simple terms, the strategy involved borrowing low-cost yen and deploying it into higher-yielding assets overseas. The trade only holds together as long as yen funding stays exceptionally cheap and the currency remains steady or drifts lower. At present, leading prediction markets Polymarket and Kalshi are signaling strong odds that the BOJ will deliver a 25 basis point (bps) increase.
Polymarket traders are overwhelmingly penciling in a quarter-point rate increase from the BOJ, with probabilities hovering near 98%. Every other scenario — no change, a larger move, or a cut — has been largely cast aside, each sitting at 2% or lower, reflecting a near lock that a quarter-point step is the market’s central expectation.
Kalshi traders echo that conviction. A 21–40 basis-point hike at the BOJ meeting next week carries roughly 95% odds, while the chances of no change rest near 2% and a cut barely registers at under 1%. In plain terms, the market is wagering that Japan’s central bank is ready to act. For Federal Reserve rate decisions, traders can lean on the CME Fedwatch tool to gauge expectations ahead of each meeting, while there is no comparable tool for tracking BOJ rate moves.
However, to estimate the odds of a BOJ hike, individuals or institutions can look to futures pricing — specifically 3-Month TONA futures, which capture how traders are wagering on future interest rates. At present, the implied average rate blends the current 0.5% for the early part of the period with the possibility of a higher level later on.
When that figure is weighed against today’s rate and adjusted for timing, the calculation points to roughly an 89% chance of a quarter-point increase.
Many believe this particular rate increase may affect equities and crypto assets. U.S. stocks ended lower on Friday across the board, led by a sharp Nasdaq drop of nearly 400 points. The Dow, S&P 500, and NYSE Composite also closed in the red.
In Japan, data shows the Nikkei closing near 50,800 and the Topix around 3,420, pointing to broad gains after a session that opened with uneven trading. Some observers now expect bitcoin to retreat on a BOJ rate hike, a view gaining traction on X as users circulate the theory. “Bank of Japan is set to hike rates +25 bps on Dec 19. Japan = largest holder of US government debt,” one user wrote. “Every BoJ rate hike → Bitcoin dumps over 20%+”
Another user, sharing a chart, added: “Japan rate hikes’ effect on bitcoin—The next one is most likely on Friday, 19th.” That view has fueled speculation that the move could act as another trigger pushing BTC toward the $75,000 range. Whether that scenario plays out remains an open question and will not be answered until the BOJ makes its move. BTC is already down 29% from its $126,000-plus all-time high, and another hit to its valuation could prove painful.
Theories like these are scattered widely across X and other social media platforms. For now, markets remain in wait-and-see mode, with the BOJ holding the final card. Prediction markets, futures pricing, and social media chatter all point to a rate hike, but conviction does not equal certainty. If Japan does move, global ripples are likely, testing everything from equity momentum to bitcoin’s resolve.
Until that decision lands, traders are left navigating probabilities, not outcomes, and positioning for a moment that could reset expectations fast.
#PEPEATH
#kdmrcrypto
#VeChainNodeMarketplace
#BinanceHerYerde
#xmucan

The global benchmark briefly touched $116 before easing slightly, capping a dramatic climb of more than 60% since late February, when prices hovered below $73. The latest move follows a wave of Iranian missile and drone strikes targeting critical oil and gas facilities across Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Saudi Arabia.
The escalation marks a turning point in the conflict that began Feb. 28, when U.S. and Israeli forces launched Operation Epic Fury, targeting Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. While early exchanges avoided major production hubs, that restraint collapsed this week after strikes hit Iran’s South Pars gas field, the world’s largest.
Iran responded swiftly, declaring Gulf energy infrastructure “legitimate targets” and issuing warnings to evacuate facilities across the region. Within hours, key sites tied to global supply chains came under fire.
In Qatar, missiles struck Ras Laffan Industrial City, the world’s largest LNG export hub responsible for nearly one-fifth of global shipments. Fires and damage were reported, though production had already been curtailed earlier in the conflict
Kuwait reported drone strikes on facilities tied to the Mina al-Ahmadi and Mina Abdullah refineries, both of which experienced fires that were later contained. No casualties were reported, though the incidents added to mounting concerns over regional output stability.
facilities and Bab oil field following missile threats and debris from interceptions. Saudi Arabia reported limited damage after an aerial attack targeted the SAMREF refinery in Yanbu, while additional missiles aimed at Riyadh were intercepted.
The market reaction was swift. Brent crude jumped as much as 11% within a day before stabilizing in the $114 to $116 range. West Texas Intermediate lagged, trading near $96 to $98, as U.S. strategic reserve releases tempered domestic price pressure.
Natural gas markets also reacted sharply. European benchmark prices rose between 16% and 35% in a single session, reflecting fears that disruptions are shifting from shipping routes to actual production losses.
The Strait of Hormuz, which carries roughly 20% of global oil flows, remains largely blocked, cutting regional exports by at least 60% compared with pre-conflict levels. Analysts now warn that the situation has evolved beyond logistics constraints into a direct supply shock.The Strait of Hormuz, which carries roughly 20% of global oil flows, remains largely blocked, cutting regional exports by at least 60% compared with pre-conflict levels. Analysts now warn that the situation has evolved beyond logistics constraints into a direct supply shock.
Energy experts say the difference matters. Supply outages tied to infrastructure damage are far more difficult to restore than rerouting tankers or adjusting shipping lanes, raising the stakes for both markets and policymakers.
U.S. officials are reportedly weighing options to reopen tanker routes, while Gulf producers attempt to reroute exports where possible. Still, the loss of capacity, combined with ongoing attacks, has left markets pricing in further escalation.
Analysts note that prices could push toward $130 if strikes expand or persist, while any diplomatic breakthrough could ease pressure. For now, traders are reacting to real disruptions, not just geopolitical risk.#ZE_TRAD🐂
#FIT21
#VeChainNodeMarketplace
#HotTrends
#BTCSurpasses$80K

الحقيقة القاسية؟
السوق لا يرحم الجاهل… ويكافئ المنضبط فقط.
إذا كنت تريد الانتقال من “متداول عشوائي” إلى “لاعب حقيقي”… ركّز هنا 👇
🔥 1. كسر الهيكل + إعادة الاختبار (Smart Money Concept)
📊 السوق يتحرك بهيكل واضح (قمم وقيعان)
المحترفون ينتظرون الكسر… ثم يدخلون بعد التأكيد
🎯 السيناريو:
كسر قمة = بداية اتجاه صاعد
عودة السعر لإعادة الاختبار = فرصة ذهبية
💡 السر: لا تدخل عند الكسر… ادخل بعد الهدوء
🛑 SL: خلف منطقة الكسر
💰 TP: مناطق السيولة القادمة
⚡ 2. اصطياد السيولة (Liquidity Hunt)
📊 السوق “يخدعك” قبل أن يعطيك الاتجاه الحقيقي
🎯 ما يحدث:
كسر وهمي لدعم/مقاومة
دخول المتداولين
انعكاس قوي عكسهم
💡 هذه ليست مصادفة… بل سلوك مؤسسات
🎯 الدخول: بعد شمعة رفض قوية (Pin Bar / Engulfing)
🛑 SL: خلف الذيل
💰 TP: داخل الرينج أو الاتجاه المعاكس
📈 3. التداول مع الترند (Trend is King)
📊 استخدم EMA 50 + EMA 200
💡 الخلاصة :
فوق = شراء فقط
تحت = بيع فقط
🎯 أفضل دخول: Pullback على EMA 50
🛑 SL: آخر قاع/قمة
💰 TP: استمرار الاتجاه
💣 4. مناطق العرض والطلب (Institutional Zones)
📊 المكان الذي تدخل منه الأموال الذكية
🎯 الدخول:
عند أول عودة للمنطقة
مع تأكيد شمعة انعكاسية
💡 لا تلمس المنطقة الثانية… الأولى فقط الأقوى
🛑 SL: خارج المنطقة
💰 TP: أقرب مستوى سيولة
🧠 5. إدارة رأس المال (الفرق بين هاوٍ ومحترف)
⚠️ بدونها… أنت مجرد مقامر
📌 قواعد ذهبية:
1% مخاطرة فقط لكل صفقة
لا تفتح أكثر من 2-3 صفقات
التزم بالخطة حتى لو خسرت
💥 الخلاصة التي تغيّر اللعبة:
السوق ليس مكانًا للتوقع… بل لرد الفعل.
المحترف لا يقول “سيرتفع”
بل يقول: “إذا حدث كذا… سأدخل”
🚀 إذا وصلت إلى هنا… فأنت أقرب من الربح من 90% من السوق
📊 السؤال الحقيقي:
هل لديك نظام… أم مازلت تبحث عن ضربة حظ؟
$BTC
$BNB
#cryptouniverseofficial
#VeChainNodeMarketplace

For most of the 18 years since the nine-page Bitcoin whitepaper was published on Oct. 31, 2008, amid the turmoil of the great financial crisis, many have rightly or wrongly speculated about the identity of its pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.
Attempts to unveil Satoshi have continued ever since, spurred on by the pseudonymous creator's disappearance from public view in 2011. A Newsweek story in 2014 focused on Japanese American systems engineer Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, while others theorized that Bitcoin could be a CIA-controlled project, to which one expert in the documentary quipped, "I don't think our government is competent enough to do something that smart."
While the ideas put forth in many similar documentaries were ultimately dismissed, "Finding Satoshi," directed by Tucker Tooley and Matthew Miele, attempts to avoid rehashing existing theories with a character-driven investigation that, while surfacing many familiar names, reaches an interesting conclusion.
The film, viewed in advance of its release by The Block, depicts a four-year investigation led by New York Times author, financial journalist, and former M&A investment banker William D. Cohan alongside Quest Research and Investigations' team of private investigators led by Tyler Maroney, drawing on experts across cryptography, programming, and linguistics.
Cohan had originally set out on the documentary interviewing various figureheads from within the industry, including Katie Haun, the former DOJ prosecutor who led investigations tied to Silk Road and Mt. Gox and later founder and CEO of Haun Ventures; Brian Brookes, the former CLO at Coinbase, CEO at BinanceUS, CEO at Bitfury and Acting Comptroller of the Currency; and Joseph Lubin, co-founder of Ethereum and CEO of Consensys. However, he found little willingness to engage directly on the question of Satoshi's identity.
Cohan told The Block he is not entirely sure why they were so reluctant. "Part of it was, I think, that it was just irrelevant more than a decade after Satoshi wrote his whitepaper and Bitcoin was born," he said. "So, why bother? Part of it, too, might have been that what if we discovered that Satoshi was an evil person… that news could destroy the wealth that they had built up in their bitcoin ownership. In any event, it spurred us all on to try to uncover Satoshi's identity — and I think we did."
So instead, Cohan turned to Maroney and the broader QRI team. QRI's focus is on investigations in the public interest that are very difficult to crack, according to Maroney, and sought to approach the task with empirical evidence and expert testimony from people that Cohan and many earlier documentaries had not spoken to.
QRI outlined six of the most credible, yet usual suspects: Adam Back, cryptographer, CEO of Blockstream, and creator of the Bitcoin whitepaper-referenced Hashcash; Nick Szabo, computer scientist, and creator of Bitcoin precursor Bit Gold; Hal Finney, software developer, creator of Hashcash successor RPOW (Reusable Proof of Work), and the first recipient of bitcoin from Satoshi Nakamoto; Len Sassaman, systems engineer and academic; Paul Le Roux, encryption programmer, and convicted criminal; and Wei Dai, computer engineer and creator of Bitcoin precursor B-money, also referenced in the whitepaper.
price ticker sponsor logo
BTCUSD
$78,546.32
0.81%
ETHUSD
$2,311.61
1.10%
BCHUSD
$447.15
-0.85%
LTCUSD
$55.35
-0.34%
XRPUSD
$1.39
0.61%
feature
'I suspect you got to the right answer': New Satoshi documentary makes the case Hal Finney and Len Sassaman were Bitcoin's co-creators
By James Hunt
People•April 22, 2026, 9:01AM EDT

Make us preferred on Google

Share
'I suspect you got to the right answer': New Satoshi documentary makes the case Hal Finney and Len Sassaman were Bitcoin's co-creators
Partner offers
Quick Take
“Finding Satoshi” makes the case that Hal Finney and Len Sassaman were Bitcoin’s co-creators, documenting the latest effort to uncover Nakamoto’s identity.
The film follows a four-year investigation led by New York Times bestselling author William D. Cohan and private investigator Tyler Maroney.
We'd love your feedback.
Start Survey
Advertisement
For most of the 18 years since the nine-page Bitcoin whitepaper was published on Oct. 31, 2008, amid the turmoil of the great financial crisis, many have rightly or wrongly speculated about the identity of its pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

Attempts to unveil Satoshi have continued ever since, spurred on by the pseudonymous creator's disappearance from public view in 2011. A Newsweek story in 2014 focused on Japanese American systems engineer Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, while others theorized that Bitcoin could be a CIA-controlled project, to which one expert in the documentary quipped, "I don't think our government is competent enough to do something that smart."

While the ideas put forth in many similar documentaries were ultimately dismissed, "Finding Satoshi," directed by Tucker Tooley and Matthew Miele, attempts to avoid rehashing existing theories with a character-driven investigation that, while surfacing many familiar names, reaches an interesting conclusion.

The film, viewed in advance of its release by The Block, depicts a four-year investigation led by New York Times author, financial journalist, and former M&A investment banker William D. Cohan alongside Quest Research and Investigations' team of private investigators led by Tyler Maroney, drawing on experts across cryptography, programming, and linguistics.

Cohan had originally set out on the documentary interviewing various figureheads from within the industry, including Katie Haun, the former DOJ prosecutor who led investigations tied to Silk Road and Mt. Gox and later founder and CEO of Haun Ventures; Brian Brookes, the former CLO at Coinbase, CEO at BinanceUS, CEO at Bitfury and Acting Comptroller of the Currency; and Joseph Lubin, co-founder of Ethereum and CEO of Consensys. However, he found little willingness to engage directly on the question of Satoshi's identity.

Cohan told The Block he is not entirely sure why they were so reluctant. "Part of it was, I think, that it was just irrelevant more than a decade after Satoshi wrote his whitepaper and Bitcoin was born," he said. "So, why bother? Part of it, too, might have been that what if we discovered that Satoshi was an evil person… that news could destroy the wealth that they had built up in their bitcoin ownership. In any event, it spurred us all on to try to uncover Satoshi's identity — and I think we did."

So instead, Cohan turned to Maroney and the broader QRI team. QRI's focus is on investigations in the public interest that are very difficult to crack, according to Maroney, and sought to approach the task with empirical evidence and expert testimony from people that Cohan and many earlier documentaries had not spoken to.

The candidates
QRI outlined six of the most credible, yet usual suspects: Adam Back, cryptographer, CEO of Blockstream, and creator of the Bitcoin whitepaper-referenced Hashcash; Nick Szabo, computer scientist, and creator of Bitcoin precursor Bit Gold; Hal Finney, software developer, creator of Hashcash successor RPOW (Reusable Proof of Work), and the first recipient of bitcoin from Satoshi Nakamoto; Len Sassaman, systems engineer and academic; Paul Le Roux, encryption programmer, and convicted criminal; and Wei Dai, computer engineer and creator of Bitcoin precursor B-money, also referenced in the whitepaper.

One of the first people QRI spoke to was Bjarne Stroustrup, creator of C++, the programming language used for Bitcoin, who said, looking at the Bitcoin code, that Satoshi Nakamoto was a "reasonably good C++ programmer for the time," that would have been proficient in C++, not just C — with Back, Dai, and Le Roux all fitting the bill. Szabo and Sassaman were not known to write in C++, and Finney was less known to use it.

Another link the investigators highlighted was that all of the candidates, except Le Roux, were very active in a 1990s group of coders called the cypherpunks, who had a very libertarian-leaning philosophy.

Phil Zimmerman, who founded PGP (Pretty Good Privacy), which created true email encryption, is seen by many as the "OG cypherpunk," with both Finney and Sassaman having previously worked at PGP for Zimmerman.

Asked by Maroney whether anyone he worked with at PGP could have been part of the formative team that put together Bitcoin, Zimmerman was visibly reluctant to answer. While focusing on email encryption, PGP also explored several other areas, including digital cash.

Finney and Sassaman
Maroney spoke to Alyssa Blackburn, a data scientist at the Baylor College of Medicine and specialist in early Bitcoin mining. She identified around 64 major players during the first two years of Bitcoin, including a lot of metadata on Satoshi Nakamoto's mining and communications activities, which she said provides an idea of their "digital rhythms."

Her analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto's activity shows they were predominantly active between 6 a.m. PST and 10 p.m. PST, suggesting North or South American time zones. Overlaying that with the remaining candidates and their known online activity, including the metzdowd cryptography mailing list that the Bitcoin whitepaper was distributed through, Blackburn surmised that only Finney and Sassaman matched Satoshi Nakamoto's activity profile. She argued it was "inconceivable" that Back, Szabo, or Dai could be Satoshi Nakamoto based on that analysis.

The New York Times recently suggested Back as a leading candidate based on linguistic analysis and circumstantial evidence, including a 2015 email attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto, though its authenticity is widely disputed. Back also strongly denied the NYT's claims.

QRI also looked into the same email. However, Maroney told The Block that multiple sources said it was inconsistent with Satoshi Nakamoto's known writing style and focused on topics, such as bitcoin's price, that Nakamoto did not typically discuss. The email was also not signed using Nakamoto's cryptographic key, a standard method of verifying identity, and may have originated from a compromised account, he added.

From her research, Blackburn said that qualitatively, Finney and Sassaman looked like the most viable candidates.

One of Maroney's concerns about Sassaman was his propensity to "bash" Bitcoin, referencing social media posts in 2010 and 2011 describing it as "bunk" and "overhyped," with its success due to "irrational exuberance."

Cohan and the investigators' concerns over the case for Finney were that he was a coder, not an academic writer, and the Bitcoin whitepaper was an academic paper.

PGP Corp. co-founder Will Price said that, looking at the structure of RPOW, and having spent 15 years working with Finney, he could tell it was coded by Finney instantaneously. However, unlike Hashcash and B-Money, Price noted that RPOW was not credited in the Bitcoin whitepaper, questioning why that would be, as it was "as close to Bitcoin as anything could possibly be."

However, when Maroney tried to make the case against Finney being Satoshi Nakamoto, Price laughed and wished him "good luck." Maroney made the point that Finney was not known for coding in C++, and again Price laughed.

"To an engineer of Hal's caliber, a different language is like chicken versus steak," Price said. "It has no meaning and he can change languages in hours," noting that he was already having to work on C++ tasks at PGP. "A lot of the Bitcoin code is very similar to what Hal does in his normal C++, but then he sticks in some things to throw you off the trail," Price said.

Maroney suggested Price's point seemed to be that Finney intentionally used C++, a language he was not known publicly for, to code in, because it provided "additional cover."

By 2008, Price said the company was running out of things for Finney to do and suggested he just keep working on RPOW — and he thinks that's exactly what happened.

Price explained that there was a two-month gap from Oct. 31, 2008 (the date Bitcoin's whitepaper was published) to early January 2009 (Bitcoin's genesis block), where Finney made no PGP commits. Price said they still knew what his tasks were, and Finney, a remote employee, would send weekly updates, confirming things like he was still working on his Windows fingerprint technology.

"So he's working on C++ on Windows, which is what Bitcoin is written for and in," Price said. "What was going on in those two months that the last two months before the release of the Bitcoin source code, Hal made no commits to the source code at work? What was he working on? I think it was Bitcoin."

Finney passed away due to complications from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in August 2014. Toward the end of Finney's life, PGP Corp. co-founder Jon Callas and Zimmerman took a trip to visit him, where Callas said he asked him if he was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"His answer was, why would I deny being Satoshi if I were because I have a fatal disease. And you know, there's no reason in the world for me to deny it because I'm not going to be around in two or three years, but no, I'm not," Callas recalled. "At the time, I interpreted that as a non-denial and interpreted it as a yes," he said.

But, of course, it would be reasonable to deny it.

"I don't know why you would go through the effort of making everything anonymous, creating a pseudonym, going through all this effort, and then you just start randomly telling people," Price said. "Right? I mean, you're going to be consistent about that or not."

"One of my big takeaways from this meeting is these people miss Hal. They respect Hal, they believe his story finally needs to be told," Maroney reflected. "They want the truth out there. And yeah, maybe Satoshi can never actually move a bitcoin, but three eyewitnesses, experts in the field, friends of Hal's confirming his identity, seem like good corroborating evidence."

Though not noted in the documentary, following the original Newsweek story connecting Finney and Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto in 2014, Forbes and others also pointed out that the pair had both lived in Temple City, a small suburb of Los Angeles with a population of around 35,000, just a few blocks away from one another. While this doesn't prove anything, many have speculated on the coincidence and suggested that Finney may have used local directories at the time for inspiration on the pseudonym.

"We were well aware of this, confirmed what others had previously found, worked to find any other connections between Nakamoto and Finney, and ultimately decided not to include it in the film," Maroney told The Block. "I'll note this point can be used to strengthen our case."

A spanner in the works?
Just when he thought they were getting somewhere, Maroney was presented with an October 2023 article from "professional cypherpunk" Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, titled "Hal Finney Was Not Satoshi Nakamoto."

"Researching a lot of Hal's and Satoshi's early activity, I discovered several different conflicts that showed that they were both doing things at the exact same time when Hal could not have been at a computer on the internet," Lopp said in an interview with Maroney.

For example, Lopp looked at back and forth emails and a Bitcoin transaction between Satoshi Nakamoto and early Bitcoin developer Mike Hearn with timestamps while Hal Finney was provably running a race.

"From the very simple fact that it's not possible to be in two places at the same time, it's highly unlikely that Satoshi and Hal were the same person," Lopp said.

Maroney said he had a hard time squaring the conversations with the PGP team and Lopp, but went on to ask what other explanations Lopp may have.

"One possible explanation is that Satoshi was a group of people. Whether Hal was like 'in on it' will, I think, never really be able to prove," Lopp said. "But Occam's razor, it's difficult to keep secrets amongst multiple people," he added, echoing Puckett's observations. "Unless they're all dead" — which could also help explain why Satoshi Nakamoto's funds were never moved.

'Unless they're all dead'
At first, Maroney thought Lopp was "blowing up" his theory. "But then I realized he gave me the answer because Hal Finney was not the only candidate who was no longer with us," he said.

So the investigators sought the help of Meredith Patterson, a coder involved in computer security, linguistics, and civil rights. But the real reason they wanted to talk to her was that she is also the widow of Len Sassaman.

Maroney recalled a conversation with PGP's Price about Sassaman's life as an academic and a PhD student focused on anonymity.

"When you look through the whitepapers of Len Sassaman, he was really great at writing whitepapers," Price said. "He would have really cared about checking every reference as they did, the precision and the correctness of every part of that whitepaper. He is the kind of person who would really have gone through that, gotten it right."

"The whitepaper is written in a certain way, that is someone who writes whitepapers," Price continued. "And that's not Hal."

Len lived in Europe during the time Satoshi Nakamoto was active, and despite being American, his writing often contained British spellings and phrases, just like Nakamoto. His PhD advisor was David Chaum, the inventor of DigiCash and widely recognized as the "godfather" of cryptocurrency.

Patterson and Sassaman met at CodeCon, a conference he ran in San Francisco with Bram Cohen, an American computer programmer, best known as the author of the peer-to-peer BitTorrent protocol.

Like Finney, Sassaman suffered from debilitating health conditions, dealing with Crohn's disease and severe calcium depletion in his spine, using a cane by the time he was 30, Patterson said. Sadly, on July 3, 2011, around six months after Satoshi Nakamoto's last public post, Sassaman took his own life.

Back in 2005, Finney had presented RPOW at CodeCon.

"I had read a couple of articles about Hashcash, which was basically the forerunner of RPOW," Petterson told Maroney. "But it was fascinating to see that transformed into a system for actually using it as money."

RATINGS
Best prediction market platforms in 2026
Best prediction market platforms in 2026
Best exchanges for trading crypto in 2026
Best exchanges for trading crypto in 2026
Best crypto cards with token rewards in 2026
Best crypto cards with token rewards in 2026
See more ratings
Petterson confirmed that Finney and Sassaman were friends, had worked together at PGP, and were "definitely" in touch in 2008. "They were certainly still interacting online," she said.

Asked what she had thought about Bitcoin when she first heard of it, Patterson said she immediately went to read the whitepaper and saw it as a "neat way to get around the central operator." Asked about the use of a pseudonym, she said that it did not surprise her. "Whoever was behind it had definitely been reading the cypherpunk's mailing list. They were familiar with the kinds of problems that the cypherpunks were interested in solving," she said.

Sassaman was also an expert in stylometric anonymization, small stylistic changes to writing that blur the fingerprints used to help identify who wrote it. Something that could explain the inconclusive analysis of the Bitcoin whitepaper.

Discussing the theory that Sassaman's talents could have complemented Finney's in the creation of Bitcoin, Patterson said she thinks it is plausible. "Is it possible that Len would have helped Hal and not told you?" Maroney asked. "Oh, yes, absolutely," she said.

The skills and experience needed to create Bitcoin
BitTorrent's Cohen, who had known both Finney and Sassaman, described Sassaman as his best friend, having been roommates for a long time. In a series of social media posts in 2021, Cohen said: "Len posted pseudonymously on the cypherpunks list constantly, including at least one fleshed-out and long-lived handle."

"The implication with that one seemed to be that it was Hal or Len or some combination of the two, very unsure though," Cohen added. "Len also tried to get me to publish BitTorrent pseudonymously, which seems indicative of something."

Asked by Maroney why he personally saw Finney and Sassaman as Bitcoin's creators, Cohen said they knew each other, and they both had a pattern of posting pseudonymously to cypherpunks. "What they liked doing exactly matched, you know, what we know about Satoshi Nakamoto, because Satoshi, first and foremost, was a cypherpunk," he said.

In terms of the skills and experience needed to create Bitcoin, Cohen said Finney exhibited those especially, whereas Sassaman would be more of a fit for the human language element of it — hinting at the whitepaper and forum post contributions — which also explains how Finney could have been running a race while Sassaman was acting as Satoshi, Maroney suggested.

But one problem remained. Why would Sassaman publicly bash Bitcoin? "You don't make all your pseudonyms agree with each other about everything or everyone's going to know who your pseudonyms are," Cohen said. "If you have some identity that you're trying to hide, then your normal public persona has very little to gain by agreeing with a hidden identity, particularly if it's some controversial topic like Bitcoin."

Who is Satoshi?
For Maroney, the pieces were falling into place. Meeting with William D. Cohan, he said that, "For the entire investigation, we've been pursuing Satoshi as if he were one person. But all of our evidence is leading to the conclusion that it was two people collaborating."

"If we take all of the circumstantial evidence, all of [the] empirical evidence, and all of the eyewitness testimony, the conclusion is that Hal Finney and Len Sassaman collaborated to create Bitcoin," Maroney said. "That the two of them were Satoshi Nakamoto."

Unlike the early interviewees, some crypto industry insiders were willing to comment on the documentary's conclusions. In a press release accompanying the film's official trailer last month, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said: "It's the most thoughtful take on this subject I've seen out there, and I suspect you got to the right answer." Coinbase is also a supporter of the film.

After seeing the documentary, Lopp also reportedly told the filmmakers it was "easily the most expertly produced Bitcoin documentary" he had seen, adding that it is "a plausible take that may finally put an end to chasing ghosts."

Many have criticized attempts to uncover Satoshi's identity, fairly citing potential threats to their families and friends. Participants in the documentary, including Zimmerman, were also wary, describing it as "dangerous" and "people could get hurt."

However, notably in this case, the widows of both Finney and Patterson were willing to take part in the documentary themselves and seemed to agree with the plausibility of the investigation's ultimate conclusions.

"I liked your movie," Fran Finney said. "The reason I [initially] declined to speak with you is because I misunderstood where your movie was going. I had been approached by a number of different projects, and I assumed this project was similar. And most of those projects are just very exploitive. But after I saw the film and what you've done with it so far, I was really touched and impressed and blown away."

Asked if she ever asked her husband if he was Satoshi Nakamoto, Fran Finney said she did, but that he just laughed and said no. "Is it possible he helped build it and didn't tell you?" Maroney said. "Yes, I think he did help build it," she said. "You also brought forth the possibility that I hadn't considered that Hal might have collaborated in the writing of the code for Bitcoin. And I mean, he did. He was excited to write that. The whitepaper itself, I didn't think he wrote. But he could have helped. Making edits for it. So what you present in the film makes sense to me."

Reflecting on the interview with Fran Finney, Maroney said it reminded him of a Forbes interview with Hal Finney shortly before he died. "In the conclusions to the article, Hal was asked if given his contributions to open source cryptography, he could perhaps be considered one of the creators of Bitcoin," Maroney said.

PGP's Will Price also picked up on the same thing. "When he phrased it the final way, which was whether he's one of the creators of Bitcoin, Hal raised his eyes and eyebrows, which in the article is identified as his way of saying yes," Price said. "And he asked him if he was proud of that work. And Finney raised his eyes and he smiled."

"I think, for Hal, it was always true to say that he didn't create Bitcoin. He didn't create Bitcoin, it was a team. But if you ask him, are you one of the creators of Bitcoin? Yes," Price said. "At this point, I think it's better that people understand that these people who are long past did create it. They had all of the best intentions and didn't do it for the money."

"Hal's influence on the world in a number of behind the scenes but extraordinarily important things ought to be valued," PGP's Callas said. "He is the person who is not like what you see out there in the cryptocurrency world and that is why he deserves the accolades because he is proof positive that you don't have to be a horrible person to make a big impact on the world."

"That's his big legacy. He left his footprint. And I'm so proud of him," Fran Finney said.

It's important to note that the documentary emphasized that "based on an extensive investigative review, the filmmakers affirm that there is no evidence or reasonable inference that Fran Finney or Meredith Patterson have any access, direct or indirect, to Satoshi Nakamoto's private keys."

"I admire Hal and Len almost more than anyone I've ever investigated because their motives I learned were so much more beautiful and pure than the motives of most people who want to hide behind something," Maroney concluded. "Usually I'm looking for people who've done something wrong and are hiding behind a mask. But in this case, I was looking for somebody or a few people who did something really creative and innovative. These were
While Satoshi Nakamoto's identity remains uncertain, perhaps never to be provably confirmed, the investigation arguably makes one of the most compelling cases to date that Finney and Sassaman jointly collaborated to launch Bitcoin.
Finding Satoshi was released globally on April 22 via FindingSatoshi.com.
#PEPEATH
#VeChainNodeMarketplace
#fahadcreator
#XRPRealityCheck
#ZeroFeeTrading

I can provide a more detailed analysis based on current trends and factors that could influence its price in 2025. Please keep in mind that this is speculative, and any predictions should be taken with caution.

**Overview of VeChain (VET)**
VeChain is a blockchain platform specifically designed for supply chain and business process management. Through its decentralized solutions, it enables businesses to track products as they move through the supply chain, ensuring transparency and reducing fraud. The project is backed by strong partnerships with global companies like Walmart China, BMW, and DNV GL, which positions it as a leader in the enterprise blockchain sector.

#### **Factors That Could Drive VeChain's Growth in 2025**

1. **Continued Adoption in Supply Chain and Logistics**
VeChain's core value proposition is its ability to enhance transparency and traceability within supply chains. As industries such as logistics, luxury goods, automotive, and pharmaceuticals continue to adopt blockchain technology for tracking products and ensuring their authenticity, VeChain is likely to see increasing demand. Major companies across various sectors are beginning to recognize the need for blockchain solutions to ensure product integrity and reduce counterfeiting, which directly benefits VeChain.

2. **Strategic Partnerships and Collaborations**
VeChain’s partnerships are a major driver of its success. In addition to collaborations with high-profile companies like Walmart China, VeChain continues to secure more partnerships in different industries. These partnerships provide real-world utility to VeChain’s ecosystem and enhance its credibility, boosting both adoption and the demand for its native token, VET.

3. **Technological Advancements**
The continued development of VeChain’s blockchain technology, including improvements in scalability, security, and privacy, will play a significant role in its future growth. If the platform can make these advancements while maintaining ease of use for enterprises, it will attract more companies to its ecosystem. Additionally, VeChain's focus on the sustainability of its projects, including reducing carbon footprints, aligns with growing global attention on environmental concerns, further strengthening its market position.

4. **Global Regulatory Environment**
One of the most significant external factors that could impact VeChain’s growth is regulatory changes. As governments around the world work to regulate cryptocurrencies, VeChain’s ability to navigate this landscape will be critical. The blockchain and cryptocurrency space is likely to see more regulatory clarity in the coming years, and companies like VeChain that focus on real-world applications could benefit from a favorable regulatory environment.

#### **VeChain Price Prediction for 2025**

While we cannot guarantee specific price predictions, here are some factors that could shape the potential value of VeChain (VET) in 2025:

- **Market Adoption**: If VeChain continues to expand its ecosystem, solidify its partnerships, and gain wider adoption across various industries, the demand for VET could rise significantly. With broader use cases, VET's price could rise in tandem.

- **Bullish Crypto Market**: If the broader cryptocurrency market experiences a bull run, driven by increased institutional investment or mainstream adoption, VeChain could also see substantial price growth. Past crypto market cycles suggest that altcoins tend to follow the momentum set by Bitcoin and Ethereum, which could provide VeChain with a strong tailwind.

- **Supply and Demand**: The total supply of VET tokens is capped at 86 billion. While a large supply can sometimes limit price growth, increased demand due to utility and adoption could drive the price higher.

### **Potential Price Range for VeChain in 2025**
Given these factors, some analysts and crypto enthusiasts have speculated that VeChain (VET) could reach a price between **$0.50 to $1.00 USD** by 2025, if adoption continues to grow, partnerships expand, and the cryptocurrency market as a whole sees a positive trend. However, this is highly speculative, and the actual price could be significantly higher or lower depending on market dynamics and the execution of VeChain’s roadmap.

#### **Risks and Challenges to Consider**
- **Market Volatility**: Cryptocurrencies are known for their price volatility, and VeChain is no exception. Even with strong fundamentals, external factors like global financial crises or drastic regulatory changes could lead to price fluctuations.
- **Competition**: VeChain faces competition from other blockchain platforms, particularly those focused on enterprise and supply chain solutions. Its ability to maintain and grow its market share is crucial for its long-term success.
- **Technological Risks**: While VeChain’s technology is promising, it needs to continually evolve to stay ahead of competitors and maintain its relevance in the rapidly changing blockchain landscape.

### **Conclusion**
VeChain (VET) has significant potential in the growing blockchain and supply chain industries. Its strong partnerships, real-world use cases, and ongoing technological advancements position it as one of the more promising projects in the crypto space. If it continues on this trajectory and if the broader market trends in a favorable direction, VeChain could see significant growth by 2025.

However, as with any cryptocurrency, it is essential to approach investing with caution, as prices can be influenced by factors that are hard to predict. Always conduct thorough research and consider diversifying your investments to mitigate risks.
$VET
---
@news_hub more updates stay connected with me and follow me!
Please note: This is a speculative analysis, and cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Always do your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.#VET #VeChainNodeMarketplace

This announcement is for general information only. Availability may vary by region.@Vanar
This is a general announcement. Products and services may not be available in your region.@Vanar $VANRY
This is a general announcement. Products and services may not be available in all regions.#VeChainNodeMarketplace

Vanar Chain is emerging as one of the most promising Layer-1 ecosystems focused on real-world Web3 adoption. What makes Vanar stand out is its strong focus on gaming, AI, metaverse infrastructure, and creator empowerment. Unlike many chains that only talk about scalability, Vanar is actively building tools that allow developers and creators to launch fast, low-cost, and user-friendly decentralized applications.
The Vanar ecosystem is designed to remove friction for both builders and users, making blockchain technology accessible beyond crypto-native audiences. With ultra-fast finality, low transaction fees, and a creator-first mindset, Vanar Chain provides a solid foundation for next-generation digital experiences. The native token $VANRY plays a key role in powering the network, enabling transactions, staking, and ecosystem growth.
What’s exciting is Vanar’s long-term vision: creating a sustainable blockchain environment where innovation, creativity, and utility come together. As adoption grows, Vanar has the potential to become a key player in Web3 infrastructure. Follow @Vanar vanar to stay updated on this journey.
#vanar #VeChainNodeMarketplace 🚀