#americanpolitics
americanpolitics
18,816 skatījumi
18 piedalās diskusijā
Populārie
Jaunumi
Tramps ir uz robežas, lai noslēgtu $10 MILJARDU tiesas prāvu pret IRS.
Tava cena: $1.7 MILJARDI.
Vienošanās ir vienkārša.
Pārtraukt tiesas prāvu. Ņemt naudu. Turpināt.
Izņemot to, ka nauda nav Trampa.
Tā ir tava.
$1.7B fonds nonāk pie sabiedrotajiem, kuri apgalvo, ka Baidena administrācija ir ieročojusi IRS pret viņiem.
Nav tiesas. Nav sprieduma. Nav atbildības.
Tikai čeks, ko parakstījis Amerikas nodokļu maksātājs.
Padomā par to, kas notika.
Prezidents iesūdzēja savu pašu valdību.
Pēc tam noslēdza vienošanos ar savu pašu valdību.
Izmantojot savas valdības naudu.
Tavu naudu.
Tas nav juridisks uzvarējums.
Tas ir pārskaitījums.
Un tas tikko ir apglabāts jaunumu ciklā, ko lielākā daļa cilvēku nelasīs tālāk par virsrakstu.
Izlasi to vēlreiz lēnām.
$1,700,000,000.
Pazudis.
Nav tiesas nolēmuma. Nav žūrijas. Nav tiesneša, kas izlemtu, kurš bija pareizs.
Tikai sarunāts iziešana ar publiskiem līdzekļiem kā klusuma cena.
Neatkarīgi no tā, vai esi kreisajā, labajā vai pavisam izslēdzies
Tam vajadzētu padarīt tavu vēderu saspringtu.
Jo precedents, kas šeit tiek noteikts, ir lielāks par Trampu.
Tas ir lielāks par Baidenu.
Tas ir par to, kurš patiesībā maksā, kad varas spēles noiet greizi.
#Trump #IRS #Taxpayers #AmericanPolitics #BreakingNews
Tava cena: $1.7 MILJARDI.
Vienošanās ir vienkārša.
Pārtraukt tiesas prāvu. Ņemt naudu. Turpināt.
Izņemot to, ka nauda nav Trampa.
Tā ir tava.
$1.7B fonds nonāk pie sabiedrotajiem, kuri apgalvo, ka Baidena administrācija ir ieročojusi IRS pret viņiem.
Nav tiesas. Nav sprieduma. Nav atbildības.
Tikai čeks, ko parakstījis Amerikas nodokļu maksātājs.
Padomā par to, kas notika.
Prezidents iesūdzēja savu pašu valdību.
Pēc tam noslēdza vienošanos ar savu pašu valdību.
Izmantojot savas valdības naudu.
Tavu naudu.
Tas nav juridisks uzvarējums.
Tas ir pārskaitījums.
Un tas tikko ir apglabāts jaunumu ciklā, ko lielākā daļa cilvēku nelasīs tālāk par virsrakstu.
Izlasi to vēlreiz lēnām.
$1,700,000,000.
Pazudis.
Nav tiesas nolēmuma. Nav žūrijas. Nav tiesneša, kas izlemtu, kurš bija pareizs.
Tikai sarunāts iziešana ar publiskiem līdzekļiem kā klusuma cena.
Neatkarīgi no tā, vai esi kreisajā, labajā vai pavisam izslēdzies
Tam vajadzētu padarīt tavu vēderu saspringtu.
Jo precedents, kas šeit tiek noteikts, ir lielāks par Trampu.
Tas ir lielāks par Baidenu.
Tas ir par to, kurš patiesībā maksā, kad varas spēles noiet greizi.
#Trump #IRS #Taxpayers #AmericanPolitics #BreakingNews
Skatīt tulkojumu
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith Raises Concerns Over Independence of the U.S. Justice Department
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith has publicly criticized the current state of the U.S. Justice Department, warning that political influence is undermining institutional independence and public trust in the legal system.
Speaking at a private event in Washington, Smith argued that the department has become increasingly politicized, claiming that investigations are being influenced by political considerations rather than legal principles. He also expressed concern about pressure placed on federal prosecutors, investigators, and public servants who he said are being targeted for simply carrying out their professional responsibilities.
Smith, who previously led investigations involving former President Donald Trump, described the situation as a broader challenge to the rule of law and the long‑standing tradition of maintaining separation between the Justice Department and political leadership.
The remarks come amid continued political tensions surrounding investigations connected to the Trump administration, with ongoing debates in the United States over prosecutorial independence, accountability, and the role of federal institutions in highly polarized political environments.
While supporters of the current administration dispute Smith’s claims, his comments add to a wider national conversation about trust in democratic institutions, legal transparency, and the balance between politics and law enforcement.
The discussion also reflects how deeply legal and political battles have become intertwined in modern American governance, especially during periods of intense political division.
#USPolitics #JusticeDepartment #RuleOfLaw #Democracy #AmericanPolitics
$HIGH
$PENDLE
$OP
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith has publicly criticized the current state of the U.S. Justice Department, warning that political influence is undermining institutional independence and public trust in the legal system.
Speaking at a private event in Washington, Smith argued that the department has become increasingly politicized, claiming that investigations are being influenced by political considerations rather than legal principles. He also expressed concern about pressure placed on federal prosecutors, investigators, and public servants who he said are being targeted for simply carrying out their professional responsibilities.
Smith, who previously led investigations involving former President Donald Trump, described the situation as a broader challenge to the rule of law and the long‑standing tradition of maintaining separation between the Justice Department and political leadership.
The remarks come amid continued political tensions surrounding investigations connected to the Trump administration, with ongoing debates in the United States over prosecutorial independence, accountability, and the role of federal institutions in highly polarized political environments.
While supporters of the current administration dispute Smith’s claims, his comments add to a wider national conversation about trust in democratic institutions, legal transparency, and the balance between politics and law enforcement.
The discussion also reflects how deeply legal and political battles have become intertwined in modern American governance, especially during periods of intense political division.
#USPolitics #JusticeDepartment #RuleOfLaw #Democracy #AmericanPolitics
$HIGH
$PENDLE
$OP
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu