Why Bitcoin dropped to US$64,100: Trump tariffs, US$2.6B ETF outflows, and extreme fear grip crypto
4:51PM・Feb 24, 2026
Follow
Why Bitcoin dropped to US$64,100: Trump tariffs, US$2.6B ETF outflows, and extreme fear grip crypto
The cryptocurrency market faces a sharp correction as macroeconomic headwinds collide with fragile investor sentiment. President Trump’s announcement to raise global tariffs from 10 per cent to 15 per cent ignited a risk-off cascade, pulling capital from volatile assets like Bitcoin into traditional safe havens such as gold. This move, framed as a protective measure for the domestic industry, instead sparked immediate fears of a global trade war and resurgent inflation. Investors reacted swiftly, and the digital asset space bore the brunt of this repricing.
Macroeconomic pressure serves as the central catalyst for today’s decline. The tariff hike represents more than a trade adjustment. It signals a potential shift toward protectionism that could disrupt global supply chains and elevate costs for consumers and businesses alike. Geopolitical tensions, including a potential conflict between the United States and Iran, compound this anxiety and further strain market confidence. When traditional markets wobble, crypto often amplifies the move due to its higher beta.
Bitcoin’s drop below the critical US$65,000 support level triggered over US$460 million in liquidations across the market. This cascade of forced selling from overleveraged traders accelerated the price drop, creating a feedback loop that pushed Bitcoin near US$64,100, a decline of approximately five per cent. Ethereum followed suit, falling below US$1,900 to trade near US$1,840. Altcoins experienced even steeper losses, with Solana down seven per cent and XRP down six per cent. The Fear and Greed Index now sits at 11, reflecting extreme fear among investors. This metric, while useful, often captures short-term emotion rather than long-term value.
Institutional flows provide another layer to this downturn. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen significant outflows, with roughly US$2.6 billion exiting year to date. Major institutions, like BlackRock, reported single-day outflows of up to US$373 million. These numbers highlight how quickly institutional capital can rotate when macro conditions shift. It remains important to distinguish between strategic rebalancing and panic selling.
Some institutions may be reducing exposure temporarily to manage portfolio risk, not abandoning the asset class entirely. On-chain data adds further context, showing increased selling from whales and mining companies. Bitdeer, for instance, reportedly sold its entire Bitcoin holdings to support its balance sheet. While this activity adds selling pressure, it also reflects the diverse motivations of market participants. Miners often sell to cover operational costs, and large holders may take profits or adjust positions based on their own risk assessments. These actions are part of a maturing market’s ecosystem, not necessarily a signal of impending collapse.
The broader equity market painted a similar picture of risk aversion. Major US stock indices ended sharply lower on Monday, February 23, 2026, driven by renewed tariff uncertainty and mounting fears that artificial intelligence could disrupt corporate profits. The Dow Jones Industrial Average suffered its worst session in weeks, plunging 821.91 points to close at 48,804.06. The S&P 500 fell 1.04 per cent to 6,837.75, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid 1.13 per cent to 22,627.27. Tariff uncertainty weighed heavily on trade-sensitive stocks like American Eagle Outfitters and Ralph Lauren. Simultaneously, markets grappled with a viral research report suggesting that AI could spark a race to the bottom in white-collar work.
IBM became the S&P 500’s biggest loser, tumbling 13 per cent in its worst day since 2000, after Anthropic’s Claude Code was touted as a tool to modernise COBOL programming, potentially threatening IBM’s legacy mainframe business. Financials also faced significant declines, with JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and American Express all posting major losses. Consumer Staples bucked the trend, leading the few gainers as investors sought defensive positions. This sector rotation underscores how quickly capital moves when uncertainty rises.
Global markets reacted with mixed signals on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. Asian markets opened with divergence. Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 0.79 per cent following a holiday, while mainland Chinese shares saw gains as they returned from the Lunar New Year break, supported by optimism over potentially lower US tariffs following the Supreme Court’s ruling. This regional variation highlights how local factors can temper or amplify global trends.
For crypto, which trades continuously across borders, these disparities create both challenges and opportunities. Arbitrage possibilities emerge, but so does increased volatility as traders digest conflicting signals. The market is currently testing the US$60,000 psychological support level for Bitcoin. A break below this could signal further downside toward US$50,000. Support levels are not immutable. They represent zones where buyer interest may emerge, not guaranteed floors.
From my perspective, today’s decline reflects the growing pains of an asset class still finding its place within the global financial system. Crypto markets remain highly sensitive to macroeconomic narratives, but this sensitivity does not invalidate their long-term potential. The convergence of AI and blockchain, a theme I explore extensively, suggests that technological innovation will continue to drive value creation beyond short-term price action. The current risk-off environment tests investor resolve, but it also separates speculative noise from substantive projects. Decentralised systems offer resilience that traditional finance often lacks, and they are not immune to sentiment shifts.
The key lies in maintaining a focus on fundamentals: network activity, developer engagement, and real-world utility. These metrics matter more than daily price fluctuations.