There’s a lot of geopolitical tension building around Greenland, the massive ice-covered island near the Arctic Circle.
Greenland is self-governing, but it’s still officially part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Denmark controls key areas like foreign policy, defense, and security, while Greenland manages most internal affairs. It’s not fully independent—but it’s also not just a regular Danish territory.
The controversy heated up when former U.S. President Donald Trump openly said the U.S. should buy Greenland. His argument was based on:
National security (control of Arctic routes and missile defense),
Natural resources (rare earth minerals critical for tech, EVs, and weapons),
Blocking rivals like Russia and China from expanding their influence in the Arctic.
Denmark and Greenland’s leaders immediately rejected the idea, repeating the clear message:
“Greenland is not for sale.”
What made things even more interesting is Russia’s reaction. Moscow publicly stated that Greenland belongs to Denmark and that its status should be respected.
Why would Russia say that?
It’s less about kindness and more about strategy.
By backing Denmark’s claim, Russia is:
Calling out the U.S. for using “security threats” as justification to expand power,
Signaling that Washington shouldn’t unilaterally take control of Arctic territory,
Positioning itself as a defender of international norms—while subtly embarrassing the U.S.
It’s also a reminder that Russia is closely monitoring Arctic developments, especially as the region becomes more valuable due to melting ice, new shipping lanes, military positioning, and untapped resources.
Meanwhile, NATO countries are increasing their military presence in the Arctic to show support for Denmark and protect strategic interests. What used to be a frozen backwater is now a global power hotspot.
In short:
Greenland is becoming strategically priceless
The U.S. wants influence or control
Denmark and Greenland say no
Russia says “it’s Danish” — partly to pressure the U.S.
The Arctic is quietly turning into the next big geopolitical chessboard
So the real question remains:
Should Greenland stay under Denmark, move toward full independence, or eventually align with another power?
