One aspect of crypto that doesn’t get discussed enough is the role of community quality in shaping a project’s long term trajectory. Technology matters, but the people who gather around it matter just as much.
While following @Plasma , I’ve started paying attention not only to the updates, but also to how conversations about the project are evolving. Are people asking thoughtful questions? Are builders curious? Are discussions moving beyond surface-level hype? These signals are often more meaningful than any headline.
For $XPL , the strength of the ecosystem will likely depend on whether it continues to attract contributors who genuinely want to understand the architecture and explore its potential use cases. Healthy ecosystems are built by curiosity, not noise.
That’s why I believe #plasma is still in an interesting phase: early enough to observe organic community growth, yet structured enough to support deeper discussions. Over time, this dynamic can make a significant difference.
