Vanar Just Flipped Their Entire Business Model and Nobody’s Talking About It

Caught something weird happening with Vanar earlier this week. January 19th the trading volume hit $50 million on a $17 million market cap. That’s like a 3x ratio which doesn’t happen randomly.

Started poking around to see what caused it and turns out they dropped their whole AI-native infrastructure update that day. Neutron, Kayon, Pilot Agent all went live at once.

But here’s the part that actually matters more than the tech specs. They’re switching to paid subscriptions.

myNeutron and Pilot Agent are moving to subscription models where every interaction either burns or stakes VANRY tokens. So instead of the token just being something people speculate on, it’s now tied to actual revenue generation from people using the products.

Think about how different that is from most crypto projects. Usually tokens exist for governance votes nobody participates in or staking rewards that come from inflation. This is more like… you want to use the AI compression tool? Pay with VANRY. Want your wallet to understand natural language commands? Pay with VANRY.

The tokens either get burned completely or locked in staking, both reducing circulating supply while the platform generates actual income. That’s a fundamentally different economic model than “we printed tokens and hope number goes up.”

They’re carbon-neutral through Google’s renewable energy program too which honestly just feels responsible given how much energy AI and blockchain both consume.

I’m watching to see if this subscription approach actually works or if people just stick with free alternatives even if they’re centralized. Paying for decentralization is a tough sell when AWS is right there.

Does tying token utility to actual product subscriptions change the game or do most users not care enough to pay?

#vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain