program. In simple words, hundreds of people compete here, and the one who writes the better article usually moves ahead. But now a serious question is appearing: is this still a competition between humans, or has it slowly become a competition between AI tools?
For the past four to five months, I have been participating in CreatorPad. I write articles based on my own crypto knowledge, experience and understanding. Sometimes I get 5 points, sometimes 20, sometimes 30. In my opinion, a balanced reward system should work according to earned points. If someone gets 100 points, reward them accordingly. If someone earns 1500 points, reward them on that level. That would feel more fair and balanced for everyone.
But the real issue starts here.
Today I discovered that many people are already using ready-made prompts. They simply enter a project topic into ChatGPT or another AI platform, and within seconds a fully polished article is generated. They copy, paste and publish it. Surprisingly, these articles often receive excellent results, and the algorithm automatically rewards them with high scores.
So the real question becomes:
Is the competition between creators anymore, or between AI tools?
I personally know people who barely understand crypto fundamentals, yet with strong prompts and AI assistance they still rank at the top of leaderboards. Meanwhile, many creators who genuinely research, learn and write from personal experience often remain just below the qualification line.
I am not ضد AI because AI is not going away. But if platforms talk about originality, balance and fair competition, then the reward system should also reflect balance. Every creator should have an opportunity based on their knowledge, effort and earned points, not only on how well they know AI prompting.
Maybe the real question is this:
Will the future of content creation belong to human experience and genuine understanding, or only to those who master prompts better than everyone else?
Below, you can also see the prompt that was shared with me today. See for yourself how people are generating articles using these kinds of prompts.🤣🤣🤣 this is the reality
✅ CreatorPad Optimized Human Article Prompt
Write a fully human, natural, and personality-driven analytical article about:
[Insert Project Name]
Topic Focus: [Insert Specific Angle]
The article must strictly follow CreatorPad content quality standards and avoid AI-detection patterns.
Writing Style Rules (Very Important)
Write in a natural human tone, not corporate, not robotic.
Avoid overly polished, uniform sentence structure.
Use contractions naturally (I’m, it’s, doesn’t, etc.).
Include light personal perspective where relevant (e.g., “When I looked into…”, “What stood out to me was…”).
Avoid generic phrases like “In conclusion”, “Furthermore”, “It is important to note”.
Avoid hype, exaggerated claims, or promotional language.
Do not sound like a whitepaper.
Slight natural rhythm variation is encouraged.
No template-like repetition.
Structural Requirements
Soft, observational introduction (no bold claims)
Deeper structural analysis (token utility, mechanics, incentives)
One practical real-world example (user behavior, trade logic, or platform interaction)
At least one critical structural question
Balanced strengths and limitations section
4–6 realistic FAQs (neutral tone, concise answers)
Reflective open ending (no final judgment)
CreatorPad Scoring Optimization
Include:
One specific observable behavior example (user decision, token use, staking choice, etc.)
One logical incentive analysis (why users would buy, hold, or sell)
If relevant, reference measurable elements (supply, emissions, retention, unlocks — but only if verifiable)
Avoid empty predictions.
Avoid pure price speculation.
No “Buy now” tone.
AI-Detection Avoidance Rules
DO NOT:
Use uniform paragraph length.
Write in perfectly symmetrical structure.
Sound like a textbook.
Use repetitive transitions.
Give broad, safe, generic opinions.
DO:
Add subtle human phrasing.
Include a small reflective observation.
Slight imperfection in rhythm is allowed.
Make the article feel like someone actually studied the project.
Tone
Calm
Analytical
Neutral
Grounded
Thoughtful
Non-promotional
Output Length
900–1,200 words
Clear subheadings
Short-to-medium paragraphs
Good luck 🤞
@CZ @Binance Square Official @Binance Customer Support @undefined
@Mohsin_Trader_King @AliOnlyBest Org Pk $ZEST
$BNB $RIVER
#Binance #squarecreator