Good point. Fair rewards should come from genuine creators, not loopholes. Looking beyond numbers and checking engagement quality, repeated activity, and coordinated behavior would help keep campaigns fair for everyone.
Casper Sheraz
·
--
This issue is real, and I think CreatorPad should also look at another pattern.
It is not only about editing old posts and adding campaign tags later. Some users also create forced engagement by replying multiple times to the same comment, leaving 3-5 repeated comments on one post, or using small/extra accounts to support the same content.
This hurts fair creators who are making original campaign posts and trying to grow through real discussion.
CreatorPad should check edit history, repeated comment patterns, suspicious account clusters, and engagement that looks coordinated instead of organic.
Campaign rewards should go to original content and genuine engagement, not loopholes.
If the team cares about fair rewards, this should be reviewed seriously. @Binance Square Official @CZ @Yi He
CreatorPad should not only count engagement numbers, but also check engagement quality, account behavior, trading/activity balance, and whether the same small accounts are repeatedly boosting the same creators.
$BEAT $SLX $LAB
Отказ от ответственности. Содержит мнения третьих сторон. Не является рекомендацией. Binance AI не предоставляет гарантий.См. Правила и условия.
162
Присоединяйтесь к пользователям криптовалют по всему миру на Binance Square
⚡️ Получайте новейшую и полезную информацию о криптоактивах.
💬 Нам доверяет крупнейшая в мире криптобиржа.
👍 Получите достоверные аналитические данные от верифицированных создателей контента.