⚠️ CreatorPad Scoring & Integrity Feedback

@Binance Square Official team, kindly review CreatorPad scoring and campaign eligibility.

A serious pattern is spreading across recent campaigns: some campaign-related posts are first published without required campaign elements.

No official @mention.
No $token tag.
No campaign #hashtag.

Because of this, those posts may get treated as normal Binance Square content and receive regular recommendation reach first. Later, missing requirements are added through editing, turning them into CreatorPad submissions after visibility and engagement are already built.

⚠️ Since our last concern post, this pattern appears to be spreading even faster. Some posts I recently noticed on the feed are missing all three requirements at once: no @mention, no $tag, and no #hashtag. That makes the issue even more serious and urgent for review.

This creates an unfair advantage over creators who publish compliant campaign posts from the start.

The root issue appears to be reach-based points carrying too much weight. When reach and engagement are rewarded heavily, creators are pushed toward timing loopholes, edited submissions, reposting, and coordinated engagement instead of original content.

Suggested fixes:

🌟 Campaign eligibility should be based on the original published version.
🌟 If campaign requirements are added later, only reach/engagement after edit time should count.
🌟 Content quality should carry the highest weight.
🌟 Reach and engagement should stay secondary and balanced.
🌟 Edit history, timestamps, reposting behavior, and abnormal engagement patterns should be reviewed before final rewards.

This is not about targeting individuals. It is about protecting CreatorPad fairness.

We have documented examples with before/after screenshots and can share the evidence privately for review.

Tagging for Visisblity:
@Binance Square Official @Franc1s @Binance Customer Support @Yi He @CZ

Other Creators:
@Kaze BNB @NewbieToNode @Crypto PM @LISAx @BELIEVE_