#newt $NEWT
I was looking at the tokenomics calculations of @NewtonProtocol today.... And I noticed one thing - many times we judge a project only in terms of the token price. But in the case of Newton Protocol ($NEWT ), the picture seems to be a little bigger. Here, the technical aspect and the token economics : both need to be seen together. To be honest, what I liked at the beginning is that its maximum supply is limited to 1 billion tokens. That is, there is no inflationary mechanism to increase the supply by issuing new tokens in the future. This kind of transparency is important to me in the long run. In fact, there is a balance in the token distribution as well. A total of 60% has been reserved for the community: Onchain Ecosystem Growth Fund, Development Fund, Foundation Treasury, Network Rewards, Liquidity and Initial Airdrop & Community Rewards combined. And the remaining 40% has been allocated to Core Contributors, Early Backers and Magic Labs. Looking at the numbers, at least it seems that the plan was not made focusing on just one party. Another thing is that the use of NEWT is linked to real work. Compute and Gas Fee Payment, Network Security through dPoS Staking, AI Model Registry and Colateral, and even Governance - the token has a specific role in all areas. So looking at it as just a trading token doesn't give the full picture. The currant situation is also worth noting. Circulating Supply is around 215M - 264M, Market Cap is around $10.3M–$10.5M and FDV is around $47.9M. All in all, I think Newton Protocol is a project that should be evaluated not just by short-term hype but by both its technical foundation and the real structure of the token economy. Hmm, that's it 🚀
$BASED $NFP
I was looking at the tokenomics calculations of @NewtonProtocol today.... And I noticed one thing - many times we judge a project only in terms of the token price. But in the case of Newton Protocol ($NEWT ), the picture seems to be a little bigger. Here, the technical aspect and the token economics : both need to be seen together. To be honest, what I liked at the beginning is that its maximum supply is limited to 1 billion tokens. That is, there is no inflationary mechanism to increase the supply by issuing new tokens in the future. This kind of transparency is important to me in the long run. In fact, there is a balance in the token distribution as well. A total of 60% has been reserved for the community: Onchain Ecosystem Growth Fund, Development Fund, Foundation Treasury, Network Rewards, Liquidity and Initial Airdrop & Community Rewards combined. And the remaining 40% has been allocated to Core Contributors, Early Backers and Magic Labs. Looking at the numbers, at least it seems that the plan was not made focusing on just one party. Another thing is that the use of NEWT is linked to real work. Compute and Gas Fee Payment, Network Security through dPoS Staking, AI Model Registry and Colateral, and even Governance - the token has a specific role in all areas. So looking at it as just a trading token doesn't give the full picture. The currant situation is also worth noting. Circulating Supply is around 215M - 264M, Market Cap is around $10.3M–$10.5M and FDV is around $47.9M. All in all, I think Newton Protocol is a project that should be evaluated not just by short-term hype but by both its technical foundation and the real structure of the token economy. Hmm, that's it 🚀
$BASED $NFP