#dao
dao
66.9M views
815,721 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
උණුසුම්
නවතම
社区讨论热度低不代表没看点？Cookie DAO（$COOKIE ）当前市值约632万美元，24小时交易量达到150万美元，报价0.00813美元。当市场目光都集中在热点项目时，这类低关注度但交易量尚可的中小市值项目，或许值得纳入观察清单。#DAO #加密项目观察
$TORN DAO UNDER ATTACK - $23M TREASURY AT RISK 🚨
Body
A suspicious governance proposal landed on Tornado Cash DAO about 8 hours ago. The contract code is unverified — extremely rare for this DAO — and the proposer’s address was funded via Railgun just four days ago. If passed, the target contract uses delegatecall to grant the attacker near-total control of the treasury.
This mirrors the 2022 exploit that handed the protocol to an attacker. TORN token holders have a narrow window to vote down this proposal before it executes. Are you monitoring your voting power right now?
Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
#TORN #SecurityAlert #GovernanceAttack #DAO
⚠️
Body
A suspicious governance proposal landed on Tornado Cash DAO about 8 hours ago. The contract code is unverified — extremely rare for this DAO — and the proposer’s address was funded via Railgun just four days ago. If passed, the target contract uses delegatecall to grant the attacker near-total control of the treasury.
This mirrors the 2022 exploit that handed the protocol to an attacker. TORN token holders have a narrow window to vote down this proposal before it executes. Are you monitoring your voting power right now?
Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
#TORN #SecurityAlert #GovernanceAttack #DAO
⚠️
A 67% move grabs attention, but what keeps my attention is the bigger trend behind it.
$DEXE sits at the intersection of governance and decentralized decision-making, two areas that continue to evolve as Web3 matures. Markets can react to momentum in the short term, but long-term value often comes from communities that actively participate in shaping ecosystems.
Today’s rally is exciting, but the real question is how decentralized governance develops from here.
#dexe #DAO #defi #Web3 #Crypto $DEXE
$DEXE sits at the intersection of governance and decentralized decision-making, two areas that continue to evolve as Web3 matures. Markets can react to momentum in the short term, but long-term value often comes from communities that actively participate in shaping ecosystems.
Today’s rally is exciting, but the real question is how decentralized governance develops from here.
#dexe #DAO #defi #Web3 #Crypto $DEXE
The future of finance isn’t being built by a single company—it’s being shaped by decentralized communities around the world.
$DEXE continues attracting attention because decentralized governance remains one of the most fascinating experiments in Web3. Giving communities a voice in decision-making creates a different kind of ecosystem, one where participation matters.
Today’s market move may grab headlines, but the bigger story is how decentralized networks continue evolving.
Crypto isn’t just changing technology.
It’s changing how people collaborate and build together.
#dexe #defi #DAO #Web3 #Crypto $DEXE $POWER
$DEXE continues attracting attention because decentralized governance remains one of the most fascinating experiments in Web3. Giving communities a voice in decision-making creates a different kind of ecosystem, one where participation matters.
Today’s market move may grab headlines, but the bigger story is how decentralized networks continue evolving.
Crypto isn’t just changing technology.
It’s changing how people collaborate and build together.
#dexe #defi #DAO #Web3 #Crypto $DEXE $POWER
අර්ධ වශයෙන් සත්යයි
⚡ Lista #DAO تضيف الدعم للأسهم المُرمزة
📈 أصبحت Lista DAO أول بروتوكول قروض على سلسلة $BNB التي تدعم #BStocks ، مما يسمح للمستخدمين بإقراض ضد الأسهم المُرمزة الأمريكية الصادرة عن بورصة #Binance .
💰 من بين الأصول التي يمكن استخدامها الآن على السلسلة على مدار الساعة أثناء استمرار توليد فرص العائد، توجد أصول مثل $NVDAB و $TSLAB و #Circle و Micron و SanDisk و #SpaceX .
📈 أصبحت Lista DAO أول بروتوكول قروض على سلسلة $BNB التي تدعم #BStocks ، مما يسمح للمستخدمين بإقراض ضد الأسهم المُرمزة الأمريكية الصادرة عن بورصة #Binance .
💰 من بين الأصول التي يمكن استخدامها الآن على السلسلة على مدار الساعة أثناء استمرار توليد فرص العائد، توجد أصول مثل $NVDAB و $TSLAB و #Circle و Micron و SanDisk و #SpaceX .
If you're still ignoring governance votes in your bags, stop now. That mistake has cost crypto holders more than a few bad trades.
A lot of traders obsess over entry prices but ignore the decisions that actually shape a project’s future. Then a vote passes, tokenomics change, funds move, or incentives shift,and suddenly everyone is scrambling to understand what just happened.
The JBC ARMY is heading into its first major DAO vote, and moments like this often reveal how decentralized a community really is. Supporters argue that letting the community steer $JBC is the whole point of Web3: transparent decisions, collective ownership, and long‑term alignment similar to what we’ve seen with governance in ecosystems like $ETH and $BNB .
But critics say early DAO votes are messy. Participation is usually low, whales can dominate outcomes, and many holders don’t even read the proposals they’re voting on. In theory it’s democracy; in practice it can look more like governance theater.
So here’s the real question: are early DAO votes actually empowering communities, or are they just giving large holders more influence over projects like $JBC?
#Crypto #DAO #Web3
A lot of traders obsess over entry prices but ignore the decisions that actually shape a project’s future. Then a vote passes, tokenomics change, funds move, or incentives shift,and suddenly everyone is scrambling to understand what just happened.
The JBC ARMY is heading into its first major DAO vote, and moments like this often reveal how decentralized a community really is. Supporters argue that letting the community steer $JBC is the whole point of Web3: transparent decisions, collective ownership, and long‑term alignment similar to what we’ve seen with governance in ecosystems like $ETH and $BNB .
But critics say early DAO votes are messy. Participation is usually low, whales can dominate outcomes, and many holders don’t even read the proposals they’re voting on. In theory it’s democracy; in practice it can look more like governance theater.
So here’s the real question: are early DAO votes actually empowering communities, or are they just giving large holders more influence over projects like $JBC?
#Crypto #DAO #Web3
Last week a small community around $JBC started gearing up for its first real DAO vote.
For a lot of crypto holders, governance sounds empowering until the moment it actually matters. That’s when people realize they either didn’t pay attention, didn’t understand the proposal, or their tokens were sitting idle while decisions got made without them.
Here’s the situation. The JBC ARMY is preparing for its first major on-chain decision, the kind that turns a token from a meme-style community into something closer to a functioning DAO. The first vote might look symbolic, but historically this is where power structures start forming. Early whales accumulate voting weight, casual holders stay silent, and governance quietly becomes concentrated.
We’ve seen this pattern play out across multiple ecosystems. Communities around tokens like $UNI and $APE also started with wide participation in theory, but in practice a small group of wallets often ends up controlling outcomes. If the $JBC community isn’t actively reviewing proposals and participating in this first vote, the precedent set now could define who actually steers the project later.
The interesting part isn’t the vote itself. It’s who shows up, who stays quiet, and who quietly gains influence in the background.
So the real question is: when governance finally goes live, will the majority of $JBC holders actually vote, or will a handful of wallets end up deciding everything?
#CryptoGovernance #DAO #Web3
For a lot of crypto holders, governance sounds empowering until the moment it actually matters. That’s when people realize they either didn’t pay attention, didn’t understand the proposal, or their tokens were sitting idle while decisions got made without them.
Here’s the situation. The JBC ARMY is preparing for its first major on-chain decision, the kind that turns a token from a meme-style community into something closer to a functioning DAO. The first vote might look symbolic, but historically this is where power structures start forming. Early whales accumulate voting weight, casual holders stay silent, and governance quietly becomes concentrated.
We’ve seen this pattern play out across multiple ecosystems. Communities around tokens like $UNI and $APE also started with wide participation in theory, but in practice a small group of wallets often ends up controlling outcomes. If the $JBC community isn’t actively reviewing proposals and participating in this first vote, the precedent set now could define who actually steers the project later.
The interesting part isn’t the vote itself. It’s who shows up, who stays quiet, and who quietly gains influence in the background.
So the real question is: when governance finally goes live, will the majority of $JBC holders actually vote, or will a handful of wallets end up deciding everything?
#CryptoGovernance #DAO #Web3
everyone thinks the tech or listings make a crypto project win… but actually most of them live or die on something way less “technical”: the community.
a lot of traders learn this the hard way. you ape into a token because of utility promises or a rumored listing, then volume dies and the chart bleeds because no real community is there to carry it. seen it happen across countless launches.
case in point: the $JBC army gearing up for its first major DAO vote. this is the moment where a project finds out if its community is real or just vibes on twitter. when people actually show up to vote, debate, and shape direction, the project gains a backbone. $BTC basically proved this years ago. no marketing department, no CEO pushing narratives, just a massive decentralized crowd that refused to let it die.
ngl, projects obsess over exchange listings and flashy roadmaps, but if holders don’t care enough to participate when governance opens, that’s usually the first red flag. strong DAO participation often tells you more about long-term survival than any announcement ever will.
so when you look at newer ecosystems like $JBC, what matters more to you: real community governance or just hype and listings?
#crypto #DAO #BTC
a lot of traders learn this the hard way. you ape into a token because of utility promises or a rumored listing, then volume dies and the chart bleeds because no real community is there to carry it. seen it happen across countless launches.
case in point: the $JBC army gearing up for its first major DAO vote. this is the moment where a project finds out if its community is real or just vibes on twitter. when people actually show up to vote, debate, and shape direction, the project gains a backbone. $BTC basically proved this years ago. no marketing department, no CEO pushing narratives, just a massive decentralized crowd that refused to let it die.
ngl, projects obsess over exchange listings and flashy roadmaps, but if holders don’t care enough to participate when governance opens, that’s usually the first red flag. strong DAO participation often tells you more about long-term survival than any announcement ever will.
so when you look at newer ecosystems like $JBC, what matters more to you: real community governance or just hype and listings?
#crypto #DAO #BTC
If you’re still investing in crypto without paying attention to governance and community decisions, stop now.
A lot of traders lose money not because the tech fails, but because they ignore the people steering the project. When decisions happen behind closed doors, retail usually finds out after the price has already moved.
Right now the JBC ARMY is gearing up for its first major DAO vote around $JBC, and moments like this tend to reveal what actually drives a project forward. Some argue the only thing that matters is utility and revenue. If the product works and users pay for it, price follows.
But crypto history complicates that view. Look at $BTC . It had no marketing department, no exchange listing strategy early on, and very limited utility at first. What it did have was a stubborn, global community that kept building, debating, and defending it until it became the benchmark for the entire market.
So here’s the real debate: does long-term success come from strong community consensus, or from pure product utility and revenue? Where do you think projects like $JBC should focus first?
#Crypto #DAO #BTC
A lot of traders lose money not because the tech fails, but because they ignore the people steering the project. When decisions happen behind closed doors, retail usually finds out after the price has already moved.
Right now the JBC ARMY is gearing up for its first major DAO vote around $JBC, and moments like this tend to reveal what actually drives a project forward. Some argue the only thing that matters is utility and revenue. If the product works and users pay for it, price follows.
But crypto history complicates that view. Look at $BTC . It had no marketing department, no exchange listing strategy early on, and very limited utility at first. What it did have was a stubborn, global community that kept building, debating, and defending it until it became the benchmark for the entire market.
So here’s the real debate: does long-term success come from strong community consensus, or from pure product utility and revenue? Where do you think projects like $JBC should focus first?
#Crypto #DAO #BTC
Why is nobody talking about what actually matters when a crypto community gets its first real governance vote?
Most traders obsess over listings and hype cycles, then wonder why they end up buying tops or holding dead projects. The reality is that a lot of tokens pump on marketing but collapse because the foundation underneath was never strong.
Right now the JBC ARMY is heading into its first major DAO vote, and it’s an interesting case study. Everyone debates the same priorities: community strength, real utility, marketing push, exchange listings, or actual revenue generation. Bitcoin’s early history already gave us one clear signal. $BTC didn’t win because of aggressive marketing or fast listings. It won because the community believed in the system long enough to build the network effect.
That’s why this moment for $JBC matters more than people think. A DAO vote forces the community to reveal what it truly values. If the focus is short-term visibility, you’ll probably get a short-term chart. If the focus is utility and sustainable growth, the market usually catches up later.
So what should come first for a project trying to survive long term: community, utility, marketing, listings, or revenue?
#Crypto #DAO #Web3
Most traders obsess over listings and hype cycles, then wonder why they end up buying tops or holding dead projects. The reality is that a lot of tokens pump on marketing but collapse because the foundation underneath was never strong.
Right now the JBC ARMY is heading into its first major DAO vote, and it’s an interesting case study. Everyone debates the same priorities: community strength, real utility, marketing push, exchange listings, or actual revenue generation. Bitcoin’s early history already gave us one clear signal. $BTC didn’t win because of aggressive marketing or fast listings. It won because the community believed in the system long enough to build the network effect.
That’s why this moment for $JBC matters more than people think. A DAO vote forces the community to reveal what it truly values. If the focus is short-term visibility, you’ll probably get a short-term chart. If the focus is utility and sustainable growth, the market usually catches up later.
So what should come first for a project trying to survive long term: community, utility, marketing, listings, or revenue?
#Crypto #DAO #Web3
everyone thinks a crypto project just needs big exchange listings to win… but actually the thing that decides if it survives is who shows up to vote.
a lot of traders learn this the hard way. you ape into a project, price looks good, marketing is loud… then governance happens and a tiny group decides the direction while most holders are asleep. suddenly tokenomics change, treasury moves, or the roadmap flips and your bag is along for the ride.
case in point: the $JBC army is heading into its first major DAO vote right now. first governance events are where you see if a “community” is real or just a telegram full of lurkers. whoever actually participates sets the precedent for how power works in that ecosystem.
we’ve seen this movie before. $BTC didn’t become the top asset because of marketing budgets. it was years of builders, miners, and users aligned around rules like the 21m supply. governance pressure from the community shaped everything. if a project can’t get holders to care enough to show up for the first vote, that’s a signal traders should probably watch.
so when you’re holding something like $JBC or even majors like $BNB , do you actually track governance… or are you just hoping the crowd handles it?
#crypto #dao #web3
a lot of traders learn this the hard way. you ape into a project, price looks good, marketing is loud… then governance happens and a tiny group decides the direction while most holders are asleep. suddenly tokenomics change, treasury moves, or the roadmap flips and your bag is along for the ride.
case in point: the $JBC army is heading into its first major DAO vote right now. first governance events are where you see if a “community” is real or just a telegram full of lurkers. whoever actually participates sets the precedent for how power works in that ecosystem.
we’ve seen this movie before. $BTC didn’t become the top asset because of marketing budgets. it was years of builders, miners, and users aligned around rules like the 21m supply. governance pressure from the community shaped everything. if a project can’t get holders to care enough to show up for the first vote, that’s a signal traders should probably watch.
so when you’re holding something like $JBC or even majors like $BNB , do you actually track governance… or are you just hoping the crowd handles it?
#crypto #dao #web3
1、背景
ENS DAO最新发起的temp check治理提案，核心是扩大ENS Foundation的职责边界。根据披露内容，基金会未来可能不再只是偏执行与法律承接角色，而是进一步覆盖运营管理、资助计划以及长期资金管理等关键事务。与此同时，提案特别强调，ENS协议的最终控制权以及董事罢免权，依然保留在ENS代币持有人手中。这意味着，当前讨论的重点不是“交权”，而是DAO是否愿意将更多日常治理和资源配置工作，交由更具持续执行能力的实体来承担。🙂
2、核心分析
从治理结构看，这一提案反映出ENS正在尝试解决DAO常见难题：社区治理透明，但决策效率和长期执行力往往不足。尤其在资助计划、预算分配和资产管理方面，如果完全依赖分散投票，容易出现节奏慢、责任分散和战略连续性不足的问题。基金会职能扩张，本质上是希望建立“社区授权+机构执行”的治理框架。
不过，市场也会关注两个平衡点。第一是权力边界。虽然提案明确代币持有人保留核心控制权，但基金会一旦负责运营、拨款和资金管理，其实际影响力必然上升，后续需要更清晰的问责、披露和监督机制。第二是资金安全与效率。长期资金管理若执行得当，有助于增强ENS生态的可持续投入能力；但如果授权过大、透明度不足，也可能引发社区对中心化倾向的担忧。
3、潜在影响
对ENS生态而言，若提案后续获得更多支持，最直接的影响可能是项目运营效率提升，资助体系更稳定，生态建设节奏更清晰。这对开发者、公共产品申请方以及长期参与者来说，通常是积极信号。对代币层面，市场往往会把这类治理调整视为“组织成熟度”的体现，但短期情绪仍取决于社区反馈是否一致，以及具体执行细则是否足够透明。
更广泛来看，这也是当前DAO发展趋势的一个缩影：纯链上自治正在向“去中心化决策+专业化执行”演进。ENS若能在效率与去中心化之间找到平衡，或为其他协议提供参考样本；若争议扩大，也会再次提醒市场，DAO治理升级从来不只是结构调整，更是信任机制的再设计。整体来看，现阶段应重点关注社区讨论热度、授权范围细节以及后续正式投票路径。📌
#ENS #DAO #crypto
ENS DAO最新发起的temp check治理提案，核心是扩大ENS Foundation的职责边界。根据披露内容，基金会未来可能不再只是偏执行与法律承接角色，而是进一步覆盖运营管理、资助计划以及长期资金管理等关键事务。与此同时，提案特别强调，ENS协议的最终控制权以及董事罢免权，依然保留在ENS代币持有人手中。这意味着，当前讨论的重点不是“交权”，而是DAO是否愿意将更多日常治理和资源配置工作，交由更具持续执行能力的实体来承担。🙂
2、核心分析
从治理结构看，这一提案反映出ENS正在尝试解决DAO常见难题：社区治理透明，但决策效率和长期执行力往往不足。尤其在资助计划、预算分配和资产管理方面，如果完全依赖分散投票，容易出现节奏慢、责任分散和战略连续性不足的问题。基金会职能扩张，本质上是希望建立“社区授权+机构执行”的治理框架。
不过，市场也会关注两个平衡点。第一是权力边界。虽然提案明确代币持有人保留核心控制权，但基金会一旦负责运营、拨款和资金管理，其实际影响力必然上升，后续需要更清晰的问责、披露和监督机制。第二是资金安全与效率。长期资金管理若执行得当，有助于增强ENS生态的可持续投入能力；但如果授权过大、透明度不足，也可能引发社区对中心化倾向的担忧。
3、潜在影响
对ENS生态而言，若提案后续获得更多支持，最直接的影响可能是项目运营效率提升，资助体系更稳定，生态建设节奏更清晰。这对开发者、公共产品申请方以及长期参与者来说，通常是积极信号。对代币层面，市场往往会把这类治理调整视为“组织成熟度”的体现，但短期情绪仍取决于社区反馈是否一致，以及具体执行细则是否足够透明。
更广泛来看，这也是当前DAO发展趋势的一个缩影：纯链上自治正在向“去中心化决策+专业化执行”演进。ENS若能在效率与去中心化之间找到平衡，或为其他协议提供参考样本；若争议扩大，也会再次提醒市场，DAO治理升级从来不只是结构调整，更是信任机制的再设计。整体来看，现阶段应重点关注社区讨论热度、授权范围细节以及后续正式投票路径。📌
#ENS #DAO #crypto
SeeDAO重启了，但这次画风不太一样。
发起人唐晗官宣：第十二届节点共识大会投票通过重启提案，所有投资人的投资款已经全部退还，积分清退也在同步推进中——没兑换的成员还能去官方链接处理。
说实话，先把钱退干净再谈重启，这个顺序在DAO圈子里挺少见。大多数项目要么硬撑要么躺平，主动归零再出发的不多。
重启后的方向也变了：要发布自己的AI Agent，探索"数字城邦"的自动化和游戏化，还在筹划第二届数字游民生活周。从纯粹的DAO治理实验，转向AI+线下社区的混合形态。
这算是给老牌中文DAO提供了一个新模板：清账、轻装、转型。至于AI Agent能不能撑起"数字城邦"的叙事，得看产品落地。
#SeeDAO #DAO #AIAgent
发起人唐晗官宣：第十二届节点共识大会投票通过重启提案，所有投资人的投资款已经全部退还，积分清退也在同步推进中——没兑换的成员还能去官方链接处理。
说实话，先把钱退干净再谈重启，这个顺序在DAO圈子里挺少见。大多数项目要么硬撑要么躺平，主动归零再出发的不多。
重启后的方向也变了：要发布自己的AI Agent，探索"数字城邦"的自动化和游戏化，还在筹划第二届数字游民生活周。从纯粹的DAO治理实验，转向AI+线下社区的混合形态。
这算是给老牌中文DAO提供了一个新模板：清账、轻装、转型。至于AI Agent能不能撑起"数字城邦"的叙事，得看产品落地。
#SeeDAO #DAO #AIAgent
SeeDAO正式重启了。
发起人唐晗公告，重启提案在第十二届节点共识大会通过，现存节点投票同意。更关键的一点：所有投资人的投资款已经全额退还，积分清退也在同步推进,未兑换的成员可去官方链接处理。
这个动作挺少见的。大多数项目走到尽头要么沉默消失,要么硬撑到归零，主动退款再重启的几乎没有。某种程度上,这是把信任账户清零后再开新局。
接下来的方向也变了——不再死磕传统DAO治理,而是要发布AI Agent,探索"数字城邦"的自动化和游戏化,还在考虑办第二届数字游民生活周。
从纯链上治理转向AI+线下社区的混合形态,这条路在熊市里反而可能更轻。能不能跑通另说,但至少姿态是干净的。
#DAO #AI叙事
发起人唐晗公告，重启提案在第十二届节点共识大会通过，现存节点投票同意。更关键的一点：所有投资人的投资款已经全额退还，积分清退也在同步推进,未兑换的成员可去官方链接处理。
这个动作挺少见的。大多数项目走到尽头要么沉默消失,要么硬撑到归零，主动退款再重启的几乎没有。某种程度上,这是把信任账户清零后再开新局。
接下来的方向也变了——不再死磕传统DAO治理,而是要发布AI Agent,探索"数字城邦"的自动化和游戏化,还在考虑办第二届数字游民生活周。
从纯链上治理转向AI+线下社区的混合形态,这条路在熊市里反而可能更轻。能不能跑通另说,但至少姿态是干净的。
#DAO #AI叙事
🏛️ **SeeDAO 正式重启，全额退还投资人款项**
去中心化自治组织 SeeDAO 刚刚完成了一次关键投票——第十二届节点共识大会通过重启提案，且在此之前已全额退还所有投资人的投资款。
在 DAO 纷纷收缩的周期里，这个动作并不常见。选择先还钱、再重启，某种程度上也是一种治理层面的「信誉积累」。
积分清退同步进行中，未兑换的成员仍可通过官方渠道操作。
接下来，SeeDAO 的计划值得关注：发布 AI Agent、探索数字城邦的自动化与游戏化，以及筹办第二届数字游民生活周。
从资助退回到探索 AI Agent + 城邦自治，这条路走得挺有 DAO 实验该有的样子。
#SeeDAO #DAO
---
📌 以上内容基于公开信息整理，不构成任何投资建议。
去中心化自治组织 SeeDAO 刚刚完成了一次关键投票——第十二届节点共识大会通过重启提案，且在此之前已全额退还所有投资人的投资款。
在 DAO 纷纷收缩的周期里，这个动作并不常见。选择先还钱、再重启，某种程度上也是一种治理层面的「信誉积累」。
积分清退同步进行中，未兑换的成员仍可通过官方渠道操作。
接下来，SeeDAO 的计划值得关注：发布 AI Agent、探索数字城邦的自动化与游戏化，以及筹办第二届数字游民生活周。
从资助退回到探索 AI Agent + 城邦自治，这条路走得挺有 DAO 实验该有的样子。
#SeeDAO #DAO
---
📌 以上内容基于公开信息整理，不构成任何投资建议。
🇲🇹 Malta Proposes New DAO Category in DeFi Rulebook
Malta's financial regulator is considering a dedicated legal framework for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) as part of its broader DeFi consultation.
Key Highlights:
📌 New DAO classification proposed
📌 Greater legal clarity for decentralized organizations
📌 Part of EU-aligned crypto regulation efforts
📌 Public consultation underway
The move could help shape how DAOs are recognized and regulated across Europe as the crypto industry matures.
Read more:
https://cointopsecret.com
#DAO #DeFi #CryptoNews #Blockchain #CryptoRegulation #BinanceSquare #cointopsecret
Malta's financial regulator is considering a dedicated legal framework for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) as part of its broader DeFi consultation.
Key Highlights:
📌 New DAO classification proposed
📌 Greater legal clarity for decentralized organizations
📌 Part of EU-aligned crypto regulation efforts
📌 Public consultation underway
The move could help shape how DAOs are recognized and regulated across Europe as the crypto industry matures.
Read more:
https://cointopsecret.com
#DAO #DeFi #CryptoNews #Blockchain #CryptoRegulation #BinanceSquare #cointopsecret
තවත් අන්තර්ගතයන් ගවේෂණය කිරීමට ඇතුල් වන්න