Zverejniť
$Jager
🧠 1. Base transaction tax (IMPORTANT)
Normal phase tax = 5% per transaction
(Early phase was 10%, but that’s not relevant now)
👉 So EVERYTHING is calculated inside that 5% tax
🔥 2. How that 5% tax is split
From official tokenomics:
16% → Burn
20% → Liquidity
14% → Dev / marketing
50% → Holder rewards
💥 3. REAL % of burn (this is what you’re asking)
Now the important part most people misunderstand:
👉 The 16% burn is NOT from total transaction
👉 It’s 16% of the 5% tax
So:
5%×16%=0.8%
✅ REAL burn per transaction = ~0.8% of every buy/sell
📊 4. Full breakdown (real impact per transaction)
From 100% transaction:
🔥 Burn → 0.8%
💰 Holder rewards → 2.5%
💧 Liquidity → 1.0%
🛠️ Dev/marketing → 0.7%
👉 Total = 5% tax
🚀 5. Total supply burn insight
Already 8%+ of total supply burned historically
👉 Meaning:
Burn is slow but constant
Not hyper-aggressive like some shitcoins
More like long-term deflation model (BNB-style)
⚠️ 6. Is this “correct” or optimal?
Here’s the honest take:
👍 Good:
0.8% burn = sustainable
2.5% rewards = keeps holders engaged
Balanced system (not just hype burn)
👎 Bad:
Burn is not aggressive enough for fast moon
Needs volume to matter
👉 No volume = burn is basically useless
👉 High volume = burn becomes powerful AF
💡 My real insight (no BS)
If you’re thinking long-term:
🔥 Burn alone WON’T send it to moon
💰 Rewards + community + hype = what matters
👉 Burn is just fuel, not the engine
🧠 If you want to improve tokenomics (alpha idea)
If Jager ever changes:
Increase burn from 16% → 25–30% of tax
Or add buyback + burn events
👉 That would hit way harder
🧠 1. Base transaction tax (IMPORTANT)
Normal phase tax = 5% per transaction
(Early phase was 10%, but that’s not relevant now)
👉 So EVERYTHING is calculated inside that 5% tax
🔥 2. How that 5% tax is split
From official tokenomics:
16% → Burn
20% → Liquidity
14% → Dev / marketing
50% → Holder rewards
💥 3. REAL % of burn (this is what you’re asking)
Now the important part most people misunderstand:
👉 The 16% burn is NOT from total transaction
👉 It’s 16% of the 5% tax
So:
5%×16%=0.8%
✅ REAL burn per transaction = ~0.8% of every buy/sell
📊 4. Full breakdown (real impact per transaction)
From 100% transaction:
🔥 Burn → 0.8%
💰 Holder rewards → 2.5%
💧 Liquidity → 1.0%
🛠️ Dev/marketing → 0.7%
👉 Total = 5% tax
🚀 5. Total supply burn insight
Already 8%+ of total supply burned historically
👉 Meaning:
Burn is slow but constant
Not hyper-aggressive like some shitcoins
More like long-term deflation model (BNB-style)
⚠️ 6. Is this “correct” or optimal?
Here’s the honest take:
👍 Good:
0.8% burn = sustainable
2.5% rewards = keeps holders engaged
Balanced system (not just hype burn)
👎 Bad:
Burn is not aggressive enough for fast moon
Needs volume to matter
👉 No volume = burn is basically useless
👉 High volume = burn becomes powerful AF
💡 My real insight (no BS)
If you’re thinking long-term:
🔥 Burn alone WON’T send it to moon
💰 Rewards + community + hype = what matters
👉 Burn is just fuel, not the engine
🧠 If you want to improve tokenomics (alpha idea)
If Jager ever changes:
Increase burn from 16% → 25–30% of tax
Or add buyback + burn events
👉 That would hit way harder
Zrieknutie sa zodpovednosti: Obsahuje názory tretích strán. Toto nepovažujte za finančné poradenstvo. Môže zahŕňať sponzorovaný obsah. Pozrite si zmluvné podmienky.