Most people are still looking at Genius Terminal through the lens of its airdrop. I think that's already old information.
What stands out to me isn't how many users showed up during the incentive phase. It's how many reasons they're being given to stay after it. Those are very different things.
Airdrops are good at attracting attention. They aren't good at proving product demand. That's why the weeks after distribution are usually more interesting than the months before it. The tourists leave. The remaining activity starts revealing what was real and what was rented.
I've noticed that markets often underestimate infrastructure that quietly reduces friction. Traders don't wake up one day and decide to become loyal. They repeat actions that save time, improve execution, or fit naturally into their workflow. Over time, habit becomes retention.
The market still thinks the key question for Genius Terminal is whether incentives can keep users engaged. What I'm watching instead is whether utility can replace incentives as the primary reason people return.
That's usually where things change. Not when participation peaks, but when participation survives without being paid to exist.
This isn't about the airdrop anymore. It's about whether behavior remains after the reward disappears.
@GeniusOfficial #genius $GENIUS $FIDA
Market looks