What caught my attention was not restaking itself, but how fast people start treating audits like they remove most of the risk. @Bedrock #Bedrock

Audits definitely matter. A good audit can catch major smart contract issues before users put real money into a protocol. That part is important.But with restaking, I don’t think security ends once the audit report is published.$GPS

The more I look at projects like Bedrock, the more it feels like the bigger risks appear over time. Users are still relying on validators performing properly, withdrawals working smoothly, integrations staying stable, and upgrades not creating unexpected problems later.That’s where things can get tricky.$OPN

A protocol can look completely fine when market conditions are calm, then suddenly face pressure when volatility spikes or too many users try to exit at once. Even small issues with bridges, wrapped assets, or liquidity can become bigger problems very quickly.I don’t see this as a Bedrock-specific problem either. It feels more like a reality of how restaking systems work in general.

So for me, audits are only one part of the picture.The bigger thing worth watching is whether protocols can stay reliable after months of upgrades, market stress, and real user activity start piling up. @Bedrock $BR #Bedrock