I keep seeing BTCFi discussions focus on where yield comes from. What caught my attention with @Bedrock is that they're starting to focus on where Bitcoin capital goes next.
Thats a different question.
The Bedrock 2.0 idea seems less about finding one yield source and more about turning uniBTC into a routing layer that can move across different opportunities as conditions change. Sounds clean. But it also creates a new challenge: the quality of the routing becomes more important than the yield itself.
If Bitcoin becomes productive through intelligent allocation rather than a single strategy, does BTCFi become easier to use or does it simply hide more complexity behind the interface??