There are blockchains, like highways to run on. They are the moving of values, they are the clearing up of transactions, they are the keep the lights on. However, the rate will not be adequate when you examine where the world is heading critically. The new era is where software cannot be narrow-minded/reactive. It is becoming agentic. It is acting, looking, learning, adapting and acting. And when that is changed so is the expectation of a blockchain.
The thing is that Vanar has been positioning itself round, a chain, which is not simply programmable, but smart by definition. It is not presented as marketing soft-hearted in reading the updates posted in recent times, and the manner in which the ecosystem discusses how the infrastructure is established as memory and reasoning. It can be defined as an effort to re-architecture the stack to correspond with the reality of AI workloads and not to force AI to the edge of the existing designs.
It is mere philosophy behind it. Human beings explode their transactions. The artificial intelligence systems are different. They run continuously. They must be in a position to hold context besides referencing the past and condense knowledge and make verifiable decisions. Such a declaration by Vanar is actually a statement that in order to have AI onchain, the chain is not supposed to be storing payments and contracts. At least it should be a part and parcel and not an alternative.
This is a visionary but is also practical. The agents of AI produce intermediate data in huge amounts. They move about in (micro) activities. They need foreseeable cost of implementation. Once all the little steps are costly, time sensitive, and fallible, it is the shortcuts that are reintroduced to the AI economy center. Vanar goes as far as focusing on infrastructure that would accommodate AI workloads without losing familiarity to the builders.
That alone is not even a minor benefit. Vanar is compatible with EVM and the implication is that, even the developers that need to be familiar with Solidity workflows will not need to go through everything again before they can go ahead to create something. In practice, adoption is more what is good in theatrics, and less of what the team can offer, timely, and sustain. Vanar can be quite frank in his description of such choice: first compatibility, and the ecosystem will develop at an increased speed.
It is the actual tale that Vanar is attempting to inject some spice into topping that fit with. The eco system is meant to be an AI infrastructure stack and cannot be thought of as a chain on its own. The manner in which it has defined its architecture and product direction is such that it creates applications that learn, evolve, and improve with time and not an application that remains the same when deployed.
A similar theme is the theme of the week to week recaps messages and ecosystem messages of the recent weeks: memory becomes primitive. That is a strong concept, because memory is that on which the intelligence of the real world rests. AI is as ignorant as a calculator without memory. The continuity is in the form of memory. This is one direction, which, as Vanar updates, the memory and reasoning layers are regarded as the fundamental building blocks in new onchain experiences.
And when you zoom out such an approach is not technical alone. And it is sentimental in a weird manner. Application next generation in fact does not give people more functions. They desire systems that would be friendly, open and intimate. The type of applications that are not intrusive and that are memory of your likes. The type that bears you, and yet makes up. A chain that must bestow aid to so is seeking more than expeditious transactions.
One can now talk about value capture, because it is only because the economics works which narratives continue to survive. The token model matters. Vanar is categorical in the documentation that the token of the network is transaction fee and executions of smart contracts, and it is also involved in the staking incentives which is related to the network security.
There it will be where the demand will be real and not speculative. It does not just generate a hype in society that the AI native usage is increasing. It triggers real onchain deal that needs to incur execution and settlement charges. The higher the value of the activity the more natural an economic loop will be: usage creates fees, fees create token utility, and token utility creates long term network incentives and validators.
This is what makes me come back to a plain thought again and again. And suppose Vanar should be able to do it, he will not do it in the most screaming way. It will be that it was instrumentalized into the ordinary, prosaic manner. It is these chains that will emerge as the winning ones, which will no longer be talked about by people as they can now use them. It is the least success that can be underestimated.
The single piece of information that I observed in the new stream of community reporting is a pressure towards quantifiable network maturity such as upgrades, assertions by performance on network stability and growth direction. Although the indicators of the posts in the public may be approached with a grain of salt, the tendency is not meaningless: Vanar is attempting to demonstrate that the infrastructure building is occurring alongside the narrative.
This puts the future holders and the community at large at risk particularly Binance users who are following the momentum with keen eyes and would like to know what would make the next level of demand in its entirety.
The previous direction of growth has been the utility based growth. As soon as Vanar has the potential to roll with products where memory, reasoning, automation of the workflow are some of the tools that can be implemented to attain the results, the token demand will be pegged to the actual results. Not to buy and desire but to eat and get. This is a slower demand, although difficult to break as well to work since this demand is linked to actual working processes and not trends.
The second stickiness is the ecosystem stickiness. The creators and consumers of the chain can make it defensible and the sensation of not abandoning the chain exists rather than being enforced. Informing your service and fluentized, by the strength of native memory arrangements and inference power, you do not make your migration informally. You are, You are and the net multiplies.
The third one is the cultural identity. It is not noisy but still it does. The survival chains will tend toward being a community of belief. According to Vanar, AI systems and smartness should not be confined to closed systems. Having held on to that, like a mission and not merely a slogan, as held by the community, creates an anchor in the long run.
To reason as a holder of the future, when I look at the applications that exist in the stack, when I look at the tooling of the developers, when I look at the measurably increasing usage of the product, which is a sign of usage and more economic loops familiar to all, I would cease to think about day to day price candles. These are the signs of a chain turning into infrastructure and not noise.
And here is where the most exciting opportunity of all comes in: imagine Vanar with people having a personal AI economy, and having an agent remember what they liked, search alternatives and resolve values in real-time within digital services. imagine games where characters accrue an unpersistent intelligence, which is associated with onchain memory. Suppose that you are negotiating trade bargains and making micro-deals on behalf of AI and you have an opportunity to understand the reason why not to passively accept it. These are not the fantasies to play. The offing business schemes are them.
This is what I envision my future when I contemplate this project when I take my free time. The inclination of Vanar is what gives a touch of the software attempting to lay rail on which the software agency is being played and where the software should be accountable. The reward will not be a token chart in case it is fruitful. It is a recent form of alive applications that are in the sense that Web3 has been promising years to do and I can remember one thing that all that, best technology does not simply scale markets, but opportunity of man. The long-term narrative of the $VANRY is not hype cycles, as long as the author of the post, @Vanarchain is working on the path of creating a smart system, which can be trusted. It is a question of becoming gas to the silent engine of the next digital era, in which the hashtag vanar is not just a line of words that people repeat, but it is the intelligence itself that is programmed.
