El-Erian's take on the Iran situation is worth sitting with for a second.

Most people are asking who won. He's saying that's the wrong question.

His framing: this isn't a rubber band that snaps back. It's a ping pong ball knocked off the table. You don't return to equilibrium — you drift into a new one.

The mechanism is simple but ugly. Energy shock spreads to transport costs, then food. Hormuz also chokes fertilizer supply, so the real food price pain hits 6-9 months out.

But the precedent is worse. Iran just showed the world that weaponizing a choke point gives you massive leverage at low cost. Now Red Sea, Taiwan Strait, Malacca — all fair game.

Geo-economics. Strangling a supply route is cheaper than missiles.

He kept using the word "scarring." Not temporary. Not cyclical. Scarring.

This one sticks with the global economy for years. Crypto might look like the cleanest hedge in hindsight.