Cryptokoko-4278
3.2k منشورات
Cryptokoko-4278
market analysis and feeder
فتح تداول
حائز على LUNC
مُتداول مُتكرر
5.2 سنوات
27 تتابع
821 المتابعون
4.3K+ إعجاب
منشورات
الحافظة الاستثمارية
الكل
اقتباسات
مقاطع فيديو
dyor :-pettern show it will pull upnor big down condition . manipulation soon started
everybody write on X thank you president Donald Trump for distroy crypto market . everyone write on X .show the community power .
$REZ even AI say is impossible to recover invest fund if you invest in Renzo shit protocol 40% gurrentee you will recover but not gurrentee 60% you will recover
i don't want to be a rich or i don't want to be millionaire . i ant back my 150k $ ,now which valuation is now 9k approx .i want back my 150k that it .
$REZ one month chart clearly show for Renzo is going to create a new atl or even added new zeros .handoff, Renzo protocol scammer founder and team .you are doing really really hard for for create a new atl or added new zeros , congratulations scammer founder and team
$REZ chart and buying and selling show clearly Renzo shit protocol can't capable to reach atleast 10% ath 50% is so far .rubbish founder and team
$REZ why Renzo shit protocol will not recover
Regulatory Limitations Cited by the Renzo Team
When contacted directly, Renzo stated they could not assist due to regulatory limitations. In DeFi, teams are extremely cautious about intervening in specific user fund movements. Doing so can be interpreted as exercising custody/control over user assets, which risks reclassifying the protocol under securities, money transmitter, or other regulations. Many protocols deliberately stay “non-custodial” to avoid this. Decentralization & Precedent Concerns
Renzo (like most serious DeFi protocols) emphasizes trustlessness. Granting the team (or even governance) easy power to seize, burn, or redirect arbitrary user funds sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the “not your keys, not your coins” principle. It could also open the door to abuse or legal liability.
The stuck ezETH was burned from the CoboSafeAccount contract.
Equivalent ezETH was minted back: ~80% (~6,330 ezETH) to the user’s wallet and ~20% split between two other addresses (widely believed to be a finder’s fee / white-hat / negotiator compensation
Regulatory Limitations Cited by the Renzo Team
When contacted directly, Renzo stated they could not assist due to regulatory limitations. In DeFi, teams are extremely cautious about intervening in specific user fund movements. Doing so can be interpreted as exercising custody/control over user assets, which risks reclassifying the protocol under securities, money transmitter, or other regulations. Many protocols deliberately stay “non-custodial” to avoid this. Decentralization & Precedent Concerns
Renzo (like most serious DeFi protocols) emphasizes trustlessness. Granting the team (or even governance) easy power to seize, burn, or redirect arbitrary user funds sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the “not your keys, not your coins” principle. It could also open the door to abuse or legal liability.
The stuck ezETH was burned from the CoboSafeAccount contract.
Equivalent ezETH was minted back: ~80% (~6,330 ezETH) to the user’s wallet and ~20% split between two other addresses (widely believed to be a finder’s fee / white-hat / negotiator compensation
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى