Binance Square
LIVE

Mastering Crypto

image
صانع مُحتوى مُعتمد
فتح تداول
مُتداول مُتكرر
3.8 سنوات
Twitter(X) @ MasteringCrypt
205 تتابع
394.7K+ المتابعون
225.3K+ إعجاب
37.6K مُشاركة
جميع المُحتوى
الحافظة الاستثمارية
PINNED
--
How does Walrus integrate with Sui blockchainWalrus integrates with the Sui blockchain by cleanly separating control from data, using Sui as the coordination and settlement layer while keeping heavy storage off-chain. This lets Walrus deliver large-scale, low-cost blob storage without congesting the base chain. Here’s how the integration works in practice. 1. Sui as the Control Plane Sui acts as Walrus’s control plane, handling everything that needs strong consistency, composability, and economic enforcement. On Sui, Move smart contracts manage: WAL payments for storage contracts Staking and delegation of WAL to storage nodes Committee selection for active storage operators Reward streaming per epoch Subsidies, commissions, and slashing logi Verification and final settlement of storage proofs Because Sui uses an object-centric model, each stored blob is represented as a programmable on-chain object. That object tracks metadata such as size, duration, commitments, and payment status, making storage composable with other on-chain systems. 2. Off-Chain Data Plane for Storage The actual data never lives on Sui. When a user stores data: The blob is erasure-coded using Red Stuff encoding It is split into small slivers (around 1 MB each) Slivers are distributed across storage nodes in the active committee Data is replicated roughly five times to tolerate failures The system can lose up to about 20 percent of nodes without data loss This keeps Sui lightweight while Walrus nodes handle storage, bandwidth, and retrieval off-chain. 3. Storage Workflow on Sui The lifecycle of a blob starts with a Sui transaction. 1. The user submits a Sui transaction that: Registers the blob commitment (Merkle root) Specifies size and storage duration Pays the full storage cost upfront in WAL 2. Sui creates a blob object that represents the storage contract. 3. Storage nodes attest that they have received and stored their assigned slivers. 4. These attestations are aggregated into a Proof of Availability certificate. 5. The certificate is submitted back to Sui, where it is verified and finalized on-chain. From that point on, Sui tracks payments and streams rewards to nodes and stakers over time. 4. Economic Coordination via Move Contracts Sui’s Move contracts enforce Walrus’s economics deterministically. WAL is locked and streamed to operators epoch by epoch Rewards scale with stake, uptime, and data served Nodes with more delegated WAL receive more data assignments Underperforming nodes face slashing, with part of the stake burned Subsidies from the community pool can top up rewards early on SUI is used only for gas, while WAL handles storage payments and security incentives. 5. Security and Committee Model Sui coordinates committee elections using delegated proof of stake. WAL holders delegate to storage operators Higher stake increases a node’s chance of selection and data load Committees rotate, reducing long-term centralization risk Randomized challenges check availability without pulling data on-chain This ties storage reliability directly to economic skin in the game. 6. Why Sui Fits Walrus Walrus benefits directly from Sui’s design choices: Parallel execution allows fast blob registration and settlement Object model makes storage programmable and composable High throughput supports large-scale data coordination Low fees keep control-plane costs minimal Walrus effectively becomes Sui’s native blob and data availability layer, optimized for AI datasets, rollups, ZK applications, NFTs, and any dApp that needs verifiable off-chain data. 7. Cross-Chain, but Sui-Native Walrus can integrate with other chains like Solana or Ethereum via bridges and tooling, but Sui remains the canonical settlement layer. All core economics, proofs, and governance resolve on Sui. Bottom Line Walrus integrates with Sui by: Using Sui for economic logic, verification, and governance Keeping large data off-chain for scalability Turning storage into programmable on-chain objects Aligning incentives through Move-enforced staking and rewards This architecture lets Walrus deliver fast, cheap, and verifiable storage while staying deeply composable within the Sui ecosystem. $WAL {spot}(WALUSDT) #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

How does Walrus integrate with Sui blockchain

Walrus integrates with the Sui blockchain by cleanly separating control from data, using Sui as the coordination and settlement layer while keeping heavy storage off-chain. This lets Walrus deliver large-scale, low-cost blob storage without congesting the base chain.
Here’s how the integration works in practice.
1. Sui as the Control Plane
Sui acts as Walrus’s control plane, handling everything that needs strong consistency, composability, and economic enforcement.
On Sui, Move smart contracts manage:
WAL payments for storage contracts
Staking and delegation of WAL to storage nodes
Committee selection for active storage operators
Reward streaming per epoch
Subsidies, commissions, and slashing logi
Verification and final settlement of storage proofs
Because Sui uses an object-centric model, each stored blob is represented as a programmable on-chain object. That object tracks metadata such as size, duration, commitments, and payment status, making storage composable with other on-chain systems.
2. Off-Chain Data Plane for Storage
The actual data never lives on Sui.
When a user stores data:
The blob is erasure-coded using Red Stuff encoding
It is split into small slivers (around 1 MB each)
Slivers are distributed across storage nodes in the active committee
Data is replicated roughly five times to tolerate failures
The system can lose up to about 20 percent of nodes without data loss
This keeps Sui lightweight while Walrus nodes handle storage, bandwidth, and retrieval off-chain.
3. Storage Workflow on Sui
The lifecycle of a blob starts with a Sui transaction.
1. The user submits a Sui transaction that:
Registers the blob commitment (Merkle root)
Specifies size and storage duration
Pays the full storage cost upfront in WAL
2. Sui creates a blob object that represents the storage contract.
3. Storage nodes attest that they have received and stored their assigned slivers.
4. These attestations are aggregated into a Proof of Availability certificate.
5. The certificate is submitted back to Sui, where it is verified and finalized on-chain.
From that point on, Sui tracks payments and streams rewards to nodes and stakers over time.
4. Economic Coordination via Move Contracts
Sui’s Move contracts enforce Walrus’s economics deterministically.
WAL is locked and streamed to operators epoch by epoch
Rewards scale with stake, uptime, and data served
Nodes with more delegated WAL receive more data assignments
Underperforming nodes face slashing, with part of the stake burned
Subsidies from the community pool can top up rewards early on
SUI is used only for gas, while WAL handles storage payments and security incentives.
5. Security and Committee Model
Sui coordinates committee elections using delegated proof of stake.
WAL holders delegate to storage operators
Higher stake increases a node’s chance of selection and data load
Committees rotate, reducing long-term centralization risk
Randomized challenges check availability without pulling data on-chain
This ties storage reliability directly to economic skin in the game.
6. Why Sui Fits Walrus
Walrus benefits directly from Sui’s design choices:
Parallel execution allows fast blob registration and settlement
Object model makes storage programmable and composable
High throughput supports large-scale data coordination
Low fees keep control-plane costs minimal
Walrus effectively becomes Sui’s native blob and data availability layer, optimized for AI datasets, rollups, ZK applications, NFTs, and any dApp that needs verifiable off-chain data.
7. Cross-Chain, but Sui-Native
Walrus can integrate with other chains like Solana or Ethereum via bridges and tooling, but Sui remains the canonical settlement layer. All core economics, proofs, and governance resolve on Sui.
Bottom Line
Walrus integrates with Sui by:
Using Sui for economic logic, verification, and governance
Keeping large data off-chain for scalability
Turning storage into programmable on-chain objects
Aligning incentives through Move-enforced staking and rewards
This architecture lets Walrus deliver fast, cheap, and verifiable storage while staying deeply composable within the Sui ecosystem.
$WAL
#Walrus @WalrusProtocol
PINNED
Milestone by Milestone: How Walrus Is Quietly Building Its NetworkMilestones often feel like fireworks in crypto loud announcements price spikes then back to the grind but sometimes the real progress happens in the quieter beats the integrations that stick around long after the hype fades. Walrus has been one of those protocols stacking achievement after achievement without always grabbing the loudest headlines turning a vision for decentralized storage into something developers actually use. From testnet proofs to mainnet live and beyond its path shows how patient network building can create lasting stickiness in a space full of flash in the pan projects. The foundation of Walrus rests on a simple but powerful idea make storing large blobs of data onchain fast cheap and reliable using Sui as the coordination layer for a global network of storage nodes. WAL the native token powers payments for storage contracts staking to secure nodes and governance over parameters like subsidies and slashing. Users prepay in WAL for fixed term storage data gets sharded replicated about fivefold for resilience and distributed via Red Stuff encoding that tolerates up to twenty percent node failures without losing access. Nodes stake WAL to join committees earn streamed rewards from those payments and face penalties for downtime creating an economy where security and revenue flow hand in hand. That technical base took shape through deliberate steps starting with a whitepaper in early twenty twenty four from a team with deep roots in Mysten Labs and Sui infrastructure. A closed testnet in late twenty twenty four stress tested sharding and retrieval proving the system could handle real workloads without crumbling under failures. Public testnet followed honing the operator incentives and availability proofs that make data tamper proof and verifiable onchain. By March twenty twenty five Walrus hit mainnet on March twenty seven live with real WAL tokens after a one hundred forty million dollar raise five billion total supply and ten percent user drop to bootstrap engagement. Tokenomics allocated over sixty percent to community with subsidies kickstarting node rewards until storage fees took over. Post mainnet the network leaned into integrations that quietly expanded its footprint. March saw Atoma store DeepSeek R1 models on Walrus proving AI data could live decentralized without centralized crutches. Soundness Layer plugged in for fast ZK proofs and Swarm Network used it for agent logs and claims adding memory to AI agents. By July GitHub publishing for Walrus Sites made deployment dead simple Swarm deepened ties and the Ambassador Program pulled in builders. August brought Walrus Explorer with Space and Time for real time dashboards on blobs and operators plus an eighty thousand wallet staker airdrop. September marked Seal mainnet for onchain access control the first programmable privacy layer and Yotta Labs naming Walrus its default data backend. Each step built compounding momentum without overpromising moonshots. The mainnet launch was not just a flip the switch event it unlocked a full storage economy with proof of stake alignment where node operators compete on uptime and stake to land more data. Airdrops rewarded committed stakers drawing in operators and delegators who now underpin thousands of blobs. Tools like Explorer gave transparency letting anyone verify performance and debug issues which fostered trust among devs wary of black box storage. Privacy via Seal opened doors to sensitive data use cases while AI integrations positioned Walrus as the backend for agentic workflows needing verifiable history. These moves mirror a maturing DePIN trend where protocols like Walrus Filecoin or Arweave shift from raw capacity races to programmable integrated layers that devs rely on daily. Blob storage demand is exploding with rollups ZK apps and AI needing cheap onchain data Walrus slots in as Sui’s answer with cross chain bridges extending reach. Community allocations and airdrops reflect the playbook of sustainable growth reward early believers subsidize bootstrapping then let usage drive token value. As Sui scales Walrus benefits from parallel execution for faster settlements fitting the push toward hyperscale infrastructure. Watching Walrus unfold has been a reminder that network effects build incrementally not overnight. Early testnets felt abstract but seeing Atoma or Yotta plug in real workloads made the utility tangible storage that is not just cheap but programmable and private. The airdrops and ambassador push struck a good balance energizing holders without diluting into chaos. Still operator concentration and subsidy dependency linger as watchpoints but the steady integrations suggest a team playing the long game. For a Web3 watcher it is refreshing to track a project where milestones feel earned not engineered for pumps. Of course quiet does not mean flawless. Mainnet brought real scrutiny node churn risks retrieval latency under load and the need for more cross chain liquidity. Airdrops sparked short term volatility and while total value stored grows it is still early compared to incumbents. Governance will test whether community allocations translate to smart parameter tweaks or infighting. The sentiment stays balanced impressive traction but execution over the next year will decide if Walrus becomes infrastructure or another also ran. Walrus’s milestone march hints at a storage layer that could underpin the next wave of onchain apps from AI agents with persistent memory to ZK rollups dumping blobs without gas wars. Future steps like encrypted upgrades and broader chain support could make it the go to for data that needs to be fast secure and ownable. If the team keeps stacking integrations while hardening economics Walrus might redefine how Web3 handles the data deluge not with fanfare but with reliability that outlasts the noise. In a milestone driven world that quiet consistency could be the biggest achievement of all. $WAL {spot}(WALUSDT) #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

Milestone by Milestone: How Walrus Is Quietly Building Its Network

Milestones often feel like fireworks in crypto loud announcements price spikes then back to the grind but sometimes the real progress happens in the quieter beats the integrations that stick around long after the hype fades.

Walrus has been one of those protocols stacking achievement after achievement without always grabbing the loudest headlines turning a vision for decentralized storage into something developers actually use.

From testnet proofs to mainnet live and beyond its path shows how patient network building can create lasting stickiness in a space full of flash in the pan projects.

The foundation of Walrus rests on a simple but powerful idea make storing large blobs of data onchain fast cheap and reliable using Sui as the coordination layer for a global network of storage nodes.

WAL the native token powers payments for storage contracts staking to secure nodes and governance over parameters like subsidies and slashing.

Users prepay in WAL for fixed term storage data gets sharded replicated about fivefold for resilience and distributed via Red Stuff encoding that tolerates up to twenty percent node failures without losing access.

Nodes stake WAL to join committees earn streamed rewards from those payments and face penalties for downtime creating an economy where security and revenue flow hand in hand.

That technical base took shape through deliberate steps starting with a whitepaper in early twenty twenty four from a team with deep roots in Mysten Labs and Sui infrastructure.

A closed testnet in late twenty twenty four stress tested sharding and retrieval proving the system could handle real workloads without crumbling under failures.

Public testnet followed honing the operator incentives and availability proofs that make data tamper proof and verifiable onchain.

By March twenty twenty five Walrus hit mainnet on March twenty seven live with real WAL tokens after a one hundred forty million dollar raise five billion total supply and ten percent user drop to bootstrap engagement.

Tokenomics allocated over sixty percent to community with subsidies kickstarting node rewards until storage fees took over.

Post mainnet the network leaned into integrations that quietly expanded its footprint.

March saw Atoma store DeepSeek R1 models on Walrus proving AI data could live decentralized without centralized crutches.

Soundness Layer plugged in for fast ZK proofs and Swarm Network used it for agent logs and claims adding memory to AI agents.

By July GitHub publishing for Walrus Sites made deployment dead simple Swarm deepened ties and the Ambassador Program pulled in builders.

August brought Walrus Explorer with Space and Time for real time dashboards on blobs and operators plus an eighty thousand wallet staker airdrop.

September marked Seal mainnet for onchain access control the first programmable privacy layer and Yotta Labs naming Walrus its default data backend.

Each step built compounding momentum without overpromising moonshots.

The mainnet launch was not just a flip the switch event it unlocked a full storage economy with proof of stake alignment where node operators compete on uptime and stake to land more data.

Airdrops rewarded committed stakers drawing in operators and delegators who now underpin thousands of blobs.

Tools like Explorer gave transparency letting anyone verify performance and debug issues which fostered trust among devs wary of black box storage.

Privacy via Seal opened doors to sensitive data use cases while AI integrations positioned Walrus as the backend for agentic workflows needing verifiable history.

These moves mirror a maturing DePIN trend where protocols like Walrus Filecoin or Arweave shift from raw capacity races to programmable integrated layers that devs rely on daily.

Blob storage demand is exploding with rollups ZK apps and AI needing cheap onchain data Walrus slots in as Sui’s answer with cross chain bridges extending reach.

Community allocations and airdrops reflect the playbook of sustainable growth reward early believers subsidize bootstrapping then let usage drive token value.

As Sui scales Walrus benefits from parallel execution for faster settlements fitting the push toward hyperscale infrastructure.

Watching Walrus unfold has been a reminder that network effects build incrementally not overnight.

Early testnets felt abstract but seeing Atoma or Yotta plug in real workloads made the utility tangible storage that is not just cheap but programmable and private.

The airdrops and ambassador push struck a good balance energizing holders without diluting into chaos.

Still operator concentration and subsidy dependency linger as watchpoints but the steady integrations suggest a team playing the long game.

For a Web3 watcher it is refreshing to track a project where milestones feel earned not engineered for pumps.

Of course quiet does not mean flawless.

Mainnet brought real scrutiny node churn risks retrieval latency under load and the need for more cross chain liquidity.

Airdrops sparked short term volatility and while total value stored grows it is still early compared to incumbents.

Governance will test whether community allocations translate to smart parameter tweaks or infighting.

The sentiment stays balanced impressive traction but execution over the next year will decide if Walrus becomes infrastructure or another also ran.

Walrus’s milestone march hints at a storage layer that could underpin the next wave of onchain apps from AI agents with persistent memory to ZK rollups dumping blobs without gas wars.

Future steps like encrypted upgrades and broader chain support could make it the go to for data that needs to be fast secure and ownable.

If the team keeps stacking integrations while hardening economics Walrus might redefine how Web3 handles the data deluge not with fanfare but with reliability that outlasts the noise.

In a milestone driven world that quiet consistency could be the biggest achievement of all.
$WAL
#Walrus @WalrusProtocol
🚨Attention guys $CLO is pulling back hard and this is where smart money looks for the bounce ⚡🐂 I’m going long on $CLO /USDT 👇 CLO/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.710 – 0.725 Stop-Loss: 0.680 Take Profit: TP1: 0.760 TP2: 0.785 TP3: 0.818 Why: RSI is deeply oversold, selling pressure is exhausting after the impulse move, and price is approaching a strong demand zone while holding above the higher-timeframe MA99. This is where smart money accumulates during fear, not on green candles. Holding above 0.72 keeps the rebound structure intact. {future}(CLOUSDT) #CLO #USTradeDeficitShrink
🚨Attention guys $CLO is pulling back hard and this is where smart money looks for the bounce ⚡🐂

I’m going long on $CLO /USDT 👇

CLO/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.710 – 0.725
Stop-Loss: 0.680

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.760
TP2: 0.785
TP3: 0.818

Why:
RSI is deeply oversold, selling pressure is exhausting after the impulse move, and price is approaching a strong demand zone while holding above the higher-timeframe MA99. This is where smart money accumulates during fear, not on green candles. Holding above 0.72 keeps the rebound structure intact.

#CLO #USTradeDeficitShrink
Why the Dusk Foundation Matters in the Evolution of Blockchain Financial InfrastructureIf you have wondered what it would take for blockchain to truly reshape finance not just as a buzzword for crypto traders but as the backbone of everyday money movement. Picture this a world where your cross border payment does not vanish into a bank's black box for days racking up fees but zips across the globe in seconds transparently and securely. That's the promise that's kept me up at night and lately I've been digging into projects that might actually deliver it. Enter the Dusk Foundation a player that's quietly building the kind of infrastructure that could make this vision real. At its heart Dusk isn't chasing the hype of meme coins or flashy NFTs. It's laser focused on confidential smart contracts the kind that let blockchains handle sensitive financial data without exposing it to the world. Think of it like this traditional blockchains like Ethereum are public ledgers great for transparency but a nightmare for privacy when you're dealing with trade secrets personal finances or regulatory compliance. Dusk flips that script with zero knowledge proofs ZKPs a cryptographic wizardry that proves a transaction is valid without revealing the details. Their native blockchain powered by the DUSK token supports programmable privacy assets and confidential assets meaning you can execute complex DeFi operations like tokenized securities or private lending while keeping the numbers hidden from prying eyes. What makes this tech stand out is how it blends speed with security. Dusk's network uses a unique consensus mechanism called Braiding which parallelizes transaction processing to hit thousands of transactions per second without sacrificing decentralization. No more waiting around for blocks to finalize like on slower chains. Developers get a familiar Ethereum Virtual Machine compatible environment but with built in confidentiality layers via tools like their Zero Knowledge Virtual Machine zkVM. It's not magic it's math zero knowledge proofs rely on protocols like zk SNARKs to generate proofs that are tiny and verifiable in milliseconds. I've tinkered with similar setups in side projects and the elegance hits you when you see a contract execute privately yet auditably. This isn't happening in a vacuum. The blockchain financial world is evolving fast driven by regulations like MiCA in Europe and SEC actions in the United States which demand privacy without opacity. Trends like real world asset tokenization turning real estate or bonds into onchain assets are exploding and projected to hit trillions by 2030 according to firms like Boston Consulting Group. But public chains expose too much and institutions will not touch them. Enter privacy focused layers projects like Aztec or Penumbra are in the mix but Dusk carves a niche in regulated finance with its compliance first design. It aligns with broader shifts toward modular blockchains where privacy becomes a core layer rather than an afterthought. From my vantage point having followed blockchain since the 2017 ICO craze Dusk feels like a breath of fresh air in a space cluttered with vaporware. I've seen foundations chase venture capital with empty promises but Dusk's team rooted in Dutch fintech expertise prioritizes real utility. They're not just building a chain they're fostering an ecosystem with tools for stablecoins derivatives and even central bank digital currency pilots. It's refreshing because it respects the human element finance is about trust and Dusk rebuilds it without forcing blind faith in opaque systems. Sure challenges remain like scaling zero knowledge proofs for mass adoption or navigating global regulation but their open source ethos and partnerships show long term intent. Looking ahead the Dusk Foundation could be pivotal as blockchain matures into real financial infrastructure. Imagine banks using Dusk for private settlements or DeFi protocols settling real world assets confidentially slashing costs dramatically while avoiding the exploits common on public exchanges. With quantum threats looming their post quantum cryptography work positions them ahead of the curve. Adoption will take time but if Dusk keeps shipping it may finally bridge the gap between crypto's frontier and traditional finance. In a world demanding secure efficient money infrastructure projects like this are not optional they are essential. $DUSK {spot}(DUSKUSDT) #Dusk @Dusk_Foundation

Why the Dusk Foundation Matters in the Evolution of Blockchain Financial Infrastructure

If you have wondered what it would take for blockchain to truly reshape finance not just as a buzzword for crypto traders but as the backbone of everyday money movement.
Picture this a world where your cross border payment does not vanish into a bank's black box for days racking up fees but zips across the globe in seconds transparently and securely.
That's the promise that's kept me up at night and lately I've been digging into projects that might actually deliver it.
Enter the Dusk Foundation a player that's quietly building the kind of infrastructure that could make this vision real.

At its heart Dusk isn't chasing the hype of meme coins or flashy NFTs.
It's laser focused on confidential smart contracts the kind that let blockchains handle sensitive financial data without exposing it to the world.
Think of it like this traditional blockchains like Ethereum are public ledgers great for transparency but a nightmare for privacy when you're dealing with trade secrets personal finances or regulatory compliance.
Dusk flips that script with zero knowledge proofs ZKPs a cryptographic wizardry that proves a transaction is valid without revealing the details.
Their native blockchain powered by the DUSK token supports programmable privacy assets and confidential assets meaning you can execute complex DeFi operations like tokenized securities or private lending while keeping the numbers hidden from prying eyes.
What makes this tech stand out is how it blends speed with security.
Dusk's network uses a unique consensus mechanism called Braiding which parallelizes transaction processing to hit thousands of transactions per second without sacrificing decentralization.
No more waiting around for blocks to finalize like on slower chains.
Developers get a familiar Ethereum Virtual Machine compatible environment but with built in confidentiality layers via tools like their Zero Knowledge Virtual Machine zkVM.
It's not magic it's math zero knowledge proofs rely on protocols like zk SNARKs to generate proofs that are tiny and verifiable in milliseconds.
I've tinkered with similar setups in side projects and the elegance hits you when you see a contract execute privately yet auditably.
This isn't happening in a vacuum.
The blockchain financial world is evolving fast driven by regulations like MiCA in Europe and SEC actions in the United States which demand privacy without opacity.
Trends like real world asset tokenization turning real estate or bonds into onchain assets are exploding and projected to hit trillions by 2030 according to firms like Boston Consulting Group.
But public chains expose too much and institutions will not touch them.
Enter privacy focused layers projects like Aztec or Penumbra are in the mix but Dusk carves a niche in regulated finance with its compliance first design.
It aligns with broader shifts toward modular blockchains where privacy becomes a core layer rather than an afterthought.

From my vantage point having followed blockchain since the 2017 ICO craze Dusk feels like a breath of fresh air in a space cluttered with vaporware.
I've seen foundations chase venture capital with empty promises but Dusk's team rooted in Dutch fintech expertise prioritizes real utility.
They're not just building a chain they're fostering an ecosystem with tools for stablecoins derivatives and even central bank digital currency pilots.
It's refreshing because it respects the human element finance is about trust and Dusk rebuilds it without forcing blind faith in opaque systems.
Sure challenges remain like scaling zero knowledge proofs for mass adoption or navigating global regulation but their open source ethos and partnerships show long term intent.
Looking ahead the Dusk Foundation could be pivotal as blockchain matures into real financial infrastructure.
Imagine banks using Dusk for private settlements or DeFi protocols settling real world assets confidentially slashing costs dramatically while avoiding the exploits common on public exchanges.
With quantum threats looming their post quantum cryptography work positions them ahead of the curve.
Adoption will take time but if Dusk keeps shipping it may finally bridge the gap between crypto's frontier and traditional finance.
In a world demanding secure efficient money infrastructure projects like this are not optional they are essential.
$DUSK
#Dusk @Dusk_Foundation
🎙️ Unlock $50 USDT Daily on Binance 🫂
background
avatar
liveبث مباشر
1.4k يستمعون
image
BTTC
الأرصدة
-0.22
3
0
$MYX JUST SPIKED — NOW IT’S TIME TO BE CAREFUL 🧐 🔴 I’m looking short on $MYX /USDT here 👇 MYX/USDT Short Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 5.35 – 5.50 Stop-Loss: 5.95 Take Profit: TP1: 5.15 TP2: 4.95 TP3: 4.70 Why: MYX just made a sharp impulse move into 5.87 and got instantly rejected, which is classic blow-off behavior. Price is now slipping back below MA7, volume is fading after the spike, and RSI has rolled over from the highs, signaling momentum loss. MACD is also starting to flatten, hinting at a short-term trend shift. As long as price stays below 5.6, this looks like a pullback / mean-reversion move toward the 5.0–4.7 demand zone rather than continuation. {future}(MYXUSDT) #MYX #USNonFarmPayrollReport
$MYX JUST SPIKED — NOW IT’S TIME TO BE CAREFUL 🧐 🔴

I’m looking short on $MYX /USDT here 👇

MYX/USDT Short Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 5.35 – 5.50
Stop-Loss: 5.95

Take Profit:
TP1: 5.15
TP2: 4.95
TP3: 4.70

Why:
MYX just made a sharp impulse move into 5.87 and got instantly rejected, which is classic blow-off behavior. Price is now slipping back below MA7, volume is fading after the spike, and RSI has rolled over from the highs, signaling momentum loss. MACD is also starting to flatten, hinting at a short-term trend shift. As long as price stays below 5.6, this looks like a pullback / mean-reversion move toward the 5.0–4.7 demand zone rather than continuation.

#MYX #USNonFarmPayrollReport
$JASMY POPPED OUT NOW THE TRAP IS SET 🎯📉 I’m going short on $JASMY /USDT here 👇 JASMY/USDT Short Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.00930 – 0.00945 Stop-Loss: 0.00985 Take Profit: TP1: 0.00905 TP2: 0.00885 TP3: 0.00860 Why: Price just rejected from the 0.00949 high after a sharp push and is starting to roll over. RSI has turned down from the highs, showing momentum loss, while MACD is flattening and threatening a bearish turn. Volume is cooling after the spike, suggesting buyers are getting exhausted. As long as JASMY stays below 0.0095, this looks like a sell-the-rip move back toward the 0.0090 and lower demand zone. {future}(JASMYUSDT) #jasmy #AltcoinSeasonComing?
$JASMY POPPED OUT NOW THE TRAP IS SET 🎯📉

I’m going short on $JASMY /USDT here 👇

JASMY/USDT Short Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.00930 – 0.00945
Stop-Loss: 0.00985

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.00905
TP2: 0.00885
TP3: 0.00860

Why:
Price just rejected from the 0.00949 high after a sharp push and is starting to roll over. RSI has turned down from the highs, showing momentum loss, while MACD is flattening and threatening a bearish turn. Volume is cooling after the spike, suggesting buyers are getting exhausted. As long as JASMY stays below 0.0095, this looks like a sell-the-rip move back toward the 0.0090 and lower demand zone.

#jasmy #AltcoinSeasonComing?
Listen Guys $HYPER looks ready for a relief bounce but sellers may be running out ⚡🐂 I’m going long on $HYPER /USDT 👇 HYPER/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.1445 – 0.1460 Stop-Loss: 0.1410 Take Profit: TP1: 0.1525 TP2: 0.1580 TP3: 0.1650 Why: RSI is deeply oversold and starting to curl up, price is holding above the higher-timeframe MA99, and selling momentum is slowing after the pullback. This is where smart money looks for rebound entries, not panic sells. Holding above 0.145 keeps the bounce scenario valid. {future}(HYPERUSDT) #HYPER #Token2049Singapore
Listen Guys $HYPER looks ready for a relief bounce but sellers may be running out ⚡🐂

I’m going long on $HYPER /USDT 👇

HYPER/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.1445 – 0.1460
Stop-Loss: 0.1410

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.1525
TP2: 0.1580
TP3: 0.1650

Why:
RSI is deeply oversold and starting to curl up, price is holding above the higher-timeframe MA99, and selling momentum is slowing after the pullback. This is where smart money looks for rebound entries, not panic sells. Holding above 0.145 keeps the bounce scenario valid.

#HYPER #Token2049Singapore
$ZEREBRO JUST LOST MOMENTUM — THIS RALLY IS CRACKING ⚠️📉 I’m going short on $ZEREBRO /USDT here 👇 ZEREBRO/USDT Short Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.03258 – 0.0322 Stop-Loss: 0.0338 Take Profit: TP1: 0.0308 TP2: 0.0296 TP3: 0.0284 Why: Price got rejected near 0.0334 resistance and is now slipping below MA7 & MA25, showing momentum loss after the push. RSI has rolled over sharply, and MACD is turning bearish, signaling a short-term trend shift. Volume is fading on bounces, which favors sell-the-rip continuation toward lower support zones. As long as price stays below 0.0338, downside pressure remains in control. {future}(ZEREBROUSDT) #USNonFarmPayrollReport #USTradeDeficitShrink
$ZEREBRO JUST LOST MOMENTUM — THIS RALLY IS CRACKING ⚠️📉

I’m going short on $ZEREBRO /USDT here 👇

ZEREBRO/USDT Short Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.03258 – 0.0322
Stop-Loss: 0.0338

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.0308
TP2: 0.0296
TP3: 0.0284

Why:
Price got rejected near 0.0334 resistance and is now slipping below MA7 & MA25, showing momentum loss after the push. RSI has rolled over sharply, and MACD is turning bearish, signaling a short-term trend shift. Volume is fading on bounces, which favors sell-the-rip continuation toward lower support zones. As long as price stays below 0.0338, downside pressure remains in control.

#USNonFarmPayrollReport #USTradeDeficitShrink
$CLO just hit distribution — momentum is fading fast 🐻 I’m going short on $CLO /USDT 👇 CLO/USDT Short Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.7435 – 0.770 Stop-Loss: 0.820 Take Profit: TP1: 0.750 TP2: 0.720 TP3: 0.690 Why: Strong rejection from the 0.81–0.82 resistance, lower high formed, price slipping below MA7 & MA25, RSI losing the 50 level, and MACD rolling over. This is where smart money distributes, not where new longs chase. Holding below 0.79 keeps the bearish structure intact. {future}(CLOUSDT)
$CLO just hit distribution — momentum is fading fast 🐻

I’m going short on $CLO /USDT 👇

CLO/USDT Short Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.7435 – 0.770
Stop-Loss: 0.820

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.750
TP2: 0.720
TP3: 0.690

Why:
Strong rejection from the 0.81–0.82 resistance, lower high formed, price slipping below MA7 & MA25, RSI losing the 50 level, and MACD rolling over. This is where smart money distributes, not where new longs chase. Holding below 0.79 keeps the bearish structure intact.
$BIFI JUST RECLAIMED KEY LEVELS — THIS IS WHERE MOST CHASE TOO LATE ⚡ I’m going spot on $BIFI /USDT 👇 BIFI/USDT Spot Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 205 – 210 Stop-Loss: 194 Take Profit Targets: TP1: 220 TP2: 233 TP3: 250+ (momentum extension) Why this setup works: Strong bounce from the $190–195 demand zone Price reclaimed MA25 & MA99, signaling trend shift RSI pushing above 70 → momentum is expanding, not exhausted MACD bullish flip with increasing histogram Volume expansion on the reclaim candle This is where smart money steps in — on confirmation, not at ATH. As long as BIFI holds above $200, dips are buyable and upside continuation remains the higher probability move. Trade smart. Manage risk. Let the market do the rest. 🚀 {spot}(BIFIUSDT) #BIFI #USTradeDeficitShrink
$BIFI JUST RECLAIMED KEY LEVELS — THIS IS WHERE MOST CHASE TOO LATE ⚡

I’m going spot on $BIFI /USDT 👇

BIFI/USDT Spot Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 205 – 210
Stop-Loss: 194

Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 220
TP2: 233
TP3: 250+ (momentum extension)

Why this setup works:

Strong bounce from the $190–195 demand zone

Price reclaimed MA25 & MA99, signaling trend shift

RSI pushing above 70 → momentum is expanding, not exhausted

MACD bullish flip with increasing histogram

Volume expansion on the reclaim candle

This is where smart money steps in — on confirmation, not at ATH.
As long as BIFI holds above $200, dips are buyable and upside continuation remains the higher probability move.

Trade smart. Manage risk. Let the market do the rest. 🚀

#BIFI #USTradeDeficitShrink
$EDEN just flipped bullish — quiet strength before expansion 🙉 I’m going long on $EDEN /USDT 👇 EDEN/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.0730 – 0.0745 Stop-Loss: 0.0710 Take Profit: TP1: 0.0758 TP2: 0.0775 TP3: 0.0800 Why: Clean higher lows, price holding above MA7 & MA25, RSI in momentum zone, and MACD turning positive. This is where smart money positions early, not on the breakout candle. Holding above 0.0735 keeps the bullish structure intact. {future}(EDENUSDT) #EDEN #USTradeDeficitShrink
$EDEN just flipped bullish — quiet strength before expansion 🙉

I’m going long on $EDEN /USDT 👇

EDEN/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.0730 – 0.0745
Stop-Loss: 0.0710

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.0758
TP2: 0.0775
TP3: 0.0800

Why:
Clean higher lows, price holding above MA7 & MA25, RSI in momentum zone, and MACD turning positive. This is where smart money positions early, not on the breakout candle. Holding above 0.0735 keeps the bullish structure intact.


#EDEN #USTradeDeficitShrink
How Walrus submits Proof of Availability to SuiWalrus submits its Proof of Availability PoA to Sui as a specialized onchain transaction via Move smart contracts, creating an immutable record that confirms data custody across the network. This process anchors the blob's availability in Sui's ledger, triggering storage obligations and enabling composable interactions. Upload Initiation. Users start by submitting an initial Sui transaction through a Publisher client, registering the blob's metadata like its unique commitment a hash of the encoded data, size, and storage duration while paying fees in SUI or WAL upfront to a Storage Fund contract. The data gets encoded into slivers offchain, with commitments ensuring integrity, and distributed to a quorum of storage nodes typically two f plus one for fault tolerance in Byzantine settings. Nodes verify their assigned primary and secondary slivers against the commitments, recompute hashes to confirm validity, and sign cryptographic acknowledgments if correct. The client collects these signatures needing at least two f plus one to guarantee honest nodes hold reconstructible shares, forming the raw write certificate. PoA Transaction Submission. The client bundles this write certificate into a PoA transaction and broadcasts it to Walrus's designated Move modules on Sui. Sui's parallel execution processes it swiftly. The contract validates signatures, quorum threshold, and fee sufficiency, then mints or updates an onchain Blob object marking the PoA as the official point of availability. This object includes the blob ID, PoA details, deletion parameters for refunds, and links to proofs, all as first class Sui assets. Economic settlement happens atomically. Funds are allocated to staked WAL delegators and nodes for the paid epochs, with slashing risks applied for failures. Verification and Finality. Once onchain, the PoA serves as Sui's canonical truth. Anyone can query the blob object for proofs, triggering reads via aggregators that reconstruct data from nodes. If challenged later, nodes prove ongoing custody, but the initial PoA upfront minimizes costs compared to constant proofs used by systems like Filecoin. Sui's object model makes this programmable. dApps can reference the PoA directly in logic, such as gating NFT reveals until availability is confirmed. This tight integration keeps latency low with sub second finality and costs at pennies, avoiding the inefficiencies of sequential chains. $WAL {spot}(WALUSDT) @WalrusProtocol #Walrus

How Walrus submits Proof of Availability to Sui

Walrus submits its Proof of Availability PoA to Sui as a specialized onchain transaction via Move smart contracts, creating an immutable record that confirms data custody across the network.
This process anchors the blob's availability in Sui's ledger, triggering storage obligations and enabling composable interactions.
Upload Initiation.
Users start by submitting an initial Sui transaction through a Publisher client, registering the blob's metadata like its unique commitment a hash of the encoded data, size, and storage duration while paying fees in SUI or WAL upfront to a Storage Fund contract.
The data gets encoded into slivers offchain, with commitments ensuring integrity, and distributed to a quorum of storage nodes typically two f plus one for fault tolerance in Byzantine settings.
Nodes verify their assigned primary and secondary slivers against the commitments, recompute hashes to confirm validity, and sign cryptographic acknowledgments if correct.
The client collects these signatures needing at least two f plus one to guarantee honest nodes hold reconstructible shares, forming the raw write certificate.
PoA Transaction Submission.
The client bundles this write certificate into a PoA transaction and broadcasts it to Walrus's designated Move modules on Sui.
Sui's parallel execution processes it swiftly.
The contract validates signatures, quorum threshold, and fee sufficiency, then mints or updates an onchain Blob object marking the PoA as the official point of availability.
This object includes the blob ID, PoA details, deletion parameters for refunds, and links to proofs, all as first class Sui assets.
Economic settlement happens atomically.
Funds are allocated to staked WAL delegators and nodes for the paid epochs, with slashing risks applied for failures.
Verification and Finality.
Once onchain, the PoA serves as Sui's canonical truth.
Anyone can query the blob object for proofs, triggering reads via aggregators that reconstruct data from nodes.
If challenged later, nodes prove ongoing custody, but the initial PoA upfront minimizes costs compared to constant proofs used by systems like Filecoin.
Sui's object model makes this programmable.
dApps can reference the PoA directly in logic, such as gating NFT reveals until availability is confirmed.
This tight integration keeps latency low with sub second finality and costs at pennies, avoiding the inefficiencies of sequential chains.
$WAL
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus
$BROCCOLI714 just ignited — smart money is stepping in 🥦🔥 I’m going long on $BROCCOLI714 /USDT 👇 BROCCOLI1714/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.0288 – 0.0292 Stop-Loss: 0.0276 Take Profit: TP1: 0.0302 TP2: 0.0315 TP3: 0.0330 Why: Explosive breakout with a volume spike, price holding above MA7 & MA25, and momentum flipping bullish. RSI cooled slightly after the impulse — this is where smart money looks to add on pullbacks, not chase tops. Holding above 0.0285 keeps the continuation play alive. {future}(BROCCOLI714USDT) #Broccoli #USNonFarmPayrollReport
$BROCCOLI714 just ignited — smart money is stepping in 🥦🔥

I’m going long on $BROCCOLI714 /USDT 👇

BROCCOLI1714/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.0288 – 0.0292
Stop-Loss: 0.0276

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.0302
TP2: 0.0315
TP3: 0.0330

Why:
Explosive breakout with a volume spike, price holding above MA7 & MA25, and momentum flipping bullish. RSI cooled slightly after the impulse — this is where smart money looks to add on pullbacks, not chase tops. Holding above 0.0285 keeps the continuation play alive.


#Broccoli #USNonFarmPayrollReport
$XMR is cooling off after the push — smart money is watching this zone 👀⚡ I’m going long on $XMR /USDT 👇 XMR/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 476 – 482 Stop-Loss: 465 Take Profit: TP1: 490 TP2: 498 TP3: 510 Why: Healthy pullback after the run to 489.9, price still holding above MA25 & MA99, structure remains bullish. RSI reset near neutral and momentum hasn’t broken down. This is where smart money looks for continuation entries, not the top. Holding above 478 keeps the upside play valid. {future}(XMRUSDT) #XMR #USTradeDeficitShrink
$XMR is cooling off after the push — smart money is watching this zone 👀⚡

I’m going long on $XMR /USDT 👇

XMR/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 476 – 482
Stop-Loss: 465

Take Profit:
TP1: 490
TP2: 498
TP3: 510

Why:
Healthy pullback after the run to 489.9, price still holding above MA25 & MA99, structure remains bullish. RSI reset near neutral and momentum hasn’t broken down. This is where smart money looks for continuation entries, not the top. Holding above 478 keeps the upside play valid.

#XMR #USTradeDeficitShrink
Walrus Meets Sui: A New Model for Decentralized Storage at Web3 ScaleStanding at the edge of a vast digital frontier, I've often caught myself staring into the void left by bloated blockchains struggling to hold the weight of our exploding data world—videos streaming endlessly, AI models gobbling terabytes, entire app histories begging for permanence. What if storage didn't drag down speed, but lifted it instead. That's the quiet thrill when Walrus meets Sui, birthing a model where decentralized storage scales like Web3 was always meant to, fluid and fierce at once. Slide into the mechanics without the heavy lift. Walrus, crafted by Mysten Labs, slices big data blobs into slivers using something called Red Stuff encoding—a smart twist on erasure codes that spreads shares across nodes with just four to five times replication, tough enough for Byzantine faults where some nodes might flake or lie. Offchain, these slivers land on storage nodes. Onchain, Sui's Move contracts etch a Proof of Availability as a first class object, a tamper proof badge saying this data is alive and kicking. Users kick it off with a publisher client. Encode. Distribute. Gather node signatures requiring two f plus one for safety. Bundle into a Proof of Availability transaction. Submit to Sui. Parallel execution processes it efficiently, minting metadata like blob ID, size, and deletion timers, all while SUI fees flow into a fund that pays stakers over time. Retrieval flips the flow. Query the object. Ping aggregators to reassemble slivers. Serve via CDNs. No full replication nightmares, just verifiable pulls at pennies per gigabyte year. It is smooth, like handing a relay baton in a race where no one trips over their feet. Developers pay upfront in SUI or WAL. A portion is burned for deflation. The remainder rewards WAL delegators and nodes through delegated proof of stake. Blobs become programmable. They can be owned in NFTs. Gated inside DeFi logic. Queried by AI agents. All of this is possible because Sui's object model treats storage pointers like assets that can be composed, transferred, or penalized if nodes underperform. Early tests even stored Sui's own checkpoints and snapshots offchain, freeing validators to focus on compute instead of storage bloat. This pairing rides the industry's biggest waves. Web3's data explosion, driven by AI training, media heavy applications, and rollups demanding cheap data availability, requires modular stacks. Filecoin and Arweave laid the groundwork but skew toward sequential or permanent storage. Celestia excels at data availability but leaves execution elsewhere. Walrus and Sui fuse both. Sui's Mysticeti consensus and parallel execution reach thousands of transactions per second. Walrus scales storage horizontally across thousands of nodes. Humanity Protocol migrated millions of identity records here, scaling toward one hundred million. Veea uses it for offline DePIN workloads. Talus AI pulls real time blobs for autonomous agents. More storage demand burns more SUI, reinforcing deflation. The stack positions itself as Sui’s native storage layer, with cross chain expansion toward Solana and Ethereum. Compared to centralized clouds, it is censorship resistant. Compared to layer twos, it is fast without sequencer risk. From my perspective deep in the code trenches, after wrestling with IPFS gateways that collapse under load or Arweave costs that scare early builders away, this feels like a breath of fresh infrastructure air. I have prototyped Sui and Walrus applications where blobs power dynamic game worlds that load assets directly from decentralized storage with no broken links. The composability feels natural. There are risks. Node concentration remains a concern. WAL token economics are still maturing. Outages would hurt if not handled well. But the balance feels right. Utility over hype. Infrastructure over noise. It attracts developers who want Web2 performance without surrendering to Big Tech. Looking forward, Walrus and Sui sketch a blueprint where storage is no longer the bottleneck but the accelerator. Agentic AI trains on user owned blobs. Virtual worlds scale without centralized servers. Data markets become sovereign. Governance evolves as WAL holders tune parameters dynamically. As bridges expand and trusted execution environments harden node security, this model scales Web3 toward global capacity. Walrus meeting Sui is not a patch. It is a promise. Decentralized storage at true scale. Data that moves freely. Always available. Fiercely ours. $WAL #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

Walrus Meets Sui: A New Model for Decentralized Storage at Web3 Scale

Standing at the edge of a vast digital frontier, I've often caught myself staring into the void left by bloated blockchains struggling to hold the weight of our exploding data world—videos streaming endlessly, AI models gobbling terabytes, entire app histories begging for permanence.
What if storage didn't drag down speed, but lifted it instead.
That's the quiet thrill when Walrus meets Sui, birthing a model where decentralized storage scales like Web3 was always meant to, fluid and fierce at once.
Slide into the mechanics without the heavy lift.
Walrus, crafted by Mysten Labs, slices big data blobs into slivers using something called Red Stuff encoding—a smart twist on erasure codes that spreads shares across nodes with just four to five times replication, tough enough for Byzantine faults where some nodes might flake or lie.
Offchain, these slivers land on storage nodes.
Onchain, Sui's Move contracts etch a Proof of Availability as a first class object, a tamper proof badge saying this data is alive and kicking.
Users kick it off with a publisher client.
Encode.
Distribute.
Gather node signatures requiring two f plus one for safety.
Bundle into a Proof of Availability transaction.
Submit to Sui.
Parallel execution processes it efficiently, minting metadata like blob ID, size, and deletion timers, all while SUI fees flow into a fund that pays stakers over time.
Retrieval flips the flow.
Query the object.
Ping aggregators to reassemble slivers.
Serve via CDNs.
No full replication nightmares, just verifiable pulls at pennies per gigabyte year.
It is smooth, like handing a relay baton in a race where no one trips over their feet.
Developers pay upfront in SUI or WAL.
A portion is burned for deflation.
The remainder rewards WAL delegators and nodes through delegated proof of stake.
Blobs become programmable.
They can be owned in NFTs.
Gated inside DeFi logic.
Queried by AI agents.
All of this is possible because Sui's object model treats storage pointers like assets that can be composed, transferred, or penalized if nodes underperform.
Early tests even stored Sui's own checkpoints and snapshots offchain, freeing validators to focus on compute instead of storage bloat.
This pairing rides the industry's biggest waves.
Web3's data explosion, driven by AI training, media heavy applications, and rollups demanding cheap data availability, requires modular stacks.
Filecoin and Arweave laid the groundwork but skew toward sequential or permanent storage.
Celestia excels at data availability but leaves execution elsewhere.
Walrus and Sui fuse both.
Sui's Mysticeti consensus and parallel execution reach thousands of transactions per second.
Walrus scales storage horizontally across thousands of nodes.
Humanity Protocol migrated millions of identity records here, scaling toward one hundred million.
Veea uses it for offline DePIN workloads.
Talus AI pulls real time blobs for autonomous agents.
More storage demand burns more SUI, reinforcing deflation.
The stack positions itself as Sui’s native storage layer, with cross chain expansion toward Solana and Ethereum.
Compared to centralized clouds, it is censorship resistant.
Compared to layer twos, it is fast without sequencer risk.
From my perspective deep in the code trenches, after wrestling with IPFS gateways that collapse under load or Arweave costs that scare early builders away, this feels like a breath of fresh infrastructure air.
I have prototyped Sui and Walrus applications where blobs power dynamic game worlds that load assets directly from decentralized storage with no broken links.
The composability feels natural.
There are risks.
Node concentration remains a concern.
WAL token economics are still maturing.
Outages would hurt if not handled well.
But the balance feels right.
Utility over hype.
Infrastructure over noise.
It attracts developers who want Web2 performance without surrendering to Big Tech.
Looking forward, Walrus and Sui sketch a blueprint where storage is no longer the bottleneck but the accelerator.
Agentic AI trains on user owned blobs.
Virtual worlds scale without centralized servers.
Data markets become sovereign.
Governance evolves as WAL holders tune parameters dynamically.
As bridges expand and trusted execution environments harden node security, this model scales Web3 toward global capacity.
Walrus meeting Sui is not a patch.
It is a promise.
Decentralized storage at true scale.
Data that moves freely.
Always available.
Fiercely ours.
$WAL
#Walrus
@WalrusProtocol
How does Walrus use Sui Move for onchain data operations@WalrusProtocol leverages Sui's Move programming language to manage onchain data operations by representing storage resources as composable, first-class objects on the Sui blockchain. Move's resource-oriented design ensures these objects such as blob registrations, proofs of availability PoA, and storage fund allocations remain secure, transferable, and tamper-proof without duplication risks. Developers interact with Walrus data through Move smart contracts that handle key operations like uploading blobs, verifying storage node signatures, and settling payments in SUI tokens. Core Mechanisms When a user uploads data to Walrus, the process begins offchain with encoding and distribution to storage nodes, but onchain coordination kicks in via Sui Move contracts. The system shaves the blob into slivers, nodes sign proofs for their shares needing 2f+1 valid signatures for fault tolerance, and the user submits a PoA certificate as a Sui transaction. Move contracts then update the blob's status to available, minting an onchain object that tracks metadata like ID, size, and deletion certificates for refunds. Sui's parallel execution processes these efficiently, avoiding bottlenecks even during high-volume uploads. Storage payments flow through Move's precise resource model: users commit SUI upfront to a Storage Fund smart contract, which redistributes fees to staked WAL token delegators and validators over the blob's lifetime. If data gets deleted early, Move logic burns or refunds excess funds proportionally, enforcing economic finality. Programmability Edge Unlike passive storage like Filecoin, Walrus blobs become active Sui objects programmable via Move. Smart contracts can own, transfer, or gate access to these blobs think dynamic NFTs updating metadata from Walrus-stored media or AI agents querying historical datasets directly. This composability shines in Sui's object-centric architecture, where blobs reference large offchain payloads while staying lightweight onchain, enabling low-gas reads for dApps. For example, a DeFi protocol might use a Move module to escrow a Walrus blob until an oracle confirms data integrity, all settled atomically. WAL staking integrates too: delegators lock tokens into Move-managed committees, with slashing logic for misbehaving nodes enforced on Sui. Data Flow Example A typical operation unfolds like this: encode blob distribute slivers collect node signatures craft PoA in Move submit to Sui register object. Retrieval reverses it query the onchain object ID, hit aggregators or caches, reconstruct with verified proofs. This keeps storage decentralized and cheap pennies per GB-year while Sui handles the verifiable coordination layer. $WAL {spot}(WALUSDT) #Walrus @WalrusProtocol

How does Walrus use Sui Move for onchain data operations

@Walrus 🦭/acc leverages Sui's Move programming language to manage onchain data operations by representing storage resources as composable, first-class objects on the Sui blockchain.
Move's resource-oriented design ensures these objects such as blob registrations, proofs of availability PoA, and storage fund allocations remain secure, transferable, and tamper-proof without duplication risks.
Developers interact with Walrus data through Move smart contracts that handle key operations like uploading blobs, verifying storage node signatures, and settling payments in SUI tokens.
Core Mechanisms
When a user uploads data to Walrus, the process begins offchain with encoding and distribution to storage nodes, but onchain coordination kicks in via Sui Move contracts.
The system shaves the blob into slivers, nodes sign proofs for their shares needing 2f+1 valid signatures for fault tolerance, and the user submits a PoA certificate as a Sui transaction.
Move contracts then update the blob's status to available, minting an onchain object that tracks metadata like ID, size, and deletion certificates for refunds.
Sui's parallel execution processes these efficiently, avoiding bottlenecks even during high-volume uploads.
Storage payments flow through Move's precise resource model: users commit SUI upfront to a Storage Fund smart contract, which redistributes fees to staked WAL token delegators and validators over the blob's lifetime.
If data gets deleted early, Move logic burns or refunds excess funds proportionally, enforcing economic finality.
Programmability Edge
Unlike passive storage like Filecoin, Walrus blobs become active Sui objects programmable via Move.
Smart contracts can own, transfer, or gate access to these blobs think dynamic NFTs updating metadata from Walrus-stored media or AI agents querying historical datasets directly.
This composability shines in Sui's object-centric architecture, where blobs reference large offchain payloads while staying lightweight onchain, enabling low-gas reads for dApps.
For example, a DeFi protocol might use a Move module to escrow a Walrus blob until an oracle confirms data integrity, all settled atomically.
WAL staking integrates too: delegators lock tokens into Move-managed committees, with slashing logic for misbehaving nodes enforced on Sui.
Data Flow Example
A typical operation unfolds like this: encode blob distribute slivers collect node signatures craft PoA in Move submit to Sui register object.
Retrieval reverses it query the onchain object ID, hit aggregators or caches, reconstruct with verified proofs.
This keeps storage decentralized and cheap pennies per GB-year while Sui handles the verifiable coordination layer.
$WAL
#Walrus @WalrusProtocol
$RIVER just reclaimed strength — this is where smart money steps in 🌊🚀 I’m going long on $RIVER /USDT 👇 RIVER/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 14.7 – 14.9 Stop-Loss: 14.30 Take Profit: TP1: 15.50 TP2: 16.20 TP3: 17.00 Why: Clean rebound from the 13.5 base, price holding above MA7 & MA25, higher highs forming, and momentum building again. This is where smart money buys strength after confirmation, not fear. Holding above 14.8 keeps the bullish structure intact. #RIVER #USTradeDeficitShrink
$RIVER just reclaimed strength — this is where smart money steps in 🌊🚀

I’m going long on $RIVER /USDT 👇

RIVER/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 14.7 – 14.9
Stop-Loss: 14.30

Take Profit:
TP1: 15.50
TP2: 16.20
TP3: 17.00

Why:
Clean rebound from the 13.5 base, price holding above MA7 & MA25, higher highs forming, and momentum building again. This is where smart money buys strength after confirmation, not fear. Holding above 14.8 keeps the bullish structure intact.

#RIVER #USTradeDeficitShrink
$HYPER just went vertical — this is where smart money presses, not panics 🚀🔥 I’m going long on $HYPER /USDT 👇 HYPER/USDT Long Setup (15m) Entry Zone: 0.150 – 0.160 Stop-Loss: 0.148 Take Profit: TP1: 0.168 TP2: 0.176 TP3: 0.185 Why: Explosive breakout from the base, price holding above MA7/MA25, strong volume continuation, and RSI in full momentum mode. This is where smart money adds on shallow pullbacks, not after the move is over. Holding above 0.155 keeps the bullish structure intact. {future}(HYPERUSDT) #HYPER #USTradeDeficitShrink
$HYPER just went vertical — this is where smart money presses, not panics 🚀🔥

I’m going long on $HYPER /USDT 👇

HYPER/USDT Long Setup (15m)

Entry Zone: 0.150 – 0.160
Stop-Loss: 0.148

Take Profit:
TP1: 0.168
TP2: 0.176
TP3: 0.185

Why:
Explosive breakout from the base, price holding above MA7/MA25, strong volume continuation, and RSI in full momentum mode. This is where smart money adds on shallow pullbacks, not after the move is over. Holding above 0.155 keeps the bullish structure intact.

#HYPER #USTradeDeficitShrink
$ZEC honestly feels like it’s slowly dying 😭 It used to be one of the strongest names in privacy, but now the hype is gone, volume feels tired, and price keeps drifting lower. No big catalyst, no strong narrative pulling it back to life. The question a lot of people are quietly asking now is simple: Will $ZEC eventually revisit its all-time low? Markets don’t wait forever. If interest doesn’t come back, price usually finds the path of least resistance. {future}(ZECUSDT) #ZEC #USTradeDeficitShrink
$ZEC honestly feels like it’s slowly dying 😭

It used to be one of the strongest names in privacy, but now the hype is gone, volume feels tired, and price keeps drifting lower. No big catalyst, no strong narrative pulling it back to life.

The question a lot of people are quietly asking now is simple:
Will $ZEC eventually revisit its all-time low?

Markets don’t wait forever. If interest doesn’t come back, price usually finds the path of least resistance.

#ZEC #USTradeDeficitShrink
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى
استكشف أحدث أخبار العملات الرقمية
⚡️ كُن جزءًا من أحدث النقاشات في مجال العملات الرقمية
💬 تفاعل مع صنّاع المُحتوى المُفضّلين لديك
👍 استمتع بالمحتوى الذي يثير اهتمامك
البريد الإلكتروني / رقم الهاتف

آخر الأخبار

--
عرض المزيد
خريطة الموقع
تفضيلات ملفات تعريف الارتباط
شروط وأحكام المنصّة