@Vanarchain I had a moment recently where I asked myself, if my cousin who plays mobile games every day tried Web3, would he stay? Probably not. Too much friction, too many steps. That’s why I’ve started looking at L1 blockchains through a different lens.
When I explored Vanar, I wasn’t focused on hype. I wanted to see how it connects to real usage. From what I’ve seen, it’s structured around gaming networks, metaverse platforms, AI integration, and brand ecosystems. That feels closer to how mainstream users already interact online.
I think the AI layer only makes sense because it’s tied to on-chain ownership. Digital assets, in-game rewards, virtual identities. If AI can simplify how users manage those assets or enhance their experience without making things complicated, that’s actual value. AI for the sake of narrative doesn’t interest me anymore.
The real-world financial asset angle is where I’m cautiously curious. Tokenization could reshape parts of finance, but regulation and liquidity fragmentation are real risks. An L1 built with scalability and consumer adoption in mind might handle that transition better, but nothing is guaranteed. VANRY only becomes meaningful long term if ecosystem activity grows organically.
I’m not blindly optimistic. The L1 space is competitive, and onboarding billions of users is harder than it sounds. Still, I respect projects trying to connect AI, Web3 infrastructure, and tangible digital ecosystems instead of chasing whatever narrative is trending.
Vanar feels like it’s aiming to make blockchain part of everyday digital life. I’ll keep watching how it evolves before drawing any firm conclusions.