#vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain

Most L1s talk about throughput. Vanar is quietly talking about cost certainty and that’s a very different conversation.

Buried in their architecture is a simple but powerful mechanic: fees are designed to stay roughly stable in dollar terms, with periodic adjustments based on VANRY’s price. In other words, the chain tries to make “on-chain action” feel like a fixed-cost API call rather than a volatile trading instrument.

Why does that matter?

Because Vanar isn’t targeting degens. It’s targeting game studios, entertainment brands, and marketplaces environments where margins are calculated per user action. A loot box, a skin mint, a microtransaction. If your gas cost swings 3x in a week, your business model breaks. If it stays predictable, you can actually design around it.

That’s the subtle bet here: not “we’re faster,” not “we’re cheaper,” but “we’re easier to price.”

If Vanar succeeds, VANRY won’t behave like a typical L1 narrative token. It becomes more like infrastructure collateral for consumer-grade transaction flow. The real question isn’t TPS it’s whether enough real usage materializes to justify that stability model at scale.

Most chains optimize for traders.

Vanar is optimizing for product managers.

That’s a very different game.