The hard part is not writing an attestation. It is when finance is ready to release a payout here, but the proof that decides it still lives on Base.

That is where the workflow breaks. The payout is blocked on this chain. The deciding fact is on another one. So someone sends a screenshot, pastes a payload, or retells what the remote record said, and finance is supposed to treat that as enough to move money.

What felt sharp to me in SIGN is that the verification request can carry the exact remote reference forward instead of rewriting it. It points to the target chain, the target attestation, and the exact field that matters. The check comes back as a delegated attestation with a clear yes or no, backed by a threshold signature from at least two thirds of the Lit network.

That changes the payout decision. Finance does not release because someone copied the remote proof more convincingly. It releases because the carried-forward evidence cleared it. If the answer is no, the payout stays blocked for a real reason.

Remote proof sounds simple until money is waiting on it.

If more payouts depend on evidence from another chain, who is still going to trust the manual copy paste version? #SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN @SignOfficial