Validator Economics of Vanar Chain: What the Numbers Say about Network Security
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not. Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs. In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
Where Plasma is at Five Months In: On-Chain Figures, Token Unlocks and What the Data Says
@Plasma $XPL #plasma I got in with Plasma right around the mainnet launch back in Sept 25. The hype was enormous. Billions in liquidity coming in day one, Aave going live on the network in the first week and XPL going past $1.60. Five months later the token has declined to the neighborhood of $0.08. A 95% drawdown off the all-time high of $1.68 was observed on September 28. I want to deconstruct what happened what were, on-chain numbers like right now and what does the token unlock schedule means for anybody paying attention to this network. First the basics for the new comers. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain platform and has been built from the top for stablecoin payments. Zero Fee transfers of USDT, EVM compatible, sub-second finality using PlasmaBFT consensus. The team have backgrounds at Apple, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Imperial College London and Los Alamos National Lab. Tether are backing the project directly, which is significant as the whole value proposition is making USDT the native currency of an entire blockchain. The public sale has raised $ 50Million, 1Billion tokens at $0.05/token. Total supply is 10 billion XPL with about 1.8 billion in circulation at the moment. So in effect there is around 18% of total supply out there at the moment. Keep that number in mind because things are about to change when it comes to that float.
This is where the on-chain story comes in interesting. At peak Plasma TVL passed $6.4 billion in a week of mainnet and was the 5th largest DFi chain overnight. Aave on Plasma alone brought $6.6 billion in deposits with $1.58 billion in active borrowing. The supply of stablecoins on the network reached a stable point of $2.1 billion. But here is the gap, the chain was designed for 1000 transactions per second and at its low points, it was going at 14.9 TPS. Daily fees peaked at $4,200. So you had billions that were sitting on the chain and mostly it was sitting in lending vaults getting yield and then thin activity outside of that. The network had liquidity but not use the way that a payments chain needs to show. Incentives drew capital. Organic transaction demand was slow to keep pace. Since then DeFi protocols have been going from strength to strength. Pendle is projected for launch on Plasma in October of 2025. Coinbase added XPL to its list on 2nd December. Kraken enabled USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on December 10th. And in January of 2026, Plasma became integrated with NEAR Intents that was connecting XPL and USDT0 to a cross-chain liquidity pool of 25+ assets across 25 blockchains. The Aave v3.6 upgrade proposal of Plasma went to on-chain voting on 17th January. These are actual integrations and not vapor. The question is whether they translate into the kind of sustained volume of transactions that result in organic demand of XPL.
Now the part that everybody need to understand, unlock schedule. Right now the rate of ecosystem allocations are currently unlocking at a rate of about 88.9 million XPL per month. That is about 2.22% of the whole supply that is dropped to the market every 30 days. The bigger event is July 28, 2026 when the 2.5 billion tokens that are allocated to the US public sale participants are unlocked all at once. These buyers paid $0.05 per token. Even at the current price, of about $0.08, they are sitting on a 60% gain. The question is simple, how many of those holders sell once they get access? That one unlock will more than double the amount of supply in circulation. Team and investor tokens have their own schedule which include one year cliff, and monthly vesting for 2 years after. Plasma has an EIP-1559 style burn mechanism as well as proof-of-stake inflation beginning at 5% annually, and reduce 0.5% annually to a floor of 3%. A staked delegation system is coming up in Q1 2026 to stimulate locking tokens and remove sell pressure from the system. If the staking were to come live prior to July, some that supply shock may be absorbed. If the staking is late in the launching, the July unlock comes to a market without any mechanism for absorption.
I continue to follow the Plasma, as the thesis behind the project makes a lot of sense. Stablecoins see $22 trillion+ in volume transactions in 2024 on the blockchain. Tron dominated that space for years with $6.1 billion in TVL at the time Plasma was launched. A special purpose chain for stablecoins payments with the direct backing of Tether, is not a small idea. The currently in the works Bitcoin bridge would bring the liquidity of BTC into the ecosystem in the form of collateral. Confidential payment features are ahead selective transaction private. The Plasma One neobank product is targeted at real world payments in regions in which there is high demand for remittances. All these are promising things on paper. But, it's the network that has to fill in the void between capital we park in the DeFi vaults, and people sending stablecoins for groceries, rent and cross-border transfers. The infrastructural is going under. Not there for the metrics on adoption. For the time being, I am tracking three things every week: How many active transactions are made on Plasmascan on a daily basis, What the unlock impact on circulating supply will be on a monthly basis and the stablecoin transfer volume outside of DeFi lending loops. Those 3 data-points will have more information on where Plasma is going than any chart pattern or sentiment post.
One thing I do see with Vanar Chain is the emphasis on entertainment and gaming right from the beginning. Most L1s get off to a start and scramble to find a niche. Vanar picked theirs early. The chain already on-boarded mainstream brands and IP holder to build on the network. VANRY staking allows fixing the chain while holding the fees low (close to zero) to the end users. Listed in Binance with sector focus. L1s with identity have a tendency to live longer than the generic ones.
Plasma made two big integration moves in January of 2026. NEAR Intents went live on 23rd and connected XPL and USDT0 to 125+ assets on 25+ chains. CoW Swap was released on the 12th with the addition of DEX execution on-chain. Then MassPay introduced indigenous USDT payment rails. Three integrations within one month. The pattern here is obvious: Plasma is fixing its greatest weakness at the beginning of its development, isolation. A stablecoin chain only works if there is no friction in capital flowing in and out of the chain. These bridges do exactly this.
Michael Saylor informed CNBC one thing, Strategy plans no Bitcoin sales, even as price baiting carries large paper losses.
Saylor referred to the post as a long term position, but not trade. He opined that credit risk remains minimal unless Bitcoin falls 90 percent and remains long-term. In such pressure, he continues to predict debt refinancing to continue. CEO Phong Le also expressed a comparable opinion, indicating liquidation risk only appears in case Bitcoin is close to $8,000 by 2032.
A financial cushion also was mentioned by Saylor. He stated that the company has approximately two and a half years of cash flow to pay dividends and debt payments. He has included that net leverage is approximately 50 percent of a typical investment grade company. Buying plans stay the same. Saylor reported that the company spent billions to buy Bitcoin and intends to make a purchase every quarter. On the week between 2 and 8, strategy reported another weekly acquisition of 1,142 $BTC . The unrealized loss is now reported to be approximately at $5.1B with the drop of Bitcoin below the average entry of the company at around 76,056.
He linked the recent swings of $MSTR shares to the pullbacks in Bitcoin, following a dismal four months decline as well as a recent leap of 25 percent in a single day. He further added that MSTR is traded on a high liquidity and options open interest has been placed among the leading in the U.S. markets. According to TradingView information, MSTR was trading at approximately $134.93 and was down 2.38 percent today.
Saylor resisted claims of miner costs of $60,000 floor and an 12 month price call. He indicated that in the coming 4-8 years, Bitcoin will outperform S&P 500 by 2-3 times. #BTCMiningDifficultyDrop #SaylorStrategy #BTC
XRP Price Forecast Before White House Meeting That Can Fire Clarity Act Ambitions
$XRP is stable at $1.42, with traders unsure what to expect of the White House meeting in the day, which may cause Clarity Act expectations to take off. The cryptocurrency has already dropped by 12% last week, and this tendency was affected by the bear market trend. However, XRP appears to be creating a back and forth and potentially to scale out of the $1.50 zone. Meanwhile, the entire crypto sector is falling by 1.91 percent with the total market cap amounting to 2.35 trillion. Bitcoin is at present priced at $68, 800 and Ethereum at around 2000 and is recovering. Clarifying CLARITY Act May Break Stalemate at key White House Meeting today. Today, February 10, the White House is hosting an important meeting, which is to define the future of the stablecoins in the United States and to work out the main questions about the CLARITY Act. Developed in response to establishing a final crypto market framework, this bill has experienced a long process of stalling in the Senate, and one of the most significant concerns in this bill is stablecoin yield. The bill was amended on July 17, 2025, passing through the House, and has yet to be made into law since the lawmakers cannot reach an agreement on the bill. The representatives of the staff level will be trying to act on the side of breaking the impasse of the current meeting with a specific focus on whether companies would be allowed to give interest on the stablecoin holdings. The senior policy representatives of major banks will be engaged in the discussion the first time, which is characterized by the heightened urgency to compromise. The White House is also hopeful that the stalemate will come to an end and the bill will be signed by the end of February 2026. The inaction of the lawmakers would lead to the downfall of the crypto market because of uncertainty with the regulation. This would have an impact on major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP by Ripple, and Solana. Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP ETFs experience huge inflows. On February 9, the inflow of XRP spot ETFs was impressive at 6.31 million. At the same time, Bitcoin spot ETFs had a massive inflow of 145 million dollar the most, and Grayscale had 131 million. As of Feb. 9 (ET), the U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs had accumulated total net inflows of 145 million, with Grayscale having the highest net inflows of 131 million. Ethereum spot ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $57.05 million which is the first net inflow since net outflows on three consecutive days. Ethereum spot ETFs also registered an inflow of 57.05 million which rebounded. This was the initially positive growth recorded by Ethereum in three days of consecutive outflows. XRP Price Projection: Will it Retain at 1.40 in February 2026? The most recent XRP price was 1.42 on February 10, 2026, and its price went up by a small percentage of 0.52. XRP price is now fighting to keep the price above the important zone of 1.40. RSI (Relative Strength Index) stands at 48.11 which shows a neutral position with regard to momentum. The MACD indicator is indicating that there is a slight bearish trend since the MACD line is lower than the signal line. The traders would be recommended to keep an eye on the support level of US 1.40, a lesser level may prompt further depreciations. On the other hand, the XRP price will be able to maintain a price above $1.43. The possibility of a price reversal to achieve a price of 1.50 or even the resistance price of 1.70 is possible. XRP is trading flat as traders await the white house conference on CLARITY Act. Despite some difficulties the market experiences in the recent past, it is capable of growing given that they possess some levels of support. The market situation can turn out in such a way that it will become a rebound.
Ether Price Projection The dumping of ETH by Vitalik and the accumulation of ETH by Wall Street
Ether price stayed at the high of over 2,000 USD due to the crypto market consolidation phase. In the last one week, ETH has gone down by 13 percent leading to a bearish crossover indicating that it has the potential of falling further. At the same time, on Wall Street, the cryptocurrency is still being bought when Vitalik Buterin is selling ETH. Moreover, ETFs of Ethereum are recovering as well. The ETH Sell-Off of Vitalik vs Wall Street Buying Spree; The Future of Ethereum The sale of 6,183 ETH by Vitalik Buterin at the beginning of February of 2026 was valued at about 13.24 million USD. The sale was done using the CoW Protocol in small batches such that it did not cause serious shocks in the market. The average price was 2,140 ETH. This action however does not depict panic or withdrawal of the market. Buterin already stated on January 30, 2026, that he is going to spend the 16,384 ETH that he has in his wallet that is worth roughly 43-45 million of his own money.
The financing will be done to finance open-source projects in the security and privacy technology, AI safety, and biotechnology. Even following its recent sale to Buterin, Ethereum is of great interest to the Wall Street. BitMine company, which is under the ownership of Tom Lee, has been able to purchase ETH amidst huge losses in the general collapse of the crypto market. According to recent statistics, BitMine currently has an extra 84 million Ethereum value in its stash and its total stash has now reached 4325734 value ETH worth 9.14 billion. Lee is also optimistic about the future of Ethereum, as it is increasingly finding more uses, and is especially strong in the face of the current difficulties in the market.
Ether funds ETFs recover with 57M in net inflows U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs recorded the reversal of a negative net inflow of 57.05 million on 9 th February, after three days of negative net outflows.
The inflow was virtually being driven by Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH), which accepted the sums of 67.32 million and 44.62 million, respectively, which were considerable growth contributors. Will Ethereum Price Hold Just 2000 Price at Weak Momentum? The ETH price has fallen by 0.14% to reflect a slight dip at $2,044 as at the reporting. Relative Strength Index (RSI) = 41, that is, Ethereum is neutral. Also, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator stands at 0.03, which implies that there was a neutral accumulation of capital. In terms of the future price levels, the inability to hold on to the support of the price at the $1,900 mark can even put the price to the test downwards, to as low as the price of $1,750. To the positive side, the possibility of a reclaim of 2,250 would leave the future Ethereum perspective with an opportunity to retest the resistance level of 2,500. In conclusion, the fact that Vitalik Buterin sold ETH and Wall Street bought it does not mean that there is panic and great institutional support, respectively. Ethereium Spot ETFs show a recovery, and this signifies that more investors are confident. Still, the Ethereum price faces a threat of a volatile situation with significant support levels to be followed. #WhaleDeRiskETH #ETH #Bitmine
Bitcoin Price Forecast Before US NFP, Inflation Report, White House Crypto Summit
On Tuesday, February 10, the prices of Bitcoin dropped once again, and this is a part of a, already, downward trend that began in October when the international cryptocurrency hit a new high of 126,300. Its price move will be in the spotlight in the next few days as traders are keen on the next white house crypto summit, non-farm payrolls (NFP) data and consumer inflation in US. Bitcoin Price to respond to US NFP, Inflation, and White House Crypto Summit. The worth of BTC will also be in focus since the US will publish critical macro data over the coming several days and the White House Crypto Summit will be taking place. Later on Tuesday, top officials of massive American banks such as Wells Fargo and JPMorgan will have a meeting with top officials of the White House. The other participants will be the representatives of the crypto industry, including the representatives of such companies as Coinbase and Ripple Labs. The discussion intends to deal with the remaining pending problem with a frozen CLARITY Act. More specifically, it is aimed at striking a middle ground regarding the rewards on the stablecoins that are being opposed by numerous banks and credit unions. The crypto companies, in particular, Coinbase claim that it will be beneficial to the customer to enable exchanges to provide staking rewards since the customers will be able to receive a return. According to the banks, such a move will result in capital outflows of the banking sector. The white house however is enthusiastic about enacting a significant crypto bill due to their attachment to the industry. It has already made a big step following the enactment of the GENIUS Act. The next significant trigger of the Bitcoin price will be the non-farm payrolls (NFP) data of the United States of America on Wednesday and the new consumer inflation report. Economists believe that the next report would indicate that the economy will have generated an economic growth of 70k jobs in January with the headline and core inflation levels expected to fall throughout the month. Such figures are significant in the crypto market since they will affect the Federal Reserve. Reduction in inflation will most likely make the bank reduce the interest rates immediately in the next meeting of March this year. BTC Price Forecast: Techno Analysis. The timeframe chart of every week indicates that Bitcoin price has nosedived during the last several months as the bullish trend vanished. The coin is on the downside as it is below the 50-week and 100-week Exponential Moving Averages (EMA). It is also under the Supertrend indicator and the key support level of $74,420, which is the lowest price in April last year. On the positive side though the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has plummeted to an all time low of 27 since July of this year. In February 2023, the Percentage Price Oscillator (PPO) has hit its lowest point. This was the last occasion where Bitcoin price made a powerful recovery. In case this occurs, then the coin could rebound and strike the key resistance point at $80,000. The bullish outlook will be null in case of a drop below the key support level of $60,100. #BTC #USTechFundFlows #USRetailSalesMissForecast
I recall when around the close of last month, gold was at five thousand, and silver was at one hundred. Gold is now back, and silver is not much more than seventy. To most people, the mania in precious metals in the present macro cycle can be viewed as an opportunity to the average man. The other side of the same, however, is very cruel: should gold be the rod which the world central banks have ready in the event of the fiat currency system going under, silver is the 'liquidity trap' excavated by the large capital in the panic of the little retailers.
Hedge of sovereign credit The massive rush of gold this time is more of an event that is not really speculated but it is more of a great migration of world reserve money. By embarking on hoarding gold at a rate of tens of tons every month, the world central banks are fighting the credit drain of sovereign currencies. In our case as ordinary people, the professional worth of gold is the low beta characteristic. Even though it is not generating interest, the stability of gold even in severe turmoil cannot be replaced by any other asset. It is central banks and leading financial institutions, which have the price power of gold, which is followed by the trend of the open card of the macro games. In the case of gold, where we engage in gold, even when we purchase on a fleeting peak, we have to deal with an asset whose fluctuations are very wide, and the cost of holding and psychological pressure are entirely in a manageable dead zone. It is a preservation gift bestowed by the macro cycle on an ordinary person.
The exaggerated ratio of gold and silver. This is why silver is getting the picker in this wave: it offers to the ordinary people a lethal psychological clue: it remains extremely cheap. The market has a long-term story under the title of gold-silver ratio repair. Speculators are monitoring the historical ratio of price of gold to silver and they assume that when the price of gold is high, the price of silver will definitely recover. However, the truth is as follows: the financial feature of silver is being stripped of its industrial features. The diffused pricing power: Do not be mislead by the fact that it is all bulk precious metals; the market level of silver is even less than that of gold. This implies that a minimal leveraged amount of finances can cause violent swings. The duality strangulation: Gold is currency pure, on the contrary, silver is one half financial and the other half industrial. Gold will increase with safe-haven demand when economic recession is expected, but silver can decrease with a declining industrial demand. This attribute tear is very likely to put potential retail investors in a fallacious judgement.
Liquidity traps and the invisible scythe of physical expenses. The cost of transaction friction is not much considered by ordinary people who purchase silver. The loss of monetizing gold is very low and circulates all over the world. But the premium on physical silver is normally 10-20% and the discount on repurchase is also simply staggering. This implies that when you purchase silver bars, you must have the silver price increase further so that you can simply break even. There is more derivatives market undercover harvesting. Silver is a natural harvester by institutions because of its high volatility. New silver traders or investors can be successfully forced out of the market before the primary upward trend occurs because the 3 percent intraday movement using leverage will trigger most of the retail traders. Such a high leverage, high volatility, low depth feature of silver makes silver a superior instrument of capital to tap into the emotions of retail investors.
Accurate stalking of class psychology. It is a hunting mission towards poverty anxiety. Gold: Investors are generally risk averse and want protection. Silver: These include those players who are usually found to have limited capital to redeem themselves. This inherent psychology of seeking speed, seeking cheapness and seeking high elasticity is exploited by harvesters. Gold emergence of the smooth shift of assets and the bloody swings of silver are more or less the redistribution of social wealth, the inability of some to buy gold and seek the leaps of classes in silver are transformed into the successful arbitrageurs who can make volatility and narratives.
There is even some reinforcement that is meant to attract the enemy closer. When confronted by the macro tide, the ordinary people ought to identify their stand. And gold is a shield; heavy, but capable, at the right time, of saving lives; silver a two-edged sword; light, and apparently sharp, but in the hands of a person who has no knack of fighting, the chances of injury are much greater than of doing injury. Do not leap out into a prettyly painted but rickety-looking fast boat simply because you imagine the ticket on the ark costs a lot of money. In this age of games the most obvious is that: there are some shiny spurts in the market that are meant to tempt you to a predestined battlefield. Others are bred in order to be sacrificed.
The weekly Relative Strength Index (RSI) for Bitcoin indicates an oversol͏d condition (market state). Historically such situations are observed when market lows are approached. At other times it does not occur. The 200-week EMA (indicator) serves as a significant benchmark. A firm price above that line is required. Staying below it is not desirable. #BTC #RSI
📉 Almost 10 YEARS of nothing. It went sideways. It was boring and forgotten. Everyone stopped caring about gold.
Then things started to change 👀
2019 $1517 2020 $1898 2021 $1829 2022 $1823
🧨 Pressure was building up. No one talked about it. People were just buying.
And then it went up a lot 💥
2023 $2062 2024 $2624 2025 $4336 2026 ❓
📈 From $1800 to almost $5000 in about 3 years. That's not normal.
What's really going on 👇 🏦 Banks are buying lots of gold 🏛 Authorities are safeguarding their interests against financial obligations (debt). Measures are being taken to ensure fiscal stability. Accepting debt is not an option for many governments. 💸 Money is losing value ⚠️ People don't trust paper money
Now look at where we are.
💭 Could gold be $10000 in 2026? It doesn't seem impossible now. Gold isn't expensive. 💵 Money is becoming worth less.
You have two choices: 🔑 Buy early 😱 Or buy later when everyone is panicking
The AI Stack of Vanar Chain Gives Web3 Applications a Green Field
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar Vanar Chain is a Web3 blockchain using AI as the first layer-1 layer. The modular base layer provides speed and security to provide loads. Neutron transforms files into Seeds which continue to make meaning to AI to read on chain. Kayon excavates data into trends and decisions without additional layers. Axon uses automations to shoot off tasks on a command. It is sucked together in flows to apps in payments or games. JavaScript, Python and Rust SDKs are snatched by builders to connect quickly. The chain is similar to EVM in that contracts fall in easy. Fees lock at half a cent each. Videos or PDFs with evidence are stored on chain by Folks. In December 2025, Worldpay partnered with agentic payments at Abu Dhabi finance week. Payments to tie in finance worlds were assumed by Saiprasad Raut. The installation operates on Google cloud on green power with no carbon print. This draws in innovators of smart tools. Blocks are locked down by validators to provide spread out control. Neutron allows applications to store context on a long-term basis. It is the week of events of Vanar Chain. AIBC Eurasia is an event in February 9-11, in Dubai, where team discussions on AI will take place. The agreement begins with the Hong Kong infrastructure discussions on February 10-12. Crypto Expo Dubai strikes on March 15 to 17. TOKEN2049 Dubai follows April 29 to 30. These link up with builders. The complete AI stack had been deployed January 19. Pilot queries information in normal speech. The files are saved on chain in neutron. Proposal 2.0 provides VANRY holders with a vote on models and pots. There are domains of AI agents and finance. Grants fund fresh work. Base is a starting node in multi-chain ties. MyNeutron changes to paid to run steadily. There are buzzes in forums such as agent memory. Demos show Kayon live. Rewards are formed by votes in order to attract users. Growth is tracked using on chain numbers. The total transactions go over 44 million. Wallet covers the first count 1.6 million. Blocks hit 19 million. Types and gas are recorded by the explorers. Dune evacuates file types of Neutrons. There are Docs tutorials, which exhibit SDK steps and stat pulls. Rolls such as AI stack are connected with jumps. More than 100 keep it diffused by the validators. Transfers and AI hits are divided by mixes. Neutron takes media and docs. Dashboards plot week trends. Guides build custom views. Nodes watch work direct. Block times are below two seconds. Pilot is one of the flows flag top tools. These help shape apps.
In the decentralized arrangement, Vanar Chain is aligned with AI. Chain checks and stack are the ones that token goods want. Games create the worlds of play, which change through play. Transactions are agent style without hands. APIs slot smarts in simple. This supports globe cyber movements. Finance self checks rules. Metaverses add live bits. Tracks prove goods paths. Tendencies drive AI in chains towards laboriousness. Vanar is a leader of design. Axon is then dropped by Roadmap as automations. Flows widen apps. Other chain links share info. Holders pick paths. Vanar grows as smart hub.
Where Plasma Fits in the Emerging Stablecoin Payments Landscape
@Plasma $XPL #plasma Stablecoins transform how individuals transfer money to other parts of the world. People use them to transfer moneyfolk within the banks without experiencing high bank charges. Plasma has increased its efforts with a chain that is constructed in USDT and operates without charges. The completion of transactions takes less than one second. This is suitable to the need of quick worldwide payment. The amount of remittances is almost nine hundred billion annually. Expatriate employees take care of their families members back home via the internet. These flows are addressed by plasma whereby bridges lead in assets. Value locked stands at two point nine billion dollars. Stablecoins are worth one point nine seven billion in capital. The bridged value stands at six point eight billion dollars. Original shares constitute four point six billion. Exchange volumes took on the twenty one million dollars mark daily. The charges amount to a couple of hundreds of dollars daily. Revenue aligns with fees. These figures denote continued usage of the networks. The XPL token is used to lock the chain. There is a limit of ten billion tokens as total supply. There was ten percent or one billion token in public sale. Ecosystem takes forty percent of development. Team vests twenty five percent after time. Another twenty five percent is also locked in by investors. The number of circulation tokens has topped two billion. Validators are rewarded with five percent per year to get started with inflation. The rate is reduced by a half percent every year to three percent. Base fees cause a fall in supply as an increase in activity. Block confirmers XPL blocks. Shareholders are delegating interests to stock options. Voting on the change of protocols is possible through governance. The design relates the token with network performance. Staking becomes operational within a short time and draws larger numbers of users.
Plasma conforms to changes in finance. Digital currencies are developed by central banks, but the prevalence of stablecoins. The USDT has been flowing at more than hundred billion dollars across the globe. Plasma maximizes this token with instant settlements. Regions such as Latin America use digital remittances to meet their needs. The chain handles thousands of transactions in one second. Total operations record hundreds of millions since its launch. Jumps of more than two hundred percent in the recent times increase active addresses. The revenues of the apps are up to twenty eight thousand dollars a day. These are support lending and trading functions. Last week the volume of exchanges was raised fifty per cent. In seven days, stablecoin cap expanded by seven percent. Monitor essential metrics in order to identify changes. Value locked decreased by one per cent in the previous day. Liquidity in protocols is accumulated by bridge inflows. Analyze weekly shifts in order to determine patterns. User growth is associated with the global expansion of the stablecoins. Do not have to analyze data to form perspective. Plasma does not charge high as a focused stablecoin. Supply control is compensated by burns. Network security requires staked XPL. Nodes do consensus transfers. Inflation stimulates a long-term participation. Emission balance is made by Fee burns. Voting is one of the ways by which holders have an effect on rules. Sections of the ecosystem open up every month. Market capital is near to one hundred and eighty million dollars. These features enhance the position of Plasma in digital transfers.
Vanar Chain partners with NVIDIA to make AI tools on chain stronger. Partnering expedites growth. Staking is more than 67 million VANRY. Network sees steady growth. This quarterly subscription model of myNeutron. Users pay fees for AI access. AIBC Eurasia is currently operational with Vanar negotiations on AI payments. Today Consensus Hong Kong takes off. They focus on real Web3 AI apps.
@Plasma has a $6.85 billion total value. Native assets lock $4.66 billion. Third party flows comprise $2.16 billion. Stablecoins take the lead with APLAUSDT at $2.1 billion. USDT secures $1.54 billion. SUSDE totals $1.23 billion. APLAUSDE reaches $643 million. The set up provides deep liquidity for payments. There are no fees for transfers of USDT. Blocks are completed in less than a second. The plasma has a great handling ability for high volume. $XPL #plasma
🧠 Reason (3 bullets max): Trend: Sharp sell-off got absorbed, followed by a strong reclaim (bullish momentum returning). Level: Demand held near 1.37–1.39 and price reclaimed the mid-range. Trigger: Break & hold above 1.44–1.45 → continuation toward 1.50+.
🕒 Plan: If hits TP1: take partial (30–50%) + move SL to entry (reduce risk). If invalidates: exit on close below 1.40 — no revenge trade; wait for reclaim above 1.44. ⚠️ Risk: 1–2% max per trade. Not financial advice.
🧠 Reason (3 bullets max): Trend: Choppy structure with lower highs forming after the bounce (weak follow-through). Level: Supply zone 3.40–3.46 getting defended; rebounds stalling into it. Trigger: Rejection/fail to hold above 3.40 → continuation back toward 3.25 then lower.
🕒 Plan: If hits TP1: take partial (40–60%) + move SL to 3.35 (reduce risk). If invalidates: exit on close above 3.46 — no revenge trade; wait for a new setup. ⚠️ Risk: 1–2% max per trade. Not financial advice.
🧠 Reason (3 bullets max): Trend: Spike up looks exhausted; price snapped back and is struggling to hold strength. Level: Heavy supply overhead (wick to 0.577) + resistance 0.520–0.535. Trigger: Rejection from the highs + failure to reclaim 0.52 area → pullback/mean reversion setup.
🕒 Plan: If hits TP1: take partial (40–60%) + move SL to 0.510 (reduce risk). If invalidates: exit on close above 0.535, no revenge trade.
⚠️ Risk: 1–2% max per trade. Not financial advice.
🧠 Reason (3 bullets max): Trend: Bounce + higher-low structure forming after the sharp dip. Level: 0.00200 area reclaimed (support flip / buyers defending). Trigger: Break & hold above 0.00200 → retest 0.00219 and continuation higher.
🕒 Plan: If hits TP1: take partial (30–50%) + move SL to 0.00200 (risk-free idea). If invalidates: exit on close below 0.00175 — no revenge trade; wait for reclaim above 0.00200. ⚠️ Risk: 1–2% max per trade. Not financial advice.
🧠 Reason (3 bullets max): Trend: Base breakout + strong higher highs (momentum expansion). Level: 0.088–0.090 flipped to support; price holding above it. Trigger: Break & hold above 0.0915 zone → continuation toward 0.1004.
🕒 Plan: If hits TP1: take partial (30–50%) + move SL to 0.0910 (reduce risk / protect gains). If invalidates: exit on close below 0.0880 — no revenge trade; wait for reclaim above 0.0900. ⚠️ Risk: 1–2% max per trade. Not financial advice.