#dusk $DUSK @Dusk

DUSK

0.1095

+7.56%

I’ve noticed that people who think in worst-case terms get called negative immediately—when they’re really just trying to understand risk responsibly.

Inner Question: If Dusk goes wrong, who gets hit first?

Is it the regular user—one wrong click under pressure? Or the developer—building a system on top of it? Or the infrastructure—freezing when things get tense?

And if the damage starts, does it stop there… or does it quietly spread?

Most importantly: when real harm happens, who carries responsibility—do we have a clear answer, or a blurry one?

Maybe the real test isn’t the benefit… it’s the path of harm—and whether we’re willing to name it.