Bitbull Noah
Web3 Maximalist | Researcher & Analyst | Exploring the future of decentralized intelligence | Unfiltered Thoughts On-chain & Alpha Insights Crypto Stories
55 تتابع
154 المتابعون
274 إعجاب
8 تمّت مُشاركتها
الكل
اقتباسات
Live
ترجمة
APRO just pushed something important live on Ethereum.
Oracle as aService is now available, and the angle here is simplicity.
No nodes to run.
No custom infra.
No messy data pipelines.
Builders can now plug straight into verified, multi source data feeds on demand.
What this unlocks: • Reliable oracle data for prediction markets
• Real world and crypto event feeds
• AI-enhanced handling of structured and unstructured data
• Simple API access via x402 subscriptions
• Built-in attestation and auditability across chains
Use cases are broad: sports, finance, elections, weather, and any app that needs trustworthy external data.
The bigger shift is what this means for developers.
Oracles stop being a heavy lift and become a product.
Faster builds, fewer assumptions, and stronger data guarantees.
This is the kind of infra that quietly enables the next wave of onchain applications without the usual friction.
$AT #AT @APRO Oracle @APRO-Oracle
Oracle as aService is now available, and the angle here is simplicity.
No nodes to run.
No custom infra.
No messy data pipelines.
Builders can now plug straight into verified, multi source data feeds on demand.
What this unlocks: • Reliable oracle data for prediction markets
• Real world and crypto event feeds
• AI-enhanced handling of structured and unstructured data
• Simple API access via x402 subscriptions
• Built-in attestation and auditability across chains
Use cases are broad: sports, finance, elections, weather, and any app that needs trustworthy external data.
The bigger shift is what this means for developers.
Oracles stop being a heavy lift and become a product.
Faster builds, fewer assumptions, and stronger data guarantees.
This is the kind of infra that quietly enables the next wave of onchain applications without the usual friction.
$AT #AT @APRO Oracle @APRO-Oracle
ترجمة
QuadrigaCX was one of the darkest fraud in crypto
And the death of the founder is not confirmed yet
December 2018:
- the CEO Gerald Cotten dies in India at 30
- the exchange says he was the only person with the keys
- 215M CAD becomes unreachable
- around 76,000 users are stuck
at first, the story was simple
cold wallets exist, but nobody can open them
then the OSC report in 2020 changes everything
- it was not a hack
- it was a long fraud
- 169M CAD missing
- 115M tied to fake trading using fake accounts and fake balances
- wallets were already empty since April 2018, months before his death
so the key problem was never the real problem, there were no coins left to unlock
And the death details are messy
- no autopsy in India
- closed casket in Canada
- his last name misspelled on the death certificate
December 2022
- 104 $BTC moves
- four years after Cotten’s death
- those BTC came from five cold wallet addresses EY had sent to by mistake in February 2019
- EY says they did not move the funds
- a big part was sent into a Wasabi CoinJoin flow
someone had access, just not the public, and not the victims
There’s still Ethereum sitting there
a labeled Quadriga wallet is still holding:
- 67,317 ETH
- around 201M dollars at recent prices
- mostly untouched
- small dust activity this year
the blockchain remembers everything
but this story still has a hole in the middle that never closed
And the death of the founder is not confirmed yet
December 2018:
- the CEO Gerald Cotten dies in India at 30
- the exchange says he was the only person with the keys
- 215M CAD becomes unreachable
- around 76,000 users are stuck
at first, the story was simple
cold wallets exist, but nobody can open them
then the OSC report in 2020 changes everything
- it was not a hack
- it was a long fraud
- 169M CAD missing
- 115M tied to fake trading using fake accounts and fake balances
- wallets were already empty since April 2018, months before his death
so the key problem was never the real problem, there were no coins left to unlock
And the death details are messy
- no autopsy in India
- closed casket in Canada
- his last name misspelled on the death certificate
December 2022
- 104 $BTC moves
- four years after Cotten’s death
- those BTC came from five cold wallet addresses EY had sent to by mistake in February 2019
- EY says they did not move the funds
- a big part was sent into a Wasabi CoinJoin flow
someone had access, just not the public, and not the victims
There’s still Ethereum sitting there
a labeled Quadriga wallet is still holding:
- 67,317 ETH
- around 201M dollars at recent prices
- mostly untouched
- small dust activity this year
the blockchain remembers everything
but this story still has a hole in the middle that never closed
ترجمة
Trust Wallet Security Incident What Actually Happened
There was a confirmed security incident involving Trust Wallet, with reported losses exceeding $7M.
Important context: this was not a blockchain exploit and not a mass drain of all Trust Wallet users.
A key update: CZ confirmed that affected users will be compensated, which materially reduces the impact for those involved.
What we know so far
The issue is linked specifically to Trust Wallet browser extension v2.68
Mobile only users were not affected
Other extension versions were not impacted
v2.69 is the patched release
What to do now
If you used extension v2.68, disable it and update to v2.69 immediately
If that wallet ever held significant funds, consider moving to a fresh wallet
If you only use the mobile app, no action is required
Important clarification This isn’t an argument against software wallets.
It’s a reminder that browser extensions carry higher risk for long-term storage.
Better practice:
Extensions → daily use, small balances
Long term holdings → mobile wallet used sparingly or hardware wallet
Don’t rush decisions out of fear
Never enter seed phrases anywhere
Initial headlines were alarming, but the details matter.
This was a contained incident, not a system-wide failure.
Stay calm.
Protect your keys.
Fear spreads faster than facts.
$BNB #TrustWalletHack #BinanceAlphaAlert
There was a confirmed security incident involving Trust Wallet, with reported losses exceeding $7M.
Important context: this was not a blockchain exploit and not a mass drain of all Trust Wallet users.
A key update: CZ confirmed that affected users will be compensated, which materially reduces the impact for those involved.
What we know so far
The issue is linked specifically to Trust Wallet browser extension v2.68
Mobile only users were not affected
Other extension versions were not impacted
v2.69 is the patched release
What to do now
If you used extension v2.68, disable it and update to v2.69 immediately
If that wallet ever held significant funds, consider moving to a fresh wallet
If you only use the mobile app, no action is required
Important clarification This isn’t an argument against software wallets.
It’s a reminder that browser extensions carry higher risk for long-term storage.
Better practice:
Extensions → daily use, small balances
Long term holdings → mobile wallet used sparingly or hardware wallet
Don’t rush decisions out of fear
Never enter seed phrases anywhere
Initial headlines were alarming, but the details matter.
This was a contained incident, not a system-wide failure.
Stay calm.
Protect your keys.
Fear spreads faster than facts.
$BNB #TrustWalletHack #BinanceAlphaAlert
ترجمة
Trust Wallet Hack
There was a confirmed security incident related to Trust Wallet.
Users reportedly lost $7M+ worth of crypto, but context matters.
This was not a blockchain hack and not a mass drain of all Trust Wallet users.
Important update:
Changpeng Zhao (CZ) posted on X confirming that impacted Trust Wallet users will be covered for losses. That significantly reduces downside risk for affected users.
What we know so far:
• Losses are linked to the browser extension version 2.68
• Mobile-only users are NOT affected
• Other extension versions are NOT affected
• Version 2.69 is the patched update
What to do if you use Trust Wallet:
✅ If you used the browser extension 2.68 → disable it and update to 2.69 immediately
✅ If that wallet ever held meaningful funds → consider moving to a fresh wallet
✅ If you only use the mobile app → no action needed
Important clarification:
This doesn’t mean “never use software wallets.”
It means browser extensions are higher risk for long-term storage.
Better practice: • Extensions → daily use, small balances
• Long-term holdings → mobile wallet used rarely or hardware wallet
• Never rush moves out of fear
• Never paste seed phrases anywhere
When I first saw this news, my energy dropped and my heart started racing too.
After reading the details and CZ’s confirmation it’s clear this is a scoped incident, not a system-wide failure.
Stay calm.
Protect your keys.
Fear spreads faster than facts.
There was a confirmed security incident related to Trust Wallet.
Users reportedly lost $7M+ worth of crypto, but context matters.
This was not a blockchain hack and not a mass drain of all Trust Wallet users.
Important update:
Changpeng Zhao (CZ) posted on X confirming that impacted Trust Wallet users will be covered for losses. That significantly reduces downside risk for affected users.
What we know so far:
• Losses are linked to the browser extension version 2.68
• Mobile-only users are NOT affected
• Other extension versions are NOT affected
• Version 2.69 is the patched update
What to do if you use Trust Wallet:
✅ If you used the browser extension 2.68 → disable it and update to 2.69 immediately
✅ If that wallet ever held meaningful funds → consider moving to a fresh wallet
✅ If you only use the mobile app → no action needed
Important clarification:
This doesn’t mean “never use software wallets.”
It means browser extensions are higher risk for long-term storage.
Better practice: • Extensions → daily use, small balances
• Long-term holdings → mobile wallet used rarely or hardware wallet
• Never rush moves out of fear
• Never paste seed phrases anywhere
When I first saw this news, my energy dropped and my heart started racing too.
After reading the details and CZ’s confirmation it’s clear this is a scoped incident, not a system-wide failure.
Stay calm.
Protect your keys.
Fear spreads faster than facts.
ترجمة
Stablecoins had a huge year in 2025.
Total onchain supply is close to $310B by mid December
That’s up more than 50% from roughly $205B at the start of the year.
So if all this capital is sitting in stables
why aren’t people buying yet?
Lesson for beginners
having capital doesn’t mean you must trade every time
sometimes the best move is waiting for the right moment. $BTC $USDT $USDC
Total onchain supply is close to $310B by mid December
That’s up more than 50% from roughly $205B at the start of the year.
So if all this capital is sitting in stables
why aren’t people buying yet?
Lesson for beginners
having capital doesn’t mean you must trade every time
sometimes the best move is waiting for the right moment. $BTC $USDT $USDC
ترجمة
On December 26, 2025, a major structural pressure on Bitcoin expires.
Around $6.1B in upside call options vanish if $BTC settles below $90K.
This isn’t a prediction. It’s mechanics.
Those calls sit above spot. If BTC doesn’t reach them, they expire worthless.
What matters is dealer hedging.
Dealers hedge sold calls by buying spot as price rises.
That flow has been capping upside for months not sentiment, structure.
At expiry, if BTC is below $90K, those hedges disappear.
Nothing is forced to sell. No liquidations.
The market doesn’t lose a floor.
It loses a ceiling.
Upside suppression turns off.
This doesn’t guarantee a rally or direction.
It simply resets the rules.
The real question comes after
once structure steps away, does real demand show up?
Around $6.1B in upside call options vanish if $BTC settles below $90K.
This isn’t a prediction. It’s mechanics.
Those calls sit above spot. If BTC doesn’t reach them, they expire worthless.
What matters is dealer hedging.
Dealers hedge sold calls by buying spot as price rises.
That flow has been capping upside for months not sentiment, structure.
At expiry, if BTC is below $90K, those hedges disappear.
Nothing is forced to sell. No liquidations.
The market doesn’t lose a floor.
It loses a ceiling.
Upside suppression turns off.
This doesn’t guarantee a rally or direction.
It simply resets the rules.
The real question comes after
once structure steps away, does real demand show up?
ترجمة
The last 3 cycles for Bitcoin all lasted around the same amount of time.
2015-2017: 1067 days
2018-2021: 1059 days
2022-2025: 1062 days
Sometimes the simplest indicators are the best.
$BTC #CPIWatch
2015-2017: 1067 days
2018-2021: 1059 days
2022-2025: 1062 days
Sometimes the simplest indicators are the best.
$BTC #CPIWatch
🎙️ only 400 left in 3k guysss ❤️🔥
إنهاء
01 ساعة 53 دقيقة 14 ثانية
2.4k
ترجمة
$150B in leveraged positions got wiped this year.
That’s longs and shorts.
Roughly $400–500M getting liquidated every single day, according to CoinGlass.
$ASTER
That’s longs and shorts.
Roughly $400–500M getting liquidated every single day, according to CoinGlass.
$ASTER
ترجمة
🎄 🎁 Merry Christmas 🎅 🎁
ترجمة
Why banks couldn’t hold XRP and why that might change soon
Right now, banks avoid XRP for one main reason:
regulation.
Under current rules, XRP is treated as high risk.
For every $1 of XRP a bank holds, it must lock up $12.50 in capital.
That makes holding XRP basically pointless for institutions.
It’s not about tech.
It’s not about demand.
It’s about capital rules.
But here’s what’s changing 👇
As regulations become clearer, XRP could move into a lower-risk category.
If that happens, the capital requirement drops massively.
And that changes everything.
• Banks could finally hold XRP directly
• Liquidity becomes easier
• Real institutional usage becomes possible
This isn’t hype or price talk.
It’s about how banks are allowed to operate.
Markets don’t move on hype.
They move when rules change.
And if those rules change for XRP, demand won’t slowly grow
it turns on instantly.
That’s the part most people are missing.
$XRP
Right now, banks avoid XRP for one main reason:
regulation.
Under current rules, XRP is treated as high risk.
For every $1 of XRP a bank holds, it must lock up $12.50 in capital.
That makes holding XRP basically pointless for institutions.
It’s not about tech.
It’s not about demand.
It’s about capital rules.
But here’s what’s changing 👇
As regulations become clearer, XRP could move into a lower-risk category.
If that happens, the capital requirement drops massively.
And that changes everything.
• Banks could finally hold XRP directly
• Liquidity becomes easier
• Real institutional usage becomes possible
This isn’t hype or price talk.
It’s about how banks are allowed to operate.
Markets don’t move on hype.
They move when rules change.
And if those rules change for XRP, demand won’t slowly grow
it turns on instantly.
That’s the part most people are missing.
$XRP
ترجمة
In 2025 an estimated $2 billion in crypto was lost
In 2025 an estimated $2 billion in crypto was lost to a single coordinated actor
This was not one breach
It was a sustained campaign operating quietly across the ecosystem
This is not a claim about the end of crypto
It is a record of how the attacks unfolded and why the timing matters
A year long campaign
Security reports and incident disclosures indicate that state linked North Korean operators carried out repeated intrusions throughout 2025
The activity is widely attributed to Lazarus Group
The methods were consistent
Phishing malware supply chain compromise and social engineering
Targets varied
Centralized exchanges
DeFi protocols
Wallet providers
Bridge infrastructure
No single failure explains the losses
The pattern suggests persistence rather than opportunism
Where the funds went
Onchain analysis shows the stolen assets did not sit idle
They moved through
• Mixers
• Cross chain bridges
• Peel chains and intermediary wallets
These routes complicated attribution and reduced the effectiveness of sanctions
The goal was not speed
It was survivability inside the financial system
A longer timeline
The $2 billion figure from 2025 fits into a broader historical pattern
Public estimates suggest more than $6 billion in crypto linked to North Korean operations over the past decade
Earlier incidents followed similar mechanics
Initial compromise
Delayed movement
Gradual laundering
Each cycle improved operational discipline
Why this matters beyond crypto
This is no longer only a security issue for exchanges or protocols
It raises structural questions
When digital assets can be moved at scale across borders
When sanctions can be diluted by protocol design
When infrastructure failures carry geopolitical consequences
Weak security becomes a national exposure
Financial tools become strategic assets
What remains unresolved
There is no single protocol flaw that explains this
There is no evidence crypto itself caused the activity
What remains unclear is how global coordination adapts
Whether enforcement can keep pace
And how much of this activity is still undiscovered
The numbers are known
The full scope may not be
#USGDPUpdate
This was not one breach
It was a sustained campaign operating quietly across the ecosystem
This is not a claim about the end of crypto
It is a record of how the attacks unfolded and why the timing matters
A year long campaign
Security reports and incident disclosures indicate that state linked North Korean operators carried out repeated intrusions throughout 2025
The activity is widely attributed to Lazarus Group
The methods were consistent
Phishing malware supply chain compromise and social engineering
Targets varied
Centralized exchanges
DeFi protocols
Wallet providers
Bridge infrastructure
No single failure explains the losses
The pattern suggests persistence rather than opportunism
Where the funds went
Onchain analysis shows the stolen assets did not sit idle
They moved through
• Mixers
• Cross chain bridges
• Peel chains and intermediary wallets
These routes complicated attribution and reduced the effectiveness of sanctions
The goal was not speed
It was survivability inside the financial system
A longer timeline
The $2 billion figure from 2025 fits into a broader historical pattern
Public estimates suggest more than $6 billion in crypto linked to North Korean operations over the past decade
Earlier incidents followed similar mechanics
Initial compromise
Delayed movement
Gradual laundering
Each cycle improved operational discipline
Why this matters beyond crypto
This is no longer only a security issue for exchanges or protocols
It raises structural questions
When digital assets can be moved at scale across borders
When sanctions can be diluted by protocol design
When infrastructure failures carry geopolitical consequences
Weak security becomes a national exposure
Financial tools become strategic assets
What remains unresolved
There is no single protocol flaw that explains this
There is no evidence crypto itself caused the activity
What remains unclear is how global coordination adapts
Whether enforcement can keep pace
And how much of this activity is still undiscovered
The numbers are known
The full scope may not be
#USGDPUpdate
ترجمة
Bitcoin performance per year.
2011 +1,317%
2012 +218%
2013 +5,428%
2014 -58%
2015 +36%
2016 +120%
2017 +1,375%
2018 -74%
2019 +95%
2020 +305%
2021 +83%
2022 -64%
2023 +106%
2024 +120%
2025 -10%
2026 ?????
After a red year, what usually comes next?
#BTCVSGOLD $BTC
2011 +1,317%
2012 +218%
2013 +5,428%
2014 -58%
2015 +36%
2016 +120%
2017 +1,375%
2018 -74%
2019 +95%
2020 +305%
2021 +83%
2022 -64%
2023 +106%
2024 +120%
2025 -10%
2026 ?????
After a red year, what usually comes next?
#BTCVSGOLD $BTC
ترجمة
BTC/USD1 crashed to 24k Look so here’s why that might’ve happened 👇
BTC didn’t actually crash.
It was a low-liquidity glitch on the BTC/USD1 pair only.
What caused it:
• Very thin order book
• One or more large market orders
• Stop-losses and liquidations triggering instantly
• Bots amplifying the move
Once liquidity disappeared, price wicked hard for seconds, then snapped back.
This wasn’t a real market dump.
BTC on major pairs (USDT, USDC, Perps) never moved like that.
Who got hit?
• High leverage traders
• Tight stop-loss users
• Anyone trading low-liquidity pairs
Who benefited?
• Arbitrage bots
• Fast traders
Lesson:
Low liquidity + leverage = danger
Not every “crash” is real
Always check the pair before panicking.
$BTC $USD1
BTC didn’t actually crash.
It was a low-liquidity glitch on the BTC/USD1 pair only.
What caused it:
• Very thin order book
• One or more large market orders
• Stop-losses and liquidations triggering instantly
• Bots amplifying the move
Once liquidity disappeared, price wicked hard for seconds, then snapped back.
This wasn’t a real market dump.
BTC on major pairs (USDT, USDC, Perps) never moved like that.
Who got hit?
• High leverage traders
• Tight stop-loss users
• Anyone trading low-liquidity pairs
Who benefited?
• Arbitrage bots
• Fast traders
Lesson:
Low liquidity + leverage = danger
Not every “crash” is real
Always check the pair before panicking.
$BTC $USD1
ترجمة
I would be better off broke without working
than working 3–6 months and ending up with nothing.
They seriously need to fix InfoFi.
Vesting messes, instant price dumps, broken TGE claims.
Grinding half a year for $10 isn’t worth anyone’s time.
The community has already realized this.
InfoFi turned from opportunity into disappointment,
and now it just looks dead.
These days, when I see an InfoFi post,
I hit not interested and mute.
$BTC
than working 3–6 months and ending up with nothing.
They seriously need to fix InfoFi.
Vesting messes, instant price dumps, broken TGE claims.
Grinding half a year for $10 isn’t worth anyone’s time.
The community has already realized this.
InfoFi turned from opportunity into disappointment,
and now it just looks dead.
These days, when I see an InfoFi post,
I hit not interested and mute.
$BTC
ترجمة
When will the algo finally realize BitBullNoah isn’t built for just 10 views 😤
$USDC $ETH
$USDC $ETH
ترجمة
People were waiting for stocks and commodities to crash
Talking nonstop about recession
Instead
Gold at ATH
Silver ripping
S&P 500 at ATH
Looks like the recession showed up
Just not where everyone expected
Crypto alts coins got it instead
lmao
Talking nonstop about recession
Instead
Gold at ATH
Silver ripping
S&P 500 at ATH
Looks like the recession showed up
Just not where everyone expected
Crypto alts coins got it instead
lmao
ترجمة
Prediction markets aren’t gambling
Right up until
you start losing
$POL
Right up until
you start losing
$POL
ترجمة
Memecoin dominance is sitting near cycle lows
Lower than levels seen during the 2022 to 2023 bear market
The last comparable period was February 2024
At that time sentiment was similar
Participation was thin
Prices were compressed
Most traders had written the sector off
Shortly after that point
Several large memecoins saw outsized moves
Not because fundamentals changed
But because positioning and attention were already exhausted
The current setup
Today many major memecoins are down between 80 and 99 percent from highs
Liquidity is thin
Volumes are muted
Public interest is low
The prevailing narrative is exhaustion
That the sector has already played out
This mirrors earlier cycle behavior
What matters here
This is not a claim that a rally is guaranteed
And it is not a call to buy
Historically
Extreme pessimism in a crowded retail sector
Often coincides with low positioning
When capital rotates
It tends to move where expectations are already minimal
The open question
If memecoins are considered finished
Who is still positioned to sell
And if no one is paying attention
What happens when attention returns even briefly
$DOGE $SHIB
Lower than levels seen during the 2022 to 2023 bear market
The last comparable period was February 2024
At that time sentiment was similar
Participation was thin
Prices were compressed
Most traders had written the sector off
Shortly after that point
Several large memecoins saw outsized moves
Not because fundamentals changed
But because positioning and attention were already exhausted
The current setup
Today many major memecoins are down between 80 and 99 percent from highs
Liquidity is thin
Volumes are muted
Public interest is low
The prevailing narrative is exhaustion
That the sector has already played out
This mirrors earlier cycle behavior
What matters here
This is not a claim that a rally is guaranteed
And it is not a call to buy
Historically
Extreme pessimism in a crowded retail sector
Often coincides with low positioning
When capital rotates
It tends to move where expectations are already minimal
The open question
If memecoins are considered finished
Who is still positioned to sell
And if no one is paying attention
What happens when attention returns even briefly
$DOGE $SHIB
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى