Wendyy_

The Hong Kong SFC and FSTB publish consultation results and launch a new review of advisory and management regimes for virtual‑asset service providers.

Hong Kong’s Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced on 24 December 2025 that they have concluded consultations on legislative proposals for virtual‑asset (VA) dealer and custodian regimes, and will move forward with the related licensing frameworks. The agencies also opened a fresh consultation on proposed regimes for VA advisory and management service providers, extending the “same business, same risks, same rules” approach.
The dealer regime will align with Type 1 securities‑dealing rules, while the custodian regime focuses on safeguarding private keys and client assets. Regulators invite interested parties to begin pre‑application discussions to ensure readiness for the upcoming licensing requirements, aiming to cement Hong Kong’s position as a trusted hub for digital‑asset innovation.
#Binance #wendy #bitcoin #HongKong $BTC $ETH $BNB

Silver’s breakout above $70 is stoking inflation fears and dollar anxiety, with Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki warning the move could foreshadow deeper currency erosion while fueling a bullish path toward $200.

Silver Rally Fuels Kiyosaki’s Inflation Alarm and Bullish Price Forecast
Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki warned that silver trading above $70 could be an early signal of rising inflation risks and continued erosion of the U.S. dollar, framing the move as beneficial for precious metals holders and harmful for cash savers.
In a post on social media platform X dated Dec. 23, Kiyosaki said:
I am concerned $70 silver may signal hyper- inflation in 5 years as the fake $ keeps losing value.
He added: “Don’t be a loser. Fake $ will continue to lose purchasing power as silver goes to $200 in 2026.” Kiyosaki has repeatedly criticized fiat currencies, arguing that government spending and monetary expansion undermine long-term purchasing power. His comments echoed past warnings in which he has urged investors to favor assets such as gold, silver, and bitcoin over cash and bonds.
The remarks come as precious metals prices surge amid persistent concerns over inflation, mounting government debt, and the outlook for interest rates. Silver has recently pushed to record highs, extending gains driven by strong investment demand and tightening supply, while also benefiting from robust industrial use in solar panels, electric vehicles, and electronics. Market data confirms the surge, with spot silver reaching $71.94 an ounce by Dec. 25, up 142% year to date, driven by industrial demand from the solar and electronics sectors and safe-haven inflows amid a weakening U.S. dollar. Meanwhile, gold has traded near all-time highs as central banks, particularly in emerging markets, continue adding to reserves and investors seek protection from currency volatility and geopolitical risk.
#Binance #wendy $BTC $ETH $BNB

This week has been an absolute roller coaster in the precious metals space, with price action doing cartwheels and headlines barely keeping up. Spot silver on the Shanghai Gold Exchange finished Dec. 24, 2025, at a premium to futures contracts, a classic case of backwardation that hints at a snug physical market in China.

China’s Silver Market Enters Deep Backwardation as Demand Outpaces Supply in Shanghai
Silver prices on the Shanghai Gold Exchange climbed to lofty territory on Dec. 24, 2025, with the Ag(T+D) spot contract settling near 19,400 Chinese yuan per kilogram, or roughly $78.55 per ounce using the day’s USD/CNY rate of about 7.015.
That price tag placed Shanghai silver comfortably above the global yardstick on Comex, where futures wrapped up at $72.36 per troy ounce. The gap pointed to local strains in China’s market, where near-term physical demand looked heavier than available supply.

Silver backwardation—when spot prices top futures—made itself known in China’s silver contracts toward the end of 2025. On the Shanghai Futures Exchange, near-dated silver futures sat below the spot equivalent, with the main contract around 17,609 yuan per kilogram, or about $78.02 per ounce, confirming the inverted curve. Such a setup, far from business as usual, suggested traders preferred metal in hand now rather than promises later, often an early warning of supply stress.
The main force behind this backwardation traced back to thinning silver stockpiles in China, the world’s largest consumer of the metal. Inventories on Shanghai exchanges slid to multi-year lows by November 2025, pressured by strong industrial appetite that ran ahead of imports and local output. China’s solar panel industry, a heavy silver user for photovoltaic cells, grew sharply in 2025, helping fuel expectations of a global silver deficit for a fifth straight year.
Other contributors included supply hiccups from major mining regions beyond China, notably Peru and Mexico, where labor disputes and environmental rules trimmed production. These global bottlenecks restricted bullion flows into China, intensifying the local mismatch. Trade policy shifts and currency moves added to the mix, as a firmer yuan against the U.S. dollar raised import costs and nudged holders toward keeping metal close.
The first big blast higher in silver on the chart—circa 1979–1980—came courtesy of the Hunt brothers’ audacious bid to corner the global silver market. The brothers—chiefly Nelson Bunker Hunt and William Herbert Hunt—went on a buying spree in the 1970s, hoovering up physical silver and loading up on silver futures. The strategy was part inflation shield, part currency-hedge panic after the Bretton Woods system fell apart, with a side quest of gaining oversized influence over supply. That party ended abruptly when COMEX and the Chicago Board of Trade rewrote the margin rules, sending prices tumbling.
On the demand front, China’s electronics and electric vehicle industries added further pressure, since silver’s conductivity makes it indispensable for batteries and wiring. Investment demand heated up too in recent times, with retail buyers and institutions eyeing silver as a hedge against inflation and geopolitical strains, including U.S.-Venezuela tensions that indirectly influenced commodity routes. Together, these forces fed a loop in which higher spot prices encouraged hoarding physical metal instead of rolling into futures.
Also read: Crypto Traders Cry Foul as Bitcoin Lags Behind a Red-Hot Gold, Silver and Stock Market
The backwardation has sent ripples across China’s silver market, bringing sharper day-to-day price swings. Trading volumes on Shanghai exchanges jumped, with reports of brisk activity as speculators lined up for possible short squeezes. Silver lease rates-essentially the cost to borrow physical metal—rose to record territory, signaling tight conditions in the lending pool.
Chinese producers reacted by speeding up sales to take advantage of elevated spot prices, a move that could ease immediate pressure but risk future supply gaps if investment in mining falls behind. Industrial users, meanwhile, faced steeper input costs, which could filter through to higher prices for exports such as solar panels and electronics. This dynamic highlighted silver’s split personality as both a factory input and a financial plaything.
Beyond China, the backwardation echoed through global pricing, with Comex futures showing sympathetic moves even as inversion remained milder in Western markets. Analysts have warned that ongoing deficits could propel silver toward triple-digit prices if supply fails to recover in 2026. Still, Federal Reserve rate decisions and economic momentum in regions like the U.S. and Europe could temper the pace.

Traders kept a close watch on inventory data, treating Shanghai warehouse levels as a pulse check on market tightness. By late December 2025, withdrawals from these stocks continued, reinforcing the backwardated curve and sparking calls for more recycling and alternative sourcing. Comparisons to past squeezes surfaced, though specialists cautioned that any resolution hinges on supply chain adjustments.
In sum, China’s silver backwardation in 2025 points to deeper structural strains in the global market, where demand from green technologies has been outpacing mine supply growth. As the year wraps up, Shanghai’s premium over Comex has held firm, a sign that physical imbalances could spill into the new year unless policy shifts or production gains step in.
#Binance #wendy #Silver $BTC $ETH $BNB

Bitwise Asset Management released 10 crypto predictions for 2026, outlining a forcefully bullish, bitcoin-centered outlook driven by ETF demand, institutional adoption, regulatory progress, supply constraints, and a shifting market structure favoring sustained upside momentum ahead.

Bitwise Forecasts 10 Predictions as Bitcoin Decouples From Stocks and Follows Crypto-Specific Catalysts
Bitwise Asset Management, a U.S.-based asset manager, released its “10 Crypto Predictions for 2026” report on Dec. 15, laying out a bitcoin-centered outlook alongside a clearly defined set of market, regulatory, and institutional forecasts.
The report, authored by Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan and Head of Research Ryan Rasmussen, states:
We think the bulls will win out in 2026. The prevailing positive trends, from institutional adoption to regulatory progress, appear too strong and too far-reaching to be subdued for long.
The first prediction emphasizes: “ Bitcoin will break the four-year cycle and set new all-time highs,” as Bitwise argues that the historical drivers of pullback years—halvings, interest-rate spikes, and leverage-driven blowups—have weakened. The second prediction states that bitcoin will be less volatile than Nvidia, highlighting BTC’s transition toward a lower-risk profile as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) broaden ownership. The third prediction projects that ETFs will purchase more than 100% of new bitcoin supply, alongside ethereum and solana, reinforcing a structural supply-demand imbalance. Explaining the long-term foundation behind these calls, the report adds:
One of the primary reasons we’re bullish on crypto in the long term is that we think demand from institutional investors will outpace new supply for years to come.

The remaining seven predictions expand the framework supporting bitcoin’s outlook. The fourth prediction forecasts that crypto equities will outperform tech equities as regulatory clarity unlocks new revenue streams and product launches. The fifth predicts that Polymarket open interest will reach a new all-time high, surpassing levels seen during the 2024 U.S. election.
The sixth anticipates that stablecoins will be blamed for destabilizing an emerging-market currency, even as adoption reflects underlying inflation pressures. The seventh predicts that onchain vaults, described as “ETFs 2.0,” will double assets under management as institutional-grade risk controls emerge. The eighth projects that ethereum and solana will reach new all-time highs if the CLARITY Act passes, strengthening the overall regulatory environment for crypto, including bitcoin.
The ninth states that half of Ivy League endowments will invest in crypto, expanding institutional exposure to bitcoin-linked products. The tenth predicts that more than 100 crypto-linked ETFs will launch in the U.S., further broadening access. A bonus prediction returns directly to bitcoin, forecasting that its correlation with stocks will fall as crypto-specific catalysts increasingly drive performance.
#Binance #wendy #bitcoin $BTC $ETH $BNB

Tether’s rejected $1.2 billion bid to acquire Juventus will likely trigger a high‑stakes battle for control of the club, fueled by the stablecoin issuer’s vast profits, deep liquidity, and existing 10% stake. Beyond the takeover drama, the move signals crypto’s evolution into a mainstream, institutionally credible force, as Web3 companies increasingly use elite sports partnerships to accelerate global adoption and brand legitimacy.

The Audacious Bid: Tether’s Power Play for Juventus
Tether shocked the European sports and crypto markets with a late‑2025 bid to acquire Juventus, one of Italy’s most successful football clubs. Although the Agnelli family rejected the company’s nearly $1.2 billion offer, expectations are rising that CEO Paolo Ardoino and chairman Giancarlo Devasini will return with an improved bid.
After all, Tether already owns 10% of the club, while Ardoino and Devasini are two lifelong fans of Juventus who already expressed their desire to become more involved with the club. However, perhaps the most important factor in the ongoing saga is Tether’s immense and virtually unmatched financial strength. Tether remains an enormously profitable business that has recorded billions in annual profits, primarily generated from the interest earned on the massive reserves that back its USDT tokens.
This has left the company sitting on a pile of cash—reported to be tens of billions in excess reserves and liquid assets—which Tether executives have stated they intend to deploy for strategic growth and diversification beyond crypto operations. This combination of deep liquidity and a clear need for high-profile asset diversification almost guarantees a long, drawn-out tussle for the control of Juventus. For the Agnelli family, this protracted fight for a club that reportedly has not turned a profit in almost a decade means they face a highly motivated and virtually bottomless counterparty.
Beyond Sponsorship: A Shift in Crypto’s Reputation
The politics for the control of the club aside, Tether’s audacious bid holds deeper significance for the crypto industry. It dramatically underlines just how far the company has evolved—moving from being frequently scrutinized and often labeled a “pariah” in earlier crypto cycles—to positioning itself as a legitimate, highly liquid Web3 leader with serious mainstream institutional ambitions.
This high-stakes move into football, however, is part of a larger, strategic pivot that exposes a growing consensus among Web3 companies: sponsoring or associating with popular global sports organizations is the most reliable, sure path to mass adoption and public trust. Unlike past crypto marketing, which often targeted niche technical audiences, this strategy leverages the inherent loyalty and massive, global viewership of sports—particularly European football and Formula 1—to achieve essential goals.
Following a well-trodden, highly effective playbook, crypto exchanges and various Web3 companies have systematically poured hundreds of millions of dollars into sports teams, particularly the globally dominant English football clubs. In exchange for massive investment, these teams prominently adorn their playing or training kits with logos or titles of the sponsoring exchanges, effectively transforming their globally televised athletes into walking billboards.
This strategy is a direct, calculated replication of the market penetration model successfully executed by mainstream global corporations decades prior. For example, it is said that the U.S.-based insurance giants AON and AIG used shirt sponsorship of Manchester United throughout the 2000s to achieve crucial brand recognition. Their success demonstrated that associating with top-tier sports clubs provides an unparalleled, instant injection of trust and legitimacy, transforming relatively niche financial services into household names across diverse, international demographics.
Today, Web3 companies are attempting to leverage the same powerful mechanism to leapfrog the typical decades-long cycle of consumer trust development. By offering unprecedentedly lucrative deals to the most popular sports franchises, they aim to achieve rapid global visibility and, crucially, a tacit endorsement from the traditional world of popular culture.
It has been said that these two insurance companies were able to penetrate Asia and Europe in part because of the popularity of Manchester United in those parts of the world. Today, Web3 companies are attempting to replicate this success by offering lucrative deals to popular sports teams. In this article, Bitcoin.com News looks back at some of the more significant partnerships established or cemented in 2025.
Tether’s Juventus Stake and Rejected Takeover Bid
This has easily ranked as the most significant, both in terms of the funds involved as well as the profile of the sports team involved. Until a few years ago, Juventus dominated Italian football, winning everything on offer and was recognized as one of the big guns of European football. However, the club, which won the Italian Serie A a record 36 times, has struggled in the last few years, and its reputation has been tarnished by allegations of match-fixing. This bad patch has affected Juventus’ ability to generate revenues and turned it into a loss-making club.
The club has attempted to find ways of generating extra revenues, but these have fallen short, forcing the Agnelli family to consider raising capital by selling its shares. Tether, which sponsored the Swiss professional football club FC Lugano in 2023, has been participating in Juventus’ investment rounds, culminating in its shareholding rising to 10.12%.
However, given their personal connection to the club and billionaire status, Ardoino and Devasini appear to want more, and this was made clear in June when the Tether CEO publicly expressed frustration with what he perceived to be the limited communication between the Agnelli family’s Exor and the stablecoin issuer. Now, with the Agnelli family having thrown the gauntlet with the rejection of Tether’s offer, the stage seems set for a lengthy and public fight for the club. Whichever way this ends, the crypto industry is likely to be a big winner from this fight.
Crypto Industry’s Love Affair with European Football Teams
While Tether’s Juventus pursuit is by far the biggest story of the year, it was not the only one. There were several shirt or other sponsorship deals between Web3 companies and European football clubs. For example, crypto exchange Kraken added Atlético Madrid and RB Leipzig to its presence with sleeve sponsorships, while Bitpanda expanded its partnership with another Italian football powerhouse, AC Milan, to bring visibility on the back of the men’s first team’s jerseys.
Meanwhile, Binance is the sponsor of next year’s Africa Cup of Nations, a biannual football tournament featuring 24 African national football teams. Crypto.com, on the other hand, secured the naming rights for the Los Angeles multi-purpose indoor arena Staples Center.
Formula Partnerships
2025 will be definitively marked as the year crypto achieved true institutional prominence within Formula 1 (F1), the premier global motor racing series. Coinbase forcefully headlined this strategic pivot to motor racing with its groundbreaking partnership with the Aston Martin Aramco F1 Team. This was not merely a passive branding deal; it served as a high-profile, practical demonstration of blockchain utility, as the entire agreement was reportedly settled entirely in the stablecoin USDC. Furthermore, the partnership signals a clear future focus on deeper Web3 integration, with fan initiatives slated to be built on Ethereum’s Layer 2 network, Base, optimizing speed and reducing transaction costs for fan engagement.
The competition among exchanges for trackside visibility was fierce. Gate.io secured a major sponsorship deal with the perennial powerhouse Red Bull Racing, aligning its brand with one of the most successful F1 teams and ensuring maximum exposure across every race weekend. Meanwhile, OKX solidified its high-profile role as a primary partner of McLaren, featuring prominent branding on the car chassis and driver suits, and frequently collaborating on special edition liveries that generate significant media buzz.
Of all these high-value arrangements, the OKX sponsorship arguably secured the most immediate returns on investment, as McLaren’s Lando Norris stunned the field to win the 2025 Formula One World Drivers’ Championship. Norris claimed the title with 423 points, narrowly edging out Red Bull’s two-time champion Max Verstappen by just two points, ensuring that the OKX logo was front-and-center during the year’s most celebrated motorsport moment.
Coinbase Makes Inroads in North American Sports
In 2024, Coinbase became the first crypto partner of a major Canadian professional sports league, sponsoring the 111th Grey Cup. This deal emphasizes innovative fan engagement through blockchain, including on-chain events and digital prizes at games. However, by June 2025, Coinbase announced a multi-year partnership with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (MLSE), which owns the CFL’s Toronto Argonauts. This new deal acts as a continuation and deepening of their CFL investment, with Coinbase’s logo being featured on the Argonauts’ jersey for the 2025 and 2026 seasons, confirming the longevity of their presence in Canadian football.
Coinbase also continues its relationship with the NBA team, focusing on innovative fan engagement using blockchain technology, digital collectibles, and exclusive experiences.
Conclusion
As Web3 companies have demonstrated through their multi-million-dollar investments throughout 2025, the sponsorship of elite sports teams transcends mere advertising; it is a meticulously calculated, full-scale corporate reputation and global adoption strategy. These firms are not just buying billboard space; they are actively harnessing the unrivaled prestige, mass appeal, and inherent trust of traditional, long-standing athletic institutions to swiftly cement crypto’s legitimacy and dominance in the global financial and cultural landscapes.
By aligning their technology with the proven stability and passionate loyalty of major leagues and iconic teams, Web3 entities are fundamentally seeking to accelerate the mass migration of traditional finance users into the cryptoeconomy. This aggressive positioning is aimed at transforming public perception and making blockchain technology an inseparable fixture of the modern consumer experience.
$BTC $ETH $BNB

Gold and silver ended 2025 with outsized gains, driven by monetary policy shifts, central bank accumulation, and sustained industrial demand that pushed both metals to multi-decade highs.

Gold and Silver Post Standout 2025 Performance
Gold prices climbed from $2,585 per ounce in January to $4,524 by Dec. 23, posting a 75% annual gain, while silver rose from $28.51 to $72.66 per ounce, marking a 155% increase over the same period.
The advance capped one of the strongest years for precious metals in decades, with both assets outperforming most major commodities and financial benchmarks. Analysts pointed to a combination of macroeconomic uncertainty, central bank diversification, and supply constraints as core drivers behind the sustained rally.
“The market divergence is hard to ignore. While indices show exhaustion, metals are soaring,” one X user wrote in mid-December. “With structural deficits & central banks buying, the flight to safety is on. The next leg higher is soon.”

Gold’s performance in 2025 reflected renewed demand for monetary hedges as real interest rates remained pressured for much of the year. Expectations for interest rate cuts early in the year set the tone, while persistent geopolitical tensions reinforced gold’s appeal as a reserve asset. Central banks continued to accumulate bullion at a historically elevated pace, adding steady demand independent of short-term market positioning.
Silver’s move proved even more pronounced, reflecting its dual role as both a monetary metal and a critical industrial input. Demand from solar manufacturing, electric vehicles, data centers, and electronics expanded throughout the year, tightening supply in a market already experiencing multi-year deficits. Unlike gold, silver’s price action showed sharper acceleration during periods of industrial demand growth.

Market data from 2025 showed that gold and silver followed a phased trajectory. Early gains were supported by monetary policy expectations and safe-haven flows. Midyear consolidation gave way to renewed upside momentum in the second half as physical supply constraints became more visible and investment demand reaccelerated.
Silver inventories, particularly across major exchanges and vaulting systems, declined as industrial consumption absorbed available supply. Leasing rates rose sharply at several points during the year, signaling tightness in the physical market rather than speculative excess. These conditions amplified silver’s price response during periods of increased demand.

Gold’s rise was steadier but equally significant. Investment flows into bullion-backed products increased alongside physical bar and coin demand, particularly outside North America. Central banks in emerging and developed markets alike continued diversifying reserves amid concerns surrounding currency exposure and long-term fiscal sustainability.
The broader economic backdrop also played a role. Global debt levels remained elevated, while inflation metrics proved uneven across regions. These factors reinforced demand for hard assets viewed as stores of value (SoV), particularly during periods of currency volatility and geopolitical strain.

Industrial demand emerged as a defining feature of silver’s outperformance. Solar panel production alone accounted for a growing share of annual silver consumption, while electric vehicle manufacturing continued to increase silver loadings per unit. Expansion in artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and advanced electronics further tightened the supply-demand balance.
“Silver is no longer playing second fiddle — it’s gaining real market value, not just hype,” one X influencer explained. “Some analysts are calling this a once-in-a-decade reset. Silver may just be finding its real value, and if demand holds — this ride could go WAY higher.”
By year’s end, both metals reached new nominal highs, reflecting not only cyclical forces but longer-term structural shifts. Analysts noted that silver’s performance highlighted vulnerabilities in supply chains for energy transition technologies, while gold’s strength always points to ongoing demand for neutral reserve assets.
Market participants debated whether the gains represented a temporary overshoot or a repricing driven by durable fundamentals. While short-term volatility remained possible, the breadth of demand across investment, industrial, and official sectors differentiated 2025 from previous metals rallies.
Silver flipped Apple this week, becoming the third most valuable asset by market cap.
Looking ahead, expectations for 2026 remain mixed but grounded in similar themes. Central bank demand is expected to persist, while industrial consumption of silver is projected to remain elevated. Potential economic slowdowns could affect industrial metals broadly, though structural demand drivers remain intact.
The 2025 performance of gold and silver ultimately reflected a convergence of financial, industrial, and geopolitical forces. Rather than a narrow speculative episode, the year’s gains signaled a broader reassessment of precious metals’ role within global markets as economic and technological transitions continue.
#Binance #wendy #Silver $BTC $ETH $BNB

Bitcoin ETFs posted a fourth consecutive day of outflows, while ether ETFs slipped back into the red. XRP and solana ETFs continued to attract modest but steady inflows, underscoring selective investor demand.

Ether Turns Red Again as Bitcoin ETFs Sink Further
Risk appetite cooled further across crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as the holiday-shortened week approached, with investors pulling more capital from bitcoin and ether while keeping a cautious bid for XRP and solana products.
Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a net outflow of $188.64 million, extending their losing streak to four consecutive sessions. The pressure was concentrated in just four funds, led overwhelmingly by Blackrock’s IBIT, which alone shed $157.34 million.
Fidelity’s FBTC followed with a $15.30 million outflow, while Grayscale’s GBTC saw $10.28 million exit. Bitwise’s BITB rounded out the day with a smaller $5.72 million outflow. Despite the continued withdrawals, trading activity remained active at $3.16 billion, and total net assets were largely unchanged at $114.29 billion.
Ether ETFs also reversed course, returning to outflows after a brief rebound. The group posted a net exit of $95.53 million, driven primarily by Grayscale’s ETHE, which lost $50.89 million. Blackrock’s ETHA added to the pressure with a $25.04 million outflow. Smaller but notable exits were also seen on Bitwise’s ETHW at $13.98 million and Franklin’s EZET at $5.61 million. Total value traded dipped to just under $1 billion, while net assets held steady at $18.02 billion.
XRP ETFs continued their steady run, albeit at a slower pace. The group added $8.19 million on the day, entirely driven by Franklin’s XRPZ. Trading volume came in at $12.41 million, with total net assets holding firm at $1.25 billion, suggesting investors remain comfortable maintaining exposure even as flows moderate.
Solana ETFs also stayed in positive territory, bringing in $4.20 million. Bitwise’s BSOL led with a $1.64 million inflow, followed closely by Grayscale’s GSOL at $1.46 million and Fidelity’s FSOL at $1.10 million. Trading activity reached $28.57 million, pushing total net assets up to $940.96 million as solana ETFs inch closer to the $1 billion milestone.
As markets get set to close for the Christmas holiday, the year-end outlook for bitcoin and ether ETFs continue to look bleak with more capital departure. On the other hand, XRP and solana look to finish strong after their impressive debuts in 2025.
#Binance #wendy #bitcoin $BTC $ETH $BNB

Bitcoin’s price on Wednesday stands at $87,234, with a market capitalization of $1.74 trillion, reflecting a cautious tone heading into Christmas Eve as 24-hour trading volume clocks in at $36.90 billion and the intraday range stays boxed between $86,713 and $88,091. The numbers suggest bitcoin is pacing itself rather than sprinting, as traders digest mixed signals across timeframes and indicators.

Bitcoin Chart Outlook
On the daily chart, bitcoin remains stuck in a sideways-to-down posture after failing to hold its early December surge toward the mid-$94,000 area. Price action continues to carve out lower highs and lower lows, forming a mild descending channel that signals short-term fatigue rather than outright panic.
Volume has tapered off noticeably, reinforcing the idea that momentum is waning on both sides of the market. Importantly, price has not convincingly breached the $85,000 to $86,000 support zone, which keeps broader consolidation firmly in play instead of a deeper unraveling.
BTC/USD 1-day chart on Dec. 24, 2025.
Zooming into the four-hour chart, the structure leans bearish to neutral following repeated rejections near the $89,000 to $90,000 zone. Lower highs since Dec. 22 and spikes in selling volume on declines show that downside pressure has not fully clocked out for the holidays. That said, price behavior near $86,000 to $87,000 suggests some absorption is taking place, with candles shrinking as volatility cools. Translation: participants are waiting for confirmation, not charging blindly into thin liquidity.
BTC/USD 4-hour chart on Dec. 24, 2025.
The one-hour chart adds nuance rather than drama. Bitcoin has been drifting sideways around $87,000 to $87,500 with low volume and small-bodied candles, a classic sign of short-term exhaustion after a pullback. This kind of compression often precedes a sharper move, though direction remains unresolved. Think coiled spring, not wrapped present. Intraday participants appear content to let price reveal its hand rather than force a narrative.
BTC/USD 1-hour chart on Dec. 24, 2025.
Oscillators on the daily timeframe underscore that theme of indecision. The relative strength index ( RSI) sits at 42, firmly in neutral territory and far from signaling excess in either direction. The Stochastic oscillator at 34, the commodity channel index (CCI) at minus 80, the average directional index (ADX) at 23 and the Awesome oscillator at minus 948 all echo a market lacking strong conviction. Momentum and the moving average convergence divergence ( MACD) do hint at short-term recovery pressure, but those signals are counterbalanced by the broader trend, making this more of a cautious eyebrow raise than a victory lap.
Moving averages (MAs), however, are decidedly less festive. Every major trend gauge, from the exponential moving average (EMA) and simple moving average (SMA) across 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 periods, sits above the current price. That alignment reinforces the broader downward bias and confirms that bitcoin is trading below key dynamic resistance levels. Until price reclaims those averages with authority, rallies are likely to be treated with skepticism. In short, bitcoin isn’t breaking down, but it also isn’t handing out gifts just yet.
Bull Verdict:
Bitcoin’s case for upside rests on resilience, not bravado. Price is holding above the critical $85,000 to $86,000 support band while the one-hour and four-hour charts show signs of seller exhaustion and stabilization. Momentum and the moving average convergence divergence ( MACD) both lean constructive in the short term, suggesting room for a relief move if volume returns and nearby resistance levels are challenged. It is not fireworks, but it is steady footing — and in this market, that still counts.
Bear Verdict:
The opposing argument is grounded in trend, and trends tend to win arguments. Bitcoin remains below every major exponential moving average (EMA) and simple moving average (SMA), from the short-term 10-period to the long-term 200-period, reinforcing a dominant downward bias. Daily structure shows lower highs, weakening volume and failed attempts to reclaim higher territory near $90,000 and above. Until price convincingly re-enters that range, rallies risk looking more like seasonal cheer than sustainable strength.
#Binance #wendy #bitcoin $BTC