shuaibs

The U.S. Federal Reserve recently injected approximately $74.6 billion into the financial system through an overnight liquidity operation. This move supplied short-term cash to banks to ensure smooth settlement processes and maintain stability across money markets.
While liquidity injections are not unusual—especially around year-end—this operation stands out due to its size. One of the largest single-day injections in recent history, it suggests that parts of the financial system may be experiencing short-term funding stress.
Why the Fed Injects Liquidity
The Federal Reserve uses tools such as repurchase agreements to provide temporary liquidity when cash demand spikes. These operations help banks meet obligations, manage balance sheets, and avoid disruptions in overnight lending markets.
Although year-end balance sheet management often leads to increased liquidity needs, the magnitude of this injection indicates that underlying pressures may be more persistent. When banks rely heavily on central bank liquidity, it can signal that private funding markets are less willing or able to provide sufficient capital on their own.
Implications for Risk Assets and Crypto
Historically, expanding liquidity environments tend to benefit risk assets, including equities and cryptocurrencies. When more capital is available:
Borrowing stress is reduced
Market volatility can ease
Capital is more likely to flow into speculative and high-growth assets
For crypto markets, sustained liquidity support can improve sentiment and provide a tailwind, particularly for assets with strong narratives or high beta exposure. However, liquidity injections alone do not guarantee sustained price appreciation—market structure and demand still matter.
What This Signals About the Financial System
While increased money supply can stabilize markets in the short term, it also highlights a key reality: the financial system may not currently be operating without central bank assistance. Continued reliance on liquidity support suggests fragility beneath the surface, even if headline markets appear calm.
This dynamic creates a mixed environment for investors—one where liquidity-driven rallies are possible, but structural risks remain.
Key Takeaway
The Federal Reserve’s $74.6 billion liquidity injection underscores the importance of monitoring macro conditions alongside crypto-specific developments. Expanding liquidity often supports risk assets, but it also reflects stress within the traditional financial system.
For crypto participants, understanding how central bank actions influence capital flows is essential. Liquidity does not just move markets—it shapes cycles.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BTCVSGOLD

Verasity (VRA) has declined into a critical long-term support area after a sharp sell-side liquidity sweep on the higher timeframes. Technical analysis shared by EGRAG CRYPTO highlights this region as a historical demand zone, making it a key level to monitor for any potential price reaction.
The asset is now trading near some of its lowest levels in recent years, placing it at a technical and fundamental inflection point. While the chart suggests the possibility of a short-term relief bounce, broader concerns surrounding tokenomics and utility continue to weigh on sentiment.
Sell-Side Liquidity and Market Structure
On the monthly timeframe, VRA has moved directly into a sell-side liquidity area where prior accumulation previously occurred. Such zones often attract speculative interest as price searches for equilibrium after extended downside moves.
EGRAG’s chart identifies a highlighted demand zone that may act as temporary support. A green marker on the chart indicates the analyst’s final buy order, suggesting that some long-term participants are watching this region closely for a reaction rather than chasing higher prices.
However, it is important to note that demand zones do not guarantee reversals. Without confirmation through volume expansion or structure reclaim, any bounce remains corrective rather than trend-defining.
Token Supply Expansion and Dilution Risk
A major headwind for VRA is the recent expansion of its total token supply to 200 billion. This change has materially altered the project’s tokenomics by increasing dilution and reducing scarcity.
From a valuation perspective, a higher supply significantly raises the market capitalization required for VRA to revisit previous all-time highs. This creates persistent selling pressure, particularly if new demand fails to scale alongside supply growth.
Community feedback has reflected growing frustration, with many investors questioning the rationale behind the supply adjustment and its impact on long-term value capture.
Fundamentals vs Technicals
While technical levels may offer short-term opportunities, sustainable recovery depends on more than chart structure. Key factors that could influence VRA’s future include:
Clear and measurable token utility
Transparent communication around tokenomics
Restoration of confidence among long-term holders
Consistent ecosystem growth and adoption
Without progress on these fronts, technical bounces are more likely to be sold into rather than evolve into trend reversals.
Key Takeaway
VRA is currently at a crossroads. The chart presents a defined demand zone that could generate a relief reaction, but structural concerns around supply expansion and utility remain unresolved.
For traders, this is a zone to observe rather than assume. For long-term participants, fundamentals now matter more than historical price levels. Understanding the interaction between liquidity zones, tokenomics, and investor confidence is critical when evaluating assets at deep support.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD

Bitcoin has started the new year with renewed momentum, gaining nearly 2% over the past 24 hours as traders returned after the holiday period and risk appetite stabilized across markets. The broader crypto market also moved higher, with total market capitalization rising to approximately $3.01 trillion.
BTC is currently trading near the $89,000–$89,600 zone and could attempt a retest of $90,000 if short-term momentum continues. However, beneath the surface, Bitcoin is navigating a historically unusual phase that raises important questions about the traditional four-year cycle.
A Break From the Four-Year Cycle
Bitcoin closed 2025 with an annual decline of roughly 6%, marking the first red year following a halving event. This breaks the long-observed four-year cycle pattern that previously defined bull market peaks in 2013, 2017, and 2021.
From its October peak, BTC is down nearly 30%. Rather than following a purely retail-driven speculative cycle, current price behavior appears increasingly influenced by macro liquidity conditions, institutional capital flows, and ETF-related demand. This shift suggests Bitcoin may be transitioning from a reflexive boom-bust cycle into a more structurally driven market.
On-Chain Signals and Bear Market Debate
According to CryptoQuant’s Head of Research Julio Moreno, Bitcoin may have entered a bear market as early as November. Several indicators within the Bull Score Index — including investor profitability, network activity, demand, and liquidity — turned bearish and have yet to recover.
A key technical confirmation cited is Bitcoin trading below its one-year moving average. Historically, this has aligned with broader market downtrends.
Moreno suggests a potential bottom could form between $56,000 and $60,000, aligning with Bitcoin’s realized price — the average price at which current holders acquired their BTC. In previous cycles, realized price often acted as a base during extended bear markets.
Importantly, even a move to $56,000 would represent a drawdown of roughly 55% from all-time highs, notably smaller than the 70–80% declines seen in prior bear cycles.
Why This Cycle Looks Different
Despite the bearish metrics, this market has remained structurally stable compared to past downturns. Previous bear markets were defined by major systemic failures, such as the collapse of Terra, Celsius, and FTX in 2022.
In contrast, the current cycle has seen:
Continued institutional participation
ETF-related accumulation that is less sensitive to short-term volatility
More regulated and resilient infrastructure
These factors may help dampen extreme downside moves, even during prolonged consolidation phases.
Institutional Accumulation Continues
Adding to the long-term support narrative, Tether disclosed the purchase of 8,888 BTC on New Year’s Eve, bringing its total Bitcoin holdings above 96,000 BTC. The acquisition, valued at approximately $780 million, is part of Tether’s strategy to allocate 15% of its quarterly profits to Bitcoin.
Tether has also diversified into hard assets, increasing its gold reserves to 116 tons, signaling a broader treasury strategy focused on scarce, non-sovereign assets.
Short-Term Market Structure and Options Risk
Spot volumes and market activity have recovered after a sharp holiday-related decline. However, sentiment remains cautious as Bitcoin options with a notional value of $1.5 billion are set to expire. The put-to-call ratio stands at 0.48, with a maximum pain level near $88,000 — a zone that may act as a short-term magnet for price action.
Recent price behavior shows BTC repeatedly testing the $90,000 region but failing to sustain acceptance above it, while buyers continue to defend the mid-$87,000 to $88,000 range.
Key Takeaway
Bitcoin’s first post-halving red year does not necessarily signal structural weakness, but rather a transition. The asset is increasingly shaped by institutional flows, macro conditions, and longer-term capital rather than purely speculative cycles.
Understanding this shift is critical. Bitcoin may no longer move in the explosive, retail-driven patterns of the past — but it may also be entering a phase of deeper liquidity, reduced systemic risk, and more measured drawdowns.
For traders and investors, adapting to this evolving market structure is becoming just as important as predicting direction.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BTCVSGOLD

For the first time since Bitcoin’s inception, mainstream media failed to publish a single “Bitcoin obituary” in 2026. This marks a significant psychological and narrative shift for the world’s largest cryptocurrency, which has spent over a decade being repeatedly declared dead during every major market cycle.
The data comes from Cypherpunk Holdings CTO Jameson Lopp, who has meticulously tracked Bitcoin obituaries for the past 15 years. His latest chart shows the obituary count dropping to zero in 2026 — a milestone that reflects not just price resilience, but growing structural acceptance.
A Look Back at the Death Narrative
Bitcoin’s “death” narrative has historically surged during periods of extreme volatility.
2018 Peak Skepticism:
Despite Bitcoin’s rally into mainstream awareness and its run toward $20,000, the media published roughly 125 obituaries. The ICO bubble, retail mania, and subsequent crash fueled widespread claims that Bitcoin was finished.
2018 Crypto Winter:
As prices collapsed across the market, more than 90 obituaries appeared. The dominant narrative framed Bitcoin as a failed experiment rather than a cyclical asset.
2021 Cycle:
Skepticism resurfaced, but at a reduced intensity. Fewer than 50 obituaries were published despite major volatility, suggesting that critics were losing conviction.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #CPIWatch

The current correction in WIF against BTC appears constructive rather than bearish. After a sharp impulsive move, meme pairs often require a pause to reset momentum. These pullbacks serve an important function: they remove late entries, stabilize funding pressure, and allow genuine demand to reassert itself. Without this reset, upside continuation typically becomes unstable and vulnerable to sharp wicks and deeper retracements.
Market Structure and Momentum
On the WIF/BTC pair, price remains above key short-term and mid-term moving averages — MA(7), MA(25), and MA(99). This alignment indicates that despite recent volatility, buyers continue to control the broader structure. The rejection near 0.00000371 should be viewed as profit-taking following a fast expansion, not a structural failure.
Importantly, price has not broken its higher-low structure. Instead, it is consolidating above prior breakout levels, a behavior commonly associated with accumulation phases.
Key Support Zone
The primary area of interest lies between 0.00000355 and 0.00000340. This zone is technically significant for several reasons:
It overlaps with previous consolidation support between 0.00000344 and 0.00000335
It represents a shallow retracement of the most recent impulsive leg
Prior dips into this range have triggered swift buyer reactions, confirming active demand
When pullbacks remain shallow after an impulse, it typically reflects strong underlying bid strength.
Trade Framework Under Observation
Entry Zone: 0.00000355 – 0.00000340
Target 1: 0.00000390
Target 2: 0.00000420
Invalidation Level: 0.00000318
As long as price compresses above 0.00000340 and continues forming higher lows, the structure favors continuation rather than distribution. Compression above support often precedes expansion, particularly when sellers fail to force deeper retracements.
What to Watch Next
If the support zone holds, a move back toward 0.00000390 becomes likely, with extension toward 0.00000420 possible if broader market conditions — such as easing BTC dominance — provide a tailwind. A decisive break below 0.00000318 would invalidate the bullish thesis and suggest a deeper reset is needed.
Key Takeaway
Strong trends do not move in straight lines. Healthy corrections are essential for sustainable continuation. In WIF/BTC, the market is currently testing whether buyers can defend structure and convert consolidation into the next expansion phase.
Understanding the difference between corrective pauses and structural breakdowns is critical for trading volatile meme assets effectively.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #CPIWatch

XRP is once again drawing institutional attention following Roundhill Investments’ amendment filing for an XRP Covered Call Strategy ETF. While the structure does not involve direct spot ownership of XRP, it represents a meaningful regulatory development by placing XRP within a compliant ETF framework. This signals growing acceptance of XRP in traditional finance and strengthens its long-term legitimacy as an investable digital asset.
Despite the positive regulatory momentum, XRP’s price action has remained largely range-bound. This type of market environment often reduces the appeal of short-term speculation and instead pushes investors to explore strategies that can generate consistent returns without relying on sharp price movements.
From Volatility Trading to Income-Based Strategies
During low-volatility phases, many market participants shift focus from directional trades to income-generating models. Covered call strategies, yield products, and structured crypto contracts are increasingly favored because they aim to monetize time rather than price expansion.
This mirrors behavior seen in traditional markets, where sideways conditions tend to benefit options-based income strategies rather than outright long or short positions.
Predictable Yield Gains Traction in Crypto
As crypto matures, demand is rising for yield products that offer clarity and predictability. Instead of chasing momentum, investors are looking for:
Defined time horizons
Fixed or stable return structures
Reduced exposure to short-term price swings
USD-denominated performance metrics
Platforms offering fixed-term, automated yield contracts across major digital assets are gaining attention in this environment. These products are designed to generate returns during periods when markets are consolidating rather than trending aggressively.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD

Why Bitcoin Is the Natural Next Move
One of the most important macro indicators just flipped decisively bullish: global liquidity.
After years of tightening, balance-sheet contraction, and volatility, liquidity conditions are now accelerating to new highs. This shift matters more than any short-term candle or headline — because liquidity is what ultimately moves markets.
🔹 Liquidity Leads. Price Follows.
When global liquidity expands, capital doesn’t sit idle. It looks for assets with:
High beta
Convex upside
Deep liquidity
Scarcity characteristics
Historically, Bitcoin has been one of the cleanest and most responsive beneficiaries of these conditions.
Every major liquidity expansion cycle has eventually rotated into BTC — often with a delay, but once it starts, the move is aggressive and persistent.
🔹 This Isn’t Narrative — It’s Math
More liquidity means:
Increased risk appetite
Capital rotation out of defensive assets
Stronger demand for assets that can absorb large inflows efficiently
Bitcoin fits this profile perfectly:
Fixed supply
Global accessibility
No earnings risk
No dilution
Liquidity expansion creates the fuel.
Bitcoin provides the outlet.
🔹 Why Macro Traders Watch This First
Price reacts after liquidity shifts — not before.
Those focused only on short-term price action are watching the effect.
Macro-aligned traders watch the cause.
If liquidity continues on this trajectory, the real question isn’t if Bitcoin moves — it’s how fast and how far.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #WriteToEarnUpgrade #WriteToEarnUpgrade #USJobsData #CPIWatch

2026 marks a major shift in crypto market structure as U.S.-listed Solana staking ETFs go live. These products go beyond traditional spot ETFs by staking SOL on-chain, allowing investors to earn real network yield (approximately 6–7% annualized) while maintaining exposure to SOL price performance through standard brokerage accounts.
This development represents a significant milestone for both Solana and institutional crypto adoption.
What Makes Solana Staking ETFs Different?
Unlike spot ETFs that only track price, staking ETFs actively participate in Solana’s proof-of-stake mechanism. The SOL held by the fund is delegated to validators, generating staking rewards that are either reinvested or distributed, depending on the fund structure.
Key benefits include:
No need for wallets or validator management
No slashing risk exposure for end investors
Full regulatory oversight
Accessible through brokers, retirement accounts, and institutional platforms

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #BTCVSGOLD #CPIWatch #USJobsData

Recent U.S. trade policy shifts, including new import tariffs, are more than political headlines. They represent a structural macro move that can directly influence crypto markets over the medium to long term.
This strategy aims to push manufacturing and investment back into the U.S., reshaping global supply chains and capital flows.
What’s Happening at the Macro Level
Import tariffs are now active and impacting global trade routes
Corporations are reassessing supply chains and cost structures
Inflation risks may rise if import costs increase
Capital allocation decisions are being delayed or redirected
Why This Matters for Crypto Crypto does not move in isolation. It reacts to liquidity, inflation expectations, and global risk sentiment — all of which are affected by trade policy.
Key Crypto Implications
Inflation Risk Returns
Tariffs increase production and consumer costs. If inflation rises again, central banks may delay rate cuts — short-term bearish for risk assets, including crypto.
Market Volatility Increases
Policy shocks create uncertainty. During uncertainty, crypto often experiences sharp swings as traders rebalance risk exposure.
Bitcoin’s Hedge Narrative Strengthens
If trade wars escalate and fiat instability grows, Bitcoin may regain attention as a hedge against policy-driven monetary stress.
Altcoins React Later
In macro-driven environments, Bitcoin usually absorbs the first inflows. Altcoins typically follow only after direction is clear.
What Smart Traders Watch
Inflation data following tariff implementation
Central bank language on rates and liquidity
Dollar strength versus risk assets
Bitcoin dominance during volatility spikes
2026 Strategic Outlook Trade wars rarely create instant market trends. They build pressure that releases later through liquidity shifts or policy pivots.
The market impact is usually delayed — those who prepare early benefit the most.
Key Lesson Markets react first.
Trends form later.
Profits go to those positioned before consensus.
Trader Question Do you see tariffs as inflationary pressure that delays the bull cycle — or as a catalyst that strengthens Bitcoin’s long-term value?
Share your perspective below.

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #USJobsData #WriteToEarnUpgrade

has been respecting an ascending trendline for a period of time, acting as dynamic support. Once price fails to hold that trendline, it often signals a shift in control from buyers to sellers.
👉 The recent move shows a clean breakdown, not just a wick — this is important.
🧠 Key Technical Factors
1️⃣ Trendline Breakdown (Major Signal)
Price closed below the trendline
Breakdown shows loss of bullish structure
This confirms sellers are stepping in with strength

#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #CPIWatch #WriteToEarnUpgrade

Understanding short-term market behavior is critical for scalpers and intraday traders. Let’s break down the current AVAX/USDT structure and why bearish pressure is building on the 15-minute chart.
🔍 Market Context
AVAX recently attempted to push above a key resistance zone, but the move failed to hold. This rejection is an important signal—when price cannot sustain above resistance, it often confirms active sellers defending that level.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD #USJobsData