When you're still staring at the K-line of $BTC in a daze or frantically chasing the next MEME dream in the ecosystem of $SOL , if you're still looking around the streets for those game coins that promise "great empowerment in the future," you're likely to be burned out as expendables.
Almost 99% of the projects on the market are desperately trying to find various awkward use cases for their tokens to cover up the essence of being empty.
It's like a spare key that was made but has no idea what lock it fits.
But I've gone through the system files of @Pixels again these past two days and feel that many people have completely misunderstood its pricing logic.
Everyone still sees it as a consumer coupon that can only be used to farm and buy skins in games.
But if you peel back the underlying protocol of the real-time reward traffic platform Stacked, you'll see the truth kicking you back to reality.
This thing is fundamentally not just a simple game token.
It has long become a SaaS settlement currency operating within an infrastructure platform.
Now, every external studio wanting to reach players through Stacked is pulling data in the background every day and issuing incentives.
These dense business actions consume a substantial amount of real monetary settlement fuel, which is $PIXEL . While other tokens are still struggling to find practicality, it has already become a solid operational bill supporting the commercialization of other studios.
But when I clarified this funding pipeline from players to studios, I smelled an extremely dangerous scent.
Once the token turns into a rigid corporate-level infrastructure, a skyrocketing price is no longer simply a good thing.
When the bullish market sentiment drives the price up and retail investors are celebrating wildly, for those physical studios relying on it for activities, their customer acquisition costs are soaring like a helicopter.
When the get-rich-quick effect turns into a heavy corporate-level inflation tax, will those rational partners grit their teeth and continue to recharge, or will they overnight search for the next cheap alternative?
#pixel
Almost 99% of the projects on the market are desperately trying to find various awkward use cases for their tokens to cover up the essence of being empty.
It's like a spare key that was made but has no idea what lock it fits.
But I've gone through the system files of @Pixels again these past two days and feel that many people have completely misunderstood its pricing logic.
Everyone still sees it as a consumer coupon that can only be used to farm and buy skins in games.
But if you peel back the underlying protocol of the real-time reward traffic platform Stacked, you'll see the truth kicking you back to reality.
This thing is fundamentally not just a simple game token.
It has long become a SaaS settlement currency operating within an infrastructure platform.
Now, every external studio wanting to reach players through Stacked is pulling data in the background every day and issuing incentives.
These dense business actions consume a substantial amount of real monetary settlement fuel, which is $PIXEL . While other tokens are still struggling to find practicality, it has already become a solid operational bill supporting the commercialization of other studios.
But when I clarified this funding pipeline from players to studios, I smelled an extremely dangerous scent.
Once the token turns into a rigid corporate-level infrastructure, a skyrocketing price is no longer simply a good thing.
When the bullish market sentiment drives the price up and retail investors are celebrating wildly, for those physical studios relying on it for activities, their customer acquisition costs are soaring like a helicopter.
When the get-rich-quick effect turns into a heavy corporate-level inflation tax, will those rational partners grit their teeth and continue to recharge, or will they overnight search for the next cheap alternative?
#pixel