$SPCX To be honest, I used to really envy those folks who are super in the loop.
They're always the first to drop news in the group, always know which coin is about to hit Binance, and can capture screenshots of those K-lines before they pump.
I figured they must be raking in a ton of cash.
Later, I got close with one of them, and after a few drinks, he spilled the truth.
He said: "What's the point of having all this info? Even if I know a lot, 9 out of 10 times I don't end up buying."
I asked why, and he dropped a line that I still remember—"The more you know, the less certain you become."
Every day, he opens his phone; one news says AI is going to pump, while another says AI is crashing. This guy says this coin is a sure bet to rise, that guy says this coin is definitely going to drop.
The more information there is, the more chaotic the direction becomes. And the more chaotic it is, the less you want to act.
In the end, he knew everything but bought nothing.
Meanwhile, those who made a killing were the ones who knew nothing—just knew one thing: they bought, forgot, and then made bank.
Since then, my attitude towards information has changed. I don’t chase a lot; I chase less but better.
Now, I only look for one piece of info—Is this thing moving?
If it’s moving, it’s worth taking a second look. If it’s not moving, I don’t care what anyone says; I’m not listening. a p i a r y s hit that standard.
Working on AI computing power + multi-agent systems, the system is running, the business is moving, $ H N Y - d 6 b 0 is positioned within this ecosystem, not depending on news for survival, but relying on the system to generate output.
It’s still early, still quiet. But for someone who "only looks for movement", quiet isn’t a downside; it means it hasn’t been polluted by noise yet.
Is the info you’re focusing on helping you make a decision, or just giving you excuses not to decide?
#SPCX
They're always the first to drop news in the group, always know which coin is about to hit Binance, and can capture screenshots of those K-lines before they pump.
I figured they must be raking in a ton of cash.
Later, I got close with one of them, and after a few drinks, he spilled the truth.
He said: "What's the point of having all this info? Even if I know a lot, 9 out of 10 times I don't end up buying."
I asked why, and he dropped a line that I still remember—"The more you know, the less certain you become."
Every day, he opens his phone; one news says AI is going to pump, while another says AI is crashing. This guy says this coin is a sure bet to rise, that guy says this coin is definitely going to drop.
The more information there is, the more chaotic the direction becomes. And the more chaotic it is, the less you want to act.
In the end, he knew everything but bought nothing.
Meanwhile, those who made a killing were the ones who knew nothing—just knew one thing: they bought, forgot, and then made bank.
Since then, my attitude towards information has changed. I don’t chase a lot; I chase less but better.
Now, I only look for one piece of info—Is this thing moving?
If it’s moving, it’s worth taking a second look. If it’s not moving, I don’t care what anyone says; I’m not listening. a p i a r y s hit that standard.
Working on AI computing power + multi-agent systems, the system is running, the business is moving, $ H N Y - d 6 b 0 is positioned within this ecosystem, not depending on news for survival, but relying on the system to generate output.
It’s still early, still quiet. But for someone who "only looks for movement", quiet isn’t a downside; it means it hasn’t been polluted by noise yet.
Is the info you’re focusing on helping you make a decision, or just giving you excuses not to decide?
#SPCX