#plasma $XPL
💡 The Endgame of Web3 Payments: Making Technology "Disappeared" and Bringing Back the Experience
After discussing so much @Plasma , I want to return to a fundamental question: what kind of infrastructure can retain users?
The current public chain track is too "inward-looking," competing on performance and narrative, but forgetting to compete on "common sense." And @plasma's common sense is: stablecoin payments should not have barriers.
Its most hardcore logic lies in **"decoupling"**:
* Decoupling security and execution: leveraging Bitcoin's security base for endorsement while using the high-performance environment of EVM (Reth) for execution. This resolves the contradiction of needing both absolute security and rapid response.
* Decoupling assets and costs: through the "stablecoin priority Gas" mechanism, allowing users to completely bid farewell to the routine of "having to buy coins to spend money."
I have always believed that true Mass Adoption is not about making 1 billion people learn to use wallet mnemonics but rather allowing 1 billion people to use @plasma for stablecoin settlements without even feeling the presence of blockchain.
When a technology becomes as natural as air and water, it has truly succeeded. What @plasma is doing is bringing this kind of "natural" into Web3.
If payments no longer have Gas fees, what do you most want to do with stablecoins? See you in the comments.