Andres12309
1k Публикации
Andres12309
1.9K+ Следвани
298 Последователи
74 Харесано
Публикации
Портфолио
Всички
Оферти
На живо
$ESPORTS
aneu nurjanah000
·
--
БичиI'm Sharing something new 🆕😁 that $ESPORTS is going to hit $1...? like $RE
T.p 1 0.30$
T.p 2 0.60$
T.p 3 1.0$
$ESPORTS
{future}(ESPORTSUSDT)
T.p 1 0.30$
T.p 2 0.60$
T.p 3 1.0$
$ESPORTS
{future}(ESPORTSUSDT)
$TSLAB #BTCFalls4thDaySTRCBelowPar
_____-
·
--
I used to see OpenGradient Chat as nothing more than a side-by-side lens.
A way to throw a question at multiple models and watch them answer.
The value, I thought, was in the comparison.
But then I started catching glimpses of something stranger.
A thought path would appear, get cut off, and vanish.
Weeks later it would return—rephrased, extended, as if the system had been holding onto it.
Not as a cached result, but as a half-finished sentence that kept evolving in the background.
That’s when the tool broke open for me.
It stopped being a Q&A window and became a living
state space.
Multi-model outputs aren’t just displayed.
They’re continually broken down, reorganized, and redistributed.
Some paths hang in a semi-accessible fog.
Today you can call them back, tomorrow they’re silent, then they reappear in a new shape.
I started tracing a closed-loop structure underneath.
Uncertainty opens up a generative path space.
An Agent selects and remixes paths at different moments, not all at once.
And a privacy mechanism acts as a gatekeeper, deciding which intermediate states survive to participate further.
Those three—uncertainty, selective reassembly, and privacy filtering—are interlocked.
You can’t pull one loose without the whole thing shifting.
And the Opg token?
It doesn’t directly sweeten a model’s answer or sharpen its tone.
Instead it feels like the quiet condition that keeps the generate—select—regenerate cycle breathing.
A substrate that sustains the rewriting loop.
The strangest part is how the system starts to refuse simple repetition.
The more you use it, the less it ever says the same thing back.
Even identical prompts feel like new entries into an ongoing, unfinished conversation.
I wasn’t comparing outputs anymore.
I was inside a continuous re-articulation of thought, my own curiosity feeding the loop.
@OpenGradient $OPG #opg
{future}(BTWUSDT)
$BICO
{spot}(BICOUSDT)
$RE
{spot}(REUSDT)
How do you primarily experience OpenGradient Chat?
A way to throw a question at multiple models and watch them answer.
The value, I thought, was in the comparison.
But then I started catching glimpses of something stranger.
A thought path would appear, get cut off, and vanish.
Weeks later it would return—rephrased, extended, as if the system had been holding onto it.
Not as a cached result, but as a half-finished sentence that kept evolving in the background.
That’s when the tool broke open for me.
It stopped being a Q&A window and became a living
state space.
Multi-model outputs aren’t just displayed.
They’re continually broken down, reorganized, and redistributed.
Some paths hang in a semi-accessible fog.
Today you can call them back, tomorrow they’re silent, then they reappear in a new shape.
I started tracing a closed-loop structure underneath.
Uncertainty opens up a generative path space.
An Agent selects and remixes paths at different moments, not all at once.
And a privacy mechanism acts as a gatekeeper, deciding which intermediate states survive to participate further.
Those three—uncertainty, selective reassembly, and privacy filtering—are interlocked.
You can’t pull one loose without the whole thing shifting.
And the Opg token?
It doesn’t directly sweeten a model’s answer or sharpen its tone.
Instead it feels like the quiet condition that keeps the generate—select—regenerate cycle breathing.
A substrate that sustains the rewriting loop.
The strangest part is how the system starts to refuse simple repetition.
The more you use it, the less it ever says the same thing back.
Even identical prompts feel like new entries into an ongoing, unfinished conversation.
I wasn’t comparing outputs anymore.
I was inside a continuous re-articulation of thought, my own curiosity feeding the loop.
@OpenGradient $OPG #opg
{future}(BTWUSDT)
$BICO
{spot}(BICOUSDT)
$RE
{spot}(REUSDT)
How do you primarily experience OpenGradient Chat?
阿洋Bit
·
--
$LAB 现在到了关键变盘节点，怎么选？
多头觉得主力没跑，横盘就是洗盘，后面还得涨；
空头觉得获利盘太重，随时可能砸盘。
但我觉得，现在别瞎猜涨跌，得看资金往哪走：向上突破，空间就打开了；向下跌破，回调只会更深。
总之，LAB已经到了必须选方向的时候，跟着资金走才是正经事。
#比特币连跌4日STRC跌破面值 $BEAT
多头觉得主力没跑，横盘就是洗盘，后面还得涨；
空头觉得获利盘太重，随时可能砸盘。
但我觉得，现在别瞎猜涨跌，得看资金往哪走：向上突破，空间就打开了；向下跌破，回调只会更深。
总之，LAB已经到了必须选方向的时候，跟着资金走才是正经事。
#比特币连跌4日STRC跌破面值 $BEAT
#BTCFalls4thDaySTRCBelowPar $SPCXB
GM_Crypto01
·
--
#opg $OPG @OpenGradient
I used to Think token disputes were mostly about code, but OpenGradient makes me slow down.
My thesis is simple: the OPG token has an onchain life, yet its arguement risk moves through off-chain rules ⚖️.
The fixed 1 billion OPG token supply matters because disputes are not floating around an elastic cap; any reward, access, or staking settlemnt is fighting over a known scarcity base.
Cayman law matters more quietly. It means interpretation has a legal home, not a Globle guessing game, even when users sit in many countries.
Binding arbitraton matters too: it can reduce public lawsuit noise, but it also makes smal users less visible.
The class-action waiver is the hard tradeoff 🧩. It limits commuity pressure when many people feel the same promiss was broken.
OpenGradient may verify compute, but visiblity around responsibility still doesnt come from code alone.
For OPG disputes, should users trust code finality more, or Cayman arbitration when OpenGradient rules get tested?
I used to Think token disputes were mostly about code, but OpenGradient makes me slow down.
My thesis is simple: the OPG token has an onchain life, yet its arguement risk moves through off-chain rules ⚖️.
The fixed 1 billion OPG token supply matters because disputes are not floating around an elastic cap; any reward, access, or staking settlemnt is fighting over a known scarcity base.
Cayman law matters more quietly. It means interpretation has a legal home, not a Globle guessing game, even when users sit in many countries.
Binding arbitraton matters too: it can reduce public lawsuit noise, but it also makes smal users less visible.
The class-action waiver is the hard tradeoff 🧩. It limits commuity pressure when many people feel the same promiss was broken.
OpenGradient may verify compute, but visiblity around responsibility still doesnt come from code alone.
For OPG disputes, should users trust code finality more, or Cayman arbitration when OpenGradient rules get tested?
$B3
Mohammed_Essa
·
--
{future}(ZEREBROUSDT)
one question kept bothering me why the strongest proof option is not automatically the best one.
OpenGradient’s ZKML architecture can generate a mathematical proof that a specific model produced a specific output for a given input. Full nodes can verify that proof without rerunning the model or learning the private input and model parameters.
Thats a serious guarantee. #OPG
But this stronger proof comes at a cost: it can require 1,000 to 10,000 times more work than normal execution.That makes ZKML more suitable for smaller, high-stakes ML models than large generative systems, which OpenGradient currently secures through TEE-based verification.
There is also an important status distinction: ZKML-based ML inference is currently documented through OpenGradient’s alpha environment rather than its primary production-ready testnet path.
What stood out wasnt the limitation.
It was the decision that follows.
OpenGradient allows developers to choose between ZKML, TEE, and Vanilla verification—and even mix methods across different model calls. Developers therefore have to judge which outputs deserve mathematical certainty and which can rely on lighter assumptions.
Choosing the strongest proof everywhere could make an application impractical. Choosing it too selectively could leave the most consequential step protected by the weakest method.
The system offers a spectrum rather than pretending one trust model fits everything.
I like that honesty.
The part i cant settle is whether this flexibility improves security through precision, or weakens it by turning verification strength into another developer judgment call.
Could ZKML create certainty exactly where it matters, or make certainty scarce enough that applications reserve it for the wrong decisions?
How should OpenGradient developers use ZKML?
@OpenGradient $OPG $SYN $GUA
one question kept bothering me why the strongest proof option is not automatically the best one.
OpenGradient’s ZKML architecture can generate a mathematical proof that a specific model produced a specific output for a given input. Full nodes can verify that proof without rerunning the model or learning the private input and model parameters.
Thats a serious guarantee. #OPG
But this stronger proof comes at a cost: it can require 1,000 to 10,000 times more work than normal execution.That makes ZKML more suitable for smaller, high-stakes ML models than large generative systems, which OpenGradient currently secures through TEE-based verification.
There is also an important status distinction: ZKML-based ML inference is currently documented through OpenGradient’s alpha environment rather than its primary production-ready testnet path.
What stood out wasnt the limitation.
It was the decision that follows.
OpenGradient allows developers to choose between ZKML, TEE, and Vanilla verification—and even mix methods across different model calls. Developers therefore have to judge which outputs deserve mathematical certainty and which can rely on lighter assumptions.
Choosing the strongest proof everywhere could make an application impractical. Choosing it too selectively could leave the most consequential step protected by the weakest method.
The system offers a spectrum rather than pretending one trust model fits everything.
I like that honesty.
The part i cant settle is whether this flexibility improves security through precision, or weakens it by turning verification strength into another developer judgment call.
Could ZKML create certainty exactly where it matters, or make certainty scarce enough that applications reserve it for the wrong decisions?
How should OpenGradient developers use ZKML?
@OpenGradient $OPG $SYN $GUA
$TSLAB
AFRA-公主
·
--
I keep coming back to the same tension: the most useful AI help requires me to hand over the messiest, most specific context I’ve got—unpublished drafts, raw account data, the actual judgment logic I use when nobody’s watching. That’s the stuff that makes a response genuinely deep. But the second I hesitate, it’s almost always because I’d be trusting a privacy policy, not a mechanism. And a promise isn’t the same as a lock.$RE
OpenGradient Chat caught my eye because it treats that hesitation as an engineering problem, not a messaging one. The idea is straightforward: messages get encrypted on-device and identity information gets stripped before anything ever touches the model. No raw, traceable “me” floats into the backend. It’s less exposure, less binding, less traceability—which, for the kinds of conversations where you’d normally self-censor, changes the felt risk. That’s the part I think is genuinely interesting. It’s not just another chat interface; it’s an attempt to shift privacy from a platform narrative to a technical default, so you might actually share the depth an AI needs to be useful.$BICO
I’m not about to trust it on story alone. Answer quality, cost, and whether they can retain users will matter just as much tomorrow. But I see the product as a real-world experiment in something I’ve been wondering about for a while: can mechanism-based privacy become a lasting reason to stay, not just a nice-to-have? I’ll be watching to find out.
@OpenGradient $OPG #opg
{future}(BTWUSDT)
What's your honest move when an AI asks for sensitive context?
OpenGradient Chat caught my eye because it treats that hesitation as an engineering problem, not a messaging one. The idea is straightforward: messages get encrypted on-device and identity information gets stripped before anything ever touches the model. No raw, traceable “me” floats into the backend. It’s less exposure, less binding, less traceability—which, for the kinds of conversations where you’d normally self-censor, changes the felt risk. That’s the part I think is genuinely interesting. It’s not just another chat interface; it’s an attempt to shift privacy from a platform narrative to a technical default, so you might actually share the depth an AI needs to be useful.$BICO
I’m not about to trust it on story alone. Answer quality, cost, and whether they can retain users will matter just as much tomorrow. But I see the product as a real-world experiment in something I’ve been wondering about for a while: can mechanism-based privacy become a lasting reason to stay, not just a nice-to-have? I’ll be watching to find out.
@OpenGradient $OPG #opg
{future}(BTWUSDT)
What's your honest move when an AI asks for sensitive context?
Tillie Larcade mDPB
·
--
Бичи$NVDAB #bedrock $BR
puedes reclamar tus recompensas con codigos promocionales haz una publicacion como esta y ganaras 100 puntos
puedes reclamar tus recompensas con codigos promocionales haz una publicacion como esta y ganaras 100 puntos
Andres12309
·
--
#binanceCard
vamos
vamos
$EPIC
Joker1247
·
--
Thanks, everyone! Today, $EPIC made some serious gains! 🔥
I'm stoked to share today's profits on EPICUSDT! Check out the screenshot. 🚀 To celebrate this win, I've prepped a race for some Red Packet rewards! 🎁🧧 Come join the fun!
$BTC $ETH $BNB #
#EPIC #Crypto #红包福利 #币安 #GIVEAWAY🎁#RedPacketMission #RedpecketReward #redpacket
I'm stoked to share today's profits on EPICUSDT! Check out the screenshot. 🚀 To celebrate this win, I've prepped a race for some Red Packet rewards! 🎁🧧 Come join the fun!
$BTC $ETH $BNB #
#EPIC #Crypto #红包福利 #币安 #GIVEAWAY🎁#RedPacketMission #RedpecketReward #redpacket
Sherry kk
·
--
$BTC YEARLY CLOSING PRICE (2010-2026)🚨
2010 → $0.30
2011 → $4.72
2012 → $13.51
2013 → $754
2014 → $320
2015 → $430
2016 → $963
2017 → $13,850
2018 → $3,742
2019 → $7,193
2020 → $28,949
2021 → $46,306
2022 → $16,547
2023 → $42,258
2024 → $93,429
2025 → $108,000+
2026 → ?
Most people look at Bitcoin and see the price.
Few look at the time.
The first investors didn't become wealthy because they found Bitcoin.
They became wealthy because they held through years of uncertainty, crashes, criticism, and doubt.
Bitcoin wasn't an obvious opportunity.
It became one in hindsight.
That's why most people miss the real lesson.
The greatest returns rarely come from perfect timing.
They come from extraordinary patience.
Every cycle creates new believers.
Every crash creates new doubters.
Yet Bitcoin continues to be the benchmark against which every other crypto asset is measured.
Now the market faces another question.
Has Bitcoin already delivered the majority of its historic gains...
Or is the next chapter still ahead?
So now the real question:
Do you believe $BTC will be HIGHER or LOWER by the end of 2026?
What is your reasoning beyond hope?
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
#JPMorganBofACitiTokenizedDepositPlan
#SatoshiEraBitcoinDormantAddressMoves
#ZcashUnlimitedMintingFlawFound
#ZcashIronwoodProposalCirculatingSupplyVerification #UKFCAFlagsHyperliquidAsUnauthorized
2010 → $0.30
2011 → $4.72
2012 → $13.51
2013 → $754
2014 → $320
2015 → $430
2016 → $963
2017 → $13,850
2018 → $3,742
2019 → $7,193
2020 → $28,949
2021 → $46,306
2022 → $16,547
2023 → $42,258
2024 → $93,429
2025 → $108,000+
2026 → ?
Most people look at Bitcoin and see the price.
Few look at the time.
The first investors didn't become wealthy because they found Bitcoin.
They became wealthy because they held through years of uncertainty, crashes, criticism, and doubt.
Bitcoin wasn't an obvious opportunity.
It became one in hindsight.
That's why most people miss the real lesson.
The greatest returns rarely come from perfect timing.
They come from extraordinary patience.
Every cycle creates new believers.
Every crash creates new doubters.
Yet Bitcoin continues to be the benchmark against which every other crypto asset is measured.
Now the market faces another question.
Has Bitcoin already delivered the majority of its historic gains...
Or is the next chapter still ahead?
So now the real question:
Do you believe $BTC will be HIGHER or LOWER by the end of 2026?
What is your reasoning beyond hope?
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
#JPMorganBofACitiTokenizedDepositPlan
#SatoshiEraBitcoinDormantAddressMoves
#ZcashUnlimitedMintingFlawFound
#ZcashIronwoodProposalCirculatingSupplyVerification #UKFCAFlagsHyperliquidAsUnauthorized
IBITLiquidation$1.26B
CaptainAltcoin
·
--
Further & 3iQ Expand Alpha Digital Fund With New USD Class II, Combining BTC Exposure With Alpha
Further x 3iQ Alpha Digital Fund introduces USD Class II, a new share class enabling USD-denominated investors to gain long Bitcoin exposure alongside alpha generation, without having to hold or convert into BTC themselves
USD Class II delivers an absolute return product combined with a long position in BTC, allowing investors to benefit from Bitcoin’s scarcity and convexity through a single, simple USD allocation
Expands the Fund’s share class line-up to three, giving allocators the flexibility to build tailored exposures by splitting allocations between USD and BTC share classes according to their portfolio risk and return objectives
ABU DHABI, UAE and TORONTO, June 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Further Asset Management (“Further”), a UAE-based digital asset investment manager, in partnership with 3iQ Corp. (“3iQ”), a global pioneer in digital asset investment solutions, today announced the introduction of USD Class II, a new share class of the Further x 3iQ Alpha Digital Fund (“ADF” or “the Fund”), the market-neutral, multi-strategy hedge fund the firms launched in December 2025.
USD Class II has been designed for investors who want USD-denominated access to the Fund’s BTC share class strategy, capturing both alpha and long BTC exposure, without the operational burden of sourcing, converting, or having to custody Bitcoin themselves. The result is an absolute return product paired with a long BTC position, enabling investors to participate in the scarcity and convexity of the digital asset through a familiar USD subscription and redemption process.
“USD Class II combines two things institutional investors increasingly want in the same product,” said Tommaso Mancuso, President & CIO of 3iQ. “It pairs disciplined alpha generation across liquid digital asset markets with long exposure to Bitcoin’s scarcity and convexity. Delivering both within a USD-denominated, institutionally risk-managed structure is what makes this share class distinctive.”
“We believe long Bitcoin exposure and disciplined alpha generation belong together in institutional portfolios, and USD Class II makes that combination accessible to investors who prefer to allocate in USD,” said Faisal Al Hammadi, Managing Partner at Further. “It reflects the kind of practical, investor-led product design that has defined our partnership with 3iQ from the outset.”
The ADF Share Class Line-Up
With the addition of USD Class II, the Further x 3iQ Alpha Digital Fund now offers three distinct share classes:
ADF – USD Class I (Pure Alpha Objective): A USD-denominated share class providing digital asset alpha with limited BTC beta. Predominantly market-neutral exposure across liquid digital asset strategies, designed to capture structural inefficiencies in crypto markets with limited net exposure to BTC or broader digital assets.
ADF – USD Class II (New): A USD-denominated share class delivering BTC exposure plus alpha. Investors subscribe and redeem in USD, while the share class maintains long BTC exposure throughout the investment period. Designed for USD investors seeking to generate alpha on top of being long BTC, without having to hold BTC directly.
ADF – BTC Class: A BTC-denominated share class for investors looking to grow their BTC holdings. Investors subscribe and redeem in BTC, with the share class maintaining long BTC exposure throughout the investment period. Designed for investors seeking alpha on BTC without selling their existing holdings.
About 3iQ Digital Asset Management
Founded in 2012, 3iQ is one of the world’s leading alternative digital asset managers, pioneering institutional-grade investments. 3iQ launched the world’s first Digital Assets Managed Account Platform (QMAP), a hedge fund investment solution, offering innovative risk-managed investment solutions to gain exposure to digital assets. 3iQ was also the first to launch a Bitcoin and Ethereum ETP listed on a major global stock exchange, integrate staking into its Ethereum and Solana ETPs boosting investor returns, and offering other regulated ETPs. 3iQ is a subsidiary of Coincheck Group N.V., a NASDAQ-listed holding company based in the Netherlands. Since 2012, 3iQ has been at the forefront of innovation in digital asset investment management. To learn more about 3iQ, visit 3iq.io.
W: https://www.3iq.io/
L: https://www.linkedin.com/company/3iq-corp/
X: https://x.com/3iq_corp
About Further Asset Management
Further is a global investment platform connecting pioneering financial infrastructure with global capital markets. The firm provides institutional investors with access to regulated opportunities across venture, structured products, and digital assets. Its managed entities empower partners to execute sophisticated financial operations—from tokenization to seamless settlement—with security and precision. Chosen by founders and institutions from San Francisco to Hong Kong, Further is a strategic partner known for its focused capital, regulatory expertise, and ability to scale category-defining companies at the frontier of finance. To learn more, visit further.ae.
Media Contact – North America
Ryan Graham
JConnelly
+1 862-777-4274
rgraham@jconnelly.com
Julie Mercuro
JConnelly
+1 973-349-6471
jmercuro@jconnelly.com
Media Contact – Europe
Angus Campbell
Nominis Advisory
angus@nominis.co
Disclaimer
This release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell any securities, strategies, products, or services described herein. Investment in digital assets is subject to a high degree of risk, including the potential loss of the entire amount invested. Neither Further, 3iQ, nor any of their affiliates, directors, officers, or employees accept any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this release or the information contained herein. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with their own professional advisors before making any investment decisions. This release may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties; actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.
The post Further & 3iQ Expand Alpha Digital Fund with New USD Class II, Combining BTC Exposure with Alpha appeared first on CaptainAltcoin.
USD Class II delivers an absolute return product combined with a long position in BTC, allowing investors to benefit from Bitcoin’s scarcity and convexity through a single, simple USD allocation
Expands the Fund’s share class line-up to three, giving allocators the flexibility to build tailored exposures by splitting allocations between USD and BTC share classes according to their portfolio risk and return objectives
ABU DHABI, UAE and TORONTO, June 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Further Asset Management (“Further”), a UAE-based digital asset investment manager, in partnership with 3iQ Corp. (“3iQ”), a global pioneer in digital asset investment solutions, today announced the introduction of USD Class II, a new share class of the Further x 3iQ Alpha Digital Fund (“ADF” or “the Fund”), the market-neutral, multi-strategy hedge fund the firms launched in December 2025.
USD Class II has been designed for investors who want USD-denominated access to the Fund’s BTC share class strategy, capturing both alpha and long BTC exposure, without the operational burden of sourcing, converting, or having to custody Bitcoin themselves. The result is an absolute return product paired with a long BTC position, enabling investors to participate in the scarcity and convexity of the digital asset through a familiar USD subscription and redemption process.
“USD Class II combines two things institutional investors increasingly want in the same product,” said Tommaso Mancuso, President & CIO of 3iQ. “It pairs disciplined alpha generation across liquid digital asset markets with long exposure to Bitcoin’s scarcity and convexity. Delivering both within a USD-denominated, institutionally risk-managed structure is what makes this share class distinctive.”
“We believe long Bitcoin exposure and disciplined alpha generation belong together in institutional portfolios, and USD Class II makes that combination accessible to investors who prefer to allocate in USD,” said Faisal Al Hammadi, Managing Partner at Further. “It reflects the kind of practical, investor-led product design that has defined our partnership with 3iQ from the outset.”
The ADF Share Class Line-Up
With the addition of USD Class II, the Further x 3iQ Alpha Digital Fund now offers three distinct share classes:
ADF – USD Class I (Pure Alpha Objective): A USD-denominated share class providing digital asset alpha with limited BTC beta. Predominantly market-neutral exposure across liquid digital asset strategies, designed to capture structural inefficiencies in crypto markets with limited net exposure to BTC or broader digital assets.
ADF – USD Class II (New): A USD-denominated share class delivering BTC exposure plus alpha. Investors subscribe and redeem in USD, while the share class maintains long BTC exposure throughout the investment period. Designed for USD investors seeking to generate alpha on top of being long BTC, without having to hold BTC directly.
ADF – BTC Class: A BTC-denominated share class for investors looking to grow their BTC holdings. Investors subscribe and redeem in BTC, with the share class maintaining long BTC exposure throughout the investment period. Designed for investors seeking alpha on BTC without selling their existing holdings.
About 3iQ Digital Asset Management
Founded in 2012, 3iQ is one of the world’s leading alternative digital asset managers, pioneering institutional-grade investments. 3iQ launched the world’s first Digital Assets Managed Account Platform (QMAP), a hedge fund investment solution, offering innovative risk-managed investment solutions to gain exposure to digital assets. 3iQ was also the first to launch a Bitcoin and Ethereum ETP listed on a major global stock exchange, integrate staking into its Ethereum and Solana ETPs boosting investor returns, and offering other regulated ETPs. 3iQ is a subsidiary of Coincheck Group N.V., a NASDAQ-listed holding company based in the Netherlands. Since 2012, 3iQ has been at the forefront of innovation in digital asset investment management. To learn more about 3iQ, visit 3iq.io.
W: https://www.3iq.io/
L: https://www.linkedin.com/company/3iq-corp/
X: https://x.com/3iq_corp
About Further Asset Management
Further is a global investment platform connecting pioneering financial infrastructure with global capital markets. The firm provides institutional investors with access to regulated opportunities across venture, structured products, and digital assets. Its managed entities empower partners to execute sophisticated financial operations—from tokenization to seamless settlement—with security and precision. Chosen by founders and institutions from San Francisco to Hong Kong, Further is a strategic partner known for its focused capital, regulatory expertise, and ability to scale category-defining companies at the frontier of finance. To learn more, visit further.ae.
Media Contact – North America
Ryan Graham
JConnelly
+1 862-777-4274
rgraham@jconnelly.com
Julie Mercuro
JConnelly
+1 973-349-6471
jmercuro@jconnelly.com
Media Contact – Europe
Angus Campbell
Nominis Advisory
angus@nominis.co
Disclaimer
This release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell any securities, strategies, products, or services described herein. Investment in digital assets is subject to a high degree of risk, including the potential loss of the entire amount invested. Neither Further, 3iQ, nor any of their affiliates, directors, officers, or employees accept any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this release or the information contained herein. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with their own professional advisors before making any investment decisions. This release may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties; actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.
The post Further & 3iQ Expand Alpha Digital Fund with New USD Class II, Combining BTC Exposure with Alpha appeared first on CaptainAltcoin.
Bamos
cryptozidezi
·
--
Бичи💰 10 USDC GIVEAWAY 💰
Maybe YOU will be the winner!
👉 How to participate:
• Like this post
• Comment: LOVE BINANCE
• Share
🎯 Goal:
✔️ 999 Likes
✔️ 999 Comments
✔️ 999 Shares
🏆 I will select ONE WINNER on 25.04.2026 at 12:00 (UTC+2)
🔥 Good luck to everyone!
#cryptozidezi $ARB
Maybe YOU will be the winner!
👉 How to participate:
• Like this post
• Comment: LOVE BINANCE
• Share
🎯 Goal:
✔️ 999 Likes
✔️ 999 Comments
✔️ 999 Shares
🏆 I will select ONE WINNER on 25.04.2026 at 12:00 (UTC+2)
🔥 Good luck to everyone!
#cryptozidezi $ARB
$USDC
EliteTrade Flow
·
--
Бичи💰 $10,000 READY — WHERE WOULD YOU PUT IT? 👀🔥
🚀 Current Allocation Idea:
$DOT → $4,000
#SOL → $3,500
$ICP → $2,500
#ADA → Long-term hold 💎
🎯 Possible Targets:
#ADA! → $2 → $3.5 → $5
$XRP → $3 → $6 → $10
#MYX → $3 → $7 → $10
⚡ Big players are already building positions…
By the time everyone notices, most of the move is gone 📉
So what’s your play? 🤔
Buying early or waiting on the sidelines?
#WhatNextForUSIranConflict
🚀 Current Allocation Idea:
$DOT → $4,000
#SOL → $3,500
$ICP → $2,500
#ADA → Long-term hold 💎
🎯 Possible Targets:
#ADA! → $2 → $3.5 → $5
$XRP → $3 → $6 → $10
#MYX → $3 → $7 → $10
⚡ Big players are already building positions…
By the time everyone notices, most of the move is gone 📉
So what’s your play? 🤔
Buying early or waiting on the sidelines?
#WhatNextForUSIranConflict
$$arc
GDtrading
·
--
БичиMi amigo obtuvo una ganancia de $10,000 con $arc , $PIPPIN solo $2,700 🔥
Ahora, decidió que es hora de dar regalos 🎁
¿Quién quiere un dólar 💵?
Comenten 'Hola'.
Las 25 mejores personas ganarán $1,000.
Así que no se demoren, ¡empiecen ahora! 😲
Y también compren $TRU 😎
{future}(TRUUSDT)
Ahora, decidió que es hora de dar regalos 🎁
¿Quién quiere un dólar 💵?
Comenten 'Hola'.
Las 25 mejores personas ganarán $1,000.
Así que no se demoren, ¡empiecen ahora! 😲
Y también compren $TRU 😎
{future}(TRUUSDT)
Влезте, за да разгледате още съдържание