Material Indicators arms you with institutional-grade crypto market data visualizations and battle tested trading signals so you can replace speculative trading decisions that cost you money with smarter, data based decisions that make you money.
Who is the, so called, "smart money"? $BTC ETF's have had some huge outflows over the last 2 weeks - except for a few days of net buying on May 6th, 11th and 14th, which were consecutive local tops when price of the underlying asset, #BTC , rejected from the 200-Day SMA. To be fair, the institutions are buying and selling on behalf of their customers, but they are also advising their customers. Do you consider this to be "smart money"?
$ETH has dropped below the bear flag structure and is testing support at the Q2 2026 Timescape Levels, precisely where I said it would in my recent article. Be sure and read it to see what @Ethereum 's next target is if price fails to hold here. Pro Tip: With an imminent Death Cross forming between the 21-Day and 50-Day SMA, be prepared for the "Nasty" scenario I identified for ETH in the article. https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/6a0528aabd13d83f2f4d4ab3/
Despite another rejection from the 200-Day SMA, Bitcoin bulls are building momentum off of Saylor's big buy, and Clarity Act hype. In recognition of that momentum, Trend Precognition gave us a new ⬆️ signal on the $BTC chart. Time will tell if this is the signal that gets us to a bonafide breakout, or potentially, the anticipated blow off top. Meanwhile, FireCharts binned CVD shows purple whales are once again distributing into strength - that's the clue. #BTC #BTCCharts# #BTCPriceAnalysis#
Despite some high volume buying at the top of the structure, the 200-Day SMA served up another hard rejection for $BTC . Now it's time for another support test. With the 21-Day and 200-Day SMAs closing in on each other, Bitcoin is going to be forced into a decision to break out or break down from this range soon. #BTC #BTCCharts#
Clarity Act Markup Senate discussion and votes happening LIVE. The amendments seem to have been adopted, but this is not a done deal from here. Both sides agree there are still things to address in the final piece of legislation before it makes it through a vote to become law. In other words, the Clarity Act is still alive, but it is far from the finish line. Watch here… https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1oKMvRWRQVOGQ?s=20
I've synthesized the analysis from recent price action into an article that includes bullish and bearish scenarios with specific targets for $BTC and $ETH . These levels are not predictions, but rather technical zones that become relevant as PA develops. Give it a read, take some notes, and let me know how you think the macro trend develops from here. #BTC Price Analysis# #ETH Price Analysis# #Macro Insights# https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/6a0528aabd13d83f2f4d4ab3/
For the second time in a week, a $BTC test of resistance at the 200-Day SMA was met with a hard rejection and a strong Trend Precognition ⬇️ signal. After more than a 2% drop from yesterday's high, bulls appear to be attempting to establish an R/S Flip at $80.7k to build foundational support for another attempt at breaking the 200-Day SMA. Do bulls have the momentum to succeed? #BTC #BTCCharts# #BTCPriceAnalysis#
You build a sound argument for @Solana , but the institutional play on @Ethereum still dominates L1s. The fact that it is currently positioned as the blockchain "the new financial system" is being built on is more than just a strong narrative. It's fundamentally the foundational for this new era in the global financial sector. If this U.S. Senate can get it's s#!t together, and pass the Clarity Act, we are going to see a whole new wave of institutional adoption ushering in this new era in #TradFi# .
FireCharts shows that liquidity on both sides of price in the $BTC order book is relatively thin. That lack of liquidity reduces friction in the order book making it easy to push price in either direction with small changes in order flow. In other words, the #BTC order book is primed for volatility. At the moment, FireCharts binned CVD shows an increase in sell pressure following yesterday's rejection from $82.5k. #BTCCharts# #BTC Price Analysis#
Despite the Sunday pump, nothing has changed structurally for $BTC . The Q2 2025 Timescape Level has confluence with the 200-Day SMA which strengthens technical resistance at $82.5k. Local support sits at the adjacent Timescape Level just below the 21-Day SMA in the $78.5k range. #TradFi# opens in <30 mins - Considering the fact that war negotiations failed (again) do you think TradFi pushes the market higher, or do they take some profits today? #BTC #BTCCharts# #BTCAnalysis#
Nachdem die $BTC-Bullen an Schwung verloren haben, sehen wir, dass die BTC-Dominanz sinkt und $TOTAL3ES steigt. Das erklärt, warum ausgewählte Alts durch die Decke gehen. Wenn du glaubst, dass wir uns immer noch in einem Bärenmarkt befinden (so wie ich), dann ist es vernünftig zu denken, dass dies Ausstiegsrallies sind. #BTC #Altcoin #AltSaison
FireCharts gebinnte CVD zeigt, dass Retail stark $BTC kauft und Wale aggressiv verkaufen. Irgendwelche Fragen, was das bedeutet? #BTC #BTC Korrektur steht bevor?# #BTC Preis Analyse#
Das ist eine kritische Kerze für $BTC. Es ist die erste D-Kerze, die die Chance hat, über der Bärenflagge zu leben, ohne Wicks darunter... Allerdings ist sie auf einen Widerstand kurz unter dem 200-Tage-SMA gestoßen. Es gibt immer noch einige Magneten, die den Preis wieder nach oben ziehen können, darunter: ☑️ Ein weiterer Versuch am 200-Tage-SMA bei $83,288 ☑️ Die Oberseite der CME-Gap bei $83,980 ☑️ Das C&H-Szenario, das auf $87,5k zum Jahresbeginn auflöst. Ich sehe nicht viele Leute, die über $87,5k sprechen, aber es gibt zu viele Konfluenzpunkte in diesem Bereich, um sie zu ignorieren, einschließlich des Yearly Open Timescape Levels, des 100-Wochen-SMA und des vorherigen Range POC. Denkst du, dass diese Kerze den Tag grün abschließt, ohne Wicks zurück in die Struktur, oder werden wir einen Rücksetzer sehen? #BTC #BTC Preisanalysen # #BTCCharts # #BTC, ist die Korrektur genug?#