Trump Media verwaltet aktiv seine Bitcoin-Bestände
Trump Media übertrug etwa 174 Millionen Dollar in BTC zwischen Wallets, nur einen Tag nachdem es seinen Bitcoin-Bestand erhöht hatte. Ein kleiner Teil wurde in die Coinbase Prime Custody verschoben, während der Großteil unter der Kontrolle desselben Unternehmens blieb.
Bewegungen dieser Art deuten typischerweise auf das Management von Staatskassen hin, anstatt auf Verkäufe. Custody-Lösungen sind für sichere, langfristige Aufbewahrung konzipiert, nicht für sofortige Marktaktivitäten.
Der Preis von Bitcoin blieb nach der Übertragung weitgehend unverändert, was darauf hindeutet, dass der Markt diese Aktivität als neutral interpretierte.
Die wichtigste Erkenntnis ist das Vorhandensein von institutionellem Bitcoin-Management, anstatt spekulativem Handelsverhalten.
Bitcoin’s $70K–$80K zone stands out as one of the least developed price areas in its historical structure.
Over the past five years, BTC spent minimal time trading in this range, meaning fewer positions were established and structural support remains thin. Data from Glassnode also shows low supply concentration across the same levels.
If price revisits this area, the market may need time to build acceptance and consolidation before it can function as a reliable base.
Sustainable trends are formed where price actively trades and builds volume.
Bitcoin holding between $85,000 and $90,000 for most of December has less to do with sentiment and more to do with derivatives structure.
Heavy options exposure near spot forced market makers to hedge aggressively, buying dips and selling rallies. This behavior suppressed volatility and locked price into a narrow corridor, even as macro conditions improved and risk assets moved higher.
That dynamic changes as year-end options expire. With roughly $27B in open interest rolling off and a strong call bias still in place, the hedging pressure that pinned price fades quickly.
Implied volatility remains near monthly lows, suggesting the market is underpricing movement just as structural constraints are removed.
When positioning dominates price for weeks, the resolution often comes fast once those constraints disappear.
Why Markets Are Choosing Gold and Copper Over Bitcoin in 2025
This year’s market behavior tells a clear story. Investors are prioritizing assets they can touch, store, and rely on when confidence in financial systems weakens or when growth demands real infrastructure.
Gold has surged as fears around fiscal sustainability, currency debasement, and political instability intensify. Copper has followed, driven by the AI boom, electrification, and global infrastructure build-out. Both assets represent tangibility in a world questioning paper promises.
Bitcoin, despite being positioned as both digital gold and high-end tech, has not captured either flow. Institutions have largely priced in ETFs and regulatory clarity, while sovereigns continue to favor gold as their hedge of choice.
This divergence does not necessarily mean Bitcoin has lost relevance. Historically, gold tends to lead during periods of monetary stress, with Bitcoin reacting later and often with greater volatility.
The current market is not rejecting crypto. It is demanding proof, patience, and timing.
Melde dich an, um weitere Inhalte zu entdecken
Bleib immer am Ball mit den neuesten Nachrichten aus der Kryptowelt
⚡️ Beteilige dich an aktuellen Diskussionen rund um Kryptothemen
💬 Interagiere mit deinen bevorzugten Content-Erstellern