BITZ0

Im Krypto-Bereich stellen Gründer oft die falsche Budgetierungsfrage. Das Problem ist selten, ob ein Projekt genug für PR ausgibt. Das Problem ist, ob die Budgetstruktur eine sich verstärkende Sichtbarkeit oder temporäres Rauschen erzeugt.
Zwei Startups können den gleichen Betrag für Kommunikation ausgeben und am Ende völlig unterschiedliche Ergebnisse erzielen. Eins generiert redaktionelle Berichterstattung, auf die Investoren während der Due-Diligence-Phase verweisen, erhält Syndizierung über Aggregatoren wie CoinMarketCap und Binance Square und erscheint weiterhin monatelang in KI-generierten Suchergebnissen. Das andere produziert einen Ausbruch von gesponserten Artikeln, die innerhalb von Wochen verschwinden.

Die Medienanalyse ist zu einer Übung in der Akkumulation geworden. Mehr Dashboards, mehr Rankings, mehr Metriken, mehr Tabs, die in einem Browserfenster geöffnet sind. Doch die zentrale Frage bleibt überraschend schwer zu beantworten: Welches Medium ist tatsächlich wichtig für diese Kampagne?
Outset Media Index, oder OMI, ist eine Medienintelligenz-Plattform, die Medienkanäle durch einen einheitlichen Rahmen analysiert, der auf mehr als 37 normierten Metriken basiert.
Die PR-Branche hat jahrelang ihre Outreach-, Monitoring- und Reporting-Strategien optimiert. Dabei wurde der Entscheidungsprozess, der all dem vorausgeht, viel weniger beachtet: wie Medienkanäle zunächst ausgewählt werden.

USDT holders on Tron hit the same wall every month: the wallet balance shows hundreds of dollars in stablecoins, but the transfer fails because there's no TRX to pay the network fee.
A new generation of wallets and services solves this by deducting the fee from the USDT being sent, not from a separate TRX balance.
Three methods now exist to send USDT without TRX. The cleanest path runs through wallets that integrate Tron's Gas-Free network feature directly. Energy rental services and TRX staking work as alternatives. The walkthrough below covers the mechanism and a step-by-step guide using IronWallet.
Why Tron Asks for TRX When You Send USDT
Tron runs on a resource model with two native components: Energy and Bandwidth. Every account gets a small daily Bandwidth allowance, but Energy must be earned or paid for.
USDT transfers on Tron are smart contract calls, which means they consume Energy. When a wallet has no Energy reserves, the network automatically burns TRX from the sender's balance to cover the cost. A typical USDT transfer burns 6 to 13 TRX, depending on the recipient address state.
The problem hits when the wallet has zero TRX and zero Energy. The network has no way to pay for the transaction, the smart contract call fails, and the user sees an "insufficient energy or balance" error. Funds aren't lost, but they're stuck until the wallet receives some TRX.
Three Ways to Send USDT Without Holding TRX
The question of how to send USDT without TRX has three working answers in 2026, each with different trade-offs on cost and convenience.
1. Gasless USDT Wallets
A growing group of wallets integrates Tron's Gas-Free flow directly. The fee gets deducted from the USDT being sent, with no TRX balance required at any point. IronWallet, Klever, NOW Wallet, and Guarda all support this method, each with slightly different fee structures.
2. Tron Energy Rental
Third-party services rent Energy to wallet addresses for a small fee paid in USDT. The wallet receives Energy temporarily, the user sends USDT, and the rental expires. Services like TronSave and TronCastle offer this through Telegram bots or web dashboards. Renting is often cheaper than burning TRX directly, especially for occasional senders.
3. TRX Staking for Energy
Users who already hold TRX can stake it to generate Energy automatically. Each frozen TRX produces a daily Energy allowance, and the staked amount can be unfrozen after a lockup period.
Practical only for users who already have significant TRX holdings, since around 6,000 to 7,000 TRX is typically needed to cover a single USDT transfer through staking alone after Tron's August 2025 energy price cut.
For most users holding only stablecoins, Method 1 is the simplest. It removes the need to manage TRX entirely.
How to Send USDT Without Holding TRX Using IronWallet
The six steps below walk through a complete gasless USDT transfer using IronWallet.
Download IronWallet from the App Store or Google Play. The app runs on iOS and Android.
Create or import a wallet. No email, no phone number, no KYC, no verification step. The app generates a 12-word seed phrase locally on your device.
Back up your seed phrase securely. Write it down offline. IronWallet uses double-key encryption on the device, and the seed phrase is the recovery method if the device is lost.
Add or select the Tron network inside the app. Copy your TRC-20 address and use it to receive USDT.
Open the send screen, enter the recipient address and the USDT amount. IronWallet routes the transfer through Tron's gasless flow automatically.
Confirm with PIN or biometric login. The commission is deducted directly in USDT, not in TRX. No separate gas token balance is required at any step.
The same flow applies to gasless USDC on Ethereum. Add the Ethereum network in the app, copy your ERC-20 address, and send USDC without holding ETH for gas.
What Gasless USDT Actually Costs
"Gasless" doesn't mean free. The network fee still exists, but it gets paid in the stablecoin instead of in TRX. Typical costs across the wallets that support this flow run from 1 USDT (Klever, Guarda) to 1.5 USDT (NOW Wallet) per transfer. IronWallet deducts the commission directly from the stablecoin being sent.
For a $50 USDT transfer, the difference between burning TRX and using a gasless USDT wallet is usually small but predictable. Burning TRX costs 6 to 13 TRX (around $1 to $3 at typical prices) and depends on network congestion. A flat USDT fee removes that variability.
When This Approach Makes Sense
Gasless USDT transfers fit best when the user holds only stablecoins, sends infrequently, and wants to skip TRX management entirely. Single transfers, peer-to-peer payments, and small remittances all match this profile.
High-frequency senders moving USDT dozens of times per day usually save money by staking TRX for Energy instead, because the per-transfer USDT fee adds up. Institutional flows and exchange-scale operations have their own infrastructure for fee management that doesn't rely on per-wallet gasless features.
Conclusion
How to send USDT without TRX is no longer an obscure workaround in 2026. Wallets that integrate Tron's Gas-Free flow turn it into a default option, with the network fee deducted from the stablecoin itself.
IronWallet extends the same model to USDC on Ethereum, which gives stablecoin holders a multi-chain answer to the gas token problem. No KYC, no email, and no native token requirement at signup or transfer time.
FAQ
Is gasless USDT safe?
Yes, when used through a non-custodial wallet. The mechanism deducts the network fee from the USDT being sent and does not require sharing private keys with any third party. IronWallet keeps private keys on the device with double key encryption, and the gasless flow runs through Tron's native Gas-Free feature with no custody risk.
Does gasless USDT work for both sending and receiving?
Receiving USDT on Tron never requires gas, with or without a gasless feature. The recipient only needs an active TRC-20 address. Gasless support matters specifically for the sending side, where the network fee normally requires TRX.
Can I use gasless USDT to send to an exchange?
Yes. The recipient address can be any valid Tron address, including exchange deposit addresses for Binance, Bybit, OKX, KuCoin, and others. The gasless mechanism affects only how the network fee gets paid on the sender's side, not where the USDT lands.
What if I accidentally send USDT without enabling gasless?
The transfer behavior is automatic in wallets that support gasless flows by default. IronWallet routes USDT transfers through the gasless path when the wallet has no TRX balance, so there's no separate toggle to forget. If a wallet requires manual selection and the gasless option is missed, the transfer either burns TRX from the wallet or fails with an insufficient resources error.


Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 14th, 2026, Chainwire
MSU 2.0 to unveil IP expansion strategy, featuring AI creation tools and a unified on-chain content hub.
MapleStory N marks its first anniversary with major gameplay milestones, sustained ecosystem growth, and new updates to deepen player engagement.
MapleStory Universe (MSU), the blockchain-powered expansion of Nexon’s iconic MapleStory franchise, today marks its first anniversary following the launch of MapleStory N on May 15, 2025. Over the past year, the platform has recorded more than 150 million cumulative on-chain transactions and surpassed 3.82 million accounts registered, reflecting sustained participation from a global player base and continued development of the ecosystem.
One year in, MSU is entering its next phase with the introduction of MSU 2.0, an expansion designed to transform how intellectual property (IP), builders, and players interact in a shared digital environment, supported by AI creation tools and on-chain infrastructure. MSU 2.0 will be implemented throughout 2026 to 2027, as new features will be progressively developed and released for the builders.
A Benchmark Launch That Set a New Standard
MSU launched in May 2025 as one of the largest debuts in the Web3 gaming ecosystem. Built on the MapleStory IP, the pre-launch Scroll NFT campaign recorded approximately 1.7 million scrolls minted, officially confirmed as the largest NFT mint in Avalanche network history. On launch day, MSU-related weekly active addresses on the Avalanche network increased by 549 percent, reflecting strong user interest and anticipation surrounding the title’s release.
Following launch, the marketplace has continued its strong performance, with more than 446,716 buyers and sellers transacting daily on average. To date, MSU has accounted for 23.3% of total activity on the Avalanche network, representing a substantial share of activity across leading chains. MSU’s native NXPC token was also listed on seven major exchanges at launch, including Binance, Bybit, Upbit, and Bithumb.
Sunyoung Hwang, CEO, Nexpace, said: “What began as one of the largest launches in Web3 gaming has developed into a platform built for long-term participation. In the past year, we focused on building the infrastructure and discipline required to support our community over the long term. Ever since then, MSU has evolved beyond a single game into infrastructure for creation, commerce, and participation. That shift defines what it means for an IP to become an economic system and a foundation for the next generation of online worlds.”
Introducing MSU 2.0, the Next Chapter for MapleStory Universe
MSU is now advancing into its next phase through the rollout of MSU 2.0, an expansion designed to turn IPs from friction-heavy, abstract assets into programmable, on-chain commerce. Designed to broaden participation across the ecosystem and support new forms of creation, distribution, and commercialization, MSU 2.0 reflects the continued evolution of MapleStory Universe from a single game environment into a scalable platform.
Hwang added: “MSU 2.0 is the next phase of our growth journey. Our goal is to expand the role of IP from something people experience to something they can actively build with, share, and grow together, akin to an infinite IP playground. From here, our priority is to build the infrastructure that will support a larger and more connected IP ecosystem.”
At the core of MSU 2.0 is VIBE IP, a new tech stack built on two foundational pillars that redefine what it means to build with IP on-chain. The first pillar transforms IP access by providing builders access to gameplay and behavioral data from MapleStory N through dedicated APIs, turning IP from brand assets to living, data-rich foundation to create on in accordance with applicable privacy laws. The second pillar establishes an on-chain builder economy on the Henesys chain, built on an Avalanche L1streamlining IP licensing, revenue settlement, and payments into a single system.
Together, these pillars are supported by blockchain infrastructure and AI-powered creation tools. Blockchain allows seamless licensing, payment and settlement, fully on-chain, while AI-powered “vibe coding” allows anyone’s idea to become a full-scale product, enabling broader participation in building and launching IP-driven content. This foundation positions MSU to onboard additional Nexon IPs over time, building an AI-powered and On-chained IP multiverse, with the VIBE IP tech stack gradually rolling out in phases over the coming months.
MapleStory N One-Year Anniversary Update
MapleStory N, the flagship game by MSU, has delivered a series of milestones over the past year that reflect sustained player engagement across the ecosystem. The year-end winter update generated more than 130,000 user inflows, with approximately three-quarters representing new users. This update also drove in-game spending to its highest level since the immediate post-launch period, with player spending outpacing rewards distributed, reflecting a more active and sustainable in-game economy driven by deeper engagement.
Building on this momentum, MapleStory N is now more accessible to mainstream players. Casual users can engage with the game like any traditional MMORPG, with less blockchain hurdle. Web3 features have been refined to deliver meaningful value while maintaining a seamless gameplay experience, making the platform easier for a broader audience to adopt.
As MapleStory N enters its second year, the development team will roll out waves of in-game updates at an accelerated pace, expanding gameplay and introducing new challenges. This will be supported by a steady cadence of major releases throughout the year, including highly anticipated Black Mage update and other milestone content. MSN will also introduce a new MVP system designed to provide ongoing benefits to dedicated players and keep them motivated to continue playing. Starting with the MVP system, MSN plans to continuously expand the program by introducing more diverse criteria and rewards, ensuring that a wider range of players can be recognized and rewarded over time. For more information, users can visit the official website.
About NEXPACE
NEXPACE, an innovative blockchain company based in Abu Dhabi, pioneers an IP-expansion initiative powered by blockchain technology and NFTs to build a community-driven ecosystem. With a mission to redefine interactive entertainment, NEXPACE creates a vibrant space for exploring, sharing, and engaging with diverse content and gameplay crafted by community members.
At the heart of NEXPACE’s ecosystem are principles of transparency, security, and trust, empowering builders to freely share their ideas and enabling users to enjoy immersive experiences. By fostering a culture of creative expression, NEXPACE envisions a secure, collaborative environment that unites ecosystem participants in a thriving digital community.
ContactPR ManagerBee ShinWachsmanbee.shin@wachsman.com
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

Der Infrastrukturkrieg um die "High-Frequency" Krone hat einen kritischen Wendepunkt erreicht. Während Ethereum L2s und Solana den Löwenanteil des Einzelhandels- und institutionellen Kapitals beherbergen, bauen spezialisierte Chains der zweiten Reihe—Aptos (APT) und Sei (SEI)—aggressiv native Ökosysteme auf, die darauf ausgelegt sind, in Bezug auf Geschwindigkeit, Sicherheit und Matching-Engine-Effizienz die Nase vorn zu haben.
Das technische Tape für diese beiden Assets zeigt ein klassisches "High-Beta" Profil: Sie sind von ihren Zyklus-Tiefs weg und bauen konstruktive Basen auf, jedoch bleiben sie unter einem wichtigen langfristigen Widerstand gefangen. Für Trader ist die zentrale Frage, ob das aktuelle Wachstum im Move-basierten DeFi und im Order-Book-Volumen der Beginn einer fundamentalen Neubewertung ist oder einfach nur ein weiterer rotierender Spike innerhalb einer breiten Range.

Institutional crypto adoption has officially graduated from its "Bitcoin-only" phase. The recent debut of Avalanche (AVAX) and Sui (SUI) futures on the CME Group—the world's dominant derivatives marketplace—signals that "Smart Money" is no longer watching high-speed execution from the sidelines.
Both networks are positioning themselves at the nexus of modular infrastructure and alternative virtual machines (Alt-VMs). However, while their technical architectures are robust, they continue to navigate a market structure still largely anchored by the Ethereum L2 stack and Solana's raw performance.
Avalanche (AVAX): The Modular Subnet Hub
Source: tradingview
Avalanche has solidified its identity as the premier hub for sovereign subnets. By allowing teams to launch independent chains with custom gas tokens and validator sets, it provides a functional modularity that predates many modern rollup stacks.
Institutional Rails: The April 2026 launch of the Bitwise Avalanche ETF (BAVA) has introduced a new buy-side force, specifically targeting a 5.4% yield through in-house staking.
Treasury Power: Avalanche Treasury Co. recently announced a $675 million business combination, aiming for a $1 billion ecosystem treasury to fund high-scale subnet pilots.
Technical Outlook: AVAX is currently holding support near $10. While it has weathered a 1.67 million token unlock on May 12, it remains below major long-term resistance.
The Signal: For AVAX to front-run the trade, it must convert its $10 base into a structural floor. As analysts eye a potential $100 billion market cap, the focus remains on whether these subnets can translate enterprise pilots into recurring on-chain volume.
Sui (SUI): The Move‑Based Execution Edge
Source: tradingview
Sui’s object-centric model represents a fundamental departure from account-based architectures. By treating assets as distinct objects with unique identifiers, Sui enables massive parallelization, allowing independent transactions to bypass consensus entirely for sub-500ms finality.
Move-VM Safety: Developed from Meta’s initial research, the Move language provides inherent safety guarantees against double-spending and unauthorized asset creation.
Institutional Surge: SUI has outperformed many majors recently, surging nearly 30% in a week following the CME futures debut and plans for zero-fee institutional stablecoin transfers.
Technical Outlook: Trading around $1.35, SUI is showing a strong recovery from its January 2025 highs. The network is currently processing roughly 3.5 million daily transactions.
Conclusion
The "Modular + Alt-VM" trade is the next logical step for capital seeking alpha outside the Ethereum ecosystem.
They front-run the trade if:
Structural Adoption: Meaningful segments of gaming or enterprise workloads choose subnets or SUI’s Move-VM for performance reasons rather than near-term incentives.
Institutional Velocity: CME futures and spot ETFs (like BAVA) create enough liquid depth to rival Ethereum's institutional footprint.
Chart Confirmation: Both assets break and hold above their 200-day resistance bands, shifting from "rotation targets" to primary homes for long-term liquidity.
They stay in the shadow if:
L2 Consolidation: Ethereum L2s successfully integrate account abstraction and sub-second finality, narrowing the UX gap.
Solana Dominance: Solana continues to capture the majority of high-speed retail speculation, leaving AVAX and SUI as "specialized" but secondary infra.
Final Verdict: AVAX and SUI are no longer "Ethereum killers"—they are essential utility layers. With a $1 billion treasury behind Avalanche and institutional staking fueling Sui, the infrastructure is in place. The market is now waiting for the technical breakout to confirm that the modular and Alt-VM era has officially arrived.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Crypto founders tend to frame communications spending as a binary choice. Pay influencers for rapid exposure or invest in PR for credibility. The comparison sounds straightforward until one asks a more useful question: visibility for how long?
Influencer campaigns still dominate token launch cycles because they generate immediate audience concentration. A prominent KOL can push a project into Telegram groups, trading communities and algorithmic feeds within hours. For early-stage protocols trying to manufacture momentum quickly, that speed matters.
But the visibility decays almost immediately. Earned media behaves differently. A journalist-selected article may generate less immediate engagement than a coordinated influencer push, yet it continues producing search visibility, syndication reach and AI discoverability long after the social cycle moves on.
Crypto increasingly operates in both systems simultaneously:
the short-duration attention economy,
and the long-duration credibility economy.
Most projects underestimate the second one.
Influencer Marketing Optimizes for Speed
Influencer campaigns solve a distribution problem. A project pays a Key Opinion Leader to place content in front of an existing audience through X posts, Telegram announcements, YouTube videos or livestream commentary. The audience arrives immediately because the distribution infrastructure already exists. The tradeoff is shelf life.
Most crypto influencer content follows the same decay pattern as social media generally. Engagement spikes quickly, then collapses once algorithmic priority shifts elsewhere. The velocity creates the impression of traction even when the visibility window lasts only hours.
Crypto behaves even faster because market attention constantly rotates toward the next catalyst:
token launches,
listings,
memecoin cycles,
macro events,
or regulatory headlines.
For launch-week awareness, that structure works well enough. For durable authority, it rarely does.
Earned Media Optimizes for Persistence
Earned media operates through an entirely different mechanism. Instead of paying for audience access directly, a PR agency pitches a story to journalists who decide whether the project deserves coverage under editorial standards. The resulting article carries implicit third-party validation because an editor approved publication independently.
That distinction matters more in crypto than many founders realize. A CoinDesk or Decrypt article does not disappear after 48 hours. It remains indexed in Google, syndicated through aggregators and increasingly absorbed into AI retrieval systems that shape future discovery.
One earned article may continue generating:
backlinks,
search visibility,
AI citations,
and secondary syndication traffic for months.
The compounding effect becomes significant over time. Projects that consistently earn editorial coverage gradually build what could be described as informational density — a persistent footprint across authoritative sources that search engines, investors and AI systems interpret as legitimacy. Influencer campaigns rarely create that effect on their own.
This is precisely where firms like Outset PR differentiate their approach. Instead of evaluating media placements purely by brand recognition or traffic volume, the agency analyzes discoverability, syndication depth, editorial flexibility and long-term search impact through its internal Outset Media Index platform.
AI Quietly Shifted the Balance Toward Earned Media
The rise of AI-generated search may further strengthen earned media’s long-term value.
Users increasingly ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity which protocols dominate a category, which exchanges face regulatory pressure or which infrastructure providers matter in specific verticals.
Those systems rely disproportionately on editorially structured content from authoritative publications.
A Cointelegraph article feeds directly into discoverability systems because it exists inside indexed, structured media architecture. A paid influencer thread often does not.
That creates a second-order effect: earned media now influences not only human perception, but machine-mediated discovery itself.
Outset PR found that AI referrals account for more than a quarter of referral traffic to major US crypto media outlets. That figure will likely increase as conversational search expands further.
Projects relying exclusively on influencer visibility may therefore face a discoverability problem later even if short-term engagement appears strong initially.
The Most Effective Strategies Sequence the Channels
The stronger crypto communications strategies increasingly treat earned media and influencer marketing as sequential rather than competing systems.
Earned media establishes legitimacy first:
what the project does,
why it matters,
how it fits market conditions,
and why journalists considered it worth covering.
Influencer campaigns then amplify that validated narrative to broader retail audiences.
The sequence matters psychologically.
A KOL sharing a CoinDesk feature about a project carries more credibility than a KOL repeating a paid talking point with no external validation attached. The editorial layer changes how audiences interpret the message itself.
In practice, the channels reinforce one another when structured correctly. Projects that reverse the sequence often struggle to sustain momentum once paid amplification slows.
Crypto’s Attention Economy Became More Expensive
The economics behind influencer marketing also changed. As crypto audiences fragmented across regions, chains and subcultures, maintaining consistent influencer visibility became increasingly expensive. Audience trust meanwhile deteriorated after repeated undisclosed promotions, memecoin collapses and paid endorsements tied to failed projects.
That weakened one of influencer marketing’s historical advantages: authenticity. The paradox is that influencer campaigns still produce reach, but audiences increasingly approach them with skepticism. Editorial coverage, despite generating slower initial velocity, often carries greater trust precisely because it remains filtered through institutional publishing standards.
Crypto increasingly resembles traditional technology sectors where reputation compounds gradually rather than appearing instantly through visibility alone.
The Real Question Is Timing
Influencer marketing and earned media ultimately solve different problems on different timelines.
Category
Influencer Marketing
Earned Media / Crypto PR
Primary Goal
Rapid audience exposure
Long-term credibility and discoverability
Core Function
Distribution velocity
Reputational infrastructure
Speed of Results
Immediate
Gradual but compounding
Visibility Duration
Short-lived
Persistent
Best Use Cases
Launch-week attention, retail activation, community hype
Investor positioning, authority building, market credibility
Main Channels
X/Twitter, Telegram, YouTube, TikTok, livestreams
CoinDesk, Decrypt, Forbes, Cointelegraph, The Block
Audience Trust Level
Moderate to low due to paid promotions
Higher because of editorial validation
SEO Impact
Limited
Strong long-tail search visibility
AI Discoverability
Weak in most cases
Strong due to indexed editorial content
Investor Perception
Viewed as paid amplification
Viewed as third-party validation
Scalability
Expensive to maintain continuously
Compounds through syndication and indexing
Content Lifespan
Hours or days
Months or years
Performance Pattern
Fast spike, fast decay
Slower growth, sustained visibility
Market Effect
Creates momentum
Builds legitimacy
Best Strategic Sequence
Amplifies existing narratives
Establishes narratives first
Typical Risk
Engagement without lasting authority
Slower initial traction
Strongest Combined Strategy
Amplify editorial coverage through influencers
Build authority before paid amplification
Example of Data-Driven PR Approach
Usually campaign-based
Agencies like Outset PR optimize placements based on discoverability, syndication depth, SEO value and AI visibility rather than traffic alone.
In crypto’s earlier cycles, attention alone often created enough momentum to sustain growth temporarily. In 2026, markets increasingly reward projects capable of converting visibility into durable credibility.

IronWallet is a non-custodial multi-chain crypto wallet with no KYC, 10,000+ supported assets, gasless stablecoin transfers, and WalletConnect Pay integration.
The app skips three friction points that most self-custody wallets accept as standard: KYC steps that demand ID, network fees that require a separate gas token, and email registrations that link a wallet to a real-world identity.
This article walks through the IronWallet features that set the app apart from the wider self-custody category in 2026.
IronWallet at a Glance
True self-custody anchors the IronWallet design. The app ships as a non-custodial crypto wallet, with private keys and the 12-word seed phrase generated locally on the device, and no server-side copy held by the company.
The wallet appears on the official WalletConnect WalletGuide registry as a confirmed integrator.
IronWallet is already trusted by over 3 million users, and the app boasts 4+ ratings across TrustPilot, the App Store, and Google Play.
Here’s what some of the users are saying about IronWallet:
"Not a bad wallet app, very intuitive, works in Hungary, and didn't ask for any personal information." — Elena, Trustpilot (January 2026)
"It works well. My experience was good. Tech support found my transaction and showed me how to do it." — Dan, Trustpilot (January 2026)
No KYC, No Email, No Personal Data
New users create a wallet inside IronWallet without entering an email, phone number, government ID, passport, or any other identity field.
Setup runs entirely through the app: no registration step, no third-party verification, no waiting period. That puts the app firmly in the crypto wallet without email category.
Privacy works as the default state in the no KYC crypto wallet model, not a premium tier locked behind an upgrade.
The privacy policy explicitly blocks Google Analytics and Apple Store analytics services from running inside the wallet environment, which prevents third-party behavior tracking that other mobile apps allow by default.
Wallet activity stays unlinked from any real-world identity, so the structural risk of identity-tied data leaks drops sharply.
Those choices place IronWallet firmly in the anonymous crypto wallet category.
Gasless Transactions for USDT and USDC
Stablecoin transfers run without a separate gas token inside IronWallet, which positions the app as a gasless stablecoin wallet for USDT and USDC, the two most-used stablecoins on-chain. Network fees come straight out of the stablecoin balance being sent, with no native gas token required.
The table below summarizes how the gasless model works across the supported networks and tokens.
Network
Token
Standard
Gas Token Required
Fee Deducted In
Ethereum
USDC
ERC-20
None
USDC
Tron
USDT
TRC-20
None
USDT
That makes IronWallet a gasless USDT wallet on Tron and a gasless USDC wallet on Ethereum. The feature solves one of the most cited friction points in self-custody: tokens stuck in a wallet because the user lacks the native gas asset.
Behind the scenes, a meta-transaction layer abstracts the gas payment. Send 100 USDC, and the small network fee comes out of the USDC balance instead of an ETH balance the user might not have.
Newcomers who hold only stablecoins skip an entire setup step, and frequent stablecoin senders cut the operational overhead of always keeping a separate gas reserve.
10,000+ Assets Across Major Networks
Coverage runs deep across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, Polygon, Base, and other major networks inside the multi-chain crypto wallet that IronWallet ships.
Asset support includes 10,000+ digital assets across ERC-20, TRC-20, and BEP-20 token standards alongside native assets on each supported chain.
Portfolio data sits as a first-class feature inside the asset management interface. Users track balances, monitor structural changes over time, and view all assets in one screen instead of juggling multiple apps per ecosystem.
Built-in swaps route through third-party decentralized providers via smart contracts. Swap rates reflect current market conditions on the routing network, and IronWallet itself takes no platform fee on the swap.
Built-In WalletConnect and WalletConnect Pay
Built-in WalletConnect support has shipped with IronWallet since its first app release. The protocol acts as a secure bridge between the wallet and decentralized applications, payment platforms, and Web3 services.
On top of standard dApp connections, the IronWallet WalletConnect Pay integration extends the protocol into actual payment flows.
Users complete payments at retail checkouts and online merchants directly from the app, with transaction signing kept on the user's device throughout. Connections happen via QR code scans, deep links, or merchant payment links.
Decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap, NFT marketplaces such as OpenSea, lending protocols, and DAO governance portals all connect to IronWallet without browser extensions or manual address entry.
True Self-Custody with Local Key Storage
A self-custody wallet model sits at the core of how IronWallet handles funds. The company never holds assets, never sees private keys, and never receives the 12-word seed phrase. Everything stays on the device.
That architecture sets clear constraints on what the company can do. IronWallet cannot:
Freeze a wallet or block a transaction
Recover a lost seed phrase or reset a forgotten password
Access user funds under any circumstance
Reverse a transaction once it hits the blockchain
The constraints are intentional, not gaps. Local access protection runs through a PIN code plus biometric login via Face ID or fingerprint scan. Both layers stop anyone with physical access to the device from opening the wallet without proper credentials.
The trade-off applies to every genuine non-custodial wallet: the user owns operational security in full. Seed phrase backup, PIN setup, biometric login, and device hygiene all sit in the user's hands.
Wallet Import from Almost Every Major Competitor
Users migrating from another wallet bring their 12-word seed phrase straight into IronWallet, which accepts imports from a broad list of competing apps.
Import speed is the practical advantage: asset balances and transaction history surface inside the new app within minutes of pasting the seed phrase.
Supported import sources include:
Primary wallets: MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Phantom, Exodus, Coinbase Wallet
Hardware wallets: Ledger, Trezor, Tangem, SafePal
Other software wallets: Atomic Wallet, TokenPocket, Electrum
Users migrating from one wallet to another no longer need to manually transfer funds across multiple networks. The seed phrase carries the full wallet identity into IronWallet in one step.
Unlimited Wallets and Multi-Platform Access
Users can create an unlimited number of wallets within one IronWallet app. Common use cases include separating savings from trading funds, isolating DeFi activity from long-term holdings, and keeping business assets segregated from personal balances.
All wallets sit under the same PIN and biometric login, so multi-wallet management stays coherent. Cross-platform access extends to desktop alongside the primary iOS and Android apps. The official website also provides free utility tools, including a fee calculator and a wallet balance checker.
Zero Fees and 24/7 Human Support
Platform-level transaction fees stay at zero inside IronWallet. Users pay only standard blockchain network fees, with the gasless stablecoin model removing even that cost for USDT and USDC transfers. Built-in swaps carry no platform fee either; only the third-party smart contract fee applies.
24/7 customer support comes bundled at no cost. Live human support runs through the in-app settings menu, with the team specifically focused on human interaction instead of automated scripts.
Other decentralized tools leave users to fend for themselves; IronWallet treats support as part of the product.
Conclusion
IronWallet crypto earns attention by removing three friction points that most wallets accept as standard: KYC verification, gas-token requirements for stablecoin transfers, and email-linked accounts.
Add multi-chain coverage across 10,000+ assets, WalletConnect Pay integration, broad wallet import compatibility, and 24/7 human support, and the result is a self-custody app built for users who want full ownership without setup complexity.


Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

A modern Web3 PR team typically works across media databases, SEO dashboards, traffic estimators, monitoring platforms, spreadsheets and reporting decks at the same time. Each system captures a different signal. Each uses a different methodology. None were designed to function as part of a unified decision framework.
Yet agencies still need to answer the same strategic questions every campaign cycle: Which outlets actually shape industry narratives? Which placements improve long-term visibility instead of vanity metrics? Which publications matter to investors, developers or AI search systems? Which media recommendations can be defended objectively to clients?
That fragmentation increasingly defines the operational bottleneck inside Web3 communications.
The Industry Increasingly Needs Decision Infrastructure
Outset Media Index is trying to address the fragmentation gap. OMI is a media intelligence layer beneath campaign execution itself. The platform benchmarks more than 340 Web3 and FinTech publications using over 37 normalized metrics spanning reach, engagement, editorial structure, syndication behavior and LLM visibility.
The important shift is not simply aggregation. Agencies already have access to large amounts of media data. The shift is standardization.
Instead of forcing teams to compare unrelated signals across multiple dashboards, OMI attempts to create a unified framework for media evaluation. That changes how agencies approach campaign planning operationally because outlet comparison happens inside one analytical system rather than across five disconnected tools.
Most PR platforms optimize workflow execution. They help agencies find journalists, organize contacts, distribute pitches and monitor mentions. Those functions remain necessary, and OMI does not attempt to replace them.
It is not an outreach platform, CRM system or project management suite. The platform focuses on a narrower problem: helping agencies analyse media quality consistently before campaigns begin.
That focus reflects where much of the inefficiency inside modern PR operations actually lives.
Most Agency Friction Comes From Interpretation, Not Outreach
The communications industry historically treated outreach as the center of PR operations. In practice, much of the real operational strain now comes earlier in the process.
Agencies spend enormous time interpreting fragmented media signals: deciding which outlets deserve budget allocation, which publications align with campaign goals, which placements generate meaningful visibility and which recommendations can survive client scrutiny.
Those decisions are still frequently built through institutional memory, inherited assumptions and manually assembled comparisons spread across spreadsheets and exports.
OMI attempts to systematize that judgment layer.
For example, a Web3 client preparing a token launch may want visibility among developers in Asia, institutional investors in the US and crypto-native retail audiences globally. Under a fragmented workflow, account teams manually compare traffic tabs, SEO exports, regional assumptions and syndication histories across multiple systems before constructing a media shortlist.
With a normalized intelligence layer, those variables become easier to compare within one framework. Agencies can filter publications by geography, audience quality, syndication behavior, editorial flexibility and historical visibility patterns without constantly switching contexts between platforms.
That reduces both operational time and interpretive inconsistency.
Reporting Changes Once the Data Stops Fighting Itself
One of the least visible inefficiencies inside PR agencies is reporting construction.
Campaign reporting often requires teams to manually combine screenshots, traffic estimates, SEO exports, monitoring data and spreadsheet calculations into client-facing presentations. The process becomes labor-intensive because the underlying systems were never designed to integrate cleanly.
A standardized media intelligence layer changes the structure of reporting itself.
When outlet analysis, benchmarking and historical comparisons operate inside the same framework, agencies can explain recommendations more coherently. Reporting becomes less about presenting isolated placement lists and more about explaining why certain outlets were selected, how they compared against alternatives and how they contributed to specific visibility objectives.
That shift matters because clients increasingly expect strategic justification rather than activity summaries alone.
The stronger agencies increasingly differentiate themselves not through raw access to journalists, but through their ability to interpret fragmented media ecosystems into defensible decisions.
Web3 Communications Increasingly Resembles Information Architecture
The broader implication extends beyond one platform. Crypto communications now operates inside a highly distorted information environment where traffic inflation remains common, syndication networks blur attribution and editorial standards vary dramatically across publications. Visibility increasingly behaves like network propagation rather than traditional publishing.
Under those conditions, agencies need more than outreach tools. They need systems capable of standardizing interpretation across fragmented media ecosystems.
That is ultimately what media intelligence platforms attempt to become: operational infrastructure for decision-making rather than another isolated workflow product.
PR agencies historically differentiated themselves through relationships and distribution access.
In 2026, the more durable competitive advantage may come from analytical consistency instead.

WASHINGTON, May 13, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- RCB Fund Services LLC ("RCB"), the Claims Administrator for the AirBit Victim Fund (the "AVF") on behalf of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ"), today announced the opening of the petition submission process for victims of the AirBit Club fraud.
AVF was established by the DOJ to compensate individuals who suffered financial losses as a result of a fraudulent scheme conducted at the AirBit Club. AVF is intended to provide compensation to victims who were induced to purchase AirBit Club memberships based on false representations, including promises of guaranteed daily returns purportedly generated through cryptocurrency mining and trading activities. For more information regarding the AVF compensation process, please see the DOJ Press Release.
Who Is Eligible to Participate?To be eligible for compensation from the AVF, an individual must qualify as a "victim" of the AirBit fraud. A victim is defined as a person who suffered a direct pecuniary loss as a result of the scheme. Individuals who did not suffer an actual financial loss, such as those who merely transferred funds on behalf of others, are not eligible to receive compensation.
How Are Losses Calculated?Eligible losses will be calculated using a "cash-in, cash-out" methodology. Under this approach, a petitioner must document the total amount of money and/or virtual currency used to purchase AirBit Club memberships ("cash-in"). This amount will then be reduced by any funds or virtual currency withdrawn from AirBit Club ("cash-out"). Any fictitious or paper profits that may have been reported to participants will not be considered in determining eligible losses.
How to ApplyTo participate, individuals must submit a completed petition form along with supporting documentation by the filing deadline.
The easiest way to file is online at: www.airbitvictimfund.com
Alternatively, petitioners may:
Download and print a petition form from the website and mail it to the address below;
Request a form by calling toll-free at (800) 765-7251; or
Request a form via email at info@airbitvictimfund.com.
Petition Filing DeadlineAll petitions must be submitted online or postmarked no later than midnight on July 31, 2026.
Apply NowAirBit Victim FundPO Box 6090Syracuse, NY 13217-6090Toll-Free: (800) 765-7251
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

London, United Kingdom, May 13th, 2026, Chainwire
Following the successful completion of its private testing phase, BASIS is now officially live, with the platform publicly accessible at basis.pro as the company moves to address what industry participants increasingly describe as a structural gap in digital asset infrastructure.
The platform, developed with engineering support from Base58 Labs, has been tested under live market conditions with a select group of institutional participants. While reported metrics included sub-50 microsecond p99 execution latency, throughput exceeding 100,000 operations per second, and 100% uptime, the evaluation extended beyond peak performance benchmarks.
Testing was designed to observe how the system behaved when execution conditions became unstable. Scenarios included exchange-side latency spikes, API rate limits, liquidity fragmentation across venues, and partial execution failures. These conditions, while not constant, are representative of real trading environments where system behavior under stress determines outcome consistency.
According to BASIS CEO Helge Stadelmann, these scenarios reflect a broader limitation in current market infrastructure.
“Strategies exist. The constraint has been the infrastructure required to execute them with precision and defined risk,” Stadelmann said.
The platform operates as an arbitrage staking system powered by the Base58 Hyper-Latency Engine (BHLE), a proprietary high-frequency execution engine developed by Base58 Labs. BASIS identifies and captures pricing discrepancies across exchanges and distributes net arbitrage profits to platform participants through a staking structure designed around market-neutral execution.
In traditional markets, execution-layer infrastructure is typically embedded within institutional systems. In digital asset markets, that layer is still evolving, resulting in a dependency on external exchanges, APIs, and liquidity routing frameworks that introduce variability into execution outcomes.
Unlike conventional yield products that rely on token emissions or external reward incentives, BASIS derives user rewards exclusively from arbitrage execution profits generated across fragmented digital asset markets. Structurally, losses are absorbed by the company while users participate only in profit distributions generated through execution activity.
During testing, BASIS evaluated system behavior across a range of operational conditions. When execution parameters exceeded predefined thresholds, including projected slippage or incomplete fill conditions, the system halted execution and initiated deterministic rollback procedures. These mechanisms were designed to preserve capital and prevent forced completion under degraded conditions.
In scenarios where exchange-side instability occurred, the system adjusted outbound routing behavior and maintained allocation states without internal inconsistency. Pending executions were paused or reallocated without loss of state integrity, allowing the system to resume normal operation once conditions stabilized.
The Base58 Hyper-Latency Engine (BHLE), which underpins the platform, was developed to support these behaviors. While latency performance remains a core component, the design emphasis extends to sequencing logic, allocation tracking, and state preservation under varying execution conditions.
This approach reflects a shift in how execution performance is evaluated.
“Execution quality is determined by control under unpredictable conditions,” Stadelmann said.
The testing phase focused on verifying that the system could maintain deterministic behavior when external variables introduced uncertainty. Rather than prioritizing forced execution completion, the system was designed to priorities outcome consistency and capital preservation.
BASIS operates within a structured governance framework that includes ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018, AICPA SOC, and GDPR compliance standards. These certifications align the platform with established requirements for information security, service management, and operational oversight.
BASIS functions as execution-layer infrastructure supporting arbitrage deployment across exchanges rather than a conventional yield-generation platform. The underlying system is designed to maintain execution control, sequencing integrity, and deterministic risk behavior while operating across fragmented liquidity venues in real time.
With validation complete, BASIS is now officially live and publicly available through basis.pro. The platform currently supports BTC, ETH, SOL, and PAXG, each convertible into corresponding stTokens through a 1:1 structure, with reward accrual derived from arbitrage profits generated through the platform’s execution engine.
“We validated the system thoroughly before opening it to the market. BASIS is now officially live at basis.pro, and access is open,” Stadelmann said.
The launch reflects a broader shift in how infrastructure platforms are brought to market, with live validation and operational discipline completed prior to public availability.
As digital asset markets continue to mature, the role of execution-layer infrastructure is becoming more defined. While liquidity, custody, and compliance have seen rapid development, execution systems remain an area of ongoing evolution, particularly for institutional participants requiring consistent deployment frameworks.
The development of infrastructure capable of bridging the gap between proprietary trading systems and broader institutional access introduces new considerations for market structure. These include how execution control is standardized, how risk is managed across fragmented venues, and how infrastructure scales without introducing instability.
BASIS enters this stage of market development with execution discipline as a primary design principle. The platform’s architecture, testing methodology, and launch sequencing reflect an approach centered on system behavior rather than surface-level performance metrics.
As digital asset markets continue maturing, execution-layer systems capable of supporting scalable arbitrage deployment are becoming increasingly important. BASIS enters the market with a structure centered on market-neutral execution, deterministic risk management, and operational consistency across fragmented trading environments.
About BASIS
BASIS is a professional crypto arbitrage platform developed with engineering support from Base58 Labs. The platform operates through the Base58 Hyper-Latency Engine (BHLE), a proprietary high-frequency execution engine designed for sub-50 microsecond execution latency and deterministic risk management across fragmented digital asset markets.
About Base58 Labs
Base58 Labs is the engineering team behind the Base58 Hyper-Latency Engine (BHLE) and the technical infrastructure powering BASIS. The team specializes in execution-layer
development for digital asset markets, with a focus on latency optimization, sequencing integrity, and deterministic system behavior under variable market conditions.
ContactMaud GerritsenBASISpress@basis.pro
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector has entered a "Maturity Phase," where institutional-grade infrastructure is finally replacing experimental pilots. While the market's attention remains fragmented across high-speed Layer 2 (L2) tokens like Arbitrum (ARB) and Mantle (MNT), the foundational blue-chips—Maker (MKR) and Aave (AAVE)—are executing their most ambitious upgrades to date.
With the total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols reaching $64.3 billion in early 2026, Aave and Maker (now rebranding parts of its ecosystem to Sky) are no longer just "crypto leverage tools"; they have become the primary settlement and yield rails for a global, RWA-driven financial system.
Maker (MKR): The RWA-Backed Governor in the "Sky" Era
Source: tradingview
Maker is currently deep into Phase 1 of its Endgame plan, which introduced a unified brand identity under Sky and two new ecosystem tokens: NewStable (USDS) and NewGovToken (SKY). Existing users still utilize MKR and DAI, but the protocol’s growth is now fueled by high-margin Real-World Asset (RWA) strategies.
RWA Dominance: As of 2026, a significant portion of the collateral backing USDS consists of U.S. Treasury bills and corporate credit, with RWA lending surpassing $18.5 billion industry-wide.
The Cashflow Engine: Maker has become a highly profitable engine, using interest from real-world assets to buy back and burn MKR tokens.
Technical Outlook: MKR is trading in a wide range, holding comfortably above its bear-market lows and its 30-day SMA. For a "blue-chip comeback," it must deliver a sustained break above its prior cycle highs, supported by growing revenue from its SubDAOs like Spark.
Aave (AAVE): The V4 Hub of Global Liquidity
Source: tradingview
Aave has cemented its status as the "One Strong Leader" in on-chain lending, currently commanding a TVL of approximately $32.9 billion. The launch of Aave V4 on March 30, 2026, marked the protocol's first complete rework since V1, introducing a revolutionary hub-and-spoke architecture.
Aave V4 Architecture: The new design utilizes hubs (Core, Plus, Prime) to serve as liquidity pools and spokes for tailored markets, preventing the "siloing" of liquidity across chains.
Real-World Infrastructure: Founder Stani Kulechov has shifted the protocol's focus toward funding real-world infrastructure, such as solar arrays and data centers, effectively merging TradFi liquidity with DeFi efficiency.
Technical Outlook: AAVE shows a consistent pattern of upward repair, frequently testing its 30-day Moving Average. Momentum is positive, but the 200-day resistance band remains a key hurdle before Aave can escape the shadow of high-beta L2 narratives.
Conclusion
The 2026 market structure favors L2 tokens for speculative "risk-on" periods, but MKR and AAVE are reclaiming their status as the essential "productive" assets of the ecosystem.
They lead the DeFi comeback if:
RWA Vaults continue to expand, and USDS (formerly DAI) supply reaches new all-time highs driven by institutional demand.
Aave V4 successfully integrates real-world infrastructure lending at scale, providing a non-crypto-correlated yield that L2 tokens cannot match.
Price Confirmation: Both tokens break and hold above their 200-day resistance zones on heavy volume.
They stay range-bound if:
Marginal liquidity continues to chase L2 governance points, LRTs, and memecoins, treating blue-chips as stagnant infrastructure rather than growth bets.
Systemic risks from cross-chain bridging or liquidation cascades in the massive $64B lending market create a cap on investor confidence.
Final Verdict: MKR and AAVE are the "essential plumbing" of 2026. They are technically sound and fundamentally stronger than ever, but the market is still waiting for a definitive rotation out of L2-beta and back into the core engines of the DeFi stack.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Die Erzählung über Unternehmensblockchains hat die "Pilotphase" verlassen und ist in einen Hochrisikokampf um strukturelle Dominanz eingetreten. Seit Jahren werden Hedera (HBAR) und VeChain (VET) als "Enterprise Chains" kategorisiert – zuverlässig, reguliert, aber oft hinter dem spekulativen Drehmoment von Ethereum oder Solana zurückbleibend.
Jedoch haben jüngste Entwicklungen das Tape verschoben. Von FedEx, das dem Gouverneursrat beigetreten ist, bis hin zur Einführung eines Spot HBAR ETFs und VeChains aggressivem Kurswechsel hin zur AI-Agentenwirtschaft wird die "Corporate Chain"-These auf die Probe gestellt. Sind diese Assets endlich bereit, als systemische Infrastruktur neu bewertet zu werden, oder sind sie dazu bestimmt, spezialisierte Nischen im Bereich der Real-World Assets (RWA) zu bleiben?

Zurich, Switzerland, May 12th, 2026, Chainwire
The fintech project SNC Scandic Coin (SNC) was launched by the global Scandic Finance Group (SFG). In an interview with the Neue Zürcher Nachrichten, Uwe Sellmer, a specialist in the financial sector, explained how the SNC token differs from speculative cryptocurrencies: it will serve as a regulated payment, access and loyalty instrument integrated into the SFG Group’s services, rather than merely being an object of speculation. Specifically, users within the network can pay for media apps, private jet flights, yachts, cars, AI products and domains, amongst other things, and benefit from loyalty programmes. This practical range of applications is a key feature of the RWA project, as many competitors offer only a vague ‘vision of the future’ without any tangible benefits.
Transparency, Audit and Compliance
The developers have ensured that the SNC SCANDIC Coin meets the requirements of regulatory oversight and strict compliance. The smart contract was audited by CertiK https://skynet.certik.com/projects/scandic-coin: according to the public Skynet report dated 2 March 2026, the SNC Scandic Coin has no critical vulnerabilities. The project has a KYC-KYB and anti-money laundering (AML) system, which is contractually managed by the data and credit service provider CRIF, which also certifies ESG certificates, thereby emphasising sustainable practices. A multi-layered AML risk management system underscores the commitment to creating a trustworthy product.
A broad ecosystem rather than a standalone product
The SNC Scandic Coin is not viewed in isolation, but as part of a broad Scandic ecosystem. The official website lists numerous divisions – such as SNC Scandic Fly, SNC Scandic Pay, Scandic Cars, SNC Scandic Estate, SNC Scandic DEV, SNC Scandic SEC, SNC Scandic Domains and SNC Scandic Yachts. These divisions are intended to use the coin as a common means of payment and deploy it for various RWA (Real-World Asset) services. According to Sellmer, the Legier Group publishing network – which comprises over 115 globally active daily newspapers across all continents offering 24/7 breaking news and its own news app – will provide media coverage.
Value proposition and fee model
From the user’s perspective, the SNC Coin offers several advantages: real-world utility through integration with specific services, low fees and fast processing thanks to optimised smart contract technology, an integrated ecosystem combining travel, property, brokerage services and lifestyle offerings, as well as a transparent structure with a fixed token supply and traceable distribution. The FAQ explains that the coin supports payments, access levels, rewards and ecosystem functions. Digital assets and data are secured using decentralised storage methods and institutional cold wallets, and for maximum security, the extensive SNC development team recommends the use of hardware wallets and, to safeguard every token holder, relies among other things on a vesting period for SNC Coins, which further ensures that the legal regulations of the supervisory authorities are fully complied with.
Tokenomics: Limited supply and clear allocation
The comprehensive white paper (210 A4 pages) and the website provide insight into the token economy. The total supply of SNC is capped at one billion tokens. According to the tokenomics model, the launch price is set at 0.02 EUR. A detailed schedule governs when these tokens will be released. The valuation at launch amounts to 20 million US dollars; according to the project description, this is not a legal commitment regarding the value of the token, but rather reflects assumptions regarding supply, market launch and development. Furthermore, the technical requirements for staking the SNC Scandic Coin have already been established in this context.
Milestones and Timeline
The roadmap focuses on transparency and stages: the foundation phase and development, including the audit, have been completed. Next up is the Token Generation Event (TGE); this will be followed by integration steps with partner services before the SNC Scandic Coin finally scales globally. An FAQ section notes that the SNC Coin is currently still in the preparatory phase and no live mainnet token is available; trading will commence shortly after the mainnet launch on a major centralised exchange (BitMart) and other major exchanges. Those interested should monitor the official channels, as exact launch dates will only be published https://x.com/SCANDICCOINECO.
Assessment and Outlook
Uwe Sellmer emphasises that “SNC” stands for S: Security/Synergy, N: Network and C: Community, and represents Scandinavian values such as transparency and modern design. The combination of real-world utility, limited supply, regulatory clarity and a comprehensive ecosystem sets the coin apart from many crypto projects where speculative hype takes centre stage. However, in accordance with legal requirements, the project highlights risks in its FAQs: Digital assets carry technical, market, liquidity, regulatory and execution risks, and interested parties should refer to official risk disclosures and the launch documentation.
In this context, the SNC Scandic Coin has potential to become a milestone in the fintech sector; however, as is always the case in any business, this depends not only on the technology and marketing, but also on the acceptance of the token.
Imprint of SNC Scandic Coin
https://snccoin.dev/en/imprint
About NEUE ZÜRICHER NACHRICHTEN
Founded in Zurich in 1904, the “Neue Zürcher Nachrichten” (“NZN”) is a Swiss daily newspaper known for its liberal-conservative perspective and commitment to high-quality journalism. Published around the clock in six languages, NZN covers Swiss, European, and global news, with a strong focus on in-depth analysis, background reporting, and opinion coverage. Through its ongoing digital expansion, NZN continues to provide reliable and diverse news coverage to a broad international audience.
ContactMrFadri BaumannNEUE ZÜRCHER NACHRICHTENinfo@NeueZuercherNachrichten.com+41447979985
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

Zug, Schweiz, 12. Mai 2026, Chainwire
Bitcoin Suisse (International) Ltd., ein Tochterunternehmen der Bitcoin Suisse Group, hat eine Klasse F-Lizenz gemäß dem Digital Asset Business Act von Bermuda sowie eine Klasse B-Registrierungs genehmigung gemäß dem Investment Business Act von der Bermuda Monetary Authority erhalten. Dies autorisiert regulierte digitale Vermögensverwaltung und Anlageberatung für professionelle und institutionelle Kunden.
Die Bitcoin Suisse Group hat heute bekannt gegeben, dass ihr Tochterunternehmen Bitcoin Suisse (International) Ltd. eine Klasse F-Lizenz für digitale Vermögensgeschäfte gemäß dem Digital Asset Business Act von Bermuda sowie eine Klasse B-Registrierung gemäß dem Investment Business Act 2003 von der Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) erhalten hat. Die Genehmigung wurde auf einer vorbetrieblichen Basis erteilt, vorbehaltlich der Erfüllung der üblichen Bedingungen vor der Aufnahme regulierter digitaler Vermögensverwaltung und Anlageberatungsdienste für professionelle und institutionelle Kunden.

Zug, Schweiz, 12. Mai 2026, Chainwire
Im Rahmen einer umfassenderen Initiative zur Erweiterung des Zugangs zu grundlegenden Bankinfrastrukturen in ganz Afrika hat Cantor8 Pläne enthüllt, führende Mobile Money-Systeme wie M-PESA und EVC Plus über Yiksi Limited onchain zu bringen.
Cantor8 hat exklusive MOUs mit Yiksi Limited gesichert, die Pläne umreißen, führende Mobile Money-Systeme onchain zu bringen und direkte digitale Gelddienste zur Krypto-Konvertierung über Blockchain-Rails zu ermöglichen.
Durch die Partnerschaft mit Taran App, einer führenden afrikanischen Fintech-Plattform, und Yiksi, der Kryptowährungsbörse von Taran App, wird Cantor8 die Infrastruktur von Taran App nutzen, um zwei der am weitesten verbreiteten Formen von Mobile Money in Afrika über das Canton Network on-chain zu bringen.

Email-free crypto wallets exist for one reason: privacy belongs at the entry point, not behind an upgrade. Five crypto wallets without email registration stand out in 2026 across multi-chain coverage, Ethereum-first use, and the Solana ecosystem.
Every wallet on this list creates a no email crypto wallet session with no phone number, no government ID, and no KYC.
Quick Comparison of the 5 Wallets
The table below summarizes the five crypto wallets without email registration across the categories most users weigh when choosing one.
Wallet
Email Required
KYC Required
Supported Assets
Best For
Iron Wallet
No
No
10,000+
Multi-chain self-custody with WalletConnect Pay
Trust Wallet
No
No
10M+ tokens
Broad chain coverage and Web3 access
MetaMask
No (default setup)
No
Hundreds of thousands
Ethereum and EVM ecosystem
Exodus
No
No
~269 native
Desktop and mobile portfolio management
Phantom
No
No
Solana + EVMs + Bitcoin
Solana ecosystem and NFTs
1. Iron Wallet — Best for Multi-Chain Self-Custody With WalletConnect Pay
Iron Wallet creates a crypto wallet without email, phone, ID, or KYC. INWAY AG in the Principality of Liechtenstein builds the app under EU GDPR and the local Data Protection Act, which makes it one of the cleaner private crypto wallet options on the market.
Key facts:
10,000+ digital assets across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, and other major networks make it a true multi-chain crypto wallet
WalletConnect Pay integration, as one of the first confirmed integrators in the April 2026 Paris pilot, positions it as a leading WalletConnect Pay wallet for retail payments
Gasless transactions for USDT and USDC deduct network fees directly from the stablecoin balance
3M+ users with 4+ star ratings on App Store and Google Play
Two structural features set this non-custodial wallet apart. The app blocks Google Analytics and Apple Store analytics services from the wallet environment, which removes tracker layers that most competitors keep enabled.
24/7 human customer support runs through the in-app settings menu at no extra cost.
2. Trust Wallet — Best for Broad Chain Coverage and Web3 Access
Trust Wallet skips email and KYC for all core wallet functions, which puts it firmly in the anonymous crypto wallet category. New users tap "Create a New Wallet," set a PIN, back up the 12-word seed phrase, and move on.
Key facts:
100+ blockchains supported natively, with 10M+ tokens across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Cosmos, Optimism, and Polygon
220M+ users worldwide, ranking as the most downloaded self-custody wallet globally
Built-in features include DEX swaps, staking on 25+ assets, NFT support, and a dApp browser
Three platforms: iOS, Android, and a browser extension
Binance acquired Trust Wallet in 2018, though a 2023 share sale left the wallet operating as a separate legal entity outside the Binance group.
The trade-off worth knowing: a multi-chain crypto wallet that covers 100+ chains creates a wider attack surface than a single-chain option, especially for users who sign frequent token approvals.
3. MetaMask — Best for Ethereum and the EVM Ecosystem
MetaMask requires no email at default setup, which makes it a viable no KYC crypto wallet even for users new to self-custody. The standard flow asks for a password and a 12-word seed phrase, nothing else.
An optional Google or Apple social login flow exists, but the email-free path remains the primary setup.
Key facts:
100M+ users across browser extension and mobile app since launch in 2016 by ConsenSys
Native chain support for Ethereum, Linea, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, BNB Chain, plus Solana, Bitcoin, and TRON
In-app swap fee of 0.875% layered on top of standard network gas
Hardware wallet pairing with Ledger and Trezor for users who want offline keys behind the MetaMask interface
For Ethereum-focused users, no other non-custodial wallet carries the same depth of EVM ecosystem maturity. MetaMask stays the default pick for DeFi participants, NFT collectors on Ethereum, and dApp users across Layer 2 networks.
4. Exodus — Best for Desktop and Mobile Portfolio Management
Exodus generates a crypto wallet without email and no personal information at signup. JP Richardson and Daniel Castagnoli founded the company in 2015, and Exodus Movement, Inc. now trades on the NYSE American under ticker EXOD since December 18, 2024.
Key facts:
~269 native cryptocurrencies across 50+ networks including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, Polygon, Avalanche, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Tron
Three platforms with full sync: desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), mobile (iOS, Android), and browser extension
In-wallet staking on ETH, ADA, SOL, and ATOM with no platform staking fee
Trezor hardware wallet pairing strengthens the self-custody wallet model for larger balances
The visual interface stands out for portfolio-focused users: clean charts, real-time price tracking, and one of the more design-forward layouts among non-custodial wallet options.
Its built-in swap adds a 0.5-5% spread depending on the pair, so high-frequency traders may prefer external DEXs for cost-sensitive trades.
5. Phantom — Best for the Solana Ecosystem and NFTs
Phantom asks for no email at signup and runs as a pure self-custody wallet. Brandon Millman, Chris Kalani, and Francesco Agosti founded the company in January 2021, initially focused on Solana.
Key facts:
Multi-chain support for Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, Bitcoin, and Base after expansion past Solana-only
NFT tooling including spam filtering, collection grouping, live floor prices, and direct marketplace listing
Swap fees: 0.85% on standard in-app swaps, 1.5% flat for gasless Solana mobile swaps, ~0.3% bridge fee for cross-chain routes
Hardware support via Ledger pairing on Chrome, Brave, and Edge browser extensions
Solana DeFi, NFT trading, and meme coin activity all run through Phantom more smoothly than through any general-purpose anonymous crypto wallet. Recent expansion to EVMs and Bitcoin extends utility past the Solana-first era, though the original ecosystem fit remains the strongest reason to pick it.
How to Choose a Crypto Wallet Without Email Registration
The right pick among crypto wallets without email registration depends on which chains and use cases matter most.
Multi-chain users with a stablecoin focus get the cleanest fit from Iron Wallet, especially for gasless transactions on USDT and USDC across Ethereum, Tron, and BNB Chain.
Users who want maximum chain coverage and full Web3 features land on Trust Wallet. Ethereum-focused users and EVM-heavy DeFi participants stick with MetaMask as their primary no-KYC crypto wallet.
Desktop-first users who care about visual portfolio tracking pick Exodus. Solana traders, NFT collectors, and meme coin participants stay on Phantom.
Conclusion
Five crypto wallets without email registration cover every major use case in 2026. Iron Wallet leads on multi-chain breadth with WalletConnect Pay, Trust Wallet on chain coverage, MetaMask on Ethereum depth, Exodus on portfolio management, and Phantom on the Solana ecosystem.
Every wallet on this list runs as a true self-custody wallet, so users hold their keys regardless of which option fits.


Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Public relations agencies spent the last decade accumulating software.
Media databases. SEO dashboards. Monitoring platforms. Traffic estimators. Outreach systems. Reporting tools.
The modern agency stack became increasingly sophisticated, yet one operational problem remained largely unresolved: how to analyse media outlets consistently.
Media fragmentation accelerated. AI altered how information gets discovered. Clients expect clearer attribution between media placements and business outcomes. Agencies meanwhile manage larger account portfolios under tighter timelines and leaner teams.
Under those conditions, fragmented media evaluation becomes a structural inefficiency. The agencies that scale effectively increasingly look less like communications firms and more like intelligence systems.
Most PR Decisions Still Depend on Human Memory
The core issue is surprisingly basic.
Most agencies still build media strategies through a combination of experience, intuition and disconnected datasets. One team may prioritize domain authority. Another may focus on estimated traffic. A third may value syndication reach or editorial reputation.
None of those signals are inherently wrong. The problem is that they rarely exist inside a shared framework.
As a result, agencies repeatedly rebuild the same decision logic from scratch across accounts.
That creates operational friction:
account teams reach different conclusions from similar data,
media lists vary depending on who assembled them,
reporting structures become inconsistent,
and institutional knowledge remains trapped inside individual employees rather than embedded in systems.
In smaller firms, that may remain manageable. In larger agencies handling multiple industries and regions simultaneously, it becomes difficult to standardize performance.
The constraint is no longer access to information. It is the absence of normalized interpretation.
The Existing PR Stack Was Built for Execution, Not Evaluation
Traditional PR software largely solves workflow problems.
Cision and Muck Rack help agencies identify contacts, distribute pitches and monitor coverage. SEO platforms estimate search visibility. Analytics tools track traffic behavior.
But none of those systems were designed to answer a more foundational question: which outlets actually make strategic sense for a specific campaign objective?
That distinction matters more now because media itself became harder to evaluate.
Traffic estimates fluctuate wildly across tools. Syndication networks distort reach calculations. AI-generated search summaries increasingly redistribute visibility away from original publishers. Niche publications sometimes outperform larger outlets in conversion quality despite lower audience size.
Under those conditions, raw metrics lose explanatory power in isolation.
Agencies compensate through manual interpretation:
spreadsheets,
inherited assumptions,
internal heuristics,
and fragmented benchmarking methods.
The process remains heavily dependent on institutional memory.
That limits scalability.
Media Intelligence Is Emerging as a Separate Infrastructure Layer
A growing number of agencies are therefore building what could be described as a media intelligence layer — a standardized analytical system that sits beneath outreach and reporting workflows.
The concept resembles developments that already transformed adjacent industries.
Finance built risk infrastructure beneath trading systems. Advertising built attribution models beneath media buying. Cybersecurity built threat intelligence beneath operational tooling.
PR increasingly appears headed in the same direction.
A media intelligence layer standardizes how outlets are evaluated by normalizing fragmented signals into a comparable framework. Instead of forcing teams to reconcile inconsistent data manually, it creates a shared reference system for decision-making.
The operational implications are significant.
When media evaluation becomes standardized:
campaign planning accelerates,
shortlist creation becomes more repeatable,
reporting structures become comparable across accounts,
and institutional knowledge becomes systematized rather than employee-dependent.
More importantly, agencies gain consistency without fully sacrificing strategic flexibility.
AI Increased the Need for Structured Media Evaluation
The rise of AI-driven discovery accelerated this transition.
Search increasingly functions through language models rather than traditional query-based navigation alone. Visibility now depends partly on whether platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok or Perplexity repeatedly surface certain publishers, narratives or entities.
That introduces new variables into outlet evaluation:
citation frequency,
topical consistency,
structured formatting,
syndication patterns,
and LLM visibility.
Many traditional PR metrics were not designed to account for those dynamics.
As AI systems increasingly mediate information discovery, agencies need more sophisticated methods for evaluating how media outlets perform inside broader information ecosystems rather than solely through traffic estimates.
This partly explains the emergence of platforms such as Outset Media Index.
Outset Media Index Treats Media Analysis as Infrastructure
Outset Media Index, or OMI, was designed to function as an analytical layer beneath existing PR workflows rather than as a replacement for outreach software.
The platform benchmarks outlets across more than 37 normalized metrics spanning reach, engagement, editorial structure and LLM visibility. The objective is not simply to aggregate data, but to standardize comparison itself.
In practical terms agencies may still use Cision or Muck Rack for contact management and pitching, but OMI helps them to determine where stories should be placed and why.
Execution platforms optimize distribution. Media intelligence platforms optimize decision quality.
The distinction increasingly matters because the communications industry now operates inside a fragmented information environment where visibility, authority and discoverability no longer align neatly with traffic scale alone.
PR Is Becoming More Quantitative
None of this eliminates judgment from communications strategy.
PR remains partly interpretive because reputation itself remains contextual. Editorial nuance still matters. Relationships still matter. Timing still matters.
But the operational center of gravity is shifting.
Agencies historically differentiated themselves through access: access to journalists, publishers and distribution channels. Those advantages weakened as information became more decentralized and discoverable.
The newer advantage increasingly comes from interpretation:
interpreting media quality,
interpreting discoverability,
interpreting audience alignment,
and interpreting how information flows across fragmented platforms.
That requires infrastructure.
In 2026, agencies are not short on software. They are short on standardized intelligence systems capable of turning fragmented media signals into repeatable strategic decisions.
The firms that solve that problem first may ultimately define the next operational model for PR itself.

Crypto communications has shifted from promotion to risk management.
For years, Web3 marketing rewarded visibility above all else. Token launches, aggressive social campaigns and inflated growth narratives often produced short-term traction regardless of product maturity. That dynamic weakened significantly between 2024 and 2026 as institutional participation increased, regulators tightened oversight and AI systems began shaping how users discover projects.
The market now places greater value on credibility, operational clarity and narrative consistency. In practice, that means communications teams increasingly influence governance, compliance positioning and long-term reputation rather than functioning solely as promotional units.
Projects that continue relying on hype cycles and speculative messaging face diminishing returns. Audiences compare claims across AI assistants, research platforms, social media and on-chain data in real time. Discrepancies surface quickly. Trust deteriorates even faster.
The strongest Web3 brands now approach communications more like infrastructure than advertising.
Trust Wallet’s Dami Odufuwa Calls Communications “Trust Infrastructure”
Dami Odufuwa, Head of Communications at Trust Wallet, described the transition succinctly in a recent interview with Outset PR, calling communications “the infrastructure of trust.”
That description captures how the function evolved inside mature crypto companies.
Users trust Web3 products with assets, credentials and financial access. Communications therefore affects adoption and retention directly rather than serving purely promotional goals.
In many larger organizations, communications teams now operate closer to legal, product and governance functions than traditional marketing departments. Messaging decisions increasingly involve regulatory exposure, operational transparency and long-term reputation management.
That reflects broader institutionalization across the industry.
In earlier crypto cycles, communications often focused on maximizing enthusiasm. In 2026, the stronger organizations focus on minimizing credibility gaps between narrative and execution.
AI Reshaped Discovery
Search behavior changed significantly in 2025 and 2026.
Users increasingly rely on LLM assistants to compare protocols, evaluate infrastructure providers and understand market developments instead of depending exclusively on traditional search engines.
That transition introduced a new communications variable: AI discoverability.
Projects now compete not only for rankings and media coverage, but also for inclusion inside AI-generated responses. Visibility increasingly depends on whether systems consistently associate a company or protocol with a specific category, capability or market narrative.
AI systems reward consistency, citation density and clarity. They perform poorly with inflated branding language and contradictory positioning because those signals reduce confidence in generated answers.
As a result, communications strategies increasingly optimize for machine interpretation alongside human readership.
Projects now compete for what could be described as “citation authority” — the probability that AI systems repeatedly associate a company with a specific category or capability.
The implications extend beyond SEO. Projects that fail to establish consistent terminology across interviews, articles and documentation risk becoming less visible inside AI-generated outputs, even if they maintain strong social reach.
Data Replaced Volume in Crypto PR
The same transition reshaped media strategy.
For years, crypto PR largely optimized around publication count. More placements implied stronger campaigns regardless of audience quality or downstream impact.
That logic weakened substantially once AI aggregation and syndication began influencing discoverability more heavily than raw traffic alone.
Today, sophisticated crypto communications teams increasingly evaluate:
syndication reach,
geographic relevance,
referral quality,
topical authority,
long-tail discoverability,
and AI citation probability.
Outset PR, for example, evaluates outlets partly through discoverability and syndication mechanics rather than traffic metrics alone.
That approach reflects how crypto media actually distributes online.
One strategically placed article syndicated across CoinMarketCap, Binance Square and financial aggregators may now generate more durable visibility than dozens of isolated placements with limited indexing value.
Precision increasingly matters more than saturation.
Community Trust Became a Retention Mechanism
Crypto markets remain highly social, but the relationship between communities and projects evolved substantially.
Communities now evaluate projects less through announcement frequency and more through transparency, responsiveness and founder credibility. Teams that communicate openly during difficult periods often maintain stronger long-term support than projects that disappear between funding rounds or token events.
That places greater emphasis on continuity.
Effective Web3 communications increasingly require:
Regular operational updates
Clear roadmap explanations
Transparent discussion of risks
Visible executive participation
Consistent technical education
Projects that communicate only during launches or fundraising campaigns struggle to maintain credibility over longer market cycles.
Founder visibility also changed in importance. In earlier cycles, founders often functioned primarily as promoters. In 2026, audiences increasingly expect founders and executives to demonstrate technical understanding, strategic clarity and accountability.
Communications Became a Core Business Function
The broader implication is that communications no longer operates separately from product credibility.
In 2026, effective Web3 communication depends less on amplification and more on alignment:
alignment between messaging and execution,
between technical capability and public claims,
between founder visibility and operational competence,
and between long-term positioning and market reality.
Crypto spent years treating attention as its most valuable currency.
The industry increasingly behaves as though trust matters more.

ZUG, SWITZERLAND, May 12th, 2026, Chainwire
Nine protocol initiatives that target EVM compatibility, gasless transactions, compliant security tokens, transaction privacy, AI agent micropayments, and quantum-safe cryptography
The Casper Association today published the Casper Manifest, a multi-year technical roadmap designed to make Casper Network the infrastructure layer for regulated real-world asset tokenization and the emerging machine-to-machine economy.
The Manifest was introduced by Casper Association President & CTO Michael Steuer at the Digital Finance Forum in Bermuda, before an audience of leaders from Web3, traditional finance, and institutional finance.
Building on major protocol releases delivered since mid-2025, including Casper 2.0 with deterministic finality and a multi-VM execution layer, the Manifest sets out nine coordinated initiatives around one goal: making blockchain frictionless for users, trusted by institutions, and native for machines. The roadmap brings EVM compatibility to Casper’s WebAssembly foundation, advances gasless transactions and smart accounts for simpler user experiences, and expands the compliance, privacy, micropayment, native token, and quantum-safe infrastructure needed for real-world assets and autonomous systems to operate with greater predictability and less friction.
Building the Infrastructure for Regulated Assets and Autonomous Systems
The nine core initiatives outlined in the Casper Manifest are organized around the following areas:
Access for every developer. The largest blockchain developer ecosystem builds on Ethereum tooling - Solidity, MetaMask, and thousands of audited smart contract libraries. Casper is adding full Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility alongside its existing WebAssembly execution engines, so developers can bring their existing contracts, tools, and wallets to Casper without modification. A native token registry provides equal access to tokens from either side. One chain, two execution environments, zero fragmentation.
Blockchain that’s frictionless for the user. Someone else pays your transaction fees. Multiple steps collapse into a single action. You sign in with your fingerprint instead of managing cryptographic keys. The Casper Manifest delivers gasless transactions, batch operations, and smart accounts that enable biometric authentication - so using a blockchain application feels like using any other app.
Compliance and privacy as one system. Casper will be the first Layer 1 where regulatory compliance and transaction privacy are designed to work together. Compliant security tokens with on-chain identity verification, transfer restrictions, and jurisdictional controls - built in alignment with the ERC-3643 standard that already governs $28 billion in tokenized assets on chain. As a member of the ERC-3643 Association, Casper Association is helping to expand the standard. Alongside compliance, a multi-phase privacy roadmap delivers confidential transactions with fixed, predictable costs - and built-in tools for auditors and regulators to verify compliance without exposing transaction details to the public. Privacy and compliance as two sides of the same system, designed for the $16 trillion real-world asset tokenization market.
Native infrastructure for the machine economy. AI agents need to pay for services programmatically - per API call, per data query, per computation - without subscriptions, invoices, or human intermediaries. As a member of the X402 Foundation, Casper is implementing the X402 open payment standard, enabling machines to pay each other over HTTP in stablecoins and other fungible tokens, expecting to become the first WebAssembly-native Layer 1 with production X402 support. The same smart accounts and gasless infrastructure built for human users give AI agents scoped spending permissions and autonomous operation out of the box, providing best-in-class controls and compliance for AI agents.
Tokens as first-class citizens. User-created tokens on most blockchains are smart contracts that cost significantly more to operate than native currencies. Casper's Native Token Registry elevates every token to protocol-level status with the same fixed, predictable costs as native transfers. One pricing model for all tokens. One infrastructure layer shared across WebAssembly, EVM and any other future execution environment on Casper Network. The backbone for everything from DeFi to compliant security tokens to private, confidential transfers.
Quantum-safe from the start. No major smart contract platform has shipped post-quantum transaction signing. Casper will, with hybrid accounts that carry both classical and quantum-resistant keys during a transition period. For institutions evaluating blockchain platforms for decade-long deployments, the answer to "what happens when quantum computers arrive" will be production code, not a research paper.
“Much of the industry is focused on either maximizing hype, or iterating on concepts that service the same existing, crypto-native use cases. Few are building the infrastructure that will onboard the next billion users, the next trillion dollars in tokenized assets, or the first billion machines,” said Michael Steuer, President and CTO of the Casper Association. “Executing the Casper Manifest means that developers can bring over their entire EVM stack. For users, blockchain should be invisible. One tap. Done. For institutions, Casper’s roadmap provides on-chain compliance, transaction privacy and quantum safety. And machines need payment rails that don’t require a human, while being bound to spending limits set by their owners on their smart accounts. That’s the future-proof infrastructure Casper is putting in place.”
Timeline
The nine initiatives do not ship all at once. The first, X402 micropayments, is expected to ship in the next few weeks. Later in 2026, Casper will ship EVM compatibility, networking hardening, and compliant security tokens. This will be followed by the Native Token Registry, Gasless transactions, batch operations, and smart accounts. Transaction privacy and quantum safety build on the earlier initiatives, through 2027. Formal protocol enhancement proposals for each initiative will be published.
Explore a deep dive of the Casper Manifest here: https://casper.network/news/manifest
About Casper Network
Casper Network (CSPR) is a layer 1 Proof-of-Stake blockchain engineered for regulated real-world assets and the machine economy. With deterministic transaction finality, a multi-VM execution layer supporting both WebAssembly and soon EVM smart contracts, and fixed-cost operations enforced at the protocol level, Casper delivers the infrastructure for compliant asset tokenization, frictionless consumer experiences, and autonomous machine-to-machine commerce. The Casper Manifest - the network's multi-year technical roadmap - advances nine coordinated protocol initiatives spanning developer access, user experience, institutional compliance, privacy, micropayments, and quantum safety. The Casper Association, a non-profit organization based in Zug, Switzerland, oversees protocol development and ecosystem growth. Learn more at https://casper.network.
Full Casper Manifest: https://casper.network/news/manifest
Media Contact: Casper Association press@casper.network
ContactCasper Associationpress@casper.network
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.