zohaibakhtar
0 Following
30 Follower
65 Like gegeben
1 Geteilt
Übersetzen
Macro Expert Claims XRP’s Price Was Never Meant to Be “Discovered”
A bold claim is circulating again in the crypto world, and this one challenges a basic assumption most investors hold.
Macro analyst Dr. Jim Willie argues that $XRP was never designed to behave like a normal cryptocurrency. In his view, it is not competing with banks or chasing retail speculation. Instead, it is being positioned as infrastructure for large-scale institutional money movement.
He compares XRP’s role to the early days of email. Email itself did not create value through public excitement. The value emerged from the systems that quietly made it work at scale. According to Willie, XRP sits in that same category today. Not consumer-facing, not flashy, but foundational.
From this perspective, XRP is not a “coin” in the traditional sense. It is a settlement tool. If Ripple becomes a trusted compliance and messaging layer for financial institutions, XRP naturally becomes the bridge asset beneath it. In that role, price is about efficiency and capacity, not hype or speculation.
This is where his argument becomes controversial.
Willie claims $XRP ’s future price will not be discovered through open-market supply and demand on exchanges like Coinbase. He believes the price was effectively agreed upon long ago by powerful financial institutions that needed a bridge asset capable of handling massive global transfers. A low price, in his view, simply would not work at that scale.
He argues that the price had to be high by design, not to reward speculation, but to enable large-value settlement with minimal friction.
Timing, he says, is critical. Global financial systems are under pressure. Liquidity is tight, settlement delays are costly, and banks are cautious. In moments like these, infrastructure assets that already fit within the system may stop being treated as experiments.
Whether one agrees or not, the claim reframes XRP not as a trade, but as financial plumbing. And plumbing is only noticed when the system can no longer function without it.
$XRP
#BinanceHODLerBREV #ETHWhaleWatch #CPIWatch #USJobsData
Macro analyst Dr. Jim Willie argues that $XRP was never designed to behave like a normal cryptocurrency. In his view, it is not competing with banks or chasing retail speculation. Instead, it is being positioned as infrastructure for large-scale institutional money movement.
He compares XRP’s role to the early days of email. Email itself did not create value through public excitement. The value emerged from the systems that quietly made it work at scale. According to Willie, XRP sits in that same category today. Not consumer-facing, not flashy, but foundational.
From this perspective, XRP is not a “coin” in the traditional sense. It is a settlement tool. If Ripple becomes a trusted compliance and messaging layer for financial institutions, XRP naturally becomes the bridge asset beneath it. In that role, price is about efficiency and capacity, not hype or speculation.
This is where his argument becomes controversial.
Willie claims $XRP ’s future price will not be discovered through open-market supply and demand on exchanges like Coinbase. He believes the price was effectively agreed upon long ago by powerful financial institutions that needed a bridge asset capable of handling massive global transfers. A low price, in his view, simply would not work at that scale.
He argues that the price had to be high by design, not to reward speculation, but to enable large-value settlement with minimal friction.
Timing, he says, is critical. Global financial systems are under pressure. Liquidity is tight, settlement delays are costly, and banks are cautious. In moments like these, infrastructure assets that already fit within the system may stop being treated as experiments.
Whether one agrees or not, the claim reframes XRP not as a trade, but as financial plumbing. And plumbing is only noticed when the system can no longer function without it.
$XRP
#BinanceHODLerBREV #ETHWhaleWatch #CPIWatch #USJobsData
Übersetzen
The Truth About $LUNC: The $119 Myth vs Reality
You still hear this a lot:
“LUNC once hit $119, it will go back there.”
That’s not how it happened.
The coin that reached $119 was old Terra (LUNA), not today’s $LUNC .
Back then:
Total supply was around 350 million
The system was stable
LUNA was used to maintain the UST stablecoin peg
When UST lost its peg, the protocol started minting massive amounts of LUNA to defend it. That failed. Supply exploded into the trillions, and the price collapsed.
After the crash:
Old LUNA was renamed Terra Classic (LUNC)
A new chain launched as Terra 2.0 (LUNA)
So the LUNC on Binance today is the post-crash coin, not the one that hit $119.
Important detail:
LUNC’s actual ATH is around $0.00059, not $119
Can LUNC ever reach $1 or $119?
Realistically:
With a supply in the trillions, $1 would require a $5–6 trillion market cap
That’s not realistic under current conditions
What is possible:
Gradual price improvement if massive burns (99%+) continue
Strong community activity and real utility
Just don’t anchor to impossible targets.
The takeaway
Old LUNA ≠ current LUNC
Low supply took LUNA up
Massive supply crushed $LUNC
Research beats hype every time.
$LUNC
#BTC90kChristmas #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BTCVSGOLD #CPIWatch
“LUNC once hit $119, it will go back there.”
That’s not how it happened.
The coin that reached $119 was old Terra (LUNA), not today’s $LUNC .
Back then:
Total supply was around 350 million
The system was stable
LUNA was used to maintain the UST stablecoin peg
When UST lost its peg, the protocol started minting massive amounts of LUNA to defend it. That failed. Supply exploded into the trillions, and the price collapsed.
After the crash:
Old LUNA was renamed Terra Classic (LUNC)
A new chain launched as Terra 2.0 (LUNA)
So the LUNC on Binance today is the post-crash coin, not the one that hit $119.
Important detail:
LUNC’s actual ATH is around $0.00059, not $119
Can LUNC ever reach $1 or $119?
Realistically:
With a supply in the trillions, $1 would require a $5–6 trillion market cap
That’s not realistic under current conditions
What is possible:
Gradual price improvement if massive burns (99%+) continue
Strong community activity and real utility
Just don’t anchor to impossible targets.
The takeaway
Old LUNA ≠ current LUNC
Low supply took LUNA up
Massive supply crushed $LUNC
Research beats hype every time.
$LUNC
#BTC90kChristmas #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BTCVSGOLD #CPIWatch
Übersetzen
Big picture This claim is more interpretation than confirmation.
JackTheRippler is connecting dots that are interesting, but not definitive.
What actually holds up
The U.S. payment stack is outdated. That’s not controversial. Fedwire, ACH, SWIFT are slow and expensive.
Policymakers talking about “modernizing rails with crypto tech” is a real shift in tone. Even a few years ago, that language was off-limits.
Ripple has spent years positioning itself exactly in this lane. Faster settlement, lower costs, interoperability. That part is consistent.
Where the argument stretches
Saying $XRP is “locked in” assumes implementation decisions that have not been announced, approved, or documented.
A speech about upgrading infrastructure does not equal choosing a specific private company or token.
Meetings with executives happen all the time in Washington. Without policy text, contracts, or pilots, it’s correlation, not proof.
XRP hitting an ATH around the same time strengthens the narrative emotionally, not structurally.
The key distinction most people miss There’s a massive difference between:
“Crypto or DLT will be used somewhere in financial infrastructure” and
“XRP will be the settlement asset of the U.S. system”
The first is increasingly plausible.
The second would require explicit regulatory, technical, and political alignment that we have not seen publicly.
What would confirm this thesis If $XRP were truly a done deal, you’d expect at least one of the following:
A government pilot naming Ripple or XRPL
Language in legislation referencing interoperable DLT providers
Fed or Treasury commentary aligning with Ripple’s model
Institutional adoption that requires XRP, not optional usage
None of that is confirmed yet.
Bottom line This is a strong narrative, not a settled outcome.
XRP is well-positioned if the U.S. moves toward blockchain-based payment rails.
That’s very different from $XRP being pre-selected.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData
What actually holds up
The U.S. payment stack is outdated. That’s not controversial. Fedwire, ACH, SWIFT are slow and expensive.
Policymakers talking about “modernizing rails with crypto tech” is a real shift in tone. Even a few years ago, that language was off-limits.
Ripple has spent years positioning itself exactly in this lane. Faster settlement, lower costs, interoperability. That part is consistent.
Where the argument stretches
Saying $XRP is “locked in” assumes implementation decisions that have not been announced, approved, or documented.
A speech about upgrading infrastructure does not equal choosing a specific private company or token.
Meetings with executives happen all the time in Washington. Without policy text, contracts, or pilots, it’s correlation, not proof.
XRP hitting an ATH around the same time strengthens the narrative emotionally, not structurally.
The key distinction most people miss There’s a massive difference between:
“Crypto or DLT will be used somewhere in financial infrastructure” and
“XRP will be the settlement asset of the U.S. system”
The first is increasingly plausible.
The second would require explicit regulatory, technical, and political alignment that we have not seen publicly.
What would confirm this thesis If $XRP were truly a done deal, you’d expect at least one of the following:
A government pilot naming Ripple or XRPL
Language in legislation referencing interoperable DLT providers
Fed or Treasury commentary aligning with Ripple’s model
Institutional adoption that requires XRP, not optional usage
None of that is confirmed yet.
Bottom line This is a strong narrative, not a settled outcome.
XRP is well-positioned if the U.S. moves toward blockchain-based payment rails.
That’s very different from $XRP being pre-selected.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData
Original ansehen
Warum die Rolle von XRP schwindet? Hier ist die Wahrheit.
Zuerst ist die Dienstleistungslücke real. RippleNet funktioniert ohne $XRP . Die meisten Banken, die mit Ripple „partnerschaftlich“ verbunden sind, verwenden Messaging- und Abrechnungssoftware, nicht den Token. On-Demand-Liquidität klingt auf dem Papier großartig, aber die Akzeptanz war gering und sehr korridorspezifisch. Wenn Banken sofort mit Fiat-Währungen oder Stablecoins abwickeln können, wird XRP nicht mehr benötigt.
Zweitens hat sich die Erzählung über Brückenvermögen schlecht entwickelt. Als Nostro-Vostro-Konten langsam und teuer waren, war XRP sinnvoll. Heute erledigen Instant-Zahlungssysteme, CBDC-Piloten und regulierte Stablecoins denselben Job mit weniger Volatilitätsrisiko. Allein die Volatilität macht es für Staatsanleihen unangenehm, XRP auch nur für Sekunden zu halten.
Zweitens hat sich die Erzählung über Brückenvermögen schlecht entwickelt. Als Nostro-Vostro-Konten langsam und teuer waren, war XRP sinnvoll. Heute erledigen Instant-Zahlungssysteme, CBDC-Piloten und regulierte Stablecoins denselben Job mit weniger Volatilitätsrisiko. Allein die Volatilität macht es für Staatsanleihen unangenehm, XRP auch nur für Sekunden zu halten.
Übersetzen
XRP Rich List Update: Where Do You Stand?
Crypto analyst ChartNerd (@ChartNerdTA) recently shared updated $XRP Rich List data on X, and the takeaway is pretty clear: retail investors are getting squeezed out.
The post focused on wallet distribution and how rising prices are reshaping XRP ownership. When you look at the numbers, the shift toward concentration is hard to ignore.
What ChartNerd Pointed Out
According to ChartNerd, more than 6 million XRP wallets hold 500 XRP or less. He also noted that owning 1,000 XRP now costs around $1,750, compared to roughly $500 just over a year ago. For many participants, that price jump alone puts meaningful accumulation out of reach.
The accompanying distribution chart shows what this looks like in practice. Wallets with small balances dominate in number, but as balances increase, the number of wallets drops off sharply.
XRP Wallet Distribution Breakdown
At the lower end:
Around 3.5 million wallets hold 20 XRP or less
Another 2.5 million wallets hold between 20 and 500 XRP
Together, these millions of wallets control just over 240 million XRP.
As balances increase, concentration becomes obvious:
Only 2,011 wallets hold between 500,000 and 1,000,000 XRP, controlling about 1.34 billion XRP
Just 66 wallets hold between 100 million and 500 million $XRP , with a combined balance of roughly 11.6 billion XRP
At the very top, only 6 wallets hold more than 1 billion XRP each, controlling around 8.9 billion XRP
In total, fewer than 500 wallets hold more XRP than several million smaller accounts combined.
What This Means Going Forward
This distribution highlights how XRP ownership has matured alongside price appreciation. Higher prices limit how much new retail can accumulate, slowing token rotation and tightening liquid supply. With exchange balances shrinking, large holders gain even more influence over available XRP.
The data suggests $XRP is moving away from reliance on constant retail inflows. Ownership is consolidating, supply is settling into fewer hands, and the asset is increasingly shaped by long-term and institutional-scale holders.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD
The post focused on wallet distribution and how rising prices are reshaping XRP ownership. When you look at the numbers, the shift toward concentration is hard to ignore.
What ChartNerd Pointed Out
According to ChartNerd, more than 6 million XRP wallets hold 500 XRP or less. He also noted that owning 1,000 XRP now costs around $1,750, compared to roughly $500 just over a year ago. For many participants, that price jump alone puts meaningful accumulation out of reach.
The accompanying distribution chart shows what this looks like in practice. Wallets with small balances dominate in number, but as balances increase, the number of wallets drops off sharply.
XRP Wallet Distribution Breakdown
At the lower end:
Around 3.5 million wallets hold 20 XRP or less
Another 2.5 million wallets hold between 20 and 500 XRP
Together, these millions of wallets control just over 240 million XRP.
As balances increase, concentration becomes obvious:
Only 2,011 wallets hold between 500,000 and 1,000,000 XRP, controlling about 1.34 billion XRP
Just 66 wallets hold between 100 million and 500 million $XRP , with a combined balance of roughly 11.6 billion XRP
At the very top, only 6 wallets hold more than 1 billion XRP each, controlling around 8.9 billion XRP
In total, fewer than 500 wallets hold more XRP than several million smaller accounts combined.
What This Means Going Forward
This distribution highlights how XRP ownership has matured alongside price appreciation. Higher prices limit how much new retail can accumulate, slowing token rotation and tightening liquid supply. With exchange balances shrinking, large holders gain even more influence over available XRP.
The data suggests $XRP is moving away from reliance on constant retail inflows. Ownership is consolidating, supply is settling into fewer hands, and the asset is increasingly shaped by long-term and institutional-scale holders.
#BTC90kChristmas #StrategyBTCPurchase #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD
Original ansehen
SUI Mega Ziel Bestätigt: $10+ Setup in Spiel
$SUI blinkt ein qualitativ hochwertiges Langzeit-Setup im Wochenchart. Die Struktur ist sauber, die Unterstützung ist klar und das Risiko ist gut definiert.
Lass es uns aufschlüsseln.
Technische Übersicht (Wöchentlich)
SUI hat ein Lehrbuch-Doppeltief nach einem tiefen Rückgang von 75 % abgeschlossen. Der Preis hält derzeit eine kritische Konfluenzzone zwischen $1,35 und $1,45, wo:
Die Unterstützung der langfristigen Aufwärtstrendlinie stimmt überein
Die makro-strukturelle Unterstützung ist intakt
Verkäufer haben bereits die Dynamik erschöpft
Diese Zone ist entscheidend. Solange sie hält, bleibt die technische Neigung fest bullish.
Lass es uns aufschlüsseln.
Technische Übersicht (Wöchentlich)
SUI hat ein Lehrbuch-Doppeltief nach einem tiefen Rückgang von 75 % abgeschlossen. Der Preis hält derzeit eine kritische Konfluenzzone zwischen $1,35 und $1,45, wo:
Die Unterstützung der langfristigen Aufwärtstrendlinie stimmt überein
Die makro-strukturelle Unterstützung ist intakt
Verkäufer haben bereits die Dynamik erschöpft
Diese Zone ist entscheidend. Solange sie hält, bleibt die technische Neigung fest bullish.
Original ansehen
XRP Sicherheitswarnung: Was Inhaber wissen sollten
$XRP -Inhaber sollten nach Berichten über Sicherheitsprobleme, die bestimmte Krypto-Plattformen betreffen, wachsam bleiben.
Was ist los:
Plattformanfälligkeiten: Einige Dienste berichteten über unerwartete Sicherheitsanfälligkeiten, die möglicherweise $XRP -bezogene Transaktionen beeinträchtigt haben.
Präventive Maßnahmen: Benutzern wird geraten, die Berechtigungen ihrer Wallets zu überprüfen, starke Sicherheitseinstellungen zu aktivieren und die Interaktion mit unbekannten Links oder Apps zu vermeiden.
Marktreaktion: Nachrichten wie diese lösen oft kurzfristige Ängste aus, aber erfahrene Inhaber konzentrieren sich darauf, Vermögenswerte zu schützen, anstatt in Panik zu verkaufen.
Was ist los:
Plattformanfälligkeiten: Einige Dienste berichteten über unerwartete Sicherheitsanfälligkeiten, die möglicherweise $XRP -bezogene Transaktionen beeinträchtigt haben.
Präventive Maßnahmen: Benutzern wird geraten, die Berechtigungen ihrer Wallets zu überprüfen, starke Sicherheitseinstellungen zu aktivieren und die Interaktion mit unbekannten Links oder Apps zu vermeiden.
Marktreaktion: Nachrichten wie diese lösen oft kurzfristige Ängste aus, aber erfahrene Inhaber konzentrieren sich darauf, Vermögenswerte zu schützen, anstatt in Panik zu verkaufen.
Original ansehen
$SOL Rückgang in Schlüsselzone 🎯
$SOL
Niedriger Nachrichten Druck, Technik im Fokus.
Stärker (Long) 📈
Wenn der Preis über $125.50 hält und stabilisiert, bleiben Long-Setups gültig.
Ziele: $130 zuerst, dann $140 bei Fortsetzung.
Stop-Loss: $120 zur Verwaltung des Abwärtsrisikos.
Bärisch (Short) 📉
Fehler beim Zurückerobern von $127, gefolgt von einer Bewegung zurück zu $122, könnte Verkäufer anlocken.
Die Abwärtsziele liegen bei etwa $113, mit Verlustrisiko in Richtung $106.
Saubere Levels, klare Ungültigkeit. Lass den Preis bestätigen.
$SOL
#USGDPUpdate #USGDPUpdate #USJobsData #CPIWatch
Niedriger Nachrichten Druck, Technik im Fokus.
Stärker (Long) 📈
Wenn der Preis über $125.50 hält und stabilisiert, bleiben Long-Setups gültig.
Ziele: $130 zuerst, dann $140 bei Fortsetzung.
Stop-Loss: $120 zur Verwaltung des Abwärtsrisikos.
Bärisch (Short) 📉
Fehler beim Zurückerobern von $127, gefolgt von einer Bewegung zurück zu $122, könnte Verkäufer anlocken.
Die Abwärtsziele liegen bei etwa $113, mit Verlustrisiko in Richtung $106.
Saubere Levels, klare Ungültigkeit. Lass den Preis bestätigen.
$SOL
#USGDPUpdate #USGDPUpdate #USJobsData #CPIWatch
Original ansehen
Bitcoins Q4 taucht tief in negatives Territorium: Ist 2026 bedroht?
$BTC
Erstens sind die Schäden im Q4 wichtiger, als die Leute zugeben wollen. Ein stark negatives Q4 ist nicht nur eine weitere rote Kerze. Auf höheren Zeitrahmen setzt es oft den Ton für die nächsten paar Quartale. Es belastet die Stimmung, tötet Reflexrallies und verwandelt jeden Bounce in eine Verkaufsgelegenheit. Diese „Anker“-Idee von CryptoQuant ist real. Wir haben es schon einmal gesehen.
Zweitens sind die Kapitulationssignale früh, nicht abgeschlossen. SOPR unter 1, kurzfristiger Inhaber MVRV unter 1 und über ein Drittel des Angebots unter Wasser deuten alle auf Stress hin, aber historisch gesehen kommen die echten Tiefpunkte normalerweise, wenn diese Kennzahlen eine Weile deprimiert bleiben, nicht nur dippen und aufspringen. Im Moment sind Verkäufer aktiv, aber sie sehen noch nicht ganz erschöpft aus.
Erstens sind die Schäden im Q4 wichtiger, als die Leute zugeben wollen. Ein stark negatives Q4 ist nicht nur eine weitere rote Kerze. Auf höheren Zeitrahmen setzt es oft den Ton für die nächsten paar Quartale. Es belastet die Stimmung, tötet Reflexrallies und verwandelt jeden Bounce in eine Verkaufsgelegenheit. Diese „Anker“-Idee von CryptoQuant ist real. Wir haben es schon einmal gesehen.
Zweitens sind die Kapitulationssignale früh, nicht abgeschlossen. SOPR unter 1, kurzfristiger Inhaber MVRV unter 1 und über ein Drittel des Angebots unter Wasser deuten alle auf Stress hin, aber historisch gesehen kommen die echten Tiefpunkte normalerweise, wenn diese Kennzahlen eine Weile deprimiert bleiben, nicht nur dippen und aufspringen. Im Moment sind Verkäufer aktiv, aber sie sehen noch nicht ganz erschöpft aus.
Original ansehen
ETH 🔥🚀 | Preisprognose 2025–2028
Ethereum wird derzeit in einem Rückgang gehandelt, was eine solide Einstiegsmöglichkeit für sowohl kurzfristige als auch langfristige Investoren bieten könnte.
Wenn Sie heute $1,000 in $ETH investieren und bis zum 10. März 2026 halten, deuten die Prognosen auf eine potenzielle Rendite von $1,902.68 hin, was einer geschätzten Rendite von 90.27% in etwa 94 Tagen entspricht.
📊 Ethereum Preisprognose
🔹 Dezember 2025
Mindestbetrag: $2,965
Durchschnitt: $3,326
Höchstbetrag: $3,897
$ETH wird erwartet, dass es sich stabilisiert und nach oben tendiert, während das Vertrauen auf dem Markt wieder aufgebaut wird.
🔹 2026 Prognose
Mindestbetrag: $4,105
Durchschnitt: $4,928
Wenn Sie heute $1,000 in $ETH investieren und bis zum 10. März 2026 halten, deuten die Prognosen auf eine potenzielle Rendite von $1,902.68 hin, was einer geschätzten Rendite von 90.27% in etwa 94 Tagen entspricht.
📊 Ethereum Preisprognose
🔹 Dezember 2025
Mindestbetrag: $2,965
Durchschnitt: $3,326
Höchstbetrag: $3,897
$ETH wird erwartet, dass es sich stabilisiert und nach oben tendiert, während das Vertrauen auf dem Markt wieder aufgebaut wird.
🔹 2026 Prognose
Mindestbetrag: $4,105
Durchschnitt: $4,928
Übersetzen
Terra Classic and Binance: What Most People Miss
The common narrative is simple: Binance dumped its LUNC after the 2022 collapse and walked away. Case closed.
The problem is the data does not fully support that story.
As of late 2025, CoinMarketCap still categorizes $LUNC under the YZi Labs portfolio. YZi Labs is the rebranded successor to Binance Labs and now operates as the family office of CZ and Yi He. This is not a minor label. The YZi Labs portfolio is one of the largest tracked ecosystems by market cap on CMC, and LUNC remains listed within it, sometimes even appearing among top gainers.
That raises an obvious question. If Binance and its affiliated entities truly exited LUNC entirely, why does this classification still exist years after the collapse, the chain split, and the rebrand?
CZ has previously stated that Binance never sold its original LUNC holdings. Since then, several facts stand out:
Binance continues to execute monthly LUNC burns, removing billions of tokens from circulation
The exchange has supported multiple Terra Classic network upgrades
$LUNC remains persistently associated with the YZi Labs ecosystem on CoinMarketCap
Taken together, this does not look like abandonment.
The original position may be relatively small in dollar terms today, but visibility matters. Keeping LUNC within the YZi Labs portfolio maintains relevance, signals continued engagement, and leaves the door open for long-term recovery.
You can write $BTC LUNC off if you want. But the chain is still live, the token is still being burned, and the Binance connection has not been fully severed. That alone makes Terra Classic harder to dismiss than most people assume. #USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD #WriteToEarnUpgrade
The problem is the data does not fully support that story.
As of late 2025, CoinMarketCap still categorizes $LUNC under the YZi Labs portfolio. YZi Labs is the rebranded successor to Binance Labs and now operates as the family office of CZ and Yi He. This is not a minor label. The YZi Labs portfolio is one of the largest tracked ecosystems by market cap on CMC, and LUNC remains listed within it, sometimes even appearing among top gainers.
That raises an obvious question. If Binance and its affiliated entities truly exited LUNC entirely, why does this classification still exist years after the collapse, the chain split, and the rebrand?
CZ has previously stated that Binance never sold its original LUNC holdings. Since then, several facts stand out:
Binance continues to execute monthly LUNC burns, removing billions of tokens from circulation
The exchange has supported multiple Terra Classic network upgrades
$LUNC remains persistently associated with the YZi Labs ecosystem on CoinMarketCap
Taken together, this does not look like abandonment.
The original position may be relatively small in dollar terms today, but visibility matters. Keeping LUNC within the YZi Labs portfolio maintains relevance, signals continued engagement, and leaves the door open for long-term recovery.
You can write $BTC LUNC off if you want. But the chain is still live, the token is still being burned, and the Binance connection has not been fully severed. That alone makes Terra Classic harder to dismiss than most people assume. #USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD #WriteToEarnUpgrade
Original ansehen
🚀 GALA könnte sich auf einen massiven Move vorbereiten (bis zu 15.000%)
Hallo zusammen. Dies ist wahrscheinlich mein letzter Beitrag über $GALA in diesem Jahr, und ehrlich gesagt, es könnte der beste Einstieg sein, den wir seit langem gesehen haben.
Auf dem aktuellen Niveau ist GALA immer noch stark unterbewertet. Das angehängte Diagramm sagt mehr als Worte jemals könnten. Die Struktur zieht sich zusammen, der Schwung baut sich auf, und ein Ausbruchsszenario formt sich klar.
Was das noch interessanter macht:
Starkes, aktives Team
Fortgesetzte Entwicklung im Gaming und in der Musik
Zunehmender Fokus auf DeFi und den Ausbau des Ökosystems
Das ist kein Hype ohne Substanz. Es ist ein Projekt, das kontinuierlich liefert, während der Preis gedrückt bleibt.
Auf dem aktuellen Niveau ist GALA immer noch stark unterbewertet. Das angehängte Diagramm sagt mehr als Worte jemals könnten. Die Struktur zieht sich zusammen, der Schwung baut sich auf, und ein Ausbruchsszenario formt sich klar.
Was das noch interessanter macht:
Starkes, aktives Team
Fortgesetzte Entwicklung im Gaming und in der Musik
Zunehmender Fokus auf DeFi und den Ausbau des Ökosystems
Das ist kein Hype ohne Substanz. Es ist ein Projekt, das kontinuierlich liefert, während der Preis gedrückt bleibt.
Übersetzen
HBAR Coin ☄️⚡ Price Forecast (2025–2028)
If you invest $1,000 in Hedera Hashgraph ($HBAR ) today and hold until March 11, 2026, current projections suggest a potential value of $2,315.95, representing a profit of $1,315.95 and an estimated ROI of 131.59% over the next 87 days.
📊 Price Prediction: December 2025
Based on technical analysis for 2025:
Minimum price: $0.109
Maximum price: $0.218
Average trading price: $0.194
📈 Price Prediction: 2026
Looking at historical trends and market behavior:
Minimum price: $0.210
Maximum price: $0.348
Average trading price: $0.281
$HBAR
📈 Price Prediction: 2027
According to expert technical analysis:
Minimum price: $0.291
Maximum price: $0.559
Average trading price: $0.459
🚀 Price Prediction: 2028
Based on long-term market cycles and adoption trends:
Minimum price: $0.491
Maximum price: $1.76
Average trading price: $1.32
$HBAR
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #BTCVSGOLD
📊 Price Prediction: December 2025
Based on technical analysis for 2025:
Minimum price: $0.109
Maximum price: $0.218
Average trading price: $0.194
📈 Price Prediction: 2026
Looking at historical trends and market behavior:
Minimum price: $0.210
Maximum price: $0.348
Average trading price: $0.281
$HBAR
📈 Price Prediction: 2027
According to expert technical analysis:
Minimum price: $0.291
Maximum price: $0.559
Average trading price: $0.459
🚀 Price Prediction: 2028
Based on long-term market cycles and adoption trends:
Minimum price: $0.491
Maximum price: $1.76
Average trading price: $1.32
$HBAR
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #BTCVSGOLD
Original ansehen
Was passiert gerade wirklich mit Bitcoin?
$BTC Bitcoin steckt nicht zwischen $85k und $90k fest, weil die Händler verwirrt oder ängstlich sind. Es steckt aufgrund von Optionsmechaniken fest.
Eine enorme Menge an Optionsgamma ist in diesem Bereich konzentriert:
Nahe $85k gibt es eine starke Put-Exposition. Wenn der Preis sich diesem Niveau nähert, hedgen die Händler, indem sie $BTC kaufen, was den Fall abfedert.
Nahe $90k gibt es eine starke Call-Exposition. Wenn der Preis steigt, hedgen die Händler, indem sie BTC verkaufen, was die Rallyes begrenzt.
Dies schafft einen mechanischen Kampf, der den Preis immer wieder in die Mitte zieht. Nachrichten, Stimmung und Narrative spielen kaum eine Rolle, solange dies so ist.
Eine enorme Menge an Optionsgamma ist in diesem Bereich konzentriert:
Nahe $85k gibt es eine starke Put-Exposition. Wenn der Preis sich diesem Niveau nähert, hedgen die Händler, indem sie $BTC kaufen, was den Fall abfedert.
Nahe $90k gibt es eine starke Call-Exposition. Wenn der Preis steigt, hedgen die Händler, indem sie BTC verkaufen, was die Rallyes begrenzt.
Dies schafft einen mechanischen Kampf, der den Preis immer wieder in die Mitte zieht. Nachrichten, Stimmung und Narrative spielen kaum eine Rolle, solange dies so ist.
Übersetzen
China’s Thorium Discovery Could Reshape the Energy Race
China has identified major thorium resources at the Bayan Obo mining complex in Inner Mongolia, following extensive geological surveys that also mapped more than 200 potential thorium-rich sites nationwide.
Thorium is drawing renewed attention because it could support a new generation of nuclear power that is safer, cleaner, and more abundant than traditional uranium-based systems.
Why thorium matters
Thorium is more abundant than uranium and easier to source
It does not require enrichment
In molten salt reactor designs, it operates at lower pressure, reducing meltdown risk
Produces significantly less long-lived nuclear waste
Not suitable for nuclear weapons use
China is already testing fourth-generation nuclear technologies, including molten salt reactors, and these discoveries could accelerate that program over the coming decades.
What this means globally If thorium-based reactors become commercially viable at scale, the impact would be profound:
Reduced reliance on fossil fuels
Lower long-term carbon emissions
Pressure on oil, gas, and coal markets
A shift in energy geopolitics toward nuclear technology leadership
The reality check Thorium is not a plug-and-play solution. Commercial deployment still faces engineering, regulatory, and economic hurdles. Most projects remain experimental, and widespread adoption is likely measured in decades, not years.
Still, China’s early investment and resource base give it a real strategic advantage in the next phase of nuclear energy development.
Bottom line This isn’t the end of fossil fuels tomorrow.
But it could be the start of a long-term shift toward safer, more sustainable nuclear power.
$SOL
$BNB
$XRP
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD
Thorium is drawing renewed attention because it could support a new generation of nuclear power that is safer, cleaner, and more abundant than traditional uranium-based systems.
Why thorium matters
Thorium is more abundant than uranium and easier to source
It does not require enrichment
In molten salt reactor designs, it operates at lower pressure, reducing meltdown risk
Produces significantly less long-lived nuclear waste
Not suitable for nuclear weapons use
China is already testing fourth-generation nuclear technologies, including molten salt reactors, and these discoveries could accelerate that program over the coming decades.
What this means globally If thorium-based reactors become commercially viable at scale, the impact would be profound:
Reduced reliance on fossil fuels
Lower long-term carbon emissions
Pressure on oil, gas, and coal markets
A shift in energy geopolitics toward nuclear technology leadership
The reality check Thorium is not a plug-and-play solution. Commercial deployment still faces engineering, regulatory, and economic hurdles. Most projects remain experimental, and widespread adoption is likely measured in decades, not years.
Still, China’s early investment and resource base give it a real strategic advantage in the next phase of nuclear energy development.
Bottom line This isn’t the end of fossil fuels tomorrow.
But it could be the start of a long-term shift toward safer, more sustainable nuclear power.
$SOL
$BNB
$XRP
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD
Original ansehen
BREAKING (wahrscheinlich): Michael Saylor in der Nähe eines Lagerfeuers gesichtet 🔥
$BTC
Ehrlich gesagt, das ist die Spitze der Saylor-Lore. Der Mann verwaltet kein Risiko, er führt ein Ritual durch. Wenn Überzeugung eine erneuerbare Energiequelle wäre, würde er das gesamte Netzwerk selbst mit Energie versorgen.
Vulkanische Speicherung ist verrückt. Kalte Wallets sind für Sterbliche. Saylor läuft hier herum und führt den Beweis des Opfers.
$BTC
Und der gruselige Teil? Der Markt würde wahrscheinlich pumpen. Nicht auf Fundamentaldaten. Nicht auf ETFs. Nur Vibes, Angst und ein kollektives „ja… leg dich nicht mit diesem Typ an.”
Sei ehrlich, Antwortzeit 👇
Die meisten Leute sagen B.
Ehrlich gesagt, das ist die Spitze der Saylor-Lore. Der Mann verwaltet kein Risiko, er führt ein Ritual durch. Wenn Überzeugung eine erneuerbare Energiequelle wäre, würde er das gesamte Netzwerk selbst mit Energie versorgen.
Vulkanische Speicherung ist verrückt. Kalte Wallets sind für Sterbliche. Saylor läuft hier herum und führt den Beweis des Opfers.
$BTC
Und der gruselige Teil? Der Markt würde wahrscheinlich pumpen. Nicht auf Fundamentaldaten. Nicht auf ETFs. Nur Vibes, Angst und ein kollektives „ja… leg dich nicht mit diesem Typ an.”
Sei ehrlich, Antwortzeit 👇
Die meisten Leute sagen B.
Übersetzen
Tron Founder Justin Sun Hit With $60 Million Loss After WLFI Blacklisting
Justin Sun, the founder of Tron ($TRX ) and one of crypto’s most polarizing figures, has reportedly suffered a $60 million paper loss tied to World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump-backed DeFi project he strongly supported.
According to blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps, Sun remains blacklisted by WLFI, leaving his tokens locked and unable to move. Over the past three months, the value of those locked tokens has dropped by roughly $60 million.
“Sun is still blacklisted by $WLFI , and the value of his locked tokens has dropped by $60 million in three months. Absolutely brutal,” Bubblemaps posted on X.
What Happened?
The dispute traces back to September, when Sun transferred around $9 million worth of WLFI tokens to another address. Shortly after, the WLFI team froze his assets, citing concerns over alleged price manipulation.
Sun publicly pushed back, calling the tokens “sacred and inviolable” and demanding equal treatment. Despite his objections, the WLFI team refused to lift the freeze, and the blacklist remains in place more than three months later.
A Surprising Fallout
The situation caught many by surprise, especially given Sun’s strong backing of the project and his public support for Donald Trump’s crypto initiatives.
Sun has invested an estimated $175 million into Trump-linked crypto ventures. This includes:
$75 million invested in World Liberty Financial ($WLFI )
$100 million spent on Trump’s memecoin, making him the largest known holder of the TRUMP token
Despite that level of backing, Sun now appears to be sidelined within WLFI, with his funds locked and losses mounting as token values decline.
Bigger Picture
The episode highlights the risks of centralized control, blacklisting mechanisms, and governance disputes in DeFi projects, even for high-profile insiders. For Justin Sun, it’s a rare moment where influence and capital have not translated into control.
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD #CPIWatch
According to blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps, Sun remains blacklisted by WLFI, leaving his tokens locked and unable to move. Over the past three months, the value of those locked tokens has dropped by roughly $60 million.
“Sun is still blacklisted by $WLFI , and the value of his locked tokens has dropped by $60 million in three months. Absolutely brutal,” Bubblemaps posted on X.
What Happened?
The dispute traces back to September, when Sun transferred around $9 million worth of WLFI tokens to another address. Shortly after, the WLFI team froze his assets, citing concerns over alleged price manipulation.
Sun publicly pushed back, calling the tokens “sacred and inviolable” and demanding equal treatment. Despite his objections, the WLFI team refused to lift the freeze, and the blacklist remains in place more than three months later.
A Surprising Fallout
The situation caught many by surprise, especially given Sun’s strong backing of the project and his public support for Donald Trump’s crypto initiatives.
Sun has invested an estimated $175 million into Trump-linked crypto ventures. This includes:
$75 million invested in World Liberty Financial ($WLFI )
$100 million spent on Trump’s memecoin, making him the largest known holder of the TRUMP token
Despite that level of backing, Sun now appears to be sidelined within WLFI, with his funds locked and losses mounting as token values decline.
Bigger Picture
The episode highlights the risks of centralized control, blacklisting mechanisms, and governance disputes in DeFi projects, even for high-profile insiders. For Justin Sun, it’s a rare moment where influence and capital have not translated into control.
#USGDPUpdate #USCryptoStakingTaxReview #USJobsData #BTCVSGOLD #CPIWatch
Original ansehen
Eilmeldung 🗞️
Der südkoreanische Wissenschaftler YoungHoon Kim, der behauptet, den höchsten IQ der Welt zu haben, hat ein langfristiges Szenario geteilt, in dem $XRP $1.000 erreichen könnte.
In einem Beitrag auf X stellte Kim klar, dass dies keine kurzfristige Preisschätzung oder finanzielle Beratung ist. Stattdessen handelt es sich um eine theoretische Perspektive, die sich über die nächsten 10 Jahre erstreckt, mit einem möglichen Zeitrahmen bis 2035.
🔍 Schlüsselannahmen hinter dem $1.000 $XRP Szenario
Laut Kim würde eine solche Bewertung folgendes erfordern:
Massive globale Kapitalmigration in Krypto
In einem Beitrag auf X stellte Kim klar, dass dies keine kurzfristige Preisschätzung oder finanzielle Beratung ist. Stattdessen handelt es sich um eine theoretische Perspektive, die sich über die nächsten 10 Jahre erstreckt, mit einem möglichen Zeitrahmen bis 2035.
🔍 Schlüsselannahmen hinter dem $1.000 $XRP Szenario
Laut Kim würde eine solche Bewertung folgendes erfordern:
Massive globale Kapitalmigration in Krypto
Übersetzen
Bitcoin Loses Ascending Channel – What’s Next 🎯
$BTC Bitcoin has broken down from its ascending channel and is now consolidating below former channel support. That zone has flipped into resistance around $89.5k–$90.5k. Price action is printing lower highs, which keeps the short-term structure bearish.
If $BTC gets rejected again from this resistance area, downside continuation becomes likely. The first support to watch sits around $85.5k–$86k. A clean break below that level opens the door toward the $80.5k–$81k zone, which stands out as the next major downside target.
$BTC
The bearish view only weakens if Bitcoin can reclaim and hold above $92k on a sustained basis. That would invalidate the current structure and signal a potential recovery phase.
For now, momentum favors caution until the chart proves otherwise.
#USCryptoStakingTaxReview #BinanceBlockchainWeek #USJobsData
If $BTC gets rejected again from this resistance area, downside continuation becomes likely. The first support to watch sits around $85.5k–$86k. A clean break below that level opens the door toward the $80.5k–$81k zone, which stands out as the next major downside target.
$BTC
The bearish view only weakens if Bitcoin can reclaim and hold above $92k on a sustained basis. That would invalidate the current structure and signal a potential recovery phase.
For now, momentum favors caution until the chart proves otherwise.
#USCryptoStakingTaxReview #BinanceBlockchainWeek #USJobsData
Original ansehen
Unterwasser-Goldentdeckung in der Nähe von China
Eine große Unterwasser-Goldentdeckung in der Nähe von China sorgt für Schlagzeilen, und wenn sie bestätigt wird, könnte sie sowohl die Gold- als auch die Krypto-Märkte umgestalten.
$BTC
Gib mir zwei Minuten und ich werde erklären, warum das wichtig ist.
Alles beginnt mit Angebot und Nachfrage
Gold ist nicht teuer, weil es glänzend ist.
Es ist nicht teuer, weil es stark ist.
Gold ist aus einem einfachen Grund teuer: Knappheit.
Es gibt nur eine begrenzte Menge Gold auf der Erde. Dieses begrenzte Angebot hält die Nachfrage hoch und die Preise über lange Zeiträume hoch.
Jetzt kommt der entscheidende Punkt.
$BTC
Gib mir zwei Minuten und ich werde erklären, warum das wichtig ist.
Alles beginnt mit Angebot und Nachfrage
Gold ist nicht teuer, weil es glänzend ist.
Es ist nicht teuer, weil es stark ist.
Gold ist aus einem einfachen Grund teuer: Knappheit.
Es gibt nur eine begrenzte Menge Gold auf der Erde. Dieses begrenzte Angebot hält die Nachfrage hoch und die Preise über lange Zeiträume hoch.
Jetzt kommt der entscheidende Punkt.
Melde dich an, um weitere Inhalte zu entdecken