MIH imtiaj

With only a few days left until the new year, Bitcoin ($BTC ) has yet to break above the $90,000 level—let alone reach $100,000. After moving sideways below $90,000 for an extended period, optimism around a further BTC rally has started to fade among investors.
Amid this uncertain market environment, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder of Binance and one of the most influential figures in the crypto industry, has shared a timely message about Bitcoin and the coming year.
In a post on his X (formerly Twitter) account, CZ drew attention to an important question: when is the right time to buy Bitcoin?
He asked his followers whether they ever felt regret when Bitcoin reached its all-time high (ATH), thinking:
💬 “I wish I had bought Bitcoin earlier.”
CZ used this question to highlight a key lesson in crypto investing—
👉 successful Bitcoin buyers do not buy at the peak.
According to CZ, those who have made significant profits from Bitcoin didn’t wait for perfect conditions or all-time highs. Instead, they took action during periods of fear, uncertainty, and doubt—commonly known as FUD.
In his words,
💬 “Those who bought early didn’t buy at ATH; they bought when there was fear, uncertainty, and doubt.”
CZ emphasized that real opportunities in Bitcoin often emerge when market sentiment is negative and confidence is low. Investors who can stay patient and act decisively during such moments are the ones who tend to benefit in the long run.
He concluded his post with a simple yet meaningful seasonal message:
🎄 “Merry Christmas.”
The message serves as a reminder that some of the best opportunities in Bitcoin appear quietly—right in the middle of fear and uncertainty.
$BTC

$XRP — In einem Kryptomarkt, in dem regulatorische Signale oft schneller als Preisbewegungen sind, zieht eine subtile Entwicklung im US-Bankensystem jetzt frische Aufmerksamkeit von XRP-Beobachtern auf sich.
Krypto-Analyst und Kommentator Ripple Bull Winkle hat auf das hingewiesen, was er als einen bedeutenden Politikwechsel der Federal Reserve beschreibt—einen, der die Art und Weise, wie Banken mit digitalen Vermögenswerten umgehen, erheblich verändern könnte. Seiner Einschätzung nach könnte dieser Schritt einen langjährigen Reibungspunkt beseitigen, der große Finanzinstitute an der Seitenlinie hielt.

Während die Welt die letzten Kapitel von Öl, Gas und Kohle zählt, hat die Geschichte eine dramatische Wendung auf der globalen Energiekarte genommen.
Dies ist keine gewöhnliche Entdeckung.
Dies ist ein Moment, der das Fundament der Zivilisation selbst neu definieren kann.
🔎 Aus tiefen Tiefen der Erde hat China ein außergewöhnliches Geheimnis enthüllt —
eine Quelle von Energie, die nuklear ist, aber nichts mit der alten nuklearen Energie zu tun hat.
Das ist Thorium — der neue Name für saubere, sichere und langlebige Energie ⚡
💥 Warum Thorium = Die Zukunft
Dieses Element bringt Vorteile mit sich, die so tiefgreifend sind, dass das heutige Energiesystem bald obsolet aussehen könnte 👇

Gold has done it again.
Another all-time high.
More than 50 record highs in a single year — that’s not coincidence.
This isn’t a random spike.
This is a clear signal.
This is a trend in motion.
While markets jump from one headline to another,
gold keeps doing one thing —
moving steadily higher 📈
Momentum remains strong.
Conviction hasn’t cracked.
And the forces driving this rally?
Not a single one has weakened.
🌍 Global uncertainty
📉 Macro pressure
🧠 Shifting investor sentiment
⚖️ Supply vs demand dynamics
Everything is lining up — in gold’s favor.
That’s why every dip doesn’t feel like fear.
It feels like opportunity.
It feels like an invitation.
And here’s the interesting part 👀
The crypto market is watching too.
$BTC , $ETH ,XRP — even meme coins are quietly paying attention.
Because history has shown us:
when gold moves first, markets listen.
This isn’t a short-term hype cycle.
This is a medium-to-long-term story.
And the narrative hasn’t changed.
Gold isn’t rushing.
It isn’t panicking.
It isn’t making noise.
It’s simply doing what strong trends do —
persist and progress.
Markets don’t wait for permission.
They reward those who prepare.
Gold keeps telling its story.
The only question is —
are you really listening? ✨
⚠️ Disclaimer: This content is not financial advice. Markets involve risk. Always make decisions responsibly.
$BTC
$XRP
$ETH

Bitcoin ($BTC ) verbrachte den Wochenbeginn mit seitwärts Bewegung, handelte zwischen $87.000 und etwas über $88.000 und signalisiert frühe Anzeichen der Stabilisierung nach Wochen des bärischen Drucks. Obwohl der Schwung seit Oktober erheblich nachgelassen hat, tritt der Markt jetzt in eine vertraute und oft unvorhersehbare Phase ein: die letzte Etappe des Jahres.
Während sich der Dezember dem Ende zuneigt, stellen die Händler erneut eine saisonale Frage – kann Bitcoin einen Santa Rally vor Beginn von 2025 liefern?
Um diese Möglichkeit zu erkunden, haben drei große KI-Modelle – ChatGPT, Grok und Gemini – die jüngsten Preisbewegungen von Bitcoin, das historische Verhalten zum Jahresende und die aktuelle Marktstruktur analysiert. Ihre Schlussfolgerungen variieren, aber alle weisen auf ein zentrales Thema hin: Unsicherheit, verstärkt durch dünne Liquidität.

China hat gerade ein riesiges Goldvorkommen unter dem Meer entdeckt — und das ist nicht nur eine geologische Geschichte, es ist eine marktschaffende.
Gold hat immer aus einem zentralen Grund Wert gehabt: Knappheit. Nicht, weil es glänzend ist, nicht, weil es industriell überlegen ist — sondern weil es nicht viel davon gibt. Diese Knappheit ist das Rückgrat des Goldpreises.
Nun deuten Berichte darauf hin, dass dieses neu entdeckte Offshore-Vorkommen etwa 3.900 Tonnen Gold enthalten könnte, was ungefähr 26 % der gesamten bekannten Reserven Chinas entspricht. Das ist nicht marginal. Das ist strukturell.

Das stand nicht im Drehbuch von Washington.
Nur Stunden nachdem die USA ein Rekordpaket von 11,1 MILLIARDEN Dollar an Waffen für Taiwan 🇺🇸⚔️🇹🇼 angekündigt hatten, antwortete Peking – nicht mit Worten, sondern mit Maßnahmen, die direkt das wirtschaftliche Herz Amerikas trafen.
📉 CHINA HAT 132.000 TONNEN US-WEISSEM WEIZEN ABGESAGT.
Keine Verzögerungen.
Keine Neuverhandlungen.
Einfach weg.
Und die Zeit? Präzisionsklasse. ⏱️
🚨 WAS IST GERADE PASSIERT?
Am 17. Dezember genehmigte die Trump-Administration den größten je genehmigten Militärverkauf an Taiwan, einschließlich:

You’ve probably seen the panic-filled headlines: “Quantum computers will break crypto.”
According to Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, that framing is wrong.
The real danger isn’t that crypto can’t be protected from quantum attacks.
It’s that protecting it too early could quietly break blockchains from the inside.
Let’s unpack what actually matters.
The Wrong Question Everyone Is Asking
Most debates focus on what cryptography should replace today’s standards:
Hash-based systems (favored by Ethereum)
Lattice-based systems (researched by Cardano)
Hoskinson argues this misses the point.
The real question isn’t how to upgrade —
it’s when.
Because moving too soon could be worse than doing nothing at all.
The Hidden Cost of Quantum Security
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Modern post-quantum cryptography is roughly:
10× slower
10× heavier in data (signatures, proofs, storage)
Hoskinson puts it bluntly:
“You chop off a zero from your blockchain’s throughput.”
That means:
Lower transactions per second
Higher fees
More strain on validators
Greater centralization pressure
All to defend against a threat that may still be a decade away.
Security has a price — and right now, that price is performance.
Why This Could Hurt Decentralization
Blockchains survive because validators and miners can afford to run them.
If post-quantum cryptography is forced today:
Hardware requirements rise
Bandwidth costs explode
Smaller operators drop out
The result?
Fewer validators. Less decentralization. More fragility.
Ironically, in trying to future-proof crypto, we could weaken it today.
When Does the Real Quantum Threat Arrive?
Instead of listening to hype cycles, Hoskinson points to one signal that matters: DARPA.
The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency aims to determine by 2033 whether a practically useful quantum computer is even feasible.
That’s not marketing.
That’s an evidence-based timeline.
Until then, rushing into costly upgrades may be premature.
Two Competing Paths Forward
If — and when — the transition happens, there are two main options:
1️⃣ Hash-Based Cryptography
Simple
Well-tested
Mostly limited to digital signatures
Effective, but narrow in scope.
2️⃣ Lattice-Based Cryptography
More complex
Supports encryption and advanced functionality
Can run on standard GPUs, not specialized ASIC hardware
This flexibility is why Cardano sees lattices as a long-term solution.
Cardano’s Approach: Gradual Defense, Not Panic
Hoskinson isn’t advocating for an emergency hard fork.
Instead, Cardano is exploring layered protection, such as:
Post-quantum notarization via Midnight
Historical anchoring through Mithril
Think of it like this:
You don’t rebuild your entire house for a future storm —
you reinforce the foundation and secure the vault.
The Unavoidable Trade-Off
The core message is simple:
“Every system involves compromise.”
In a post-quantum world, the blockchain trilemma becomes even harsher:
More security → less speed
More protection → higher costs
More complexity → fewer participants
Perfect security isn’t free — and it never was.
Final Thought
So what matters more right now?
Maximum quantum resistance at any cost?
Or
Faster, cheaper, more usable blockchains — while upgrading security when the threat is real?
Crypto doesn’t need panic.
It needs timing, restraint, and smart engineering.
And sometimes, the most dangerous move… is moving too early.
$ETH
$ADA
$XRP

Listen carefully 🐼
When an options expiry of this size hits the market, Bitcoin doesn’t move normally. It moves strategically.
On December 26, roughly $23.7 BILLION worth of Bitcoin options will expire — around 268,000 contracts rolling off in a single session.
This is the largest $BTC options expiry of 2025, and events like this bend price action even when headlines are completely silent.
🔍 What Most Traders Miss
Open interest is heavily skewed toward CALLS, not puts.
That means sentiment is still bullish — Put/Call ratio is low.
But here’s the catch 👇
Options don’t exist in isolation.
Large players hedge these positions using:
Spot BTC
Futures contracts
Those hedges create real buying and selling pressure, not theory — and that’s why price starts acting strange before big expiries.
🧨 Why $BTC Feels “Weird” Into Expiry
As we approach Dec 26, expect:
Sharp wicks
Fake breakouts
Choppy ranges
Long & short traps on both sides
This isn’t randomness.
It’s positioning + hedging + liquidity games.
🎯 The Level That Matters Most: $96,000
This is the Max Pain zone — the price where option buyers lose the most at settlement.
BTC doesn’t have to settle there.
But when $23B+ expires in one day, price often reacts around these key strike levels.
Ignore this level at your own risk.
⏳ Typical Pattern Around Big Expiries
Before Expiry
Sideways, messy price action
Stop hunts above & below range
Breakouts with no follow-through
After Expiry
Hedging pressure fades
Liquidity clears
Price starts moving cleaner and more directional
🧠 Final Thought
December 26 is the reset point.
Until then:
Reduce overtrading
Manage risk tightly
Don’t fall in love with breakouts
And most importantly — don’t trade emotionally
Markets are designed to frustrate the most people right before clarity returns.
Stay sharp 🐼
$SOL

Eine weitere Grenze wurde überschritten – und die Märkte beginnen, es zu spüren.
Ein zweiter Tanker, der von den USA nahe Venezuela beschlagnahmt wurde, wurde nun als chinesisch im Besitz bestätigt und transportiert eine massive Ladung Rohöl.
Nicht symbolisch.
Nicht klein.
Das waren 1,8 Millionen Barrel Merey 16 – Venezuelas wertvollster Exportmix – der direkt nach China unterwegs war.
Das war nicht nur ein Schiff.
Dies war eine geopolitische Botschaft.
⚠️ WARUM DIESES EREIGNIS WICHTIG IST
Merey 16 ist kein gewöhnliches Öl.
Es ist schwer, von hoher Qualität und essenziell für komplexe Raffinerien, insbesondere in Asien. 1,8 Millionen Barrel aus dem Verkehr zu ziehen, ist kein Lärm – es ist eine echte Versorgungsunterbrechung.

Something important just shifted in the bond market, and the majority of crypto traders are completely asleep on it.
🇯🇵 Japan’s 10-year government bond yield has pushed above its 2008 financial crisis level, right after the BOJ raised rates to the highest point in nearly 30 years.
This is not just a Japan story.
This is a global liquidity warning.
And here’s the part most people consistently misunderstand 👇
When Japanese yields spike, crypto doesn’t dump immediately.
The real move usually comes the following week.
📉 The Pattern Is Hard to Ignore
Jan 2025 BOJ hike → BTC$BTC fell ~7% the next week
Mar 2025 BOJ hike → BTC fell ~10% the next week
Jul 2025 BOJ hike → BTC crashed ~20% the next week
That’s why this coming week matters more than today.
We may see another sharp downside move — and that move could mark a local bottom, not the final one.
⚠️ Important Distinction A local bottom ≠ cycle bottom.
Despite all the noise, Bitcoin is still respecting the 4-year cycle structure.
Yes, a bounce can happen.
But expecting a fast run to new ATHs is unrealistic without liquidity returning first.
🔍 How This Usually Plays Out
Rising Japan yields → global risk-off
Stocks, crypto, and even bonds come under pressure
US yields climb further → debt stress increases
Eventually, yields rise too far for the system to handle
And history is clear on one thing:
Central banks never allow bond markets to break.
What follows is always the same playbook:
Policy reversals
Liquidity injections
QE-style responses
Just like 2020–2021 🖨️
📊 What This Means for Traders Short term
High yields = pressure on crypto
Volatility stays elevated
Weak hands get shaken out
Medium to long term
Bond stress forces easing
Liquidity returns
Crypto benefits the most
This is why patience is everything right now.
Full resets don’t happen often — but when they do, they create generational opportunities.
And smart money?
They’re not chasing candles.
They’re waiting 🐼
$BTC $BNB
#BTC走势分析 #BNB_Market_Update

Ich weiß, dass die Schlagzeile es einfach erscheinen ließ:
„Japan erhöht die Zinsen → Bitcoin fällt.“
Aber die wahre Geschichte ist viel tiefer als das.
Lass uns zuerst eine Sache klären.
Die scharfe rote Kerze, die du direkt nach den Nachrichten gesehen hast?
Das waren keine Institutionen.
Große Fonds, Banken und Makroakteure drücken nicht innerhalb von Sekunden nach einer Schlagzeile den Verkaufsbutton. Was du zunächst gesehen hast, waren größtenteils Einzelhändler, Hebel und nach Schlagzeilen gesteuerte Algorithmen, die sofort reagierten.
Institutionelle Bewegungen zeigen sich nicht in Minuten – sie zeigen sich Wochen oder sogar Monate später.

$XRP schreibt leise die Regeln der Vermögensverteilung neu — und die meisten Menschen haben es noch nicht bemerkt.
Während die Preisbewegung auf der Oberfläche ruhig aussieht, erzählt die On-Chain-Daten eine ganz andere Geschichte. Die XRP-Reichenliste ändert sich schnell, und das Fenster, um in die obere Klasse einzutreten, wird enger.
✨ Warum 2.314 XRP jetzt wichtig ist
Bei aktuellen Preisen von etwa 2,04 $ zeigt die frische Wallet-Verteilungsdaten etwas Mächtiges:
🔹 Um zu den Top 10 % aller XRP-Inhaber zu gehören, benötigt man jetzt nur noch 2.314 XRP
🔹 Das entspricht etwa 4.700–5.000 $ zum heutigen Preis

In my 15+ years of trading, I’ve seen countless projects launch — and just as many disappear for good.
Most never come back.
But Terra Luna Classic ($LUNC C) is different. It’s the project that has been declared “dead” again and again… yet somehow keeps showing up on the charts.
This week isn’t about hype or memes.
👉 It’s about structure, upgrades, and supply shock.
🛠️ Network Upgrade: v3.6.1 — The Foundation Is Getting Stronger
On December 18, 2025, Binance officially supported the LUNC v3.6.1 network upgrade.
Yes, deposits and withdrawals were temporarily suspended, and price action went sideways — but that’s short-term noise, not a long-term signal.
This upgrade delivers:
🔐 Stronger smart contract security
🔄 CosmWasm updates, improving interoperability within the Cosmos ecosystem
🚀 Preparation for Q1 2026, including discussions around Market Module reactivation
In simple terms:
👉 $LUNC is now speaking through development, not just community hype.
🔥 Burn Mechanism: Supply Is Quietly Shrinking
This is where the real game is being played.
Binance remains the largest contributor to the LUNC burn program.
As of early December 2025, over 7.49 billion LUNC have been burned this year alone.
Every burn means:
Lower circulating supply
Increasing scarcity
And if demand returns suddenly → explosive upside potential
This isn’t a short-term pump narrative.
👉 It’s a slowly building deflationary setup.
📊 Technical Zones: Decision Time
Price is currently sitting on a key support area around $0.000037.
🐂 Bullish Scenario:
If this level holds
And price breaks above $0.000040
👉 A relief rally toward the MA(99) near $0.000045 becomes likely
🐻 Bearish Scenario:
A high-volume breakdown below $0.000037
👉 Could send price back toward the $0.000032 zone
🎯 Trader’s Note:
LUNC is a high-volatility asset.
Treat it as a “moon bag” — only risk capital you can afford to lose.
⚖️ Legal Closure = Narrative Shift
With Do Kwon’s 15-year sentencing, a major overhang has been removed.
One of the biggest sources of uncertainty is now off the table.
The narrative is shifting: ❌ Chaos →
✅ Infrastructure
❌ Fear →
✅ Development
🧠 Final Thoughts
LUNC is still risky — no doubt.
But traders who only look backward often miss what’s forming ahead.
🔥 The real question:
Are you quietly accumulating during this technical pause?
Or waiting for volume confirmation before making your move?
👇 What’s your $LUNC price target for 2026?
Drop it in the comments 👇
#LUNC #LUNC✅

On December 17, Bitcoin experienced one of the most dramatic intraday swings of the month. Within just a few hours, nearly $100 billion in market capitalization was added and then wiped out.

In less than an hour, Bitcoin$BTC surged more than $3,000, briefly reclaiming the $90,000 level. The excitement, however, didn’t last long. Price quickly reversed and fell back toward the $86,000 zone.

What made this move stand out is that no breaking news, macroeconomic data, or regulatory developments triggered it. Instead, the volatility was driven by internal market dynamics — mainly excessive leverage, crowded positions, and thin liquidity.

---

A Short Squeeze Sparked the Initial Rally

The $90,000 level is more than just a psychological milestone. It was also an area packed with leveraged short positions.

As Bitcoin pushed higher toward this zone, short positions began getting force-liquidated. Since closing a short requires buying Bitcoin, this created a rapid feedback loop that pushed price even higher.

Liquidation data shows that roughly $120 million in short positions were wiped out during the spike. This type of move is known as a short squeeze, where forced buying — not genuine spot demand — drives price higher.

On the surface, the breakout looked strong. Under the hood, however, the market structure was fragile.

---

From Fake Breakout to Long Liquidation Cascade

Once Bitcoin$BTC briefly held above $90,000, momentum traders rushed in, expecting a confirmed breakout. Many of these positions were highly leveraged longs, opened during a period of low liquidity.

But without sustained spot buying, the rally failed. Price stalled, rolled over, and began moving lower.

As key intraday support levels broke, exchanges started liquidating long positions at scale. More than $200 million in long positions were wiped out, flooding the market with sell orders and accelerating the decline.

This is why the drop was faster and more aggressive than the initial rally. Within hours, Bitcoin erased most of its gains.

---

Positioning Data Exposes a Fragile Market

Trader positioning data from major exchanges paints a clear picture of market instability.

On Binance, the share of top traders holding long positions jumped sharply. However, position-size data showed low conviction — many traders were long, but with relatively small exposure, suggesting speculation rather than strong directional belief.

On OKX, position ratios shifted aggressively after the volatility began, indicating that larger players were rapidly adjusting risk, hedging exposure, or buying into forced sell-offs.

This combination — crowded positioning, high leverage, weak conviction, and thin order books — creates the perfect environment for violent price swings.

---

On-Chain Activity and the Role of Market Makers

During the volatility, on-chain data showed large market makers such as Wintermute moving Bitcoin between exchanges.

While these transfers coincided with the price swings, they do not point to manipulation. Market makers routinely move assets during periods of stress to manage inventory, provide liquidity, and adjust risk exposure.

The entire move can be explained by well-known market mechanics: liquidation clusters, leverage cascades, and shallow liquidity. There is no clear evidence of coordinated manipulation or insider-driven activity.

---

What This Means for Bitcoin Going Forward

This episode highlights a structural weakness that still exists in the Bitcoin market.

Leverage remains elevated, liquidity can vanish quickly during fast moves, and price action around key levels is often driven by forced liquidations rather than fundamentals.

Bitcoin’s long-term value did not change during these hours. There was no shift in adoption, network security, or macro conditions. The volatility reflected market fragility, not a change in outlook.

Until leverage resets and positioning becomes healthier, similar sharp moves remain a real risk. This time, Bitcoin didn’t surge and crash because of news — it moved because leverage turned price against itself.

👉 Follow for more deep dives into Bitcoin market structure, leverage dynamics, and real-time crypto analysis.
#bitcoin #BTC #CryptoNews #CryptoAnalysis

Few stories in crypto history reflect such a dramatic rise and catastrophic fall as that of Do Kwon and LUNA$LUNA . Once hailed as the future of decentralized finance, Terra has since become one of the most painful lessons the crypto industry has ever witnessed.

The Early Years: A Brilliant Mind Takes Shape

Do Kwon was born in 1991 in Seoul, South Korea. From an early age, he stood out as a top student, attending Daewon Foreign Language High School before moving to the United States. He later gained admission to Stanford University, where he studied computer science.

After graduating, Kwon worked as a software engineer at Microsoft, but the pull of entrepreneurship soon brought him back to South Korea, determined to build something of his own.

His first major venture was Anyfi, a peer-to-peer mesh networking startup. While it didn’t achieve mass adoption, it laid the groundwork for his deep dive into blockchain technology.

Terraform Labs: The Vision Takes Form

In 2018, Do Kwon co-founded Terraform Labs alongside Daniel Shin. Their goal was ambitious: to create a blockchain ecosystem that could power real-world payments through decentralized stablecoins.

The launch of the Terra blockchain and its native token LUNA$LUNA quickly drew attention. Venture capital firms poured in more than $200 million, and Terra rapidly became one of the most talked-about projects in crypto.

UST and Explosive Growth

Between 2020 and 2022, Terra entered its golden era. The team introduced TerraUSD (UST), an algorithmic stablecoin designed to maintain its dollar peg through a burn-and-mint mechanism tied to LUNA.

The ecosystem’s growth was supercharged by Anchor Protocol, which offered nearly 19.5% APY on UST deposits. Millions of investors flooded in, chasing what seemed like a low-risk, high-yield opportunity.

By April 2022, LUNA surged to nearly $116, cementing Terra’s place among the top crypto projects in the world.

May 2022: The Collapse

The turning point came suddenly. More than $2 billion in UST was withdrawn from Anchor, while liquidity was simultaneously removed from Curve pools. The pressure was too much.

UST lost its dollar peg.
The Luna Foundation Guard sold off its Bitcoin reserves in a desperate attempt to defend the system—but the reserves were quickly exhausted.

UST plunged to mere cents.
Within days, nearly $40 billion in market value evaporated, impacting over one million investors worldwide.

The crypto market watched in disbelief.

Arrest and Legal Fallout

In March 2023, Do Kwon was arrested in Montenegro after attempting to travel using a forged passport. What followed was a prolonged extradition battle between the United States and South Korea.

2024–2025: Judgment Day

In 2024, Terraform Labs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. A U.S. jury found both Terraform Labs and Do Kwon guilty of securities fraud, imposing civil penalties exceeding $4.5 billion.

By 2025, the final chapter unfolded:

Do Kwon pleaded guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy

Admitted he misled investors about the stability of UST

Agreed to forfeit $19 million in assets

Sentenced to 15 years in federal prison

The presiding judge described the case as

> “a fraud of generational scale.”

Final Thoughts

Terra is no longer just a failed project—it is a lasting warning. High yields, bold promises, and charismatic founders mean nothing without sustainable fundamentals.

The fall of LUNA will forever stand as a reminder in crypto history:
when stability is engineered without real backing, it is only an illusion.
$BTC
#LUNA✅

$XRP steht erneut im Mittelpunkt der Marktaufmerksamkeit, da ein bekannter Analyst, der den Rückgang auf 1,88 $ genau vorhergesagt hat, nun sein nächstes großes Preisziel enthüllt – und es ist gewaltig.

Laut dem angesehenen Krypto-Analysten Dark Defender hat XRP offiziell Welle 4 seiner Elliott-Wellen-Struktur abgeschlossen und bereitet sich nun auf einen kraftvollen Wellen-5-Ausbruch vor, der den Preis möglicherweise um über 200 % von den aktuellen Niveaus anheben könnte.

---

📊 XRP$XRP Technische Struktur: Welle 4 Bestätigt

Dark Defender hebt hervor, dass die jüngste Korrektur von XRP perfekt dem Elliott-Wellen-Fahrplan gefolgt ist. Seit dem 13. Februar 2025 verfolgt er die Struktur und identifizierte: