Tech Mirza

China hat gerade einen bahnbrechenden Fortschritt enthüllt, der die globale Energie für immer neu definieren könnte.
⚛️ Über 1 MILLION Tonnen Thorium wurden im Bayan Obo-Bergbaukomplex in Innerer Mongolei identifiziert – ein Vorrat, der das Land schätzungsweise 60.000 Jahre lang mit Energie versorgen kann.
🔬 Nach einer umfangreichen geologischen Untersuchung bestätigten Wissenschaftler 233 neue thoriumreiche Vorkommen, die auf etwa 178 Milliarden Dollar geschätzt werden und China sofort an die Spitze der nächsten Generation der Kernenergie heben.

Starting January 1, 2026, the European Union will implement the DAC8 Directive, bringing an end to the period of crypto “anonymity” in the EU. This is more than just a minor update—it’s a major shift toward tax transparency and control in the crypto world. Here's what you need to know:
What's Happening?
The EU is expanding its existing system of automatic tax information exchange (DAC) to cover crypto assets. This means that Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), such as exchanges, brokers, and even some non-custodial wallets, will be required to:
Collect and verify user identity and transaction data (similar to the Know Your Customer (KYC) process).
Annually report detailed transaction and holding information to tax authorities.
Share this data across EU member states.
Why Does This Matter?
Tax authorities in the EU will now have real oversight into crypto transactions, including those involving decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and staking. The key implications are:
Cross-border enforcement: Tax authorities will be able to track crypto-assets even if they are held outside their jurisdiction.
Stronger enforcement tools: Authorities could freeze or confiscate assets to tackle tax evasion.
Global reach: The rules apply to any provider servicing EU residents, regardless of where they are based, meaning even offshore platforms will have to comply.
What Does This Mean for Investors?
End of anonymity: All transactions (buying, selling, staking, DeFi swaps through regulated platforms) will become fully visible to tax authorities.
Tax compliance: It will be more important than ever to keep accurate records and declare earnings on time. Many platforms will likely begin offering ready-to-use tax reports for users.
Possible exit of smaller projects: Some smaller crypto projects that aren’t prepared to meet compliance standards may leave the EU market. This could lead to a more concentrated market and reduce innovation in the region.
The Community's Divided Views
Supporters (often institutions) argue that this is a step toward legitimacy, helping to clean up the crypto space.
Opponents (often crypto-natives) see this as an attack on privacy and a contradiction of the decentralized ideals of crypto.
The Bottom Line
The EU is integrating crypto assets into its regulated financial system. This will create a more predictable and secure environment for users, but it comes at the cost of full financial transparency. The days of crypto being an "invisible" asset in the EU are coming to an end.
What do you think? Will these new tax rules push major crypto players to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions like the UAE or Singapore, or will they attract more institutional capital to the EU by offering clear, predictable regulations?
$ETH
$BTC

Im Rahmen von Basel III wird XRP derzeit als "Typ 2 Krypto-Engagement" klassifiziert, was mit einem extrem hohen Risiko von 1250 % verbunden ist.
Übersetzung für die Wall Street:
👉 XRP auf der Bilanz eines Unternehmens zu halten, ist unglaublich kapitalineffizient – im Grunde irrational. Für jeden $1 an XRP-Engagement müssen Banken $12,50 an Kapitalreserven zurücklegen. Deshalb haben Banken jahrelang gezögert – nicht wegen der Nachfrage oder der Technologie selbst, sondern wegen der regulatorischen Eigenkapitalanforderungen.

Solana’s network activity has plunged sharply in 2025, with on-chain data showing a 97% drop from its November 2024 peak. While retail investors continue to buy, large institutional wallets appear to be exiting the ecosystem, creating a growing imbalance in market participation.
The blockchain reached an all-time high of $296 in November 2024 but has since declined by nearly 58%. Data now highlights a clear divergence between small retail wallets and larger, institutional-sized holders.
Institutional Exit Before the Peak
Crypto trader Ardi noted that buying pressure since Solana’s peak has been overwhelmingly driven by retail wallets, typically making purchases between $0 and $1,000. In contrast, larger holders began distributing SOL well before prices topped out.
According to on-chain metrics, selling activity from major wallets accelerated months ahead of October 10, 2024, suggesting that institutional players planned their exits long before the broader market downturn.
Wallets managing between $0 and $100,000, as well as institutional-sized wallets holding $100,000 to $10 million, have been steadily declining for roughly 13 months. Meanwhile, retail wallet growth has remained consistent, indicating that smaller investors still view SOL as undervalued despite the withdrawal of large capital.
Data also shows a near-perfect correlation between Solana’s demand and memecoin trading activity, underscoring the network’s reliance on speculative trends.
Network Activity and Revenue Slide
Investor and trader Jas reported that Solana’s monthly active traders fell from approximately 30 million to fewer than 1 million in 2025, marking a dramatic 97% collapse in participation.
Network revenue followed a similar trajectory, dropping fivefold year over year—from $2.5 billion in 2024 to about $500 million in 2025.
By comparison, Ethereum generated $1.4 billion in revenue this year and has outperformed Solana by 56% on a year-to-date basis. “SOL’s future may depend less on memes and more on what comes after them,” Jas said.
$XRP
$SOL
$BTC

Binance has announced a major adjustment to its FDUSD margin trading, impacting several popular altcoin pairs across cross and isolated margin.
🔻 Pairs Fully Delisted (Cross + Isolated Margin)
The following pairs will be completely removed from margin trading:
EIGEN / FDUSD
ARB / FDUSD
POL / FDUSD
ATOM / FDUSD
LDO / FDUSD
SHIB / FDUSD
GALA / FDUSD
PEPE / FDUSD
⛔ These pairs will no longer be available for partial margin trading.
🔻 Pairs Delisted from Cross Margin Only
TRUMP / FDUSD
RAY / FDUSD
📌 Isolated margin trading remains available for now on these two pairs.
📅 Key Dates & Timeline (UTC 06:00)
Starting Immediately
Manual and automatic transfers to affected pairs are disabled
Transfers allowed only up to existing debt amounts
December 24
Borrowing for isolated margin tiers will be suspended
December 30
All open positions will be automatically closed
Pending orders will be canceled
Affected pairs will be fully removed from margin trading
⏳ Note: The delisting process may take up to 3 hours.
⚠️ Important Warning from Binance
Close margin positions before December 30
Transfer funds to spot wallets in advance
Binance will not be responsible for losses caused by forced closures
📊 Summary
This is a significant change to FDUSD margin trading. Traders using margin should review their positions immediately and implement proper risk management.

#Binance #CryptoNews #MarginTrading #Altcoins #RiskManagement

Gib mir zwei Minuten, und ich erkläre dir warum.
Zuerst, ein einfaches Prinzip
Jeder Markt wird von Angebot und Nachfrage getrieben.
Warum ist Gold also teuer?
Nicht, weil es glänzend ist — viele Metalle sind glänzender
Nicht, weil es stark ist — viele Metalle sind stärker
Gold ist hauptsächlich deshalb wertvoll, weil es selten ist.
Das begrenzte Angebot hält die Nachfrage hoch, was das langfristige Preiswachstum unterstützt.
Was passiert, wenn eine riesige Goldreserve entdeckt wird?
Wenn ein Land ein riesiges Goldvorkommen entdeckt:
Das globale Angebot steigt
Seltenheit verringert sich

📈 Schlüssel-Szenarien für den XRP-Preis basierend auf Billionen, die durch XRPL fließen
🟢 1) Moderate Annahme — $3.50 bis ~$13
In grundlegenden optimistischen Prognosen, in denen Ripples Stapel (RippleNet, On-Demand Liquidity, RLUSD Stablecoin, institutionelle Flüsse) bedeutende, aber nicht dominante Liquidität bringt:
Preismodelle zeigen $3.50–$5.80 bei fortgesetzter Annahme durch Banken und Einzelhandelsinteresse. �
cryptonews.net
Mit einer tiefergehenden Nutzung als Brückenvermögen im grenzüberschreitenden Bankwesen erstrecken sich die Prognosen in das Gebiet von $8–$13. �
cryptonews.net

You’ve probably seen alarming headlines about “quantum computers breaking crypto.” According to Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, however, the real issue isn’t an imminent hack—it’s the enormous price of defending against one too early.
The Real Question Isn’t “How,” but “When”
Much of the crypto debate focuses on which post-quantum cryptography should replace today’s systems—hash-based approaches (favored by Ethereum) versus lattice-based schemes (researched by Cardano). Hoskinson argues this framing is misleading.
The critical question is timing. Transitioning prematurely could severely damage blockchain performance long before quantum computers pose a real threat.
The Cost of Quantum Security: Losing a Zero in Performance
Post-quantum cryptography today is roughly:
10× slower, and
Produces 10× larger signatures and proofs
Hoskinson summarizes it bluntly: adopting it now effectively cuts blockchain throughput by an order of magnitude—“chopping off a zero.”
That slowdown means higher fees, lower capacity, and increased hardware demands. Validators and miners may struggle to keep up, which risks pushing networks toward centralization—the opposite of crypto’s core goals.
When Does the Quantum Threat Actually Arrive?
Rather than following hype cycles, Hoskinson points to DARPA (the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) as a more credible signal. DARPA’s quantum program aims to determine by 2033 whether truly practical, cryptographically threatening quantum computers are even feasible.
That timeline suggests the danger is not immediate, and certainly not worth crippling today’s networks over.
Two Long-Term Paths: Hash-Based vs. Lattice-Based
If and when a transition becomes necessary, there are two main contenders:
Hash-based cryptography (Ethereum’s direction)
Simple and well-tested
Mostly limited to digital signatures
Lattice-based cryptography (Cardano’s focus)
More complex but far more flexible
Can handle signatures and encryption
Can run on standard GPUs instead of specialized ASIC hardware
Cardano’s Approach: Gradual Reinforcement, Not Panic
Hoskinson isn’t advocating for an urgent, disruptive hard fork. Instead, he proposes a phased strategy:
Use tools like the Midnight sidechain and Mithril
Create post-quantum “checkpoints” or notarizations of blockchain history
This approach secures the most critical data without rebuilding the entire system overnight—like reinforcing a vault instead of tearing down the house.
The Inevitable Trade-Off
Hoskinson’s core message is simple: there are no free upgrades.
In a post-quantum world, the blockchain trilemma—security, decentralization, scalability—becomes even harsher. Stronger cryptography means slower systems and higher costs.
The open question for crypto today is this:
Should the industry sacrifice speed, affordability, and usability now to guard against a threat that may be a decade away—or optimize for today and upgrade security when the risk is real?
#ADA
#ETH $ETH

In the financial ocean, whales are massive players controlling hundreds of millions of dollars. When they move, waves turn into tsunamis. You are plankton. Swim against the current and you get crushed. Swim with it, and you survive—sometimes even thrive.
Whales are intelligent and try to stay unnoticed. But because of their size, they can’t hide their footprints.
🔹 Price vs. Volume Anomalies
This is one of the clearest signals. A whale cannot deploy $100 million with a single order—they must accumulate slowly.
You’ll often see price moving sideways or dipping slightly with small candle bodies, while volume spikes aggressively.
This usually means whales are quietly placing large limit buy orders, absorbing panic selling from the crowd. Once selling pressure dries up, price launches upward.
🔸 Liquidity Hunts
Whales need liquidity to fill their positions. Where does that liquidity sit? At retail stop-losses.
Before a major move higher, price is often pushed below key support levels where most traders place their stops.
The crowd gets stopped out, whales buy that cheap supply, and price quickly reverses upward. This is known as a spring or bear trap.
🔹 On-Chain Flows (Crypto Markets)
Blockchains are transparent ledgers, offering valuable insight.
Large transfers from cold wallets to exchanges often signal preparation to sell or use assets as collateral for short positions.
Large withdrawals from exchanges to personal wallets suggest long-term holding and reduced circulating supply, often preceding a supply shock.
🔸 Don’t Predict. Observe and React.
Don’t trade based on opinions or predictions.
Wait for the stop hunt to complete and price to reclaim key levels before entering.
Wait for volume to confirm a breakout, then ride the move.

The real question is:
Are you trading what you think will happen—or what the whales are actually doing?
This content is for educational reference only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always do your own research before making decisions.

Dr. Camila Stevenson, a commentator with expertise in health and finance, has shared her perspective on why banks and major financial institutions may actually require a higher XRP price for the system to work effectively.
XRP has remained under bearish pressure alongside the broader crypto market. Since October, the total crypto market has shed over $1.3 trillion in value, and XRP has dropped about 33% over the past three months. This decline has fueled negative sentiment among many investors.
However, several analysts argue that focusing only on short-term price action misses the bigger picture.
Why Watching XRP’s Price Can Be Misleading
In a recent video, Dr. Stevenson said many investors are asking the wrong questions about XRP. To illustrate her point, she used an infrastructure analogy. Engineers, she explained, do not judge a bridge based on its current cost. Instead, they focus on how much weight it can carry, how much stress it can endure, and whether it still works under extreme conditions.
According to Stevenson, XRP and the XRP Ledger (XRPL) were designed in a similar way. People who keep asking why XRP’s price has not moved yet, she said, are thinking like short-term traders. The more important question is what the system was built to handle when real pressure enters the financial system.
How Retail Investors and Institutions Think Differently
Stevenson highlighted a key difference between retail investors and institutions:
Retail investors tend to analyze assets “from the outside in,” focusing on price charts, candles, and short-term market movements.
Institutions, on the other hand, analyze assets “from the inside out.” They look at what problem the asset solves, whether it can handle large volumes, how it performs under stress, and whether it remains reliable during market instability.
She argued that much of the confusion around XRP comes from this difference in perspective. XRP was not designed primarily as a speculative asset. Instead, it was built as financial infrastructure—something that usually goes unnoticed unless it fails.
Large financial systems, Stevenson explained, do not collapse simply because prices fall. They fail when money stops moving efficiently, settlement times become too long, liquidity breaks apart, slippage increases, or counterparty risk grows too large. For institutions, these failures can be disastrous.
Retail investors often ask, “What can I sell this for later?” Institutions ask, “Can this asset move massive amounts of value without breaking the system?” According to Stevenson, XRP is designed to answer the second question.
Why Banks May Prefer a Higher XRP Price
Stevenson stressed that XRP is not a company, not equity, and not ownership in Ripple. It functions as a liquidity and settlement instrument.
Because XRP has a fixed supply, it cannot scale by creating more tokens. As transaction volumes grow, the only way XRP can support larger flows is for each unit to represent more value.
She explained that XRP was designed as a bridge asset, not a speculative bet. Banks are not trying to profit by trading settlement assets—they want to move money safely, quickly, and efficiently. A higher XRP price helps with this because moving billions of dollars is easier with fewer high-value units than with millions of low-value ones.
This view aligns with comments made years ago by Ripple CTO David Schwartz, who said that XRP “cannot be dirt cheap” if it is to function effectively at scale.
Stevenson also noted that institutions often position themselves off-exchange through custodians, OTC desks, and private agreements. These activities rarely show up as dramatic price movements on public charts. In fact, sudden price spikes during institutional positioning could signal instability rather than success.
For large financial players, what matters most is stability, deep liquidity, predictable settlement, and the ability to absorb supply quietly—not short-term price hype.
🚀 Follow Tech Mirza
💰 Learn more. Think smarter. Trade wiser.
#XRPGoal
$XRP

Hey family — buckle up. Bitcoin may be about to remind everyone why getting overly confident about price predictions can be costly.
Many investors expected a huge year-end celebration, but instead, Bitcoin appears to be closing out 2025 with a dose of reality. While BTC is currently trading around $88,330, several analysts — including CryptoOnchain — believe the market needs to “catch its breath” before any meaningful continuation higher.
So what’s really happening?
Let’s start with an important concept: Point of Control (POC). Simply put, the POC is the price level where the most trading activity has occurred — where buyers and sellers have agreed on value. Since Bitcoin has struggled to convincingly break above recent highs, price action suggests a pullback is likely, with strong support sitting between $70,000 and $72,000.
That may sound bearish at first, but context matters. This zone marked the top of the previous cycle and could now act as a powerful long-term floor. If Bitcoin corrects roughly 20% and then holds above $70K, it would likely attract aggressive buyers and set the stage for a much healthier move into 2026. However, losing that level could open the door to a deeper and more prolonged correction — so watching this range is critical.
Momentum indicators are also flashing caution. The RSI — often thought of as a market “temperature gauge” — is showing divergence, suggesting that the current bull run is losing steam, at least temporarily. On top of that, today’s global trade environment closely resembles conditions we saw earlier this year, which preceded increased volatility.
The big question now is whether this pullback is simply a “tiger leap” before the next leg higher, or an early signal that a longer cooldown is approaching.
One thing is certain: markets don’t move in straight lines. These shakeouts are what separate disciplined investors from those who react emotionally.
Stay sharp. Stay patient.
#BTC #BTCVSGOLD

Internet Computer (ICP) continues to trade under a dominant bearish structure following a strong rejection from higher Fibonacci resistance levels. While the broader trend remains negative, price action is beginning to stabilize near a key demand zone, suggesting that downside momentum is gradually weakening.
Market Structure Overview
The recent sell-off accelerated after ICP failed to hold above the $7.14 (0.618 Fib) and $8.33 (0.786 Fib) resistance levels. This rejection led to a decisive breakdown below the mid-range structure and all major moving averages, reinforcing bearish control.
EMA Structure: Sellers in Control
ICP remains below all key EMAs, confirming sustained selling pressure:
20 EMA: $3.40
50 EMA: $3.88
100 EMA: $4.22
200 EMA: $4.75
The EMA cluster between $3.88–$4.75 represents a strong resistance band. As long as price trades below this zone, upside potential remains limited.
Price Action & Support Zone
Price is consolidating above the $3.30–$3.45 demand zone, an area that has repeatedly absorbed selling pressure. This zone sits just above the $2.77 Fib 0 level, making it a critical support region. Continued defense of this area could allow a short-term base to form, while a breakdown would likely trigger renewed downside.
Bullish Recovery Levels
For ICP to signal a meaningful recovery, buyers must reclaim the following resistance levels:
$4.44 (0.236 Fib): Initial recovery hurdle
$5.47 (0.382 Fib): Structure stabilization level
$6.30 (0.5 Fib): Mid-range resistance
$7.14 (0.618 Fib): Bullish continuation confirmation
$8.33 (0.786 Fib): Major trend reversal zone
A clean break above $8.33 would significantly improve the broader market outlook.
Bearish Continuation Scenario
Failure to hold the $3.30–$3.40 support zone would expose ICP to further downside, with $2.77 acting as the next major support. A decisive breakdown below this level would invalidate the current stabilization attempt and extend the broader downtrend.
Momentum Indicator
RSI (14): 46.97
RSI remains below the neutral 50 level, indicating weak momentum. However, the recent uptick suggests selling pressure is easing and buyers are cautiously stepping in.
Key Levels Summary
Resistance:
$4.44 • $5.47 • $6.30 • $7.14 • $8.33
Support:
$3.30–$3.45 • $2.77
Conclusion
ICP remains structurally bearish and capped below its EMA resistance cluster. That said, stabilization near the $3.30–$3.45 demand zone and slowing downside momentum hint at potential base formation. Bulls need to reclaim $4.44 and higher to confirm recovery, while a loss of current support could open the door for another move lower toward $2.77.
$ICP
#ICP.
#USNonFarmPayrollReport

A second vessel seized by the U.S. near Venezuela has now been confirmed as Chinese-owned—and the cargo was massive.
🛢️ 1.8 million barrels
🇻🇪 Merey 16, Venezuela’s highest-grade crude
🇨🇳 Bound for China
This wasn’t just a tanker.
It was a signal.
⚠️ WHY THIS MATTERS
Merey 16 is Venezuela’s crown jewel—heavy, high-value crude essential for complex refineries. Losing 1.8M barrels isn’t noise; it’s a real supply disruption.
Now zoom out 👇
U.S. enforcement is tightening around Venezuela
China remains deeply tied into sanctioned energy flows
Oil trade is colliding directly with geopolitics
This isn’t only about oil anymore.
It’s about power, pressure, and control of energy routes.
🌍 THE BIGGER PICTURE
Sanctions are being actively enforced, not just threatened
China–Venezuela energy ties are under scrutiny
Every seized barrel tightens the global supply story
Markets don’t wait for press briefings.
They reprice risk immediately.
📈 MARKET IMPLICATIONS
Bullish pressure on crude
A rising geopolitical risk premium
Volatility returning to energy-linked assets
Energy is back to being a strategic weapon, not just a commodity.
🔥 When tankers are seized,
🔥 barrels get scarcer,
🔥 and markets get nervous.
Watch the ships.
Watch the chokepoints.
Watch the price.
#Oil #Geopolitics #GlobalRisk #crudeoil #China