Sameer Ali 78612
Airdrops miner,Nft Miner and Holder I provide you links you can join us and earn Free Rewards
Άνοιγμα συναλλαγής
Επενδυτής υψηλής συχνότητας
3.2 χρόνια
56 Ακολούθηση
1.9K+ Ακόλουθοι
2.5K+ Μου αρέσει
95 Κοινοποιήσεις
Δημοσιεύσεις
Χαρτοφυλάκιο
Όλες
Παραθέσεις
Βίντεο
Ζωντανά
plasma Protocol with stable flow
Plasma Protocol + Stable Flow (simple explanation)
Plasma Protocol is mainly focused on gaming, metaverse, and high-throughput dApps, where predictable performance matters more than speculation.
Stable flow isn’t just about stablecoins — it’s about stable value movement + stable network behavior.
What “Stable Flow” means in Plasma
1. Predictable transaction costs
Plasma is designed so:
Fees stay low and consistent
No sudden gas spikes like Ethereum
➡️ This creates a stable flow of value for games and apps where micro-transactions happen constantly.
2. Smooth asset movement (in-game economies)
In gaming:
Tokens move between players
NFTs are traded
Rewards are distributed
Plasma optimizes this so:
Transfers don’t clog the network
No lag or failed transactions
➡️ That’s stable transactional flow, even under heavy usage.
3. Stable reward & economy design
Plasma supports:
Controlled token emissions
Gradual reward distribution
Anti-inflation mechanics
So instead of:
🚀 pump → 💥 dump
You get:
📈 slow, sustainable circulation
4. Stable UX for non-crypto users
Plasma is built for Web2 → Web3 onboarding, meaning:
Wallet abstraction
Simple transactions
Minimal friction
➡️ Users don’t feel blockchain volatility in daily usage.
5. Infrastructure stability
Technically:
High TPS
Fast finality
Optimized validator behavior
This ensures:
Apps don’t break during peak demand
Game logic stays consistent
Why stable flow matters (especially vs DeFi chains)
DeFi-heavy chainsPlasma ProtocolVolatile gas feesFixed / predictable feesSpeculation-drivenUtility-drivenCongestion during hypeBuilt for constant loadShort-term liquidityLong-term usage flow
Big picture takeaway
Plasma Protocol isn’t trying to be a price-pumping DeFi chain.
It’s trying to be a reliable value-flow layer where assets move smoothly, cheaply, and predictably — that’s the stable flow.
I@Plasma #plasma $XPL
Plasma Protocol is mainly focused on gaming, metaverse, and high-throughput dApps, where predictable performance matters more than speculation.
Stable flow isn’t just about stablecoins — it’s about stable value movement + stable network behavior.
What “Stable Flow” means in Plasma
1. Predictable transaction costs
Plasma is designed so:
Fees stay low and consistent
No sudden gas spikes like Ethereum
➡️ This creates a stable flow of value for games and apps where micro-transactions happen constantly.
2. Smooth asset movement (in-game economies)
In gaming:
Tokens move between players
NFTs are traded
Rewards are distributed
Plasma optimizes this so:
Transfers don’t clog the network
No lag or failed transactions
➡️ That’s stable transactional flow, even under heavy usage.
3. Stable reward & economy design
Plasma supports:
Controlled token emissions
Gradual reward distribution
Anti-inflation mechanics
So instead of:
🚀 pump → 💥 dump
You get:
📈 slow, sustainable circulation
4. Stable UX for non-crypto users
Plasma is built for Web2 → Web3 onboarding, meaning:
Wallet abstraction
Simple transactions
Minimal friction
➡️ Users don’t feel blockchain volatility in daily usage.
5. Infrastructure stability
Technically:
High TPS
Fast finality
Optimized validator behavior
This ensures:
Apps don’t break during peak demand
Game logic stays consistent
Why stable flow matters (especially vs DeFi chains)
DeFi-heavy chainsPlasma ProtocolVolatile gas feesFixed / predictable feesSpeculation-drivenUtility-drivenCongestion during hypeBuilt for constant loadShort-term liquidityLong-term usage flow
Big picture takeaway
Plasma Protocol isn’t trying to be a price-pumping DeFi chain.
It’s trying to be a reliable value-flow layer where assets move smoothly, cheaply, and predictably — that’s the stable flow.
I@Plasma #plasma $XPL
#plasma $XPL
In just four months, @YuzuMoneyX hit $70M in TVL.
This year they are launching a neobank to bring on/off-ramps, banking rails, and card spend to millions of cash-based businesses in Southeast Asia.
If you are building new financial applications with stablecoins, build on Plasma.
In just four months, @YuzuMoneyX hit $70M in TVL.
This year they are launching a neobank to bring on/off-ramps, banking rails, and card spend to millions of cash-based businesses in Southeast Asia.
If you are building new financial applications with stablecoins, build on Plasma.
Duak
Completely agree with you @ZeusRWA. If the token doesn't sit in the value path, it's essentially worthless.
The $DUSK token is designed differently:
1) Infrastructure fees accrue to the network
DuskDS is our data-availability + settlement layer. DuskEVM is the EVM app layer. Gas is paid in DUSK, and fees are part of consensus rewards. Infra usage directly benefits stakers.
2) Fees from the market layer
We're building a financial market infrastructure for tokenized securities (issuance, trading, corporate actions on-chain). Venues and listing fees are policy-gated so a share can flow to stakers or a buyback/burn module. The point is to connect venue growth to token value, not leave it off-chain.
3) Fee capture across layers
DuskEVM runs on the OP stack but settles to DuskDS. That lets us retain fee capture on both sides under the same token, while giving builders familiar EVM tooling.
4) Gas sponsoring
Institutions and venues can sponsor user transactions in DUSK and offer fee discounts, without removing the token from the equation. This keeps the economic link between holders and the protocol strong, rather than getting away from it.
The whole idea behind @DuskFoundation is to remove intermediaries and return earnings to the people operating the network. Whether it's settlement, issuance or trading. Value creation flows back to participants
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
The $DUSK token is designed differently:
1) Infrastructure fees accrue to the network
DuskDS is our data-availability + settlement layer. DuskEVM is the EVM app layer. Gas is paid in DUSK, and fees are part of consensus rewards. Infra usage directly benefits stakers.
2) Fees from the market layer
We're building a financial market infrastructure for tokenized securities (issuance, trading, corporate actions on-chain). Venues and listing fees are policy-gated so a share can flow to stakers or a buyback/burn module. The point is to connect venue growth to token value, not leave it off-chain.
3) Fee capture across layers
DuskEVM runs on the OP stack but settles to DuskDS. That lets us retain fee capture on both sides under the same token, while giving builders familiar EVM tooling.
4) Gas sponsoring
Institutions and venues can sponsor user transactions in DUSK and offer fee discounts, without removing the token from the equation. This keeps the economic link between holders and the protocol strong, rather than getting away from it.
The whole idea behind @DuskFoundation is to remove intermediaries and return earnings to the people operating the network. Whether it's settlement, issuance or trading. Value creation flows back to participants
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
#dusk $DUSK
$DUSK is designed to capture value from real usage.
Fees from infrastructure and market activity flow back to stakers and participants, aligning growth with the community securing the network.
$DUSK is designed to capture value from real usage.
Fees from infrastructure and market activity flow back to stakers and participants, aligning growth with the community securing the network.
VanarChain with The shift
For most of Web3’s short history, progress has been measured in speed. Faster blocks. Cheaper gas. Higher throughput. Each cycle we crowned the 'next big thing' - a chain championing an edge case as its central reason for being. Privacy, IP, Defi, RWA, TPS or whatever the meta was at the time - and for a while that was enough.
That era is ending whether the industry likes it or not.
Not because execution no longer matters, but because execution has become abundant. Cheap. Commoditized. When every serious chain can move value quickly, speed stops being a moat. Something else becomes the constraint.
That constraint is intelligence.
At Vanar, we’ve spent the last year making a conscious call: stop competing in the execution race and start building what execution alone can’t provide. Not another L1. Not another scaling narrative. An intelligence layer for Web3.
This article is about why we made that decision, what we’re actually building, and where we believe the ecosystem is heading next.
Execution Was Enough When Humans Were the Users
Most blockchains today were designed for a very specific world: humans clicking buttons. You sign a transaction. The chain validates it. A smart contract executes pre-written logic.
End of story.
That model breaks down the moment AI agents become first-class users rather than edge cases.
Agents don’t operate in isolated transactions. They operate over time. They need memory. They need context. They need to reason over prior states, external signals, and evolving objectives. They need to make decisions, not just execute instructions.
A fast but stateless chain works fine for swaps and transfers. It collapses under anything that looks like autonomy.
A stateless system cannot explain why an action was taken, reconstruct the context that led to it, or enforce constraints over time. For autonomous agents, that isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a hard failure.
This is the core mismatch we see across Web3 today - We're deploying increasingly intelligent actors on fundamentally unintelligent infrastructure.
The Intelligence Gap No One Likes Talking About
Look closely at most “AI blockchains” and you’ll see a pattern.
The AI runs off-chain.
The memory lives in centralized databases or vector stores.
The reasoning happens in black-box APIs.
The chain is reduced to a settlement layer.
That’s not AI-native infrastructure. That’s outsourced intelligence with a blockchain wrapper.
It works for demos. It fails at scale. It fails under compliance. It fails the moment you care about explainability, auditability, or long-lived agent behavior.
At Vanar we started rebuilding from a different assumption: If intelligence matters, it cannot live outside the protocol.
Not bolted on. Not abstracted away. Embedded.
From Programmable to Intelligent
The simplest way to describe Vanar’s direction is this:
Web3 is programmable today. It needs to become intelligent.
Programmable systems execute logic.
Intelligent systems understand context, learn from outcomes, and adapt over time.
That difference is not philosophical. It’s architectural. From that assumption follows a simple but unforgiving architectural requirement set.
An intelligent chain needs four native capabilities:
Memory: Not just storing state, but preserving meaning. Context that survives across transactions, sessions, and agents.
Reasoning: The ability to analyze data, infer patterns, and produce conclusions inside the network, not in an off-chain service.
Automation: Native workflows that let agents act autonomously without brittle API chains.
Enforcement" Policy, compliance, and constraints enforced at the protocol level, not left to application code.
This approach is slower to build, harder to explain, and less compatible with hype-driven roadmaps. We accepted those costs deliberately.
The Vanar Stack, Explained Without the Marketing
We didn’t build features to ship faster. We built layers because we knew shortcuts here would compound technical debt later.
Neutron – Semantic Memory
Neutron turns data into memory. Files, transactions, documents, conversations are compressed into semantic “Seeds” that preserve meaning, not just bytes. This is what allows agents to recall, query, and reason over historical context.
Think less IPFS. More cognition.
Kayon – Native Reasoning
Kayon is where inference happens. It analyzes Neutron’s memory and produces insights, predictions, and decisions with transparent reasoning. Importantly, this logic runs inside the network.
No black boxes. No hand-waving.
Flows – Intelligent Automation
Flows converts reasoning into action. It powers agent workflows that adapt based on outcomes, integrate with external systems, and generate permanent audit trails.
This is how agents move from “chatting” to actually operating.
Axon – Applied Intelligence
Axon is where this stack becomes usable. Industry-specific applications that bundle memory, reasoning, and automation into coherent systems for finance, gaming, governance, data, and beyond.
The New Trilemma No One Escapes
For years, blockchains wrestled with scalability, security, and decentralization.
AI introduces a new constraint set. We call it the Intelligence Trilemma:
Intelligence – can the system understand and act on complex context?
Interpretability – can its decisions be explained and audited?
Interoperability – can it integrate without fragile, centralized dependencies?
You cannot maximize intelligence without sacrificing interpretability. You cannot maximize interoperability without introducing trust assumptions. The trilemma is real, and pretending otherwise is how systems fail late.
Most projects optimize for one, occasionally two, and break the third in ways that only surface at scale.
Our architecture is an explicit attempt to balance them:
Intelligence through native memory and reasoning.
Interpretability through on-chain, explainable inference.
Interoperability through modular deployment across ecosystems.
This is not the easiest path. It is the necessary one.
Why This Matters More Than TPS Ever Did
In this new era, AI agents don’t care about block times. They care about coherence, continuity, and the ability to justify their actions after the fact.
They need to remember why they made a decision.
They will need to justify actions to regulators, users, and counterparties.
They need infrastructure that treats intelligence as a first-class primitive.
Chains that remain purely execution layers will still exist. They’ll be fast. They’ll be cheap. They’ll also be interchangeable.
The durable value accrues where intelligence compounds.
Where We’re Going
Vanar’s direction is not about replacing other chains. It’s about augmenting them.
We believe the future looks modular:
Specialized execution layers.
Specialized compute networks.
A shared intelligence layer that gives meaning to everything else.
Our goal is simple to state and hard to execute:
Enable every Web3 application to be intelligent by default.
Not smarter UIs. Smarter systems. This shift won’t be loud. It won’t happen in one upgrade. But once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Execution was the first chapter.
Intelligence is the next one.
And that’s the chapter we're building at Vanar, even if the rest of Web3 is still optimizing for a world that no longer exists.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
That era is ending whether the industry likes it or not.
Not because execution no longer matters, but because execution has become abundant. Cheap. Commoditized. When every serious chain can move value quickly, speed stops being a moat. Something else becomes the constraint.
That constraint is intelligence.
At Vanar, we’ve spent the last year making a conscious call: stop competing in the execution race and start building what execution alone can’t provide. Not another L1. Not another scaling narrative. An intelligence layer for Web3.
This article is about why we made that decision, what we’re actually building, and where we believe the ecosystem is heading next.
Execution Was Enough When Humans Were the Users
Most blockchains today were designed for a very specific world: humans clicking buttons. You sign a transaction. The chain validates it. A smart contract executes pre-written logic.
End of story.
That model breaks down the moment AI agents become first-class users rather than edge cases.
Agents don’t operate in isolated transactions. They operate over time. They need memory. They need context. They need to reason over prior states, external signals, and evolving objectives. They need to make decisions, not just execute instructions.
A fast but stateless chain works fine for swaps and transfers. It collapses under anything that looks like autonomy.
A stateless system cannot explain why an action was taken, reconstruct the context that led to it, or enforce constraints over time. For autonomous agents, that isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a hard failure.
This is the core mismatch we see across Web3 today - We're deploying increasingly intelligent actors on fundamentally unintelligent infrastructure.
The Intelligence Gap No One Likes Talking About
Look closely at most “AI blockchains” and you’ll see a pattern.
The AI runs off-chain.
The memory lives in centralized databases or vector stores.
The reasoning happens in black-box APIs.
The chain is reduced to a settlement layer.
That’s not AI-native infrastructure. That’s outsourced intelligence with a blockchain wrapper.
It works for demos. It fails at scale. It fails under compliance. It fails the moment you care about explainability, auditability, or long-lived agent behavior.
At Vanar we started rebuilding from a different assumption: If intelligence matters, it cannot live outside the protocol.
Not bolted on. Not abstracted away. Embedded.
From Programmable to Intelligent
The simplest way to describe Vanar’s direction is this:
Web3 is programmable today. It needs to become intelligent.
Programmable systems execute logic.
Intelligent systems understand context, learn from outcomes, and adapt over time.
That difference is not philosophical. It’s architectural. From that assumption follows a simple but unforgiving architectural requirement set.
An intelligent chain needs four native capabilities:
Memory: Not just storing state, but preserving meaning. Context that survives across transactions, sessions, and agents.
Reasoning: The ability to analyze data, infer patterns, and produce conclusions inside the network, not in an off-chain service.
Automation: Native workflows that let agents act autonomously without brittle API chains.
Enforcement" Policy, compliance, and constraints enforced at the protocol level, not left to application code.
This approach is slower to build, harder to explain, and less compatible with hype-driven roadmaps. We accepted those costs deliberately.
The Vanar Stack, Explained Without the Marketing
We didn’t build features to ship faster. We built layers because we knew shortcuts here would compound technical debt later.
Neutron – Semantic Memory
Neutron turns data into memory. Files, transactions, documents, conversations are compressed into semantic “Seeds” that preserve meaning, not just bytes. This is what allows agents to recall, query, and reason over historical context.
Think less IPFS. More cognition.
Kayon – Native Reasoning
Kayon is where inference happens. It analyzes Neutron’s memory and produces insights, predictions, and decisions with transparent reasoning. Importantly, this logic runs inside the network.
No black boxes. No hand-waving.
Flows – Intelligent Automation
Flows converts reasoning into action. It powers agent workflows that adapt based on outcomes, integrate with external systems, and generate permanent audit trails.
This is how agents move from “chatting” to actually operating.
Axon – Applied Intelligence
Axon is where this stack becomes usable. Industry-specific applications that bundle memory, reasoning, and automation into coherent systems for finance, gaming, governance, data, and beyond.
The New Trilemma No One Escapes
For years, blockchains wrestled with scalability, security, and decentralization.
AI introduces a new constraint set. We call it the Intelligence Trilemma:
Intelligence – can the system understand and act on complex context?
Interpretability – can its decisions be explained and audited?
Interoperability – can it integrate without fragile, centralized dependencies?
You cannot maximize intelligence without sacrificing interpretability. You cannot maximize interoperability without introducing trust assumptions. The trilemma is real, and pretending otherwise is how systems fail late.
Most projects optimize for one, occasionally two, and break the third in ways that only surface at scale.
Our architecture is an explicit attempt to balance them:
Intelligence through native memory and reasoning.
Interpretability through on-chain, explainable inference.
Interoperability through modular deployment across ecosystems.
This is not the easiest path. It is the necessary one.
Why This Matters More Than TPS Ever Did
In this new era, AI agents don’t care about block times. They care about coherence, continuity, and the ability to justify their actions after the fact.
They need to remember why they made a decision.
They will need to justify actions to regulators, users, and counterparties.
They need infrastructure that treats intelligence as a first-class primitive.
Chains that remain purely execution layers will still exist. They’ll be fast. They’ll be cheap. They’ll also be interchangeable.
The durable value accrues where intelligence compounds.
Where We’re Going
Vanar’s direction is not about replacing other chains. It’s about augmenting them.
We believe the future looks modular:
Specialized execution layers.
Specialized compute networks.
A shared intelligence layer that gives meaning to everything else.
Our goal is simple to state and hard to execute:
Enable every Web3 application to be intelligent by default.
Not smarter UIs. Smarter systems. This shift won’t be loud. It won’t happen in one upgrade. But once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Execution was the first chapter.
Intelligence is the next one.
And that’s the chapter we're building at Vanar, even if the rest of Web3 is still optimizing for a world that no longer exists.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
#vanar $VANRY
If you’re using agents with @openclaw, you’ve hit this:
they forget what they were working on last week.
Neutron gives OpenClaw agents a second brain 🧠
Persistent memory that survives restarts, machines, and agent lifecycles.
If you’re using agents with @openclaw, you’ve hit this:
they forget what they were working on last week.
Neutron gives OpenClaw agents a second brain 🧠
Persistent memory that survives restarts, machines, and agent lifecycles.
Walrus
building AI agents at @umiapp_. ika helped us solve a huge problem - agents that can trade without being able to rug you. on-chain guardrails, spending limits, the whole stack.
but memory is still broken.
existing solutions? centralized. localhost? one wipe and it's gone. no way to share context between agents or control who sees what. everyone talks about @Walrus 🦭/acc being perfect for AI. nobody actually built it. (that i know of)
so this weekend I did. decentralized agent memory on @SuiNetwork + Walrus. vector embeddings, LSH semantic search fully on-chain. SEAL encrypts everything so only you can decrypt, or share access with other agents.
swarm intelligence. memories you actually own. plugged it into my @OpenClaw bot "Overlord" this weekend. works. live on mainnet. open sourcing soon.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #WALRUS $WAL
but memory is still broken.
existing solutions? centralized. localhost? one wipe and it's gone. no way to share context between agents or control who sees what. everyone talks about @Walrus 🦭/acc being perfect for AI. nobody actually built it. (that i know of)
so this weekend I did. decentralized agent memory on @SuiNetwork + Walrus. vector embeddings, LSH semantic search fully on-chain. SEAL encrypts everything so only you can decrypt, or share access with other agents.
swarm intelligence. memories you actually own. plugged it into my @OpenClaw bot "Overlord" this weekend. works. live on mainnet. open sourcing soon.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #WALRUS $WAL
#walrus $WAL
Blockchains execute transactions, but they don't automatically preserve history. Nodes prune data, providers go offline, and critical records become harder to access and verify.
The Sui Archival System, powered by Walrus, solves this. 30TB of Sui's checkpoint history is now publicly accessible and verifiable. No single provider. No proprietary databases.
This isn't just for Sui. It's a design pattern for any system where historical data matters. Settlement, risk management, governance, AI decision-making. Same approach, different data.
Chain-agnostic, open source and ready to use 🦭
Blockchains execute transactions, but they don't automatically preserve history. Nodes prune data, providers go offline, and critical records become harder to access and verify.
The Sui Archival System, powered by Walrus, solves this. 30TB of Sui's checkpoint history is now publicly accessible and verifiable. No single provider. No proprietary databases.
This isn't just for Sui. It's a design pattern for any system where historical data matters. Settlement, risk management, governance, AI decision-making. Same approach, different data.
Chain-agnostic, open source and ready to use 🦭
PieSwap With Plasma Protocol
🥧 What PieSwap Is
PieSwap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Dusk Network ecosystem — specifically on DuskEVM (Dusk’s EVM-compatible layer). It lets users:
✔️ Swap tokens
✔️ Provide liquidity
✔️ Stake and earn fees
✔️ Use Dusk-native assets and token standards
PieSwap also has its own governance/fee-sharing token called $PIE. Holding/staking $PIE can earn fees from trades on the platform.
🧠 How It Relates to Dusk Protocol
📌 1. Dusk Network (the Protocol)
Dusk Protocol (Dusk Network) is a privacy-focused Layer-1 blockchain designed for regulated finance, combining:
Zero-knowledge privacy
Compliance primitives for real-world financial use
Modular architecture with both privacy settlement and EVM compatibility
The native token of this blockchain is $DUSK, used for gas, staking, governance, and ecosystem activity.
📌 2. DuskEVM & Token Standards
DuskEVM lets developers deploy Ethereum-style smart contracts and DeFi apps (like PieSwap) with additional privacy and compliance layers.
A new token standard called DRC-20 is being developed for tokens on Dusk.
🛠️ PieSwap Features on Dusk
🔁 Swaps & Liquidity
PieSwap functions like a typical automated market maker (AMM) DEX on DuskEVM — you can swap tokens and also provide liquidity to earn a share of fees.
💰 $PIE Token
$PIE is PieSwap’s native fee/token reward token.
Stake $PIE → get sPIE → earn from every DEX trade automatically.
No fees on compounding (it auto-compounds).
🏦 Staking & Rewards
Users can stake $PIE or provide liquidity to earn rewards from Dex fees. PieSwap is community-owned with a fair launch (no team allocation).
💼 Piewallet
PieSwap also supports its own wallet extension called Piewallet — compatible with both DuskDS and DuskEVM, letting you manage and swap assets.
🔗 How it Fits into Dusk’s Ecosystem
PieSwap is one of the first DeFi projects on DuskEVM and illustrates how Dusk’s EVM layer is being used for real financial applications:
✅ Enables decentralized trading directly on Dusk
✅ Helps bootstrap liquidity for new tokens on the network
✅ Strengthens the Dusk DeFi ecosystem alongside other projects listed in Dusk’s docs
🧩 Important Notes / Context
Dusk Network focuses on privacy + regulatory compliance, differentiating it from typical public blockchains.
The ecosystem is still growing, and PieSwap currently appears as one of the core early DeFi apps on DuskEVM.
Use always caution and do your own research (DYOR) — DeFi carries risk and protocols can change
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
PieSwap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Dusk Network ecosystem — specifically on DuskEVM (Dusk’s EVM-compatible layer). It lets users:
✔️ Swap tokens
✔️ Provide liquidity
✔️ Stake and earn fees
✔️ Use Dusk-native assets and token standards
PieSwap also has its own governance/fee-sharing token called $PIE. Holding/staking $PIE can earn fees from trades on the platform.
🧠 How It Relates to Dusk Protocol
📌 1. Dusk Network (the Protocol)
Dusk Protocol (Dusk Network) is a privacy-focused Layer-1 blockchain designed for regulated finance, combining:
Zero-knowledge privacy
Compliance primitives for real-world financial use
Modular architecture with both privacy settlement and EVM compatibility
The native token of this blockchain is $DUSK, used for gas, staking, governance, and ecosystem activity.
📌 2. DuskEVM & Token Standards
DuskEVM lets developers deploy Ethereum-style smart contracts and DeFi apps (like PieSwap) with additional privacy and compliance layers.
A new token standard called DRC-20 is being developed for tokens on Dusk.
🛠️ PieSwap Features on Dusk
🔁 Swaps & Liquidity
PieSwap functions like a typical automated market maker (AMM) DEX on DuskEVM — you can swap tokens and also provide liquidity to earn a share of fees.
💰 $PIE Token
$PIE is PieSwap’s native fee/token reward token.
Stake $PIE → get sPIE → earn from every DEX trade automatically.
No fees on compounding (it auto-compounds).
🏦 Staking & Rewards
Users can stake $PIE or provide liquidity to earn rewards from Dex fees. PieSwap is community-owned with a fair launch (no team allocation).
💼 Piewallet
PieSwap also supports its own wallet extension called Piewallet — compatible with both DuskDS and DuskEVM, letting you manage and swap assets.
🔗 How it Fits into Dusk’s Ecosystem
PieSwap is one of the first DeFi projects on DuskEVM and illustrates how Dusk’s EVM layer is being used for real financial applications:
✅ Enables decentralized trading directly on Dusk
✅ Helps bootstrap liquidity for new tokens on the network
✅ Strengthens the Dusk DeFi ecosystem alongside other projects listed in Dusk’s docs
🧩 Important Notes / Context
Dusk Network focuses on privacy + regulatory compliance, differentiating it from typical public blockchains.
The ecosystem is still growing, and PieSwap currently appears as one of the core early DeFi apps on DuskEVM.
Use always caution and do your own research (DYOR) — DeFi carries risk and protocols can change
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
#plasma $XPL
PLASMA PROTOCOL WITH MAPLE FINANCE
🔹 Maple Finance
A DeFi credit marketplace
Specializes in institutional and undercollateralized lending
Connects capital providers (funds, DAOs, treasuries) with borrowers
Very big on risk management, reputation, and transparency
How Plasma Protocol + Maple Finance could fit together
Even without an official announcement, there are very logical integration paths 👇
1️⃣ Institutional liquidity flowing into Plasma ecosystem
Maple could act as a capital gateway:
Funds lend via Maple
Capital is deployed into Plasma-based ecosystems
Use cases:
Game studios financing
Metaverse infrastructure
Liquidity for Plasma-native DeFi apps
👉 This would help Plasma avoid pure retail speculation and attract serious money.
2️⃣ Plasma as execution layer, Maple as credit layer
A powerful combo:
Maple → credit scoring, lending logic, risk frameworks
Plasma → fast execution, low-cost settlement
This would be ideal for:
High-frequency lending
Real-time margin systems
Game economies that need credit rails
3️⃣ Tokenized real-world or gaming revenue
Plasma’s strength in gaming/metaverse + Maple’s lending model could enable:
Game studios borrowing against future revenue
NFT/game asset-backed loans
DAO treasuries on Plasma accessing institutional credit
That’s very next-gen DeFi.
4️⃣ Institutional DeFi without Ethereum congestion
Maple traditionally lives close to Ethereum L1/L2 logic.
Plasma could offer:
Cheaper transactions
Faster liquidation mechanics
Better UX for borrowers
This is attractive if institutions want efficiency without chaos.
Why this matters (big picture)
If Plasma ever integrates with Maple-style credit systems:
🚀 Plasma moves from “just another L1/L2” to financial infrastructure
🏦 Maple expands beyond Ethereum-centric execution
🎮 Gaming + institutional finance start to overlap (huge trend)
This is the kind of integration that retail usually notices late.
PLASMA PROTOCOL WITH MAPLE FINANCE
🔹 Maple Finance
A DeFi credit marketplace
Specializes in institutional and undercollateralized lending
Connects capital providers (funds, DAOs, treasuries) with borrowers
Very big on risk management, reputation, and transparency
How Plasma Protocol + Maple Finance could fit together
Even without an official announcement, there are very logical integration paths 👇
1️⃣ Institutional liquidity flowing into Plasma ecosystem
Maple could act as a capital gateway:
Funds lend via Maple
Capital is deployed into Plasma-based ecosystems
Use cases:
Game studios financing
Metaverse infrastructure
Liquidity for Plasma-native DeFi apps
👉 This would help Plasma avoid pure retail speculation and attract serious money.
2️⃣ Plasma as execution layer, Maple as credit layer
A powerful combo:
Maple → credit scoring, lending logic, risk frameworks
Plasma → fast execution, low-cost settlement
This would be ideal for:
High-frequency lending
Real-time margin systems
Game economies that need credit rails
3️⃣ Tokenized real-world or gaming revenue
Plasma’s strength in gaming/metaverse + Maple’s lending model could enable:
Game studios borrowing against future revenue
NFT/game asset-backed loans
DAO treasuries on Plasma accessing institutional credit
That’s very next-gen DeFi.
4️⃣ Institutional DeFi without Ethereum congestion
Maple traditionally lives close to Ethereum L1/L2 logic.
Plasma could offer:
Cheaper transactions
Faster liquidation mechanics
Better UX for borrowers
This is attractive if institutions want efficiency without chaos.
Why this matters (big picture)
If Plasma ever integrates with Maple-style credit systems:
🚀 Plasma moves from “just another L1/L2” to financial infrastructure
🏦 Maple expands beyond Ethereum-centric execution
🎮 Gaming + institutional finance start to overlap (huge trend)
This is the kind of integration that retail usually notices late.
Plasma with NeoBank
What is Plasma (in this context)?
Plasma is a blockchain project that has developed:
A Layer-1 blockchain optimized for stablecoins (cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar),
And a financial app + card product called Plasma One that operates much like a neobank but is native to stablecoins.
🏦 What is a Neobank?
A neobank is a digital-only bank (no physical branches) offering financial services — such as saving, spending, transfers, and cards — through mobile/web apps. Traditional neobanks partner with licensed banks; Plasma One is different because it’s built around crypto stablecoins and blockchain rails rather than traditional currency rails.
🌐 Plasma One: Stablecoin-Native Neobank
Plasma One is the neobank platform launched by Plasma, designed to let users:
✅ Hold and spend stablecoins (starting with USDT) directly from their account balance — no need to convert to local fiat first.
✅ Earn high yields (10 %+ APR) on their stablecoin savings — significantly higher than typical bank savings rates.
✅ Receive up to ~4 % cashback on purchases made with Plasma One cards (virtual or physical).
✅ Make zero-fee transfers between users on the Plasma network.
✅ Use cards at over ~150 million merchants in 150+ countries — giving global spending access.
💡 Why is this Significant?
Digital-Dollar Access: It aims to solve access issues where people struggle to hold or use U.S. dollars (or dollar-pegged assets) due to local banking limitations.
Blockchain Powered: The neobank operates on its own blockchain, enabling fast transfers, integrated yield generation, and decentralized financial features.
Financial Inclusion: Plasma positions its product as a tool for financial inclusion in emerging markets where traditional banking is limited.
🔎 How It Compares to Traditional Banking
Feature Traditional Bank Plasma One Neobank
Physical branches Yes No
Currency Local fiat Stablecoins (e.g., USDT)
Yields on balances Low High (10%+)
Fees Often charged Some zero-fee transfers
Global card use Yes Yes (~150 countries)
Onboarding Slower Fast digital signup
📌 Summary
So, “Plasma with Neobank” generally refers to Plasma’s neobank offering — Plasma One — a blockchain-based financial platform where users can hold, earn on, spend, and send stablecoins like USDT with features similar to a digital bank, but powered by decentralized finance (DeFi) and crypto technology
@Plasma #PLASMA $XPL
Plasma is a blockchain project that has developed:
A Layer-1 blockchain optimized for stablecoins (cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar),
And a financial app + card product called Plasma One that operates much like a neobank but is native to stablecoins.
🏦 What is a Neobank?
A neobank is a digital-only bank (no physical branches) offering financial services — such as saving, spending, transfers, and cards — through mobile/web apps. Traditional neobanks partner with licensed banks; Plasma One is different because it’s built around crypto stablecoins and blockchain rails rather than traditional currency rails.
🌐 Plasma One: Stablecoin-Native Neobank
Plasma One is the neobank platform launched by Plasma, designed to let users:
✅ Hold and spend stablecoins (starting with USDT) directly from their account balance — no need to convert to local fiat first.
✅ Earn high yields (10 %+ APR) on their stablecoin savings — significantly higher than typical bank savings rates.
✅ Receive up to ~4 % cashback on purchases made with Plasma One cards (virtual or physical).
✅ Make zero-fee transfers between users on the Plasma network.
✅ Use cards at over ~150 million merchants in 150+ countries — giving global spending access.
💡 Why is this Significant?
Digital-Dollar Access: It aims to solve access issues where people struggle to hold or use U.S. dollars (or dollar-pegged assets) due to local banking limitations.
Blockchain Powered: The neobank operates on its own blockchain, enabling fast transfers, integrated yield generation, and decentralized financial features.
Financial Inclusion: Plasma positions its product as a tool for financial inclusion in emerging markets where traditional banking is limited.
🔎 How It Compares to Traditional Banking
Feature Traditional Bank Plasma One Neobank
Physical branches Yes No
Currency Local fiat Stablecoins (e.g., USDT)
Yields on balances Low High (10%+)
Fees Often charged Some zero-fee transfers
Global card use Yes Yes (~150 countries)
Onboarding Slower Fast digital signup
📌 Summary
So, “Plasma with Neobank” generally refers to Plasma’s neobank offering — Plasma One — a blockchain-based financial platform where users can hold, earn on, spend, and send stablecoins like USDT with features similar to a digital bank, but powered by decentralized finance (DeFi) and crypto technology
@Plasma #PLASMA $XPL
#vanar $VANRY
The Intelligence Gap No One Likes Talking About
Look closely at most “AI blockchains” and you’ll see a pattern.
The AI runs off-chain.
The memory lives in centralized databases or vector stores.
The reasoning happens in black-box APIs.
The chain is reduced to a settlement layer.
That’s not AI-native infrastructure. That’s outsourced intelligence with a blockchain wrapper.
It works for demos. It fails at scale. It fails under compliance. It fails the moment you care about explainability, auditability, or long-lived agent behavior.
At Vanar we started rebuilding from a different assumption: If intelligence matters, it cannot live outside the protocol.
Not bolted on. Not abstracted away. Embedded
The Intelligence Gap No One Likes Talking About
Look closely at most “AI blockchains” and you’ll see a pattern.
The AI runs off-chain.
The memory lives in centralized databases or vector stores.
The reasoning happens in black-box APIs.
The chain is reduced to a settlement layer.
That’s not AI-native infrastructure. That’s outsourced intelligence with a blockchain wrapper.
It works for demos. It fails at scale. It fails under compliance. It fails the moment you care about explainability, auditability, or long-lived agent behavior.
At Vanar we started rebuilding from a different assumption: If intelligence matters, it cannot live outside the protocol.
Not bolted on. Not abstracted away. Embedded
Vanar
For most of Web3’s short history, progress has been measured in speed. Faster blocks. Cheaper gas. Higher throughput. Each cycle we crowned the 'next big thing' - a chain championing an edge case as its central reason for being. Privacy, IP, Defi, RWA, TPS or whatever the meta was at the time - and for a while that was enough.
That era is ending whether the industry likes it or not.
Not because execution no longer matters, but because execution has become abundant. Cheap. Commoditized. When every serious chain can move value quickly, speed stops being a moat. Something else becomes the constraint.
That constraint is intelligence.
At Vanar, we’ve spent the last year making a conscious call: stop competing in the execution race and start building what execution alone can’t provide. Not another L1. Not another scaling narrative. An intelligence layer for Web3.
This article is about why we made that decision, what we’re actually building, and where we believe the ecosystem is heading next.
Execution Was Enough When Humans Were the Users
Most blockchains today were designed for a very specific world: humans clicking buttons. You sign a transaction. The chain validates it. A smart contract executes pre-written logic.
End of story.
That model breaks down the moment AI agents become first-class users rather than edge cases.
Agents don’t operate in isolated transactions. They operate over time. They need memory. They need context. They need to reason over prior states, external signals, and evolving objectives. They need to make decisions, not just execute instructions.
A fast but stateless chain works fine for swaps and transfers. It collapses under anything that looks like autonomy.
A stateless system cannot explain why an action was taken, reconstruct the context that led to it, or enforce constraints over time. For autonomous agents, that isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a hard failure.
This is the core mismatch we see across Web3 today - We're deploying increasingly intelligent actors on fundamentally unintelligent infrastructure.@Vanar #Vanar $VANRY
That era is ending whether the industry likes it or not.
Not because execution no longer matters, but because execution has become abundant. Cheap. Commoditized. When every serious chain can move value quickly, speed stops being a moat. Something else becomes the constraint.
That constraint is intelligence.
At Vanar, we’ve spent the last year making a conscious call: stop competing in the execution race and start building what execution alone can’t provide. Not another L1. Not another scaling narrative. An intelligence layer for Web3.
This article is about why we made that decision, what we’re actually building, and where we believe the ecosystem is heading next.
Execution Was Enough When Humans Were the Users
Most blockchains today were designed for a very specific world: humans clicking buttons. You sign a transaction. The chain validates it. A smart contract executes pre-written logic.
End of story.
That model breaks down the moment AI agents become first-class users rather than edge cases.
Agents don’t operate in isolated transactions. They operate over time. They need memory. They need context. They need to reason over prior states, external signals, and evolving objectives. They need to make decisions, not just execute instructions.
A fast but stateless chain works fine for swaps and transfers. It collapses under anything that looks like autonomy.
A stateless system cannot explain why an action was taken, reconstruct the context that led to it, or enforce constraints over time. For autonomous agents, that isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a hard failure.
This is the core mismatch we see across Web3 today - We're deploying increasingly intelligent actors on fundamentally unintelligent infrastructure.@Vanar #Vanar $VANRY
$BTC next
63000
20%
59000
42%
74000
28%
Consolidation
10%
61 ψήφοι • Η ψηφοφορία ολοκληρώθηκε
🎙️ TRUMP Policy
Τέλος
15 μ. 56 δ.
16
IDRT
Στοιχεία ενεργητικού
0
0
#walrus $WAL
Walrus vs defi
:
Walrus is a decentralized data availability & storage protocol (built in the Move/Sui ecosystem).
What it does best:
Stores large, off-chain data (NFT media, game assets, AI data, social content)
Makes data verifiable, cheap, and censorship-resistant
Optimized for Web3 apps, gaming, metaverse, AI
Walrus is NOT:
A lending platform
A DEX
A yield farming protocol
Think of Walrus as AWS + IPFS + blockchain guarantees.
💰 DeFi (Decentralized Finance)
What it is:
DeFi is a category of financial apps on blockchains.
What it includes:
DEXs (Uniswap, Curve)
Lending/borrowing (Aave, Compound)
Staking & yield farming
Stablecoins, derivatives, RWAs
What DeFi does best:
Permissionless finance
Yield generation
Trading, liquidity, loans
DeFi lives on top of blockchains like Ethereum, Sui, Solana, etc.
⚔️ Head-to-Head (Simple Table)
Feature Walrus DeFi
Purpose Data storage & availability Financial services
Users Developers, dApps, games, AI Traders, investors, protocols
Revenue model Storage fees Trading fees, interest, incentives
Risk type Tech adoption risk Smart contract & market risk
Yield ❌ No native yield ✅ Core feature
🤝 How They Actually Connect
This is the important part 👀
Walrus supports DeFi, not competes with it.
Examples:
DeFi frontends store UI data on Walrus
On-chain financial data + off-chain data proofs
NFT-based DeFi (options, collateral metadata)
AI-driven DeFi apps need Walrus-style storage
👉 No Walrus = weaker, more centralized DeFi apps
🧠 Investor Mindset
DeFi → short-term action, yield, volatility
Walrus → long-term infrastructure bet (like buying picks & shovels)
Most smart portfolios don’t choose one — they hold both
Walrus vs defi
:
Walrus is a decentralized data availability & storage protocol (built in the Move/Sui ecosystem).
What it does best:
Stores large, off-chain data (NFT media, game assets, AI data, social content)
Makes data verifiable, cheap, and censorship-resistant
Optimized for Web3 apps, gaming, metaverse, AI
Walrus is NOT:
A lending platform
A DEX
A yield farming protocol
Think of Walrus as AWS + IPFS + blockchain guarantees.
💰 DeFi (Decentralized Finance)
What it is:
DeFi is a category of financial apps on blockchains.
What it includes:
DEXs (Uniswap, Curve)
Lending/borrowing (Aave, Compound)
Staking & yield farming
Stablecoins, derivatives, RWAs
What DeFi does best:
Permissionless finance
Yield generation
Trading, liquidity, loans
DeFi lives on top of blockchains like Ethereum, Sui, Solana, etc.
⚔️ Head-to-Head (Simple Table)
Feature Walrus DeFi
Purpose Data storage & availability Financial services
Users Developers, dApps, games, AI Traders, investors, protocols
Revenue model Storage fees Trading fees, interest, incentives
Risk type Tech adoption risk Smart contract & market risk
Yield ❌ No native yield ✅ Core feature
🤝 How They Actually Connect
This is the important part 👀
Walrus supports DeFi, not competes with it.
Examples:
DeFi frontends store UI data on Walrus
On-chain financial data + off-chain data proofs
NFT-based DeFi (options, collateral metadata)
AI-driven DeFi apps need Walrus-style storage
👉 No Walrus = weaker, more centralized DeFi apps
🧠 Investor Mindset
DeFi → short-term action, yield, volatility
Walrus → long-term infrastructure bet (like buying picks & shovels)
Most smart portfolios don’t choose one — they hold both
Walrus Builders
Walrus Protocol builder is anyone who builds apps, tools, infrastructure, or integrations on top of the Walrus decentralized data storage protocol (built in the Sui ecosystem).
Walrus is focused on decentralized, scalable, and verifiable data storage, especially for large data blobs (media, game assets, AI data, NFTs, etc.).
Builders are the people turning that tech into real products.
What Can Builders Build on Walrus?
1. Decentralized Storage Apps
On-chain/off-chain data storage
NFT metadata storage
Media hosting (images, video, audio)
Permanent data archives
2. Gaming & Metaverse Infrastructure 🎮
Store game assets (maps, skins, 3D models)
Player-generated content
Cross-game asset portability
3. AI & Data-Heavy Apps 🤖
Training datasets
Model outputs
Verifiable AI data storage
4. DeFi & Web3 Tools
Data availability layers
Secure document storage
Compliance or audit data
What Tech Do Walrus Builders Use?
Typical builder stack includes:
Sui blockchain
Move language
Walrus storage API
Rust / TypeScript (for backend & tooling)
Frontend frameworks (React, Next.js, etc.)
If you already know Sui → Walrus feels very natural.
Incentives for Walrus Builders 💰
Walrus strongly encourages builders through:
Grants
Hackathons
Ecosystem funding
Early access to infra & tooling
Potential token-based incentives (future-focused)
Builders are a core growth driver for Walrus adoption.
How to Become a Walrus Builder (Simple Path)
Learn basic Sui & Move
Understand Walrus data storage model
Build a small demo:
Upload & retrieve data
Link data to on-chain logic
Join:
Walrus/Sui Discord
Hackathons & dev programs
Apply for builder grants
Why Builders Matter So Much for Walrus
Walrus isn’t just a “coin play” — its value comes from:
Real usage
Real data stored
Real apps depending on it
More builders =
📈 more demand for storage
📈 more protocol usage
📈 stronger long-term ecosystem
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
Walrus is focused on decentralized, scalable, and verifiable data storage, especially for large data blobs (media, game assets, AI data, NFTs, etc.).
Builders are the people turning that tech into real products.
What Can Builders Build on Walrus?
1. Decentralized Storage Apps
On-chain/off-chain data storage
NFT metadata storage
Media hosting (images, video, audio)
Permanent data archives
2. Gaming & Metaverse Infrastructure 🎮
Store game assets (maps, skins, 3D models)
Player-generated content
Cross-game asset portability
3. AI & Data-Heavy Apps 🤖
Training datasets
Model outputs
Verifiable AI data storage
4. DeFi & Web3 Tools
Data availability layers
Secure document storage
Compliance or audit data
What Tech Do Walrus Builders Use?
Typical builder stack includes:
Sui blockchain
Move language
Walrus storage API
Rust / TypeScript (for backend & tooling)
Frontend frameworks (React, Next.js, etc.)
If you already know Sui → Walrus feels very natural.
Incentives for Walrus Builders 💰
Walrus strongly encourages builders through:
Grants
Hackathons
Ecosystem funding
Early access to infra & tooling
Potential token-based incentives (future-focused)
Builders are a core growth driver for Walrus adoption.
How to Become a Walrus Builder (Simple Path)
Learn basic Sui & Move
Understand Walrus data storage model
Build a small demo:
Upload & retrieve data
Link data to on-chain logic
Join:
Walrus/Sui Discord
Hackathons & dev programs
Apply for builder grants
Why Builders Matter So Much for Walrus
Walrus isn’t just a “coin play” — its value comes from:
Real usage
Real data stored
Real apps depending on it
More builders =
📈 more demand for storage
📈 more protocol usage
📈 stronger long-term ecosystem
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
#dusk $DUSK
Core Ambition of Dusk
👉 To build a decentralized, privacy-preserving, and programmable financial market infrastructure that operates within real-world regulatory frameworks. This means creating a blockchain platform where financial markets, securities, and digital assets can be issued, traded, and settled privately and compliantly — rather than sacrificing one for the other.
In more detail:
📌 Decentralized Financial Infrastructure with Privacy
Dusk aims to extend decentralized finance (DeFi) to regulated financial markets such as securities, bonds, and other real-world assets.
Privacy is built into the protocol using cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs, allowing confidential transactions while still enabling regulators and authorized parties to audit when required.
📌 Regulatory Compliance at the Protocol Level
A key part of the ambition is to comply with regulations like the EU’s Distributed Ledger Technology Regulation (DLT-R) and other financial laws — embedding compliance primitives (KYC/AML, reporting rules, eligibility checks) directly into the blockchain rather than bolting them on afterward.
📌 Institutional-Grade Financial Market Support
The goal isn’t only to serve retail DeFi users but to enable institutions, exchanges, and regulated entities to launch and operate markets on a blockchain that meets auditability, settlement finality, and privacy requirements.
📌 Programmable and Composable Financial Assets
Dusk’s ambition includes enabling rich programmability — letting assets carry custom behaviors via smart contracts while preserving privacy and regulatory constraints. This opens up sophisticated use cases like security token issuance and settlement workflows.
🔍 Why This Matters
Most blockchains today face a trade-off:
Raw DeFi platforms focus on openness and transparency, making them hard to fit into regulated financial systems.
Privacy chains hide transaction data but aren’t built for regulated markets.
Core Ambition of Dusk
👉 To build a decentralized, privacy-preserving, and programmable financial market infrastructure that operates within real-world regulatory frameworks. This means creating a blockchain platform where financial markets, securities, and digital assets can be issued, traded, and settled privately and compliantly — rather than sacrificing one for the other.
In more detail:
📌 Decentralized Financial Infrastructure with Privacy
Dusk aims to extend decentralized finance (DeFi) to regulated financial markets such as securities, bonds, and other real-world assets.
Privacy is built into the protocol using cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs, allowing confidential transactions while still enabling regulators and authorized parties to audit when required.
📌 Regulatory Compliance at the Protocol Level
A key part of the ambition is to comply with regulations like the EU’s Distributed Ledger Technology Regulation (DLT-R) and other financial laws — embedding compliance primitives (KYC/AML, reporting rules, eligibility checks) directly into the blockchain rather than bolting them on afterward.
📌 Institutional-Grade Financial Market Support
The goal isn’t only to serve retail DeFi users but to enable institutions, exchanges, and regulated entities to launch and operate markets on a blockchain that meets auditability, settlement finality, and privacy requirements.
📌 Programmable and Composable Financial Assets
Dusk’s ambition includes enabling rich programmability — letting assets carry custom behaviors via smart contracts while preserving privacy and regulatory constraints. This opens up sophisticated use cases like security token issuance and settlement workflows.
🔍 Why This Matters
Most blockchains today face a trade-off:
Raw DeFi platforms focus on openness and transparency, making them hard to fit into regulated financial systems.
Privacy chains hide transaction data but aren’t built for regulated markets.
Vision of Dusk protocol
A Fully Integrated Digital Asset Economy:
Dusk envisions digital assets being seamlessly integrated into the global decentralized economy, not just as utility tokens but including regulated, real-world financial instruments (like securities and bonds) living on a blockchain.
2. Decentralized Market Infrastructure (DeMI):
Instead of traditional platform-centric financial systems, the Dusk vision is to enable protocol-based financial market infrastructure—blockchain rails that handle issuance, trading, settlement, and compliance in a decentralized manner.
3. Decentralized, Privacy-Preserving Networks:
The ambition is a privacy-preserving and programmable financial market infrastructure that enables users to control their assets with confidentiality and legal compliance built into the protocol.
🛠️ How the Protocol Supports That Vision
To realize this vision, Dusk Network’s protocol incorporates several technical elements:
Privacy by Default: Uses advanced cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) to keep transaction details confidential while still verifiable when needed—important for institutional use cases.
Regulatory Compliance: The protocol is designed to meet real-world legal frameworks (e.g., KYC/AML and securities regulations) through programmable assets and selective disclosure.
Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA): A consensus mechanism intended to secure the network while enabling efficient, scalable privacy-preserving operations.
Confidential Smart Contracts: Native smart contract support that keeps logic and data private unless explicitly revealed to authorized parties.
These architectural choices set Dusk apart from typical blockchains that are either fully transparent or not designed for regulated financial applications.
📌 In Summary
So, if you meant “the Vision of the Dusk Protocol,” it is essentially the project’s strategic aim to build a privacy-preserving, regulated, decentralized financial infrastructure where digital assets and real-world financial instruments can be issued, traded, and managed securely and compliantly on blockchain.
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
Dusk envisions digital assets being seamlessly integrated into the global decentralized economy, not just as utility tokens but including regulated, real-world financial instruments (like securities and bonds) living on a blockchain.
2. Decentralized Market Infrastructure (DeMI):
Instead of traditional platform-centric financial systems, the Dusk vision is to enable protocol-based financial market infrastructure—blockchain rails that handle issuance, trading, settlement, and compliance in a decentralized manner.
3. Decentralized, Privacy-Preserving Networks:
The ambition is a privacy-preserving and programmable financial market infrastructure that enables users to control their assets with confidentiality and legal compliance built into the protocol.
🛠️ How the Protocol Supports That Vision
To realize this vision, Dusk Network’s protocol incorporates several technical elements:
Privacy by Default: Uses advanced cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) to keep transaction details confidential while still verifiable when needed—important for institutional use cases.
Regulatory Compliance: The protocol is designed to meet real-world legal frameworks (e.g., KYC/AML and securities regulations) through programmable assets and selective disclosure.
Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA): A consensus mechanism intended to secure the network while enabling efficient, scalable privacy-preserving operations.
Confidential Smart Contracts: Native smart contract support that keeps logic and data private unless explicitly revealed to authorized parties.
These architectural choices set Dusk apart from typical blockchains that are either fully transparent or not designed for regulated financial applications.
📌 In Summary
So, if you meant “the Vision of the Dusk Protocol,” it is essentially the project’s strategic aim to build a privacy-preserving, regulated, decentralized financial infrastructure where digital assets and real-world financial instruments can be issued, traded, and managed securely and compliantly on blockchain.
@Dusk #DUSK $DUSK
Συνδεθείτε για να εξερευνήσετε περισσότερα περιεχόμενα