Coinspeaker

Jumping into Bitcoin News Today, France’s cybersecurity agency ANSSI (Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d’Information) announced at the annual France Quantum conference that it will stop certifying security products lacking quantum-resistant encryption from 2027, with a full transition deadline for companies set at 2030, a mandate that applies to French government agencies and critical infrastructure operators by regulatory requirement, and arrives as Glassnode’s May 2026 report identifies 6.04 million BTC, approximately 30.2% of the issued supply, as carrying public keys visible on-chain.
This is not simply a European procurement rule. It is the most concrete government-issued deadline yet for deprecating classical public-key cryptography, and it arrives at a moment when the Bitcoin security community is actively quantifying how much of the network’s supply is structurally exposed to a functional quantum computer.
ANSSI has sent a clear signal: from 2027, products seeking certification will need to address the quantum threat with post-quantum cryptographic protections.
As the risk of "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" attacks grows, preparing for the post-quantum transition is becoming a…
— SEALSQ (@SEALSQcorp) June 18, 2026
Bitcoin Security News Today: How Glassnode Breaks Down the 6.04 Million BTC Exposure
Glassnode separates the exposed supply into two distinct categories. The first is 1.92 million BTC (~9.6% of supply), which are labeled structurally exposed, outputs that reveal the public key by design, including P2PK (pay-to-public-key) outputs from Satoshi-era mining rewards, bare multisig scripts, and Taproot (P2TR) outputs. The second is 4.12 million BTC (~20.6%) classified as operationally exposed, where public keys became visible through address reuse, partial UTXO spending, or custodial practices.
The report’s analytical emphasis is notable: Glassnode stresses that the primary risk lies in current storage practices rather than ancient coins. Exchanges account for an estimated 1.63–1.66 million BTC of the operationally exposed set. By contrast, US, UK, and El Salvador sovereign BTC holdings reportedly show zero quantum exposure, suggesting those positions use non-exposed UTXO types. The 13.99 million BTC (~69.8%) with no public-key exposure at rest are considered safe under Glassnode’s framework.
Glassnode revealed that around 6.04M BTC nearly 30% of Bitcoin supply is theoretically at risk from future quantum threats because public keys are already visible on chain.
Whats even more interesting is that 4.12M BTC of that risk stems from preventable practices like address… pic.twitter.com/qznsfApz8P
— evans (@evans1vn) May 27, 2026
The threat mechanism is well-defined. Bitcoin’s transaction signing relies on ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) over the secp256k1 curve, with security grounded in the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem. A fault-tolerant quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could recover a private key from any public key already visible on-chain, meaning the 6.04 million BTC with exposed keys would be directly at risk once Q-Day arrives. Hash-of-pubkey outputs, such as P2PKH, carry an additional layer of protection until they are spent.
DISCOVER: Ethereum’s Quantum Security Hard Fork Plans Explained
Post-Quantum Cryptography: ANSSI’s Mandate and the Compressing Timeline
ANSSI Chief of Staff Samih Souissi, speaking at the France Quantum conference, framed the policy shift in terms that extend well beyond technical standards. “It’s not only a technical issue. It’s a matter of governance, industrial planning, regulation, and sovereignty,” Souissi said.
The agency’s roadmap calls for organizations to inventory sensitive data by end-2026, map affected systems by end-2027, and complete migration to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) by 2030.
The timeline aligns with, and in some respects accelerates, signals from other large institutions. In March 2026, Google set an internal 2029 deadline to transition its systems to PQC. Quantum security firm Project Eleven estimated in May 2026 that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer could arrive as early as 2030.
🌍 UPDATE: France Blocks Legacy Encryption By 2027
France’s cybersecurity agency ANSSI is forcing an aggressive cryptographic overhaul, halting certification for legacy encryption by 2027 and mandating exclusively quantum-safe products by 2030.
ANSSI will stop certifying… pic.twitter.com/tTFX57AB8J
— Zubiqo (@zubiqo) June 18, 2026
NIST has indicated an intent to deprecate classical public-key schemes, including RSA and ECC, by approximately 2030 and end their use by around 2035, timelines that large software vendors are now building into hardware security module and operating system roadmaps.
Academic research cited at DEF CON 33 suggests that as few as 1,754 logical qubits could, under optimistic scaling assumptions, be sufficient to attack secp256k1-based blockchains, though most experts place a realistic threat window at ten to twenty years out.
Earlier quantitative work placed the exposed BTC figure in a wide band. A Deloitte study estimated roughly 4 million BTC held in P2PK or reused P2PKH addresses, while a 2025 Chaincode Labs paper estimated 4–10 million BTC across broader vulnerability categories. Glassnode’s 6.04 million figure sits within that range and applies narrower, more precisely defined criteria.
DISCOVER: Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Capitulation: On-Chain Supply Dynamicsnext
The post Bitcoin News Today: Glassnode Says 1.92M BTC Quantum-Exposed as France Sets 2027 Deadline appeared first on Coinspeaker.

There is a structural choice in how this prediction is built that makes it stand apart from a typical bull case, three pillars, not one. Microsoft Copilot AI is not predicts on a single catalyst doing the heavy lifting. It is stacking continued central bank buying, sticky inflation keeping real rates subdued, and geopolitical risk driving safe-haven flows into a single thesis, the kind of structure where even if one leg weakens, the other two can still carry the trade. That redundancy is part of why the prediction reads with so much confidence despite gold already sitting near record territory.
Over the next 90 days, Copilot targets $4,500 to $4,650 from the current $4,240, a fresh all-time high zone that would represent roughly 6% to 10% upside. That might look modest next to some of the crypto targets in this series, but for an asset class as large and as historically stable as gold, a move of that size inside 90 days is genuinely significant.
Source: Copilot AI Gold Price Prediction
The thesis does not require gold to discover new utility or attract a wave of speculative capital the way altcoins do. It just requires the three existing pillars to keep doing what they have already been doing throughout this entire cycle.
The bear case is notably narrow, which is informative in itself. If U.S. yields spike or the dollar rallies sharply, gold could retrace to $4,050 to $4,100. There is no mention of demand collapsing or a structural reversal in the safe-haven trade, only a specific macro shock that would need to materialize to derail the move. Copilot’s own conclusion leans hard into that asymmetry, calling the confident trajectory favors upside momentum and naming $4,600 the more probable scenario rather than hedging toward the middle.
Gold Price Prediction: Three Pillars Against One Pullback
Gold price is at $4,241.125 today, and the daily chart shows an asset that has already delivered one of the most dramatic moves of any market in this entire prediction series, climbing from roughly $3,200 last May to a spike high above $5,600 in late January before correcting hard. That correction is the part of the chart that matters most right now.
Price has spent the past several months grinding lower from that peak in a series of lower highs, but the current level sits almost exactly on top of the broad consolidation zone that built through September and October last year, the same shelf that launched the entire move toward the January high. That repetition gives the $4,200 to $4,250 zone real structural weight as support, not just a number Copilot picked arbitrarily.
The immediate resistance on the way to the bull target sits at $4,400, a level that has rejected price multiple times since April, and clearing it decisively would be the first sign this consolidation is resolving upward rather than continuing to grind sideways or lower.
Source: Gold Price / Tradingview
Above that, the $4,600 target lines up close to the lower edge of the failed February rally, meaning the bull case is really asking gold to retest territory it has already proven capable of trading at, just from a more stable base this time.
Without RSI data visible on this particular chart, the price structure itself does most of the talking. Gold has corrected nearly 24% from its January spike high while still holding well above every level it traded at before September of last year, which is the technical signature of a deep but contained pullback inside a larger uptrend rather than a trend reversal. Copilot’s three pillars do not need gold to do anything new.
They need the asset to simply resume the trend that defined the entire second half of last year, and the chart’s current position right on top of old support is exactly where that resumption would need to begin.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Here is What Copilot AI Predicts for LiquidChain
Every cycle has a window where the next thing is still cheap enough to matter. That window does not announce itself. Right now, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP are all stuck at the same resistance they have been testing for weeks.
The macro relief is always one inflation print away. The institutional wave is always one quarter away. The upside ceiling for large caps is not hidden. It is right there, visible and priced in, and everyone waiting for a breakout is waiting on a catalyst that belongs to someone else’s balance sheet.
That is not where cycles get won. The asymmetric returns in any cycle come from the gap between what something is genuinely worth and what the market currently thinks it is worth. That gap exists precisely because the project has not been widely discovered yet.
Early-stage infrastructure with a small market cap does not need billions in new capital to move dramatically. It needs to be found. Once it is found, the gap closes, and the opportunity that existed before discovery is gone permanently.
Cross-chain liquidity has been broken since the first bridge launched, and the industry has never actually fixed it. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana were built as completely independent systems. There is no shared architecture between them, no native interoperability, no design intent for them to function as one. Every transaction that crosses those boundaries absorbs the cost of that decision directly.
Fees extracted before settlement. Slippage is built into every hop. Execution failures at peak congestion. Bridges did not eliminate the problem. They became the infrastructure through which the problem charges its toll. LiquidChain eliminates the toll entirely.
All 3 networks collapse into one execution layer. Single deployment. Full ecosystem reach. No cross-chain tax on any interaction. Copilot AI has flagged it as a project worth watching, and even predicts a huge upside. The presale is at $0.01454 with just over $830,000 raised.
Execution is unproven. Adoption is unknown. Established assets offer a smoother ride toward a ceiling that is already fully visible. LiquidChain is an earlier entry point into a problem that has not been solved yet.
Explore the LiquidChain Presale
next
The post Microsoft Copilot AI Predicts Stunning Gold Price For The Next 90 Days appeared first on Coinspeaker.

The Bitcoin price is trading at around $64,000, down -1.8% in the last 24 hours, pressing against a technical zone that analysts describe as a binary inflection point. What makes the current setup unusual is not the price level itself; it is the signal sitting just beneath it, one with a track record that has held across every major BTC cycle.
Kraken Chief Economist Thomas Perfumo says that closes below the 200-week simple moving average (SMA) have occurred on only about 10% of trading days since mid-2017, and have historically produced median returns of 113% over one year and 313% over two years for buyers who accumulated at those levels.
The drawdown profile is equally striking: median time to break even has been just two days, with median maximum drawdown over the subsequent year at only 9%. BTC briefly printed below its 200-week SMA on two separate occasions in the past two weeks before recovering above it each time, a pattern that puts the current price action squarely inside the signal’s historical trigger zone.
The broader tape is constructive. ETF inflows and a daily golden cross are both cited as near-term catalysts, and the market structure heading into the $64K–$68K range has traders watching for a volume-confirmed breakout. Whether that confirmation arrives is the question the next several sessions will answer.
$BTC
The amount of people calling this range "accumulation" is genuinely confusing.
Accumulation isn't a chart swinging up and down 10-30%.
It's a slow, extensive process.
It's built on a dry up of selling, a contraction of volume over a longer period, and accumulators who… pic.twitter.com/Di9Rm6ivJV
— Ardi (@ArdiNSC) June 18, 2026
Can Bitcoin Price Break $80,000 and Target $86,000 This Week?
Momentum readings are mixed. Investing.com’s technical overlay on the BTC/EUR Kraken pair shows RSI at 41.1 with a MACD sell signal and elevated volatility, a combination that reflects residual seller pressure even as price holds constructively above key moving averages. The 200-week SMA currently sits near $62,358, implying the current price is roughly a 26% premium to the historical accumulation floor Perfumo flagged.
Three scenarios are worth tracking.
Bull case: BTC clears $65,000 on volume, confirms the golden cross with follow-through, and advances toward $70,000.
Base case: price consolidates between $63,000 and $65,000 for several sessions before resolving higher, consistent with Perfumo’s historical median of two days to break even for 200-week SMA buyers.
Bear case: the one that invalidates the setup is a weekly close back below $62,000, which would bring the 200-week SMA back into play as support rather than a cleared level. On-chain capitulation data from long-term holders suggests that kind of forced selling has been dissipating, which lends some structural weight to the bull and base scenarios.
Bitcoin Hyper Positions for Early-Cycle Infrastructure Upside as BTC Tests Breakout
A Bitcoin price breakout toward $70,000 would be a meaningful move, but at a $64,000 spot price and a market cap already deep into the hundreds of billions, the asymmetry available to new spot buyers is structurally compressed relative to earlier cycle entry points.
That gap between “directionally correct” and “meaningfully asymmetric” is where early-stage infrastructure plays tend to attract attention. Cycle-bottom signal analysis has shown repeatedly that the sharpest gains in any Bitcoin bull run accrue to projects that solve BTC’s core constraints, speed, fees, and programmability, before the liquidity rotation fully hits.
Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning directly in that lane. The project describes itself as the first Bitcoin layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, targeting sub-second finality and low-cost smart contract execution built on top of Bitcoin’s security layer, a combination that doesn’t currently exist at production scale anywhere else in the ecosystem.
The presale has raised $32,840,740.13 at a current token price of $0.0136818, with a staking program now live. Key infrastructure components include a decentralized canonical bridge for BTC transfers and high-throughput transaction execution, designed to handle loads the Bitcoin base layer cannot.
Visit the Bitcoin Hyper Presale Website Here.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before investing.
next
The post Bitcoin Price Flashing Heavy Buy Signal: Same Signal Has Always Delivered appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Dusty Johnson, chairman of the House Agriculture Committee’s digital assets subcommittee, said on June 18 that the House would act swiftly on the CLARITY Act if the Senate takes up the digital asset market structure bill before the August recess, with CryptoAmerica host Eleanor Terrett first reporting the remarks, placing the entire arc of crypto legislation 2026 on a Senate floor vote that still requires 60 votes to clear a filibuster with Republicans holding roughly 53 seats.
This is not simply a scheduling signal from a junior committee chair. It is a bicameral sequencing commitment: the House is prepared to compress its own procedural timeline to zero if the Senate delivers a passable text, which means the only remaining constraint on pre-recess enactment is whether Senate leadership can produce seven or more Democratic votes beyond the two – Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks – already on record from the May 14 committee advance.
🚨NEW: We sat down with @HouseAgGOP Digital Assets Subcommittee Chair @RepDustyJohnson at @SolanaInstitute Washington x Wall Street event in Chicago.
We examined the toughest fights left in crypto legislation, what has to happen before crypto market structure legislation can… pic.twitter.com/OtHY65C2dl
— Crypto In America (@CryptoAmerica_) June 17, 2026
CLARITY Act News: How the Bill Reached the Senate Calendar
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) passed the House on July 17, 2025 by a 294–134 margin, drawing more than 70 Democratic votes and becoming the most comprehensive crypto regulation framework ever to clear one chamber. On June 1, 2026, the bill was formally placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders as Calendar No. 423, making it eligible for a full Senate floor vote without further committee action.
The Senate Banking Committee’s 15–9 markup vote on May 14, 2026 cleared the bill along partisan lines with two Democratic exceptions. Nine Democrats, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, voted against the bill; Warren has described the bill as a threat that will “blow up the economy” and filed 44 amendments during markup, most of which were rejected. Her core objection centers on the SEC-CFTC jurisdictional line, which she characterizes as drawn loosely enough to enable regulatory arbitrage at scale.
🇺🇸 UPDATE: Polymarket bettors now give a 51% chance that the Clarity Act gets signed into law in 2026, down 14% from recent highs. pic.twitter.com/IC9xxsudX0
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) June 18, 2026
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
SEC, CFTC, and the Decentralization Threshold at the Core of the Bill
The mechanism functions as follows: the CLARITY Act sorts digital assets into three regulatory buckets using a cryptographic maturity or decentralization test. Assets on sufficiently decentralized networks – including bitcoin, ether, and solana under current network conditions- fall under CFTC jurisdiction for spot and secondary market trading. Early-stage token sales structured as investment contracts remain under SEC authority with tailored disclosure obligations. Permitted payment stablecoins receive joint SEC/CFTC/banking oversight anchored in the GENIUS Act framework signed into law on July 18, 2025.
A parallel complication is the gap between the Senate Banking draft, which relies on an “ancillary asset” construct to define SEC jurisdiction, and the House text’s “digital commodities” framing – a structural difference that will require a formal conference process to resolve even after a Senate floor vote passes. Senate Agriculture members have separately pushed for stronger CFTC-first language, adding a second layer of reconciliation before any unified bill reaches the President’s desk.
Market Structure Implications if the Pre-Recess Window Closes
White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt has publicly targeted July 4, 2026 as a final passage date and described it as the last viable window before the 2026 midterm election cycle hardens partisan positioning on crypto regulation. Senator Cynthia Lummis has assessed a pre-July 4 Senate floor vote as unlikely but still expects action before the recess.
SEN. CYNTHIA LUMMIS SAYS PASSING CLARITY ACT BEFORE JULY 4 IS POSSIBLE, BUT AUGUST IS MORE REALISTIC DUE TO BILL MERGERS, ETHICS PROVISIONS, AND THE NEED FOR 60 SENATE VOTES
— The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) June 4, 2026
Galaxy Digital’s research desk has characterized the CLARITY Act as the third and final component of a federal digital asset regime – following the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework and anti-CBDC provisions already embedded in the House text – and has warned that failure to reconcile the Senate versions would push comprehensive U.S. rules into the next Congress.
The analytical question is no longer whether the House will pass the CLARITY Act; it already has. The question is whether Senate leadership schedules a cloture vote in a window narrow enough to force a result before the August recess, or whether the bill joins the longer list of crypto legislation 2026 measures that cleared one chamber and stalled in the upper body. We suspect the executive branch’s July 4 framing is calibrated less as a deadline and more as a pressure device to prevent Senate leaders from treating the recess as a soft exit.
Digital asset funds recorded $857.9 million in net inflows around the committee markup advance in May, and bitcoin pushed above $81,000 intraday on that date, per market data tracked by Galaxy Digital’s research desk.
If the pre-recess window is missed, analysts broadly expect the realistic enactment zone to shift to mid-2027 at the earliest, resetting structural expectations for custody infrastructure expansion and institutional on-ramp development that the CLARITY Act’s provisional registration regime was designed to accelerate.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post CLARITY Act Fast-Track Hinges on Senate Floor Vote Before Recess appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at around $65,000 on June 17, down roughly -2.5% in the past 24 hours, as the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) convenes for its first meeting under new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh.
The rate decision itself was already a foregone conclusion, and the real market event concentrated entirely on whether Warsh would, as anticipated, refuse to submit his personal dot-plot projection.
(SOURCE: CMEGroup)
This is not simply a procedural quirk from an idiosyncratic new chair. It is a potential regime change in how the world’s most systemically important central bank communicates.
And the structural consequences for crypto markets, Treasury pricing, and Bitcoin’s long-run value proposition are distinct enough to warrant separating the short-term noise from the durable signal.
Dot Plot Mechanics: Why Removing the Anchor Creates Immediate Turbulence
Since Ben Bernanke introduced the dot plot in 2012, Wall Street has relied on individual policymakers’ rate projections to influence Treasury yields, corporate loan spreads, and IPO valuations, with SpaceX cited as a notable example.
As of June 17, probability data indicated a 98.2% chance of maintaining the current 3.50–3.75% rate, meaning the decision itself carries little informational weight. Instead, the dot plot and statements from policymakers, particularly Warsh, are crucial for market expectations.
If Warsh withholds his projection, it could lead to increased Treasury volatility, higher fear index values (VIX), and decreased liquidity across risk assets, negatively impacting Bitcoin amidst macro uncertainty.
Analysts suggest that reduced forward guidance from Warsh could heighten market volatility and put pressure on Bitcoin if projected rate hikes materialize. Warsh’s previous comments indicate that this meeting might mark a shift away from traditional forward guidance rather than a one-time event.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Long-Term Bitcoin Thesis: Fiat Opacity as a Structural Tailwind
$BTC failed to reclaim the $67,000-$68,000 zone.
Now, the key level to hold is $64,000-$65,000.
If Bitcoin loses this, it'll end up giving most of its short-term gain back. pic.twitter.com/uI6P5k8oyD
— Ted (@TedPillows) June 17, 2026
The longer-duration case runs in the opposite direction. Analysts at Galaxy Digital and Ark Invest have characterized Warsh’s elimination of the dot plot as something that effectively erodes the credibility of the traditional fiat transparency architecture, the “centrally planned” expectation-management apparatus.
TradingKey’s analysis has underpinned institutional confidence in dollar-denominated asset pricing since the post-2008 recovery. When that architecture becomes visibly less legible, Bitcoin’s transparent, algorithmically fixed supply schedule gains relative appeal precisely because it cannot be revised at a press conference.
The structural argument is not that Warsh’s policy is wrong; it is that any reduction in fiat-system predictability shifts the asymmetry. Every subsequent CPI print, payrolls report, or PCE release becomes a larger market event without a Fed roadmap to anchor interpretation.
That regime of higher macro sensitivity and greater ad hoc volatility in rate expectations is, historically, an environment in which rules-based scarce assets attract incremental defensive allocation.
The Two Paths for Bitcoin Post-FOMC
The most important press conference in finance happens today at 2:30pm ET.
Kevin Warsh. New Fed Chair. First meeting.
Everyone expects rates to hold at 3.50%.
But the rate decision is not the story.
The story is whether Warsh kills the dot plot today.
The dot plot is how the… pic.twitter.com/wzLuJxeaVB
— Kyle Chassé 🐸 (@Kylechasse) June 17, 2026
The confirmatory condition for the bullish path is a clean Warsh abstention, no dot submitted, neutral statement language, and a press conference that avoids hawkish rate-path signals.
In that scenario, near-term volatility is elevated but contained, and the structural Bitcoin narrative described by Galaxy Digital and Ark Invest begins accumulating as a medium-term positioning thesis.
The invalidating condition is a hawkish residual signal, whether via remaining participants’ dots clustering toward a 2027 first-cut timeline, explicit tightening-bias language in the statement, or a Warsh press conference that reads as restrictive.
Kitco warned that a hawkish dot configuration pushing cuts out to 2027 would lift real yields, support the dollar, and apply direct pressure on risk assets, including crypto.
We suspect the more likely near-term outcome is controlled ambiguity rather than clean hawkishness, but the outcome distribution is wide enough that on-chain capitulation dynamics from long-term holders could amplify any downside move in the event of a negative surprise.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Warsh Kills the Dot Plot: Short-Term Pain Incoming for Bitcoin? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

The Bitcoin price is trading near $66,300–$66,800 on Tuesday, up roughly +2% over the past 24 hours, as spot markets absorb the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) decision to raise its benchmark rate to 1.0%, the highest since 1995. The hold is notable given that a prior BOJ move in December, from 0.50% to 0.75%, preceded a 25% BTC drawdown across January and February. Whether that precedent repeats is the question traders are pricing now.
The rate increase shifts carry-trade calculus: yen-funded positions in risk assets become more expensive to maintain as the cost of shorting JPY rises. Derivatives data add texture: approximately $488M in positions were liquidated over the past 24 hours, with $365M of that from short liquidations. That skew points to a bearish positioning shakeout rather than aggressive new longs driving the price.
Japan Hikes Rates To Highest Level In 30 Years
The Bank of Japan raised its short term policy rate to 1%, the highest level since 1995.
The move marks the second rate hike in roughly six months.
Officials continue to battle persistent inflation and rising import costs. pic.twitter.com/IhhQlHyrjY
— BSCN (@BSCNews) June 16, 2026
The Fear and Greed Index has climbed from 12 to 23 over the past week, still deep in fear territory but trending toward neutral. Prediction markets currently assign a 61% probability to BTC ending the near-term window in the $66,000–$68,000 band, consistent with continued range-bound action rather than a directional break.
The macro backdrop is the dominant variable. Rising yields and tightening global liquidity have historically pressured BTC, and the BOJ’s trajectory now runs parallel to that dynamic.
(SOURCE: Fear & Greed Index)
Can Bitcoin Price Break $68,000 Before the BOJ Carry Unwind Bites?
BTC is currently priced between $66,300 and $66,800 and is in a fragile position. Despite a rebound from last week’s low near $60,000, technical indicators suggest caution, as prices remain below the 50-, 100, and 200-day EMAs ($70,532 and $73,222). The previous support trendline is now resistance at approximately $72,753.
Momentum indicators are mixed: the MACD is positive, suggesting potential upside, but the RSI at 44 is below the bearish threshold of 50. Analysts see $63,500–$64,500 as a new short-term support, with a decisive close above $67,000 needed for a move towards $70,000+. A close below $65,000 could reopen the path to $60,000.
Bull case: shorts cover, $67,000 breaks, and momentum pushes to the 50-day EMA. Base case: consolidation between $65,000 and $67,000 as markets await central bank signals. Bear case: a carry unwind leads to a drop below $65,000 and a retest of $60,000.
$BTC is hovering around the $67,000 level.
The next key resistance is around $68,000 and a breakout above it could push Bitcoin to $70,000 soon. pic.twitter.com/nIT9dKdJER
— Ted (@TedPillows) June 16, 2026
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Stage Positioning as BTC Tests Structural Resistance
Spot Bitcoin price at $66,500 reflects a market in consolidation, not expansion. For holders eyeing a 50-day EMA ceiling near $70,532 and an RSI that hasn’t crossed 50, the near-term upside is constrained. That context, range-bound spot, macro overhang, no clean breakout signal, is precisely when early-stage infrastructure plays with asymmetric profiles draws attention.
Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is a Bitcoin Layer 2 project that integrates the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), positioning it as the first BTC Layer 2 to offer SVM-based smart contract execution. The value proposition targets Bitcoin’s known friction points: slow settlement, high fees, and limited programmability.
The presale has raised $32,826,181.77 at a current token price of $0.0136817, with staking available for early participants. The feature set includes a Decentralized Canonical Bridge for BTC transfers and sub-second finality via SVM integration.
Japan’s monetary tightening cycle has historically accelerated capital rotation across crypto categories, with early-stage infrastructure tokens absorbing it.
Visit the Bitcoin Hyper Presale Website Here.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post Bitcoin Price is Holding Despite BOJ Rate Hike appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Bitcoin News Today: BTC dipped to roughly $65,600 in the Asian session on June 16 before reversing to approximately $66,000 after the Bank of Japan (BOJ) raised its policy rate by 25 basis points to 1.0%, the highest level since 1995 and the fourth hike in a normalization cycle that began with the BOJ’s exit from negative rates in March 2024.
The move was met with neither a sustained sell-off nor a meaningful rally, a response that looks orderly on the surface but carries structural ambiguity underneath. Alongside the rate decision, the BOJ announced it would hold Japanese government bond (JGB) purchases at roughly ¥2 trillion per month from April 2027, effectively pausing its earlier bond-tapering plan and injecting a dovish counterweight that likely helped stabilize risk assets through the announcement window.
The analytical question is no longer whether the BOJ hike constitutes a genuine rate shock for crypto; it is whether the yen carry trade overhang that has driven four documented BTC corrections since early 2024 is dormant or permanently defused, and the derivatives data, historical pattern, and yen behavior after the decision do not yet answer that cleanly.
Why Bitcoin Didn’t Sell Off: The Pricing-In Dynamic and the BOJ’s Dovish Side-Signal
Polymarket data point to 98–99% pre-meeting probability assigned to the hike, meaning no meaningful surprise premium existed to unwind at the moment of confirmation.
When a macro event is priced to near-certainty, the directional impulse at announcement collapses, positioning had already rotated, and short-side pressure was absorbed before the decision landed. That mechanism explains the absence of a sharp sell-off more precisely than any narrative about Bitcoin decoupling from Japanese monetary policy.
#Bitcoin bounced after the #BOJ rate hike because markets looked beyond the headline. 🧐
A 31-year high rate sounds hawkish, but the bond taper pause gave risk assets room to breathe.
Higher rates were expected.
The bond taper pause was the real signal.
Smart traders don’t…
— PropW (@PropWGlobal) June 16, 2026
The bond-taper pause compounded the dovish tilt. By committing to maintain JGB purchases rather than continuing to shrink its balance sheet, the BOJ signaled that financial conditions tightening would remain gradual, a distinction that matters for yen-funded carry positions, which depend less on the rate level itself than on the pace of balance-sheet normalization and yen appreciation velocity.
With the yen holding above 156 per USD after the decision, the interest rate differential with the Federal Reserve remained wide enough to keep carry trades largely intact. The crypto derivatives market registered $488 million in total liquidations on June 16, of which $365 million were short liquidations, according to TradingPedia – suggesting the post-announcement move squeezed shorts rather than triggering long-side forced selling.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Bitcoin News Today: Four BOJ-Linked BTC Corrections Since 2024: What the Historical Record Shows
The calm reading of today’s price action sits in direct tension with a pattern that has now repeated across four distinct episodes. Following the BOJ’s March 2024 hike – its first rate increase in 17 years, Bitcoin fell approximately 23%.
The July 2024 hike preceded a roughly 25% drawdown. The January 2025 hike was followed by a decline exceeding 30%. Bitget’s research desk documents the range across these episodes at 18–28%, consistent with the pattern SignalPlus describes as BOJ tightening cycles that historically precede yen rallies and sharp Bitcoin drawdowns as yen-funded carry trades unwind.
The transmission mechanism is mechanical, not speculative. Institutions borrow yen at low interest rates and deploy that capital into higher-yielding assets – global equities, bonds, and crypto among them.
Source: BTCUSD / Tradingview
When the yen appreciates rapidly, the cost of servicing those yen-denominated loans rises in local-currency terms, forcing deleveraging: risk assets are sold to repay the debt. Bitcoin, as one of the most liquid 24-hour markets globally, absorbs a disproportionate share of that forced selling relative to less liquid carry-trade destinations.
The complication in applying this history to the current episode is that each prior correction followed a period in which the hike itself carried some element of surprise or hawkish communication beyond what markets had priced, conditions that are less clearly present today.
That distinction is important, but it does not neutralize the tail risk. As Blockonomi notes, Bitcoin’s resilience in the immediate post-hike window depends on continued yen weakness and gradual BOJ policy adjustments, two conditions that are subject to revision without notice. The prior episodes where Bitcoin sold off sharply also began with brief periods of apparent stability before the yen move accelerated and carry unwinds cascaded.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Bitcoin News Today: BTC Shrugs Off BOJ’s 31-Year Rate High, But the Calm May Be Misleading appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Eleanor Terrett, Fox News Business reporter and one of the more reliable primary sources on congressional crypto regulation, declared on June 14, 2026 that passing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, the CLARITY Act, before the White House’s July 4 target is ‘logistically impossible,’ a characterization that compresses three interlocking obstacles into a single verdict: an unresolved bipartisan ethics provision that has fractured Democratic support, substantive divergence between the House version (H.R. 3633, passed 294–134 in July 2025) and the Senate Banking Committee’s version (advanced 15–9 on May 14, 2026), and a 60-vote filibuster threshold that requires meaningful Democratic floor support that the ethics standoff is currently foreclosing.
Hitting the timeline of passing the Clarity Act into law by July 4 would require finding an ethics solution both Republicans and Democrats can live with, addressing issues in the Ag text, merging the bills, securing 60 votes, and passing it through both the Senate and House in… https://t.co/AODP0QOP0I
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) June 13, 2026
White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt had outlined an ambitious sequencing plan at Consensus Miami on May 6–7, 2026: Senate Banking markup in May, four working Senate weeks in June for floor passage, and a House reconciliation vote before Independence Day. That timeline assumed the ethics dispute would resolve quickly after markup. It has not.
This is not simply a scheduling setback that a few days of negotiations can correct. It is a structural collision between a Democratic caucus that has conditioned its votes on conflict-of-interest language the White House views as politically targeted, a Senate calendar that leaves roughly two working weeks before the July 4 recess, and a 60-vote cloture requirement that gives Democratic holdouts durable leverage regardless of how urgently Republican leadership wants to move. Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned that if the Senate does not act before the August recess, the next viable legislative window for a comprehensive crypto market-structure bill could slip toward 2030, a timeline that would effectively strand DeFi developer safe harbors, stablecoin yield rules, and the SEC–CFTC jurisdictional framework in a prolonged regulatory vacuum.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
CLARITY Act News: The Ethics Provision Architecture, the Gillibrand–White House Collision, and Why Democratic Floor Votes Remain Contingent on Language Neither Side Has Yet Accepted
The mechanism functions as follows: Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has publicly conditioned her support on inclusion of an ethics provision that would address crypto-related conflicts of interest among senior officeholders, stating explicitly that there is ‘no CLARITY Act without an ethics provision.’
That position has been adopted in varying degrees by other Banking Committee Democrats, and its resolution, or non-resolution, will determine whether the bill can reach the 60-vote threshold on the Senate floor.
The White House position, articulated by Witt, is that the administration will accept ethics rules that apply uniformly ‘across the board, from the president all the way down to the brand new intern,’ but will not accept language that targets a specific officeholder or family.
Witt stated directly: ‘We’re not going to allow targeting of anyone’s family, any one particular politician.’ That framing reflects the political reality that the Trump family’s crypto exposure, estimates of beneficial interest in crypto ventures have circulated widely, though the epistemic status of any precise dollar figure warrants care given the opacity of the relevant holding structures, makes any ethics clause with individual-level specificity politically unacceptable to the administration.
The May 14 Senate Banking Committee vote captured the fault line precisely. The committee advanced the bill 15–9, but the Van Hollen amendment, which would have attached stricter ethics language, was rejected on a 13–11 party-line basis.
THE CLARITY ACT WON'T MAKE JULY 4.
BUT THAT'S NOT THE SAME AS THE BILL DYING.
🇺🇸 Eleanor Terrett: passing the CLARITY Act by July 4 is "logistically impossible."
Ethics language unresolved, two bill versions to merge, 60 votes to find, all in two weeks.
The real one is the… pic.twitter.com/i5azSHhMyw
— Merlijn The Trader (@MerlijnTrader) June 15, 2026
That committee-level rejection of the ethics amendment did not resolve the underlying dispute; it simply deferred it to the floor negotiation, where Democratic votes are structurally necessary and where the same senators who voted for the Van Hollen amendment retain their leverage.
Post-markup closed-door talks involving Gillibrand, Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH), Lummis, and Witt collapsed without agreement, with Republicans and the White House withdrawing a compromise provision that would have allowed state attorneys general to enforce ethics rules tied to presidential crypto interests.
Gallego and Senator Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) are the two Democrats whose floor votes appear most contingent on ethics resolution. Alsobrooks co-brokered the stablecoin yield compromise with Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) – banning bank-deposit-style yield while preserving activity-based rewards, which gives her a direct stake in the bill’s passage, but she has not separated her floor vote from the ethics question.
Gallego’s position is similar: engaged on the substance, but not committed to cloture absent ethics language. We suspect the White House’s strategic calculation is that Democratic demand for ethics provisions will soften once Senate leadership formally schedules a floor vote and the alternative becomes visible as indefinite delay rather than a better bill, but that calculation requires Senate leaders to move first, which they have not yet done.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post Clarity Act News: July 4 Deadline Dead in the Water, Senate Ethics Fight and 60-Vote Hurdle appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has publicly committed to a $1 billion revenue run rate by the end of 2026, with the figure explicitly excluding XRP held on the company’s balance sheet, a condition that is doing as much strategic work as the number itself.
The target is anchored to four operating business lines: cross-border payments infrastructure, the RLUSD stablecoin, treasury software, and AI-enabled payments on the XRP Ledger.
The analytical question is not whether $1 billion is an ambitious number; it is whether the XRP-exclusion framing successfully repositions Ripple as an underwritable fintech infrastructure provider in the eyes of institutional buyers who currently have no clean operating revenue lens through which to evaluate it.
LATEST: 📈 Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse says the company expects to end 2026 with a $1B revenue run rate, not including the XRP on its balance sheet. pic.twitter.com/hNF20FBGUw
— CoinMarketCap (@CoinMarketCap) June 14, 2026
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Ripple XRP $1B Target: How the Revenue Run Rate Definition Actually Functions
The mechanism functions as follows: a revenue run rate annualizes a current period’s operating revenue, typically one quarter, to project a full-year figure, and it differs from GAAP revenue in that it represents a forward trajectory rather than a historically booked figure.
Garlinghouse’s framing specifies that neither XRP token sales nor the XRP inventory Ripple holds on its balance sheet contributes to the $1 billion figure, which strips out the component of Ripple’s economics most difficult for regulated institutional counterparties to model or get comfortable with from a compliance standpoint.
The four named business lines each carry a distinct institutional logic. Cross-border payments, Ripple’s original product, targets banks and payment firms seeking faster correspondent settlement. RLUSD, the company’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, is positioned for enterprise settlement, collateral use, and now AI agent payments on the XRP Ledger; XRPL stablecoin supply has reached $762 million with RLUSD dominant, though it is necessary to flag that on-chain supply figures reflect minted tokens rather than confirmed transactional volume. Treasury software targets corporates and banks building crypto treasury infrastructure, a segment Ripple President Monica Long has projected will grow from under $200 billion to over $1 trillion in total market size by end-2026.
As AI agents begin transacting on behalf of businesses, payments need more than speed. They need trust, controls, and clear rules for how value moves.
We're helping build the infrastructure for trusted agent-driven payments, with the XRP Ledger and $RLUSD helping lay the… https://t.co/VyrC5a8e2e pic.twitter.com/OyF5vQIDYZ
— Ripple (@Ripple) June 10, 2026
The fourth line, AI-enabled payments via the XRPL AI Starter Kit released June 13, 2026, is the earliest-stage of the four, using the x402 protocol to let software agents transact in XRP and RLUSD with minimal human involvement; its contribution to a 2026 run rate remains speculative at this stage.
It is necessary to flag the epistemic status of the $1 billion figure itself: Garlinghouse’s statement, as shared by CoinMarketCap and corroborated across multiple outlets, represents a stated target rather than a disclosed current run rate. Ripple does not report audited financials publicly, so there is no independently verifiable baseline against which to measure the gap between current revenue and the target.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post Ripple XRP CEO Targets $1B Revenue Run Rate by 2026, Excluding XRP Holdings appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Bitcoin rose +2% to $65,800 on Monday, June 15, after the US and Iran confirmed a memorandum of understanding to end their war – a deal that includes an immediate halt to hostilities and a commitment to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days.
The announcement triggered a broad risk-on rotation: S&P 500 futures rose +1.20% in Asian trade, Brent crude dropped -4.51% to $83.39 amid relief over Hormuz supply, and altcoins, including XRP, Solana, and Cardano, gained between +3% and +4% in the same session.
Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund outflows, reported by SoSoValue, cooled to $315.8M last week from $1Bn-plus in each of the prior four weeks – a deceleration that provided modest structural support but did not reverse the net selling trend.
The analytical question is no longer whether the US–Iran peace deal constitutes a genuine geopolitical catalyst; it is whether the transmission from geopolitical relief into durable BTC price recovery can sustain while ETF flows remain net negative, and the Crypto Fear & Greed Index sits at 20/100, deep in Extreme Fear territory.
$BTC pumps into a new week.
Bitcoin immediately broke the previous weekly high and previous daily high.
In terms of probabilities, this means there is a higher probability of holding the 60.8K PWL this week.
The best RR POI for longs this week is the one closest to the PWL,… pic.twitter.com/JrTCc04B7K
— Lennaert Snyder (@LennaertSnyder) June 15, 2026
Cross-Asset Transmission: How the Hormuz Reopening Flows Into Crypto Risk Appetite
The transmission mechanism linking energy prices to inflation expectations and risk asset positioning is more complex than it seems. The MOU’s 30-day Hormuz reopening removes the supply-shock premium that kept Brent crude high, exemplified by Monday’s 4.51% decline.
Falling energy prices lower near-term inflation expectations, reducing the likelihood of further Fed tightening and raising the discount rate for long-duration assets like Bitcoin.
ETF flows paint a mixed picture; there were $315.8M in net outflows for the week ending June 13, far less than the previous week but still negative.
This deceleration suggests aggressive institutional deleveraging may be easing. However, ongoing outflows indicate a structural demand challenge that a single geopolitical catalyst is unlikely to change quickly. Monday’s price action reflects relief rather than a return to strong institutional investment.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Bitcoin at $65,800: Relief Bounce or Structural Recovery in Progress?
(SOURCE: TradingView)
Bitcoin’s recovery from its June 5 annual low near $59,100 – a level not seen since October 2024 – has now covered approximately $6,700 over ten sessions, with Monday’s print at $65,809 representing the strongest close in that window. The structure of the move matters: earlier Iran-related rallies pushed BTC to a 12-week high near $79,500 in late April.
This move came before a sharp fade, and analysts tracking the bounce flagged the 50% Fibonacci retracement from the January high to the February low at $78,962 and the 200-day exponential moving average near $81,708 as meaningful overhead resistance. Those levels remain intact and distant from the current price, indicating that Monday’s move is well within the lower half of the established corrective range.
At $65,809, Bitcoin sits in a zone that offered congestion on the way down – the $62,000–$66,000 band absorbed selling pressure through late May before the final leg to annual lows. The current bid needs to establish a daily close above $66,440, the session high recorded in some venues, to confirm that the band is now functioning as support rather than overhead supply.
The prior Iran-strike selloff that drove BTC through $73,000 created a multi-level resistance structure on the way back up, and the current recovery has not yet tested the more consequential levels above $68,000. The +2% session gain is consistent with a short-covering bounce and positioning relief rather than a technically confirmed breakout – a distinction the price structure at this range makes explicit.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy for June
next
The post Bitcoin Rebounds to Near $66K as US–Iran Peace Deal Sparks Risk-On Rally appeared first on Coinspeaker.

In Chainlink news today, LINK oracle infrastructure has processed more than $7Bn in World Cup 2026 prediction market volume, powering settlement for every match across platforms, including Polymarket, yet LINK trades near $8.20, down -16% from its mid-May level and within striking distance of its 90-day low of $7.35 printed on June 5.
Daily active addresses on the Chainlink network averaged roughly 4,100 in June, up approximately 25% from the spring norm, with a single-day peak of 5,679 on the same date the token hit its quarterly floor, a data pairing that captures the price divergence in a single chart.
The analytical question is no longer whether Chainlink is the dominant oracle infrastructure for real-world event settlement; it is whether rising protocol usage can, structurally and mechanically, translate into token price appreciation given the current tokenomics architecture.
The answer requires separating three distinct problems: what Chainlink is actually powering, what macro is doing to every large-cap altcoin, and why the fee-flow design ensures that growing oracle demand does not automatically produce net buy pressure on LINK.
Chainlink News: What the Oracle Is Actually Powering Inside World Cup Markets
Your match-day calls are about to get bigger. 🏆
ADI Predictstreet x @TeamMatchbook is bringing FIFA World Cup 2026™ prediction markets to fans in the UK, Ireland, and Brazil.
Predict the tournament. Follow the action.
Make your call.
Now live at → https://t.co/r1LvmNrYaf pic.twitter.com/9XnudHLJ19
— ADI Predictstreet (@Predictstreet) June 11, 2026
ADI Predictstreet was announced as the first official prediction-market partner of the FIFA World Cup on June 9. It operates exclusively on Chainlink oracles, using Chainlink’s Runtime Environment (CRE) to automate the creation, resolution, and settlement of contracts for all 104 matches, leveraging official FIFA data.
Myriad also settles over 75 tournament contracts through this system. Polymarket’s World Cup winner market reached approximately $1.6Bn before the first match, with total World Cup betting volume exceeding $7Bn by mid-June.
Chainlink serves as a secure data bridge between off-chain FIFA match data and on-chain smart contracts, ensuring reliable contract settlement without manual intervention.
On-chain analytics from Santiment suggest that the growth in activity is due to organic usage rather than speculative trading around the LINK token, as social volume did not spike following the announcement.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Chainlink News: The LINK Price Divergence and the Macro Transmission
LINK’s current price is around $8.30, which is 25% lower than mid-May and about 84% below its all-time high of $52.70 in May 2021. This decline reflects both structural tokenomics issues and a generally hostile macro environment for risk assets, as evidenced by Bitcoin’s drop from $71,000 to $60,000 amid ongoing ETF outflows, elevated Treasury yields, and geopolitical uncertainties.
LINK, like other large-cap altcoins, exhibits a high beta relative to Bitcoin, meaning macro factors often overshadow token-specific news. Technically, LINK’s immediate support is at $7.50; a close below this level could trigger a drop toward $7.00, especially if Bitcoin falls below $58,000.
Resistance is around $9.00–$10.00, which has historically limited recoveries. Enterprise integration news, such as the AWS Marketplace listing, has previously failed to boost LINK’s price in risk-off scenarios.
$LINK Chainlink is tracking the wave 2 roadmap to the letter. Elliott Wave Analysis #Chainlink pic.twitter.com/WdAztbgtMZ
— More Crypto Online (@Morecryptoonl) June 15, 2026
LiquidChain Targets Early Infrastructure Exposure as LINK Tests Key Levels
Investors tracking the Chainlink news regarding its usage-price disconnect, strong oracle adoption, and structurally suppressed token appreciation may find the risk-reward calculus more asymmetric in earlier-stage infrastructure projects where tokenomics are still being designed, and the valuation entry point reflects development-stage risk rather than a post-adoption discount.
LiquidChain (LIQUID) is currently in presale, positioning itself within the oracle and cross-chain data infrastructure vertical with a tokenomics model that explicitly routes a portion of protocol fees to stakers.
The LiquidChain presale has raised more than $842,000 and is currently available at $0.0147 per token, making it one of the higher-upside opportunities in crypto right now.
Visit the LiquidChain Presale Website Here.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post Chainlink News: $7Bn World Cup Volume Can’t Lift LINK From 90-Day Lows appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Brad Garlinghouse, chief executive of Ripple and one of the most prominent voices in institutional crypto, appeared on Fox Business this week to accuse Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, of deliberately misrepresenting the Clarity Act, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633), to protect a payments franchise that generates approximately $20 billion in annual revenue with estimated profits exceeding $5 billion.
The specific fault line is a single clause in the pending legislation that would permit crypto exchanges to offer stablecoin yield to users, a provision that Dimon has publicly opposed and that the banking lobby has made its primary legislative target.
This is not simply a dispute over regulatory philosophy or compliance architecture. It is a structural contest over who controls the next generation of dollar-denominated digital payment instruments, and whether those instruments will function as pure transaction rails, the outcome the banking sector prefers, or as yield-bearing products that compete directly with bank deposits for household cash.
Source: Polymarket
Prediction market users on Polymarket currently assign 49% odds to the Clarity Act being signed into law this year, down approximately 18 percentage points from the prior week, a compression that reflects the genuine uncertainty produced by this specific inter-industry fracture.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Dimon’s Opposition: JPMorgan’s $20B Payments Franchise, His Specific Public Arguments Against the Clause, and the Structural Logic Behind Bank Resistance to The Clarity ACT
Jamie Dimon’s opposition to the Clarity Act’s stablecoin yield provision has been publicly stated across multiple appearances, most recently in an interview with Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, the same format and interviewer through which Dimon previously targeted Brian Armstrong, co-founder and chief executive of Coinbase, over Armstrong’s advocacy for the bill.
In that earlier May appearance, Dimon characterized Armstrong as the ‘only one’ pressing for the stablecoin yields inclusion, claimed Coinbase was spending ‘hundreds of millions of dollars in Washington’ on the effort, and concluded that Armstrong was, in Dimon’s phrasing, ‘full of shit.’ Dimon’s more recent comments, which Garlinghouse was responding to directly, argued that the Clarity Act reduces compliance safeguards and creates conditions under which illicit activity becomes easier to conduct.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon: "We will fight the CLARITY Act. If we lose, we lose, and we'll live. But it will be fought."
"Nobody is going to bow down to Brian Armstrong or Coinbase… He is full of sh*t" pic.twitter.com/okbuiu2Q0s
— Altcoin Daily (@AltcoinDaily) May 29, 2026
The epistemic status of the precise $20 billion figure warrants care. JPMorgan does not disaggregate its payments revenue as a standalone public reporting line in the manner that would allow precise verification, but the order-of-magnitude estimate is consistent with the firm’s disclosed wholesale and consumer payments activity and is treated by analysts covering the sector as a reasonable approximation of the franchise at risk.
The structural logic of bank resistance is not difficult to reconstruct from publicly available materials. The American Bankers Association and the Bank Policy Institute issued a joint statement formally opposing the yield provisions earlier this year, arguing that yield-bearing stablecoins would function as deposit substitutes, pulling household savings out of the banking system and reducing the credit intermediation capacity that regulators and community banks alike have cited as a systemic concern.
We suspect that Dimon’s stated objections, framed as compliance concerns and bad-actor facilitation risks, do not accurately reflect the primary commercial motivation behind JPMorgan’s opposition, and that the franchise-protection argument Garlinghouse advanced is the more analytically honest account of what is at stake for the bank.
A White House Council of Economic Advisers report published in April 2026 found that eliminating stablecoin yield entirely would increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion, a 0.02% increase in aggregate credit supply, while imposing an estimated $800 million net welfare cost on consumers, a ratio that does not support the systemic-risk framing Dimon has deployed publicly.
The same analysis found that large banks would capture 76% of any incremental lending enabled by a yield ban, with community banks capturing the remaining 24%, a distribution that maps precisely onto who benefits most from the regulatory outcome Dimon is advocating.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post Clarity Act Stablecoin Yield Clause: The $20B Bank vs Crypto Exchange Battle appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Latest XRP Price Prediction: Ripple (XRP) has clawed backposition, trading near $1.14 after bouncing sharply from an intraday low of $1.10, and the catalyst driving that recovery is institutional, not retail. SBI Holdings has outlined plans for Japan’s first dual Bitcoin–XRP ETF targeting the Tokyo Stock Exchange, with filings lodged in 2025 now reportedly entering what analysts describe as a “late-stage” regulatory phase at the Financial Services Agency (FSA). No approval date has been confirmed.
According to Finance Magnates and Yahoo Finance, SBI’s product lineup includes both a Bitcoin–XRP blended ETF and a separate gold-and-crypto vehicle—both pending FSA review. Community sentiment on Binance Square describes the filing as “one of the clearest institutional catalysts XRP has ever had,” while TradingView analysts point to renewed volume as confirmation that traders are pricing in an approval, not just speculating on one. Rakuten’s recent integration of XRP for payments, which triggered an earlier breakout above $1.40 back in May suggests Japanese corporate adoption is already ahead of the ETF queue.
The question now is whether the ETF approval itself has been partially priced in, or whether the actual FSA green light would constitute a second, larger leg upward.
Can XRP Price Hit $2 Before the FSA Decides?
(Source – XRP USDT, TradingView)
XRP is currently testing immediate resistance at $1.17, with technicians flagging $1.20 as the decisive breakout trigger on the 4-hour chart. The $1.05 level has held as near-term support after a decisive bounce, establishing a short-term range that tilts modestly bullish as long as that floor remains intact. Volume has picked up alongside the ETF headlines, a pattern consistent with institutional positioning rather than speculative retail rotation.
The technical setup is a bullish retest: an initial rejection at $1.18, followed by a rapid return to test that same level, a formation that technicians generally associate with accumulation and elevated breakout probability. Binance Square commentary cited by Finance Magnates suggests a push toward $1.18 is plausible within roughly 24 hours if volume sustains.
LiquidChain Targets Early-Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
LiquidChain (LIQUID) is an emerging Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer for the next cycle. Its core proposition: fusing the liquidity of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single execution environment, so developers can deploy once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously.
The architecture centers on a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once design that removes the multi-chain fragmentation problem most DeFi protocols currently work around (a problem that costs the industry billions in stranded liquidity annually).
The presale has raised $836,066.62 at a current price of $0.01469. As with all early-stage presales, the project carries meaningful execution risk—L3 infrastructure is competitive, and delivery timelines are unconfirmed. Prospective participants should review the documentation independently.
Research LiquidChain and review presale terms here.
next
The post Japan XRP ETF Listing is Getting Closer: Will it Bull XRP Price Prediction? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Bitcoin News Today: Strategy CEO Phong Le appeared on CNBC’s Power Lunch on June 10, 2026, and named three explicit reasons the company sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31, its first Bitcoin sale since a 2022 tax-lot transaction and only the second in corporate history.
That 32 BTC disposal, executed at an average of approximately $77,135 per coin for gross proceeds of roughly $2.5 million, sits against a balance sheet carrying 818,334 BTC at a total cost basis of approximately $61.81 billion.
The analytical question is no longer whether Strategy sold Bitcoin; it is what Le’s on-the-record, three-part rationale reveals about how the company now manages its treasury posture, and whether the bear-case interpretation of the sale survives contact with the actual data.
DISCOVER: Best Crypto to Buy Right Now
Bitcoin News Today: The Three Stated Reasons, What Le’s CNBC Interview Actually Establishes
Le structured his explanation around three discrete rationales, each carrying a distinct functional meaning in corporate treasury terms. The first, market inoculation, was a deliberate signaling exercise: Le stated that Strategy wanted investors to understand the company is willing to sell Bitcoin when circumstances warrant, so that any future disposal does not arrive as a surprise.
That framing is proactive investor relations management, not a distress signal; the goal was to normalize the optionality of selling rather than to exercise it under pressure.
The second rationale was process testing. Le noted that buying BTC is operationally simpler than selling, and the company needed to verify that its full sell-side infrastructure, custody, execution, settlement, functions correctly before it is ever needed at scale. Maintaining operational readiness across both sides of a trade is standard treasury hygiene for any institution managing a position measured in the tens of billions of dollars.
"We're the largest holder of Bitcoin in the world. We're the largest purchaser of Bitcoin in the world. And we'll continue to be". Watch my conversation with @CNBC @PowerLunch below.
00:00 — "We're net purchasers of Bitcoin." The 32 BTC sale helped inoculate the market, test our… pic.twitter.com/aHlcNincNU
— Phong Le (@phongle) June 10, 2026
The third reason was tax-loss harvesting, and it has a direct precedent: in December 2022, MicroStrategy sold 704 BTC to realize capital losses before buying back a comparable position shortly afterward.
The 2022 transaction left the company with more Bitcoin per share than before, because the tax benefit improved balance-sheet efficiency without reducing net exposure. Le indicated on June 10 that the same logic applies to tranches of the current 818,334-BTC position acquired at cost bases now below spot, the wide purchase range, spanning roughly $10,000 to $125,000 per coin, means selective harvesting of underwater lots is mechanically available even when the aggregate position is profitable.
As Le stated explicitly: “We did not need to sell our Bitcoin to satisfy our dividends. We’re able to do that through other capital-raising activities.” The three reasons, taken together, describe a deliberate treasury management framework, not a company liquidating under duress. The 32 BTC sale disclosed for tax purposes is consistent with that reading at every level of the filing record.
Strategy’s Holdings and Why a 32 BTC Sale Is Structurally Irrelevant
The scale contrast resolves most of the market anxiety on its own terms. A disposal of 32 BTC represents less than 0.004% of Strategy’s 818,334-BTC treasury – a rounding error against a position whose total cost basis stands at approximately $61.81 billion.
MSTR stock has lost 25% of its value since the June 1 announcement, and Bitcoin itself has declined approximately 15% over the same period, a reaction that commentator Jim Cramer characterized by saying co-founder Michael Saylor had “murdered” Bitcoin.
Source: MSTR Price / Tradingview
The magnitude of the price response relative to the size of the transaction is itself analytically informative: markets were not reacting to the 32 BTC, but to the perceived ideological shift from the absolutist accumulation doctrine Saylor built into the company’s public identity.
Le’s response to that reaction was pointed. He dismissed retail “crypto anarchists” committed to permanent holding and stated that institutional shareholders are the constituency to whom Strategy is accountable.
That framing matters structurally: it signals the company is deliberately repositioning its investor narrative around Bitcoin per share, a metric that measures BTC held per diluted share outstanding, rather than around maximalist ideology.
A treasury managed to optimize Bitcoin per share can, by definition, include selective disposals that improve per-share economics, whether through tax efficiency, dividend support, or balance-sheet optimization. Le has previously outlined two conditions under which larger sales would become rational: MSTR trading below modified net asset value and all conventional funding avenues exhausted.
Neither condition is currently met, and the company’s multi-year cash buffer, convertible debt facilities, and preferred share structures, including the 11.5% Series A perpetual preferred, provide the financing runway that makes forced Bitcoin selling unnecessary.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode
next
The post Bitcoin News Today: Strategy CEO Phong Le Reveals 3 Reasons Behind First Bitcoin Sale Since 2022 appeared first on Coinspeaker.

A closed-door ethics meeting among Senators Kirsten Gillibrand, Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Bernie Moreno (R-OH), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), joined by White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt, collapsed on Tuesday without agreement after Republicans and the White House withdrew a provision that would have allowed state attorneys general to sue the Department of Justice over failures to enforce ethics rules tied to President Trump’s crypto business interests. Simultaneously, the White House Crypto Council convened representatives from the National Sheriffs’ Association, the Fraternal Order of Police, and the National District Attorneys’ Association on Wednesday to address law enforcement objections to Section 604 of the CLARITY Act, the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, leaving the market structure bill facing two unresolved obstacles with 31 Senate session days remaining before the August recess and a 60-vote threshold still to clear.
🚨🗞️NEW: Clarity Act Hits Ethics Snag as White House Courts Law Enforcement Support
Dems left a Tues meeting frustrated after GOP walked back key elements of a tentative ethics deal. Talks expected to continue Thurs.➕ WH convenes law enforcement groups.https://t.co/YaKxuTKL09
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) June 10, 2026
This is not simply a scheduling setback for a crypto regulation bill that has already cleared both the House and the Senate Banking Committee. It is a structural diagnosis of a coalition whose two most fragile pressure points, Democratic demands for ethics guardrails addressing Trump crypto conflicts and law enforcement concerns about on-chain enforcement authority, have now fractured simultaneously rather than sequentially, which is categorically more dangerous in a compressed calendar.
If neither dispute is resolved before the recess, the practical window for passage in 2026 may close entirely, and prior statements by bill sponsors suggest reconsideration before 2030 is unlikely.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
CLARITY Act News: The Ethics Provision Collapse, Republican Walkback Mechanics, and What the AG Enforcement Clause Actually Said
Tuesday’s session was the first closed-door ethics meeting since a bipartisan group reached a tentative framework in May following the Senate Banking Committee’s 15–9 vote to advance the bill on May 14.
The mechanism functions as follows: the provision under negotiation would have authorized state attorneys general to initiate civil actions against the DOJ if federal officials failed to enforce ethics rules barring senior executive-branch officials from financially benefiting from digital asset legislation they were simultaneously shaping, a direct response to the documented financial exposure created by Trump family crypto ventures, which have generated an estimated $2.3 billion across holdings including World Liberty Financial and associated token issuances.
The epistemic status of that $2.3 billion figure warrants care; it represents a widely cited estimate assembled from public disclosures and market valuations, not a formally audited sum.
During Tuesday’s session, Republicans and Witt withdrew support for the state AG enforcement mechanism and offered a narrowed alternative limiting enforcement authority to the U.S. Attorney General, a substitution that Democrats rejected as functionally circular given that the Attorney General serves at the president’s pleasure. Republicans also floated impeachment as a remedy for presidential ethics violations, an offer Democrats likewise declined.
Notable development in the ongoing Clarity Act negotiations: reports indicate Senate Republicans have walked back a proposed enforcement mechanism that would have allowed state attorneys general to pursue the @TheJusticeDept over ethics lapses.
As bipartisan talks continue,… https://t.co/dW4LBYXAUY
— Adrian Wall (@AdrianWall8395) June 10, 2026
We suspect the White House’s reversal on the AG enforcement clause reflects a judgment that any provision creating a litigation pathway through state-level Democratic attorneys general represents a structurally open-ended political liability, regardless of how narrowly it might be drafted in statutory text.
The collapse connects directly to the committee’s prior ethics fight. During the May 14 markup, a Van Hollen amendment that would have barred the president, vice president, and members of Congress from issuing or promoting digital commodities while in office failed on a 13–11 party-line vote, with Republicans arguing the provision was outside the Banking Committee’s jurisdictional remit and should be resolved on the floor.
That defeat left the ethics question formally unresolved at the committee stage, and the closed-door post-markup negotiations were the designated venue for resolution. Their collapse, therefore, does not merely delay the bill; it reopens a fault line that was never actually closed.
Senators Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), the two Democrats whose committee votes produced the bill’s nominal bipartisan margin, have both indicated that their floor support remains contingent on strong ethics guardrails, a formulation that the Tuesday walkback has made harder, not easier, to satisfy. Details on the specific integrity gaps created by Trump’s crypto earnings and the CLARITY Act current text illustrate why Democratic insistence on enforceable guardrails is unlikely to dissolve under calendar pressure alone.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post CLARITY Act Stumbles Over Two Major Hurdles on Path to Senate Floor Vote appeared first on Coinspeaker.

In the news today, Consensys CEO and Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin said that ETH could become a fully zero-knowledge proof-based protocol within 3 to 5 years, anchoring that prediction to the Lean Ethereum proposal from Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, which targets 10,000+ transactions per second on mainnet via native ZK verification at Layer 1.
Lubin’s remarks arrive as Ethereum’s Layer 1 continues to face throughput pressure and as Vitalik Buterin has publicly pulled back from characterizing rollups as a permanent architectural destination, with Buterin stating earlier in 2026 that most L2S had become “branded shards” rather than genuinely differentiated execution environments.
Joe Lubin predicts Ethereum could become a fully ZK-proof protocol in 3-5 years.
In a June 10 interview, the Ethereum co-founder said ongoing ZK innovations will strengthen the L1 while delivering synchronous composability with L2s, enabling atomic execution and unified…
— unfolded. (@cryptounfolded) June 10, 2026
The analytical question is not whether Ethereum will eventually integrate ZK proofs; it is whether Lubin’s reframing of the rollup era as a deliberate strategic phase reflects a coherent long-run plan, or a retroactive narrative applied to a roadmap that drifted further than intended.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Ethereum News: The ZK Convergence Roadmap, What Lubin’s Framework Actually Establishes
The mechanism is bigger than the news, the Ethereum ecosystem, in Lubin’s framing, has passed through a “divergence phase” in which the rollup-centric roadmap – formalized around 2020–2021 – deliberately pushed execution off-chain to Layer 2 networks like Linea and Gnosis, allowing zero-knowledge proving technology to mature in production environments before being reintegrated at L1.
That reintegration is what Lubin calls the “convergence phase,” in which real-time ZK proving already running on L2s migrates upward to mainnet, ultimately collapsing the distinction between layers into a single atomic execution context where assets move without bridges and liquidity fragmentation disappears.
The Lean Ethereum proposal, authored by Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, operationalizes this convergence target at L1 with a throughput ceiling of 10,000+ TPS – a figure that would represent an order-of-magnitude improvement over current mainnet capacity and a direct answer to competing Layer 1 architectures; Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade, for instance, is currently in validator testing with sub-second finality as its headline metric.
Photo: Joe Lubin
It is necessary to flag the epistemic status of several details here. The phased rollout timeline, an opt-in validator phase in 2026, mandatory transition by 2027, has been reported in corroborating coverage but has not been independently confirmed by the Ethereum Foundation at the time of publication.
What is confirmed: the EF has published plans for an optional L1 zkEVM client as a first step toward full-stack ZK integration, and Lubin’s own Consensys-built Linea is already running ZK proofs in production, including experiments in synchronous composability that Lubin has previously described as “the holy grail of our ecosystem.” Gnosis’s Ethereum Economic Zone, developed in part by contributors with EF backgrounds, pursues similar integration, a shared execution context between L1 and L2 with tighter composability and shared security.
What remains unresolved is the pace at which making zkEVM verification mandatory at the consensus layer could clear the required auditing, formal verification, and client diversity work, timelines that some protocol developers assess as longer than Lubin’s 3-to-5-year window implies.
On the Ethereum Foundation restructuring, Lubin was categorical: “There won’t be a second foundation.” Instead, he indicated that at least three groups will spin out of the Ethereum Foundation, each focused on discrete mandates, core protocol development, usability and scalability, and institutional outreach, while the EF itself narrows to what Lubin called its “CROPs” components. That organizational segmentation is positioned not as instability but as preparation for the coordination demands of a ZK-heavy protocol transition.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Ethereum News: Consensys CEO Joe Lubin Sets 3–5 Year Timeline for a Fully ZK Ethereum appeared first on Coinspeaker.

XRP News: On-chain analytics firm Glassnode has recorded XRP’s 90-day realized profit-to-loss ratio at 0.38, meaning that for every $1 of profit realized on-chain, investors are booking $2.63 in losses, and has classified the current market phase as one of “intense capitulation.”
The reading sits at less than half the 1.0 equilibrium threshold that separates net-profit from net-loss regimes, and represents a near-total reversal from the ratio’s peak of approximately 50 during XRP’s 2025 euphoria phase, when realized gains dwarfed losses by an almost incomprehensible margin.
Source: Glassnode on X
XRP was trading near $1.10 at the time of the analysis, below its aggregate realized price of approximately $1.48, meaning the average holder is currently underwater on a cost-basis basis.
Glassnode stated directly that “this ratio so far from the equilibrium threshold of 1 shows a market where most investors moving their tokens do so at a loss, a typical characteristic of intense capitulation,” and added that “this dynamic has completely reversed” relative to the prior bull phase.
The speed of the reversal, from 50 to 0.38 across a single cycle, has drawn comparisons to the structural deterioration Glassnode documented for XRP in early 2022, the last time the asset entered a comparably loss-dominated on-chain regime.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
XRP News: Compounding Signals, XRPL Fees, SOPR, and Supply Underwater
The realized profit loss ratio does not stand alone. XRPL fees, measured on a 90-day moving average, collapsed from approximately 5,900 XRP per day in February 2025 to just 500 XRP, a 91.5% reduction that Glassnode attributes to a sharp decline in transactional demand associated with the prior speculative phase.
The fee metric is a direct proxy for block-space demand: when developers, payment processors, and active users transact on the XRP Ledger, fees rise; when they withdraw, fees fall, and a 91.5% decline is not fee optimization, it is user exodus.
Source: Glassnode on X
Separately, XRP’s Spent Output Profit Ratio, or SOPR, slid from approximately 1.16 in July 2025 to 0.96 by early 2026, crossing below the critical 1.0 breakeven line that separates net-gain from net-loss coin movement.
SOPR below 1.0 means that the average coin being moved on-chain was acquired at a higher price than its current sale price, a structural confirmation that loss realization, not profit-taking, is driving on-chain activity. Compounding this, Glassnode data indicate that approximately 41.5% of circulating XRP supply, roughly 26.5 billion tokens, is currently held at a loss, with 62.8% of XRP’s realized cap concentrated in investors who established their cost basis within the past six months, a distribution profile Glassnode characterizes as “top-heavy” and structurally fragile.
EXPLORE: XRP Institutional Outflows and the Four-Month Low: What the Flow Data Showed
XRP Capitulation: What the On-Chain Metrics Are Actually Showing
The analytical question is no longer whether XRP is in capitulation; the on-chain metrics confirm that it is. The question is whether the current configuration constitutes a terminal flush that precedes a cycle reset, or a structural demand collapse severe enough to make Glassnode’s implicit warning about a distant next rally the operative scenario.
The mechanics of the realized profit-to-loss ratio function as follows: the metric compares the aggregate dollar value of profits realized by coins moving on-chain against the aggregate dollar value of losses realized in the same window, smoothed here across a 90-day average to remove short-term volatility. A reading of 1.0 indicates equilibrium.
A reading of 0.38 indicates that the market is not merely weak – it is structurally dominated by holders who have either been forced to sell or have abandoned any expectation of near-term recovery. In prior Bitcoin cycles, realized profit-to-loss ratios at comparable extremes – around the December 2018 and November 2022 lows, preceded eventual bottoms, though the lag between extreme readings and price recovery ranged from weeks to several months and was not guaranteed by the ratio alone.
The “top-heavy” holder distribution that Glassnode identifies amplifies the downside transmission mechanism in a specific way: when 62.8% of realized cap was established by buyers who entered within the past six months, those buyers hold cost bases near the 2025 peak prices.
Source: XRPUSD / Tradingview
As XRP price falls below their acquisition levels, they enter the underwater cohort and face a binary choice: hold and wait, or sell and crystallize losses. When organic network demand, measured by XRPL fees, simultaneously collapses, there is no fundamental use-case catalyst to interrupt that selling calculus.
The result is the self-reinforcing loop that characterizes late-cycle capitulation: more sellers, fewer buyers, declining fees, declining prices. It is necessary to flag the epistemic status of this data: what the realized profit loss ratio at 0.38 proves is that capitulation is occurring with intensity. What it does not prove is that capitulation is complete, or that current price levels represent a durable floor.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
next
The post XRP News: Glassnode Flags ‘Intense Capitulation’ in XRP as Profit-to-Loss Ratio Hits 0.38 appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson recently suggested that Ripple should integrate Midnight, a privacy sidechain by Input Output Global, to enhance XRP’s role in DeFi, tokenization, and institutional finance.
He noted that the XRP Ledger is designed for payments, which limits its functionality for yield generation and on-chain lending. Midnight could bridge this gap by offering a zero-knowledge proof-based environment without requiring Ripple to overhaul its core infrastructure.
Hoskinson estimated that this integration could unlock over $100 billion in idle XRP liquidity, a figure that warrants critical evaluation.
The central question isn’t the technical merit of the proposal, but whether it addresses a real architectural gap in the XRP ecosystem, whether the liquidity claim is valid, and the conditions necessary for this idea to move beyond an agenda-driven pitch.
Hoskinson Says XRP Needs Midnight For its Next Chapter
Charles Hoskinson says Ripple may need Midnight to unlock the next phase of $XRP ecosystem growth, per Coinpedia.
Speaking in a recent conversation with Wendy O, he argued that XRP has strong payment infrastructure but… pic.twitter.com/ibwk5ubZhK
— BSCN (@BSCNews) June 10, 2026
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
Midnight and Ripple XRPL: What Each Network Actually Does and Where the Structural Gap Is Real
The XRP Ledger operates on a Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus protocol, capable of processing about 1,500 transactions per second with three-to-five second finality, making it a fast and cost-efficient payment solution. However, it does not support programmable smart contracts for various DeFi activities.
Midnight, introduced by Input Output Global in late 2022 and detailed in a September 2023 whitepaper, aims to address this by using a zero-knowledge proof architecture to enable confidential smart contracts.
It is designed to work across multiple blockchains, including the XRP Ledger. The proposed integration would allow XRP to be wrapped onto Midnight via a cross-chain bridge, enabling access to DeFi protocols while preserving transaction privacy.
As of now, there is no formal integration agreement between Ripple and Midnight. Although discussions have taken place between Ripple executives and IOG, no technical roadmap or partnership announcement has been made.
Cardano Whale Play: Exit Liquidity Setup?
Cardano’s ecosystem is collapsing TVL sitting at just $94M, down 87% from its peak. Yet on June 7, the biggest whales started quietly accumulating $ADA right at five year lows.
Derivatives paint the clearer picture: top traders are net… pic.twitter.com/CTf37LJdZY
— Robert 🍌 (@iR0bertt) June 10, 2026
The Web 2.5 Framing: What Hoskinson’s Competitive Positioning Actually Means
This is more than a collaborative pitch between blockchain ecosystems; it’s a strategic move by Hoskinson to position Midnight as crucial infrastructure for institutional crypto.
By categorizing Ripple with Tether, Circle, and Binance as part of Web 2.5, balancing traditional finance and crypto, Hoskinson suggests XRPL serves as a bridge between legacy finance and decentralized Web3, offering reliability without full DeFi programmability.
Ripple has established a respected regulated payment network, with its RLUSD stablecoin dominating liquidity. However, XRPL lacks a significant DeFi ecosystem, which Hoskinson views as an opportunity.
His framing benefits Midnight more significantly than Ripple in the short term, as Midnight needs access to markets and XRP represents a vast pool of underutilized on-chain capital. This incentive should be considered when evaluating his pitch alongside the technical insights it offers.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
The $100Bn Claim: What It Would Actually Take to Unlock Idle XRP Liquidity
(SOURCE: DefiLlama)
It is important to clarify the epistemic status of the $100Bn figure cited by Hoskinson regarding XRP and its DeFi potential. Neither this figure nor the related estimate of $136Bn has been derived from an independently audited methodology.
The number seems to reflect XRP’s market capitalization, reframed as dormant capital. However, it conflates total market cap with usable DeFi liquidity, which differs significantly.
The “idle” XRP refers to tokens in wallets that aren’t generating yield or participating in DeFi activities due to the XRPL’s structural limitations in supporting smart contracts. A potential Midnight integration could enable wrapped XRP to serve as collateral in DeFi, thereby changing this dynamic.
The more significant indicator of XRPL’s potential is the growing institutional interest, shown by a tokenized Treasury redemption pilot conducted by JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo Finance on XRPL in May 2026.
This involvement suggests that while the $100Bn figure is aspirational, it underscores the demand for a privacy layer to enhance the already existing institutional traction.
What Institutional DeFi and Tokenization on Ripple XRPL Would Actually Require
The JPMorgan-Mastercard-Ondo pilot highlights that XRPL has gained institutional traction for tokenization without Midnight integration. However, it does not address the data transparency issue, which poses a barrier to broader institutional DeFi use due to the need for confidentiality in financial relationships.
Midnight’s zero-knowledge proof architecture offers a solution through selective disclosure, allowing institutions to prove regulatory compliance without revealing transaction details.
Charles Hoskinson links Midnight’s value to the $10 trillion real-world asset market, suggesting that institutions will only tokenize assets on chains that ensure privacy, compliance, and interoperability.
It’s important to note that XRPL’s permissioned validator configurations already offer some compliance controls. The superiority of Midnight’s ZK-proof model over existing controls has not yet been independently tested, so the assumption that it is the optimal solution for XRPL’s institutional DeFi needs should be viewed with caution until further assessment is conducted.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Hoskinson Says Ripple Needs Midnight to Unlock XRP’s DeFi and Tokenization Potential appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Four days before Donald Trump’s January 20, 2025, inauguration, Eric Trump signed an investment agreement selling a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial to Aryam Investment 1. An Abu Dhabi vehicle backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, UAE national security adviser and brother of the UAE president, for $500 million, with an initial tranche of $250 million delivering approximately $187 million to Trump-linked entities and at least $31 million to entities tied to Steve Witkoff, World Liberty Financial co-founder. Today, this transaction sit at the center of a live House investigation and a mounting legislative credibility problem for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act as it approaches a Senate floor vote.
Four days before Trump’s inauguration, lieutenants to an Abu Dhabi royal secretly signed a deal w/the Trump family to buy a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500M, according to documents & people familiar.
The buyer paid half up front, steering $187M to Trump family…
— Rebecca Ballhaus (@rebeccaballhaus) February 1, 2026
This is not simply a business deal struck by a president’s family before he took office. It is a structural conflict of interest embedded in the legislative architecture of the most consequential piece of crypto regulation 2026 is likely to produce, a bill the Trump administration is now shepherding through a Senate whose Democratic members have already attempted once to attach an ethics bar to the text and been turned back on a party-line vote.
A CoinDesk op-ed by Scott Greytak, published June 9, identifies five discrete integrity gaps in the current CLARITY Act text, covering DeFi oversight, anonymizing tools, stablecoin regulation, jurisdictional enforcement, and ethics rules for public officials, any one of which, left unaddressed, could materially undermine the bill’s stated purpose of protecting U.S. financial system integrity.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Deal Mechanics and Clarity Act Conflict: An Ongoing Legislative Alignment Problem
The mechanism functions as follows: a pre-inauguration equity transaction by the president’s son in a crypto venture that the administration now oversees through pending legislation creates a continuous financial alignment, not a one-time snapshot, between the Trump family’s economic interests and the regulatory outcome of the CLARITY Act’s Senate floor vote.
Sheikh Tahnoon, whom the Wall Street Journal has described as the UAE’s intelligence and sovereign-capital architect, placed two executives from his AI and data firm G42 on World Liberty Financial’s board alongside Eric Trump and Zach Witkoff, giving a foreign-sovereign-linked buyer a formal governance position inside a company whose regulatory environment a sitting U.S. president directly influences.
The scale of the Trump family’s financial exposure to World Liberty Financial extends well beyond the $500 million Abu Dhabi deal. Reuters and subsequent analyses estimate WLFI has raised roughly $550 million from token buyers under a structure that entitles the Trump family to approximately 75% of net income, equating to around $400 million in fees on those sales alone.
The Trump family crypto breakdown: 💰 $WLFI tokens: $463M 💰 $TRUMP meme coin: $336M 💰 USD1 stablecoin: $235M 🇺🇦 Abu Dhabi royal: $500M investment before inauguration 📊 90%+ of Trump Org H1 2025 income = crypto
The family writing crypto policy while earning $2.3B from crypto.… https://t.co/QawhMj0fee
— Crypt Topia (@KRYPTTOPIA) June 9, 2026
A BBC review of financial disclosures found Trump holds approximately 15.75 billion WLFI tokens, part of a family stake estimated at roughly $5 billion at then-current prices, making crypto his single largest source of wealth, a characterization that is structurally significant regardless of how individual valuation figures are contested.
The White House has stated that President Trump’s assets are held in a trust managed by his children, ensuring no conflicts of interest, and a World Liberty Financial spokesperson has said neither Trump nor Witkoff was involved in the Aryam transaction or has had any connection to World Liberty Financial since taking office.
The epistemic status of those assurances warrants care: the deal was signed four days before the administration began, the payments flowed to Trump-linked entities in tranches that postdate the inauguration, and the legislative process that those entities now have a financial stake in governing has advanced entirely on the current administration’s watch. The Trump crypto conflict of interest question is therefore not a matter of intent; it is a matter of structural alignment that persists regardless of formal trust arrangements.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Trump’s $500M World Liberty Deal Exposes CLARITY Act Integrity Gaps appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Humanity Protocol’s H token collapsed by up to -90% intraday today after attackers drained more than $32M from project wallets, marking one of the sharpest single-session drops recorded by any named crypto project this year. The breach exposed a recurring vulnerability that has cost the industry hundreds of millions in 2026 alone.
Founder Terence Kwok confirmed that private keys belonging to a Humanity Foundation member were compromised, with approximately 17 wallets emptied and losses still climbing per on-chain data assessed by CoinDesk. H fell from roughly $0.67 to near $0.13, then briefly touched $0.05.
Humanity Protocol-Linked Wallets Drained for Over $19 Million, H Token Crashes More Than 80%
JUST IN: Onchain analyst Specter reported that wallets linked to or previously interacting with Humanity Protocol may have been compromised. More than 17 wallets holding H tokens have… pic.twitter.com/i6DSTSNDGw
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) June 9, 2026
The attacker has since minted an additional 100 million H tokens on BNB Chain, worth approximately $11M at current prices, signaling that selling pressure is not yet exhausted. Humanity urged users to halt all bridge and liquidity pool activity while it coordinates with security firms and exchange partners.
The incident fits a pattern that has defined crypto losses in 2026: attackers targeting keys rather than code. Broader market conditions have already been pressuring thin-liquidity altcoins, and a hack of this scale against an illiquid token produces an almost textbook air-pocket crash.
Humanity Crypto: Can H Token Price Recover After the -90% Crash?
Funny $H was actually one of the more manipulated crime coins of the last year, supply highly concentrated and pushed on perps to almost $10 Billion FDV
i have never heard of 1 single user of this protocol
The hack also comes at an interest time, as unlocks were coming. https://t.co/a8VLkrjiY1 pic.twitter.com/zOAu0Kgt0G
— Wazz (@WazzCrypto) June 9, 2026
H’s price action on Tuesday was severe by any standard. The token dropped from approximately $0.67 to a low near $0.05 before staging a partial recovery toward $0.13, still representing a loss of roughly -80% from the pre-hack level. Volume surged almost entirely on the sell side, as the attacker converted stolen H for ether and fresh-minted supply from BNB Chain continued to overhang the market, according to on-chain trackers.
Key technical levels are difficult to establish reliably, given the near-total collapse of order book structure. The $0.13 zone represents the first credible area of stabilization simply because it is where passive buyers absorbed the initial selling wave. Below that, $0.05, the intraday low, functions as an extreme bear-case reference.
Three scenarios present themselves. In a bull case, Humanity’s security response halts further minting and exchanges freeze attacker wallets, removing the supply overhang and allowing a technical relief bounce toward $0.25 to $0.30. In the base case, selling pressure from the already-minted 100 million additional H tokens continues to cap any rally, with price consolidating in the $0.08–$0.15 range for weeks.
The bear-case invalidation is if the attacker successfully liquidates the full minted supply and exchanges decline to intervene, H could revisit its $0.05 intraday floor or lower. Macro headwinds, including broader weakness in altcoins, do not help the recovery case. The data points to extended consolidation as the most probable near-term outcome.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
LiquidChain Targets Early-Stage Positioning as Key-Theft Hacks Erode Trust in Established Projects
Incidents like the Humanity crypto breach have a predictable secondary effect: capital that rotates out of compromised tokens does not always chase recovery plays. Some portion looks for earlier-stage, structurally cleaner entry points.
Whether that rotation is rational or simply fear-driven displacement is another question entirely, but the flow pattern is observable. Altcoin market conditions remain selective rather than broadly bullish, favoring projects with differentiated infrastructure narratives over pure identity or social tokens.
LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as a cross-chain liquidity layer, fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. Its stated features include a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once Architecture that allows developers to reach all three ecosystems from a single deployment.
The presale is currently priced at $0.01468, with $832,428.34 raised to date. More details on the project’s infrastructure context have been covered in a recent Coinspeaker analysis.
Visit the LiquidChain Presale Website Here.
EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in Q2
next
The post Humanity Crypto Exploited for $32M in Latest DeFi Hack appeared first on Coinspeaker.