Crypto doesn’t just create millionaires. It also creates influence without accountability. And when you step back and look at the timeline around Logan Paul’s crypto ventures, a pattern starts to form. Not one mistake. Not one failed experiment. A sequence.
2021 – The Dink Doink Era It started with memecoin mania. Logan promoted Dink Doink as a “fun joke coin” to millions of followers. The token pumped on influencer attention. What wasn’t clearly explained at the time? His level of involvement and financial stake. After the hype faded, the token reportedly collapsed more than 90%. Retail buyers were left holding bags. The influencer moved on. 2021–2024 – The CryptoZoo Collapse
Next came CryptoZoo. Marketed as: “A game that makes you money.” NFTs were sold. A token launched. Promises were made about breeding mechanics, rewards, and a full ecosystem. But the core product never fully materialized. In 2022, investigative YouTuber Coffeezilla began exposing inconsistencies. Public pressure grew. Logan later promised refunds. But: • Refund eligibility was limited • Many users were excluded • Token holders largely received nothing meaningful For many buyers, the damage was already done. 2022–2025 – Liquid Marketplace After NFTs cooled off, the narrative shifted to “tokenized collectibles.” Liquid Marketplace allowed people to buy fractional shares of rare assets — including Logan’s own PSA 10 Pikachu Illustrator card, purchased for $5.275 million. The pitch: Own a piece of high-value collectibles. Trade them like crypto. Later, regulators in Ontario alleged the platform: • Sold unregistered securities • Misled buyers about ownership structure • Operated primarily off-chain (essentially a centralized database) • Misused funds Users reported: • Withdrawals blocked • Platform going offline • Assets stuck And somehow… Logan ended up with the card again. 2026 – The Auction Spectacle Now the same Pikachu card is back in the spotlight. Bids reportedly exceeding $6.6 million. Massive livestream attention. Public refund promises tied to the narrative. The asset becomes content again. But the people who trusted earlier ventures are still dealing with the consequences. The Bigger Lesson This isn’t about one celebrity. It’s about a recurring structure: Massive audience trustHype-driven financial productRetail capital flows inProduct underdeliversNarrative shiftsInfluencer moves forward Crypto amplifies reach. But it also amplifies responsibility. When influence meets finance, transparency isn’t optional. Why This Matters Retail investors often mistake: Popularity for credibility Confidence for competence Fame for due diligence But markets don’t reward trust. They reward structure, transparency, and delivery. If a project’s main engine is an influencer’s personality instead of verifiable fundamentals, that’s a red flag. Final Thought Crypto isn’t the problem. Greed, opacity, and unchecked influence are. The next time a celebrity promotes a “revolutionary opportunity,” ask: • Is there audited infrastructure? • Is ownership legally clear? • Are regulators aware? • Is the product actually shipped? Hype is loud. Accountability is quiet. Choose carefully who you trust with your capital.
Michael Oliver just dropped a bold outlook on precious metals…
He believes “the silver run has just begun.”
And here’s the part that’s turning heads: He wouldn’t be surprised to see Silver at $300–$500 per ounce in the next 6 months. Gold? Potentially $8,000.
Let that sink in.
For years, silver has been overlooked. Quiet. Undervalued. Ignored.
But historically, when silver moves… it doesn’t crawl. It explodes.
Silver is not just a metal. It’s: • A monetary hedge • An industrial necessity (EVs, solar, AI hardware) • A leverage play on gold
When inflation fears rise and gold breaks out, silver usually outperforms.
Most people wait for confirmation. By then, the move is already halfway done.
If even a fraction of that $300–$500 scenario plays out, today’s prices will look like a gift.
The real question isn’t “Will silver move?” It’s “Will you be positioned before it does?”
Build exposure early. Don’t chase after headlines.
ALTCOINS MAY HAVE ALREADY BOTTOMED AGAINST BITCOIN.
After more than a year of pain… red charts, broken support, 80–90% drawdowns… something subtle is changing.
The Others Dominance chart (alts vs BTC) is quietly reclaiming levels we last saw before the October crash.
Here’s the interesting part:
Bitcoin is still ~40% below those highs. But alt dominance is already stabilizing.
That kind of divergence usually shows one thing: Seller exhaustion.
If alts were still in heavy distribution, dominance would keep bleeding.
It isn’t.
It’s up ~17% in the last two months.
That suggests forced selling may already be done.
We saw something similar in 2019–2020. Bitcoin kept chopping lower… But alt dominance bottomed early and never looked back.
And now the macro backdrop is shifting too:
• RSI crossover on alt dominance for the first time since mid-2023 • Small caps (Russell 2000) breaking higher • ISM at multi-year highs • Inflation cooling • Gold/Silver momentum slowing
Liquidity rotation always starts quietly.
Structurally, this market is reset.
Leverage flushed. Sentiment near cycle lows. Positioning light.
Historically, mid-term election years bring chop before expansion. That means Q3/Q4 could be where things start accelerating.
If alt season does return, it won’t wait for confirmation tweets.
It will move while people are still skeptical.
If you believe in high-beta plays, this is where you slowly build:
$SOL $BNB $ASTER
Not all at once. Not with emotion. But with intention.
The best rotations start when nobody wants to click buy.
Meanwhile… ICP is signing governments, banks, and the UN. 👀 It’s easy to call something dead when the chart is red. $ICP is trading around $2–$2.5, down massively from its $700+ launch hype. Most retail moved on. But while price bleeds, something else has been happening quietly. And it’s not small.
🌍 Real-World Partnerships (Not Just Crypto Collabs) This isn’t random DeFi noise. These are governments, institutions, and global brands. 🇺🇳 UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) In 2024, UNDP partnered with DFINITY to use ICP for Universal Trusted Credentials (UTC) — tamper-proof digital credentials to improve financial inclusion for MSMEs globally. That’s blockchain in real-world economic infrastructure.
🇸🇬 Monetary Authority of Singapore – (UTC Framework) ICP provides blockchain infrastructure within the UTC framework launched alongside MAS. This isn’t speculation — it’s sovereign-grade digital identity infrastructure. 🇨🇭 Switzerland – Sovereign Subnet Launched in 2026: A Swiss sovereign cloud subnet with nodes fully located in Switzerland & Liechtenstein. This is about data sovereignty, not memes.
🇵🇰 Pakistan Government MoU signed for a Pakistan Subnet on ICP, focused on sovereign cloud and AI infrastructure. Governments don’t experiment with “dead” chains.
🏦 Institutional & Enterprise Moves • Sygnum Bank (Switzerland) → Custody + staking for ICP • Taurus → Institutional digital asset infrastructure • Valour Inc → ICP ETP (regulated exposure in Europe) • Roland Berger + BEEAH → Blockchain-based Voluntary Recycling Credits • FEDERITALY → “100% Made in Italy” product authenticity tracking • Sodexo / Pluxee → Employee NFT initiatives on ICP This isn’t hype-driven DeFi yield farming. This is enterprise blockchain infrastructure. 🧠 What ICP Is Actually Building • Sovereign cloud (on-chain hosting) • Tamper-proof digital credentials • Sustainability tracking • Institutional custody & compliance • AI-native infrastructure The narrative is shifting from “price pump” to utility and state-level adoption. So… Dead or Early? Price says: “Nobody cares.” Adoption says: “Governments are integrating.” That disconnect is interesting. At $700, everyone believed. At $2, almost nobody does. History shows that the biggest asymmetries often sit where conviction is lowest — but execution is strongest. Is $ICP undervalued infrastructure? Or still too early? The chart looks dead. The partnerships don’t. Your move.
• AMEX hiring crypto product managers • PayPal expanding crypto business teams • Visa building blockchain partnerships • JPMorgan recruiting blockchain developers • Morgan Stanley onboarding crypto traders • BlackRock growing digital asset desks • Citi hiring blockchain engineers
The same institutions that laughed at Bitcoin are now competing for crypto talent.
This isn’t hype anymore. This is infrastructure being built in real time.
The paradigm shift didn’t “almost” happen. It already happened quietly while most people were arguing on Twitter.
Bitcoin isn’t fighting for survival now. It’s being integrated into the financial system.
You can debate it. You can ignore it. Or you can position yourself before the next wave of capital flows in.
ETH on Valentine’s Day — A Love Story With Volatility
Ethereum launched on July 30, 2015, so there’s no Feb 14 price for 2015. From 2016 onward, here’s how ETH looked every Valentine’s Day:
📅 Valentine’s Day Prices (USD) 2016: $3–$4 2017: $10–$11 2018: $800–$900 2019: $120–$130 2020: $260–$280 2021: $1,800–$1,900 2022: $2,800–$2,900 2023: $1,500–$1,600 2024: $2,700–$2,800 2025: $2,726 2026 : $2,050 📈 What This Actually Shows In 2016, $ETH was cheaper than dinner. In 2017, people said $10 was expensive. In 2019, it was declared “dead” near $120. In 2021–2022, euphoria took over. In 2023, fear dominated again. Yet here we are in 2026 — still building, still shipping, still securing billions in DeFi, NFTs, Layer-2s, staking, and real on-chain value. 🏗 Why Ethereum Still Matters
Ethereum isn’t just a token. It’s infrastructure. • Smart contracts • DeFi ecosystem • Staking economy • Layer-2 scaling • Institutional adoption It survived bear markets, regulatory noise, and brutal drawdowns — because developers never stopped building. 💡 The Pattern Every cycle, people say: “It’s too high.” “It’s too risky.” “It’s going lower.” And every cycle, patience beats panic. From $3 in 2016 to $2,050 in 2026… the long-term trajectory speaks louder than short-term headlines. Final Thought Ethereum doesn’t reward emotions. It rewards conviction. Volatility is temporary. Innovation compounds. Sometimes the real power move isn’t chasing green candles — it’s quietly stacking $ETH while others wait for certainty. And certainty is always more expensive.