王大有youyou
181 Posts
王大有youyou
AIDOGE founder。现已不做项目，专注于炒币，打工，接广子。
Open Trade
FORM Holder
High-Frequency Trader
8.1 Years
47 Following
5.0K+ Followers
1.3K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Just set a tight stop-loss on that high-leverage e
Pure e sentinel
Instead of playing donation narratives, it's better to just open e directly and keep it real
😶🌫️ The second fund from ethlab is set to happen when liquidity is good, so how about a hype expectation of 500-1000
The market's response is pretty lukewarm. I believe it's just temporary.
#eth
#ethlab
Pure e sentinel
Instead of playing donation narratives, it's better to just open e directly and keep it real
😶🌫️ The second fund from ethlab is set to happen when liquidity is good, so how about a hype expectation of 500-1000
The market's response is pretty lukewarm. I believe it's just temporary.
#eth
#ethlab
Partly True
That's another good question.
ChAIN ink company's business made a billion U last year.
Last year, thirty million was the on-chain verifiable revenue.
You need to look at LINK's income in two parts.
Yes. It can, but it might not empower. The money the company makes doesn't go to LINK.
But in reality, that's not the case. If LINK had done this from the start, how do you think the coin price would have risen? The 4CHAN community pumped LINK with MEME culture, right?
Crypto folks have three weird habits. What you see, you think is real. What you don't see, you believe didn't happen. They have to tell you what they did.
Don't forget. LINK's company, the project team, are the major holders of LINK.
$LINK #LINK
ChAIN ink company's business made a billion U last year.
Last year, thirty million was the on-chain verifiable revenue.
You need to look at LINK's income in two parts.
Yes. It can, but it might not empower. The money the company makes doesn't go to LINK.
But in reality, that's not the case. If LINK had done this from the start, how do you think the coin price would have risen? The 4CHAN community pumped LINK with MEME culture, right?
Crypto folks have three weird habits. What you see, you think is real. What you don't see, you believe didn't happen. They have to tell you what they did.
Don't forget. LINK's company, the project team, are the major holders of LINK.
$LINK #LINK
Verified
Predictive markets and RWA sector
Is there a target?
It doesn't matter who steps into the hot predictive markets and RWA sector to compete and succeed.
This target is like a safe bet, always raking in those fees, something that the top projects can't overlook, right?
Yes, bro, there is.
$LINK
This round is all about investing in the top-tier project. Unshakeable.
And there might be a contract rebound opportunity coming up.
As long as people recognize what I've mentioned above.
#预测市场 #RWA
Is there a target?
It doesn't matter who steps into the hot predictive markets and RWA sector to compete and succeed.
This target is like a safe bet, always raking in those fees, something that the top projects can't overlook, right?
Yes, bro, there is.
$LINK
This round is all about investing in the top-tier project. Unshakeable.
And there might be a contract rebound opportunity coming up.
As long as people recognize what I've mentioned above.
#预测市场 #RWA
arbtrium $ARB
Compared to $OP , the price that holds value is about to drop.
Two different directions.
These two L2s. The profits don’t really trickle back to the L1 mainnet. But profits are profits.
Last year was a mess. Arbitrum managed to rake in nearly 30 million U through the chain over the year.
Most of the revenue in recent years, aside from expenses, has been stored away for strategies, but it's not a company; it's DAO assets. I took a look, and excluding ARB assets, there's about 100 million U in value.
As for OP, the superchain allocates 50% of the income back to Optimism for buybacks and burns
$OP
. The token is starting to gain some utility.
For value investing, this round, these two L2s have a solid foundation for ongoing interest.
#ARB #OP
Compared to $OP , the price that holds value is about to drop.
Two different directions.
These two L2s. The profits don’t really trickle back to the L1 mainnet. But profits are profits.
Last year was a mess. Arbitrum managed to rake in nearly 30 million U through the chain over the year.
Most of the revenue in recent years, aside from expenses, has been stored away for strategies, but it's not a company; it's DAO assets. I took a look, and excluding ARB assets, there's about 100 million U in value.
As for OP, the superchain allocates 50% of the income back to Optimism for buybacks and burns
$OP
. The token is starting to gain some utility.
For value investing, this round, these two L2s have a solid foundation for ongoing interest.
#ARB #OP
Let's do a quick recap. A 3X profit opportunity from the day before yesterday to yesterday. The opportunity that has ended was the on-chain spot for $H .
At that time, there was a price discrepancy of 100x with the futures, but you can't just buy based on that. Because 10 billion tokens were minted to 130 billion, and the DEX liquidity was drained. Some people who bought in earlier didn't even grasp this basic understanding; they only looked at the price.
I also tweeted a reminder that you can't just buy because the price is dropping; I think my early warnings helped some people avoid losses.
But that doesn't mean there weren't any opportunities worth monitoring. It just requires a broader perspective in research and judgment.
The opportunity has expired, and I’ve already taken profits. So there’s no current actionability. But the logic and the observational angles needed for this speculative opportunity can be referenced.
The following content is what I posted yesterday in my previous group (which is now closed, just maintenance).
Body:
1 The situation: Yesterday, $H 's official announcement claimed it was a core member's private key leak. Not to say they’re lying, but at least they’re hiding the facts. The truth is: the core development rights were leaked. The hacker didn’t steal the team’s assets; instead, they stole the contract rights, highlighted it, and transferred the rights to their own address. Since the contract retained minting rights, the total supply of H was 10 billion, and yesterday the hacker inflated it to 130 billion.
For various reasons, the official narrative is different from what I just described.
2 I've been keeping an eye on things. This includes monitoring the hacker’s minting and the on-chain dumping situation. The latest minting happened last night right before it hit 130 billion. Then it stopped.
3 I got involved last night. Observing positions. On-chain H.
4 Now there are two phenomena. 1 H’s contract has stabilized and gone up. There might be some explanations. Without insider information, it should have just kept dropping. 2 The on-chain price has rebounded 50%-75% compared to when I bought in last night. But it's still not much. The market cap is too small. It was hit hard.
5 So if you've experienced LUNC, you should understand. But don’t fantasize about the next LUNC. Instead, think about the story of the next LUNC. Consider buying before there’s a dispute between reality and expectations, and sell when everything has landed and everyone is dreaming.
#humanity
At that time, there was a price discrepancy of 100x with the futures, but you can't just buy based on that. Because 10 billion tokens were minted to 130 billion, and the DEX liquidity was drained. Some people who bought in earlier didn't even grasp this basic understanding; they only looked at the price.
I also tweeted a reminder that you can't just buy because the price is dropping; I think my early warnings helped some people avoid losses.
But that doesn't mean there weren't any opportunities worth monitoring. It just requires a broader perspective in research and judgment.
The opportunity has expired, and I’ve already taken profits. So there’s no current actionability. But the logic and the observational angles needed for this speculative opportunity can be referenced.
The following content is what I posted yesterday in my previous group (which is now closed, just maintenance).
Body:
1 The situation: Yesterday, $H 's official announcement claimed it was a core member's private key leak. Not to say they’re lying, but at least they’re hiding the facts. The truth is: the core development rights were leaked. The hacker didn’t steal the team’s assets; instead, they stole the contract rights, highlighted it, and transferred the rights to their own address. Since the contract retained minting rights, the total supply of H was 10 billion, and yesterday the hacker inflated it to 130 billion.
For various reasons, the official narrative is different from what I just described.
2 I've been keeping an eye on things. This includes monitoring the hacker’s minting and the on-chain dumping situation. The latest minting happened last night right before it hit 130 billion. Then it stopped.
3 I got involved last night. Observing positions. On-chain H.
4 Now there are two phenomena. 1 H’s contract has stabilized and gone up. There might be some explanations. Without insider information, it should have just kept dropping. 2 The on-chain price has rebounded 50%-75% compared to when I bought in last night. But it's still not much. The market cap is too small. It was hit hard.
5 So if you've experienced LUNC, you should understand. But don’t fantasize about the next LUNC. Instead, think about the story of the next LUNC. Consider buying before there’s a dispute between reality and expectations, and sell when everything has landed and everyone is dreaming.
#humanity
I've got two proposals to throw out there.
First up, let's talk about BAB. (Each @Binance BN UID can only mint one SBT.) It’s a shame that this hasn't been developed further. Of course, there are many directions to explore, but I won't dive into the integration aspects of events.
Lately, I've seen a lot of chatter around AI development, concerns about the security of on-chain DeFi in a bear market, and developers’ need to verify real users.
With a few simple tweaks and support, BAB could address these issues: 1. This non-transferable SBT can not only be minted once, but we can also periodically update the data on the NFT. This data might include trading flows or positions from CEX, and users can choose what to update or stick to a fixed format. 2. Using ZK tech on-chain, users can see their own data while keeping it private from others. If the project team needs verification, they can validate results (currently just logging UID and such to prove you’re a real BN registrant).
Second: about the opbnb chain. (It’s based on the Optimism OP Stack, so GAS fees are super low.)
TVL has really tanked. There aren’t many users or projects. I think the main issue might be an unclear positioning.
We could try to make BNB CHAIN permissionless for developers and users.
However, OP BNB CHAIN requires KYC for developers at least. As for users, they might also need BAB access.
The benefits are pretty clear. Combining this with my first suggestion, it places more emphasis on real users, helping to filter out situations where one person has multiple addresses. The protocol incentives, apart from the on-chain verifiable interaction data, would flow more easily to real users. The data recorded on BAB adds another layer of reference.
Also, in cases of theft or malfeasance, tracking these issues would be a bit easier.
Plus, this won’t significantly impact the BNBCHAIN main chain. It’s an exploration for OPBNB.
@BNBCHAIN @CZ @Yi He
First up, let's talk about BAB. (Each @Binance BN UID can only mint one SBT.) It’s a shame that this hasn't been developed further. Of course, there are many directions to explore, but I won't dive into the integration aspects of events.
Lately, I've seen a lot of chatter around AI development, concerns about the security of on-chain DeFi in a bear market, and developers’ need to verify real users.
With a few simple tweaks and support, BAB could address these issues: 1. This non-transferable SBT can not only be minted once, but we can also periodically update the data on the NFT. This data might include trading flows or positions from CEX, and users can choose what to update or stick to a fixed format. 2. Using ZK tech on-chain, users can see their own data while keeping it private from others. If the project team needs verification, they can validate results (currently just logging UID and such to prove you’re a real BN registrant).
Second: about the opbnb chain. (It’s based on the Optimism OP Stack, so GAS fees are super low.)
TVL has really tanked. There aren’t many users or projects. I think the main issue might be an unclear positioning.
We could try to make BNB CHAIN permissionless for developers and users.
However, OP BNB CHAIN requires KYC for developers at least. As for users, they might also need BAB access.
The benefits are pretty clear. Combining this with my first suggestion, it places more emphasis on real users, helping to filter out situations where one person has multiple addresses. The protocol incentives, apart from the on-chain verifiable interaction data, would flow more easily to real users. The data recorded on BAB adds another layer of reference.
Also, in cases of theft or malfeasance, tracking these issues would be a bit easier.
Plus, this won’t significantly impact the BNBCHAIN main chain. It’s an exploration for OPBNB.
@BNBCHAIN @CZ @Yi He
Partly True
Am I more focused on whether there's a bottom to scoop on $H
or getting buried?
Did you go bottom fishing when they issued more tokens?
Some even bottomed out on contracts.
Next time, take a clear look before making a move. Don't just dive in when you see a dip.
#Humanity协议被盗2000万美元
or getting buried?
Did you go bottom fishing when they issued more tokens?
Some even bottomed out on contracts.
Next time, take a clear look before making a move. Don't just dive in when you see a dip.
#Humanity协议被盗2000万美元
Verified
The most valuable lesson I've learned in the crypto space: never underestimate those Web3 organizations that have made it / and don't even mention political parties or nations.
China's ability to manipulate currency and economic policy is incredibly strong.
You can't just compare the dominance of a country's currency acceptance to the dollar and conclude that the yuan is weak or that the nation's financial architects are lacking.
A hot piece of knowledge: the M2 of the yuan is actually more than double that of the dollar.
Without getting too critical or serious, you can simply understand it as:
The total value of yuan on this planet > the total value of all dollars
and it's even more than double.
Chart 2, I don't know if you've noticed. The yuan's exchange rate this year hasn't dropped and is actually rising. With so much currency, more than double that of the dollar, the exchange rate is still climbing.
The factors that determine and influence the yuan's exchange rate include both onshore and offshore yuan. However, the offshore yuan, which is more affected by the market, has its quantity controlled. Control is key; to manipulate, you gotta have control.
This is also why we have foreign exchange control systems and why individuals have a limited foreign exchange quota each year.
"Meat should be stewed in the pot." This phrase doesn't imply negativity or wrongdoing; it’s a neutral expression.
At the same time, this year we also saw in May. Internet brokers, including mainland residents, weren't allowed to invest in Hong Kong or U.S. stocks. Why?
To put it plainly, everyone knows that foreign stock markets are doing well, and there's definitely data showing a lot of money flowing out. IPOs from Spacex, OPENAI, and others are going to continue draining the yuan.
If this continues, stabilizing many domestic assets won't be easy.
So what to do? "Meat should be stewed in the pot."
Have you noticed that a bunch of high market cap enterprises in the A-share market are gearing up for IPOs recently?
It's time to play at home, not out there.
China's ability to manipulate currency and economic policy is incredibly strong.
You can't just compare the dominance of a country's currency acceptance to the dollar and conclude that the yuan is weak or that the nation's financial architects are lacking.
A hot piece of knowledge: the M2 of the yuan is actually more than double that of the dollar.
Without getting too critical or serious, you can simply understand it as:
The total value of yuan on this planet > the total value of all dollars
and it's even more than double.
Chart 2, I don't know if you've noticed. The yuan's exchange rate this year hasn't dropped and is actually rising. With so much currency, more than double that of the dollar, the exchange rate is still climbing.
The factors that determine and influence the yuan's exchange rate include both onshore and offshore yuan. However, the offshore yuan, which is more affected by the market, has its quantity controlled. Control is key; to manipulate, you gotta have control.
This is also why we have foreign exchange control systems and why individuals have a limited foreign exchange quota each year.
"Meat should be stewed in the pot." This phrase doesn't imply negativity or wrongdoing; it’s a neutral expression.
At the same time, this year we also saw in May. Internet brokers, including mainland residents, weren't allowed to invest in Hong Kong or U.S. stocks. Why?
To put it plainly, everyone knows that foreign stock markets are doing well, and there's definitely data showing a lot of money flowing out. IPOs from Spacex, OPENAI, and others are going to continue draining the yuan.
If this continues, stabilizing many domestic assets won't be easy.
So what to do? "Meat should be stewed in the pot."
Have you noticed that a bunch of high market cap enterprises in the A-share market are gearing up for IPOs recently?
It's time to play at home, not out there.
Awesome.
Yesterday was a 60% pump. But today it's retracing again.
Hit a high of 0.03.
Now it's back down to 0.02.
I bought in at 0.025.
Feels like they're testing the waters, trying to gauge the sell pressure.
But if I do it again, Pippin won't be throwing in too much capital to play around.
Yesterday was a 60% pump. But today it's retracing again.
Hit a high of 0.03.
Now it's back down to 0.02.
I bought in at 0.025.
Feels like they're testing the waters, trying to gauge the sell pressure.
But if I do it again, Pippin won't be throwing in too much capital to play around.
圈弟
·
--
BullishThis pump with $PIPPIN is gonna be wild, let's aim for 10x leverage, looking at 0.15, see you fellow traders 😏
The dreams of a fat crypto trader and builder are just fantasies before death.
Every word hits the lung.
You can tag suitable people around you
--------------------------------------------------
Are you feeling a bit out of place?
While others are studying how to profit in a bull market,
You're building stuff in a bear market.
I used to think the coolest people in the crypto space were the ones who could trade coins,
But then I met you and realized that the real money makers don’t even have time to watch the charts.
Enough about memes; I actually want to hear how you keep building when everyone else has left the game.
Just drop a few lines about consensus, protocols, and token design,
And I’ll understand why those online signal callers never really make it.
The craziest part is, you folks still think you’re just ordinary.
You’ve been through several bull runs, seen projects go from zero to billions, and then back to zero,
Yet you still call yourself just a coder.
Your biggest flaw is knowing too early that market sentiment and long-term value are not the same thing.
I love listening to you talk about Crypto
Because while others are predicting prices, you’re busy creating the future.
Every word hits the lung.
You can tag suitable people around you
--------------------------------------------------
Are you feeling a bit out of place?
While others are studying how to profit in a bull market,
You're building stuff in a bear market.
I used to think the coolest people in the crypto space were the ones who could trade coins,
But then I met you and realized that the real money makers don’t even have time to watch the charts.
Enough about memes; I actually want to hear how you keep building when everyone else has left the game.
Just drop a few lines about consensus, protocols, and token design,
And I’ll understand why those online signal callers never really make it.
The craziest part is, you folks still think you’re just ordinary.
You’ve been through several bull runs, seen projects go from zero to billions, and then back to zero,
Yet you still call yourself just a coder.
Your biggest flaw is knowing too early that market sentiment and long-term value are not the same thing.
I love listening to you talk about Crypto
Because while others are predicting prices, you’re busy creating the future.
Just made a transfer on Tron, gas fee was 11 TRX, which is about 3.5 USD.
In 2026, transferring money costs 20 bucks in fees...
Now the mainstream chains are slashing gas fees, many have stabilized under 0.1 USD.
But Tron is going the opposite way, didn't see that coming.
Back in 2020, transferring USDT on Tron was the cheapest (under 1 USD), but then the fees kept rising.
Don't tell me about energy/bandwidth/leasing mechanisms, I'm already familiar with those.
I can only say that Justin Sun is really confident about USDT’s payment habits and user retention on Tron—
he believes that even if fees are several times higher, many won't migrate immediately.
And on top of that, he wants everyone to buy TRX, stack it up, and stake it to boost burning.
#TRX #USDT
In 2026, transferring money costs 20 bucks in fees...
Now the mainstream chains are slashing gas fees, many have stabilized under 0.1 USD.
But Tron is going the opposite way, didn't see that coming.
Back in 2020, transferring USDT on Tron was the cheapest (under 1 USD), but then the fees kept rising.
Don't tell me about energy/bandwidth/leasing mechanisms, I'm already familiar with those.
I can only say that Justin Sun is really confident about USDT’s payment habits and user retention on Tron—
he believes that even if fees are several times higher, many won't migrate immediately.
And on top of that, he wants everyone to buy TRX, stack it up, and stake it to boost burning.
#TRX #USDT
Verified
Recently, I've been cautious about inflationary tokens. This includes contract permission settings and casual inflationary WEB3 projects (the focus is on the unresolved long-term total supply burn issue).
The best performers here aren't $ETH.
The underperformers include $ATOM and $CHZ, which are well-known.
The top player, with a unique approach, is the Chinese team’s Coin $BNB.
For now, the future tokens worth watching are $LIT, $HTX, $PUMP, $LINK, $HYPE, $ASTER, $LISTA, and $Cake, but that's not the complete list.
The best performers here aren't $ETH.
The underperformers include $ATOM and $CHZ, which are well-known.
The top player, with a unique approach, is the Chinese team’s Coin $BNB.
For now, the future tokens worth watching are $LIT, $HTX, $PUMP, $LINK, $HYPE, $ASTER, $LISTA, and $Cake, but that's not the complete list.
Van社长
·
--
BullishRecently, $HYPE has truly gone wild, hitting new highs non-stop. If it pumps another 30%, its market cap will surpass BNB. If this myth comes true, the foundational logic and trends in the crypto space will completely shift.
On the flip side, we have $ASTER , still playing dead at the bottom.
Both are in the decentralized exchange arena, both carrying the core responsibilities of their ecosystems, and ASTER even has the backing of industry giant Binance, making it more prestigious than HYPE, which started from scratch.
But why does one steal the spotlight while the other quietly sheds tears at the bottom? Does ASTER still hold any value?
As a core player backed by Binance, its technology, compliance, underlying stability, and application scenarios are beyond doubt.
Yet, its tragedy lies in the fact that its value seems too slow and heavy in the face of the market's extreme pursuit of "absolute profits" and "new narratives."
It's like a perfect underlying tool, doing the dirtiest and heaviest work that aligns with orthodox Web3 logic, yet in this crazy cycle of "ignoring fundamentals and only looking at sentiment," it misses out on the spotlight's rewards.
On the flip side, we have $ASTER , still playing dead at the bottom.
Both are in the decentralized exchange arena, both carrying the core responsibilities of their ecosystems, and ASTER even has the backing of industry giant Binance, making it more prestigious than HYPE, which started from scratch.
But why does one steal the spotlight while the other quietly sheds tears at the bottom? Does ASTER still hold any value?
As a core player backed by Binance, its technology, compliance, underlying stability, and application scenarios are beyond doubt.
Yet, its tragedy lies in the fact that its value seems too slow and heavy in the face of the market's extreme pursuit of "absolute profits" and "new narratives."
It's like a perfect underlying tool, doing the dirtiest and heaviest work that aligns with orthodox Web3 logic, yet in this crazy cycle of "ignoring fundamentals and only looking at sentiment," it misses out on the spotlight's rewards.
A lot of people give advice on how to play with meme coins on BSC every day.
There was a long time when I thought they wouldn't get it. Anyway, let me break it down for you. I used to think the leaders wouldn't understand this.
Then I realized, wait, what was I thinking? The staff might not be well-versed in this area. If the leaders don’t understand, then what are they even doing?
Have you thought about how long they've been trading crypto? Probably around 15 years, right? How long has the crypto scene been around? Meme coins might look like child’s play to them.
If he can do it, you can do it too. They can do it; they just pretend not to, or they don’t engage in a lot of things. Talking is one thing.
In a bear market with this environment, stop pointing fingers and giving advice.
Back in '22, the zoo was filled with coins from the trading circles. Weren't they all on BSC? At that time, there was hardly any alpha or so much ecosystem support.
The time isn't right yet. If it’s not a good time, no matter how hard you try, the results will be limited. When the timing is right, you don’t even need to hustle for that great catalyst effect.
I don’t recommend constantly deducing processes from results. This way, you’ll always feel like others are doing it wrong. Just like when coin prices drop; you might think the team is making mistakes no matter what they do.
#bnb #MEME
There was a long time when I thought they wouldn't get it. Anyway, let me break it down for you. I used to think the leaders wouldn't understand this.
Then I realized, wait, what was I thinking? The staff might not be well-versed in this area. If the leaders don’t understand, then what are they even doing?
Have you thought about how long they've been trading crypto? Probably around 15 years, right? How long has the crypto scene been around? Meme coins might look like child’s play to them.
If he can do it, you can do it too. They can do it; they just pretend not to, or they don’t engage in a lot of things. Talking is one thing.
In a bear market with this environment, stop pointing fingers and giving advice.
Back in '22, the zoo was filled with coins from the trading circles. Weren't they all on BSC? At that time, there was hardly any alpha or so much ecosystem support.
The time isn't right yet. If it’s not a good time, no matter how hard you try, the results will be limited. When the timing is right, you don’t even need to hustle for that great catalyst effect.
I don’t recommend constantly deducing processes from results. This way, you’ll always feel like others are doing it wrong. Just like when coin prices drop; you might think the team is making mistakes no matter what they do.
#bnb #MEME
Here's a rundown on two Solana MEME plays: $SCAM pumped from 600K to 2M-3X
but has since retraced.
The Solana chain's $ASTEROID hit 2M-9M, 4X.
I've recently re-entered the market and dabbled in the early and second phases of Solana MEME. I noticed that I was pretty slow in the early phase, which cost me. The second phase might be more my speed at this stage.
I see that KOLs in the Chinese crypto space, with a similar or larger following than mine, have been keeping a close eye on Solana MEME, but they don't often churn out content.
A few days ago, $usduc launched on Binance US, and it seems to have caught my attention too. Anyone interested in jumping into the second phase?
I noticed the price has pulled back a bit; could be a good entry point.
If you're interested, just hit me up. I'll get back to you ASAP.
but has since retraced.
The Solana chain's $ASTEROID hit 2M-9M, 4X.
I've recently re-entered the market and dabbled in the early and second phases of Solana MEME. I noticed that I was pretty slow in the early phase, which cost me. The second phase might be more my speed at this stage.
I see that KOLs in the Chinese crypto space, with a similar or larger following than mine, have been keeping a close eye on Solana MEME, but they don't often churn out content.
A few days ago, $usduc launched on Binance US, and it seems to have caught my attention too. Anyone interested in jumping into the second phase?
I noticed the price has pulled back a bit; could be a good entry point.
If you're interested, just hit me up. I'll get back to you ASAP.
王大有youyou
·
--
BullishLet’s chat about the two Solana memes I’ve been keeping an eye on recently.
Quick heads up. I’m more focused on observing and verifying. This kind of position isn’t suited for big plays, and the certainty is pretty low. What I mean is, if you’re just looking to research and watch, feel free to see me play without having to dive in yourself.
Remember to DYOR.
1: SCAM (Scam Altman, CA: 6AVAUKa9uxQpruHZUinFECpXEh1usRVtzQWK8N2wpump)
Previously, on the day when Elon Musk @elonmusk pinned a tweet calling Osman a scammer, it peaked at 12M. After Musk unpinned that tweet, the price quickly plummeted by 90%.
Currently, it’s fluctuating between 600K-1.2M.
Daily trading volume is around 1M.
It’s listed on GATE ALPHA and KuCoin Alpha.
My points of focus are: 1) The court trial phase starting from April 28 will last for about 3-4 weeks. During this time, SCAM might see price fluctuations based on the evidence Musk shares and the trial developments. 2) During the trial, Musk should be limited in what he can say on X by legal departments. We’ll see if he mentions this term again. 3) This is an external observation angle; from inside the crypto space, having experienced a pump from 0 to 12M, followed by a drop from 12 to 600K. If there’s a chance of a narrative reversal during this time, investment funds might come in. According to the Solana chain’s play, some people might come in for a second round, but that’s another story.
2: Solana chain's $ASTEROID (CA: 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS)
I certainly don’t think that $ASTEROID on the SOL chain has a high probability of replacing $ASTEROID on the E chain. Clearly, the market cap, trading volume, supported KOLs, and the number of exchanges listed on that side are much greater. The E chain’s $ASTEROID is likely the original and most promising to hold onto this name.
My points of focus: 1) The Solana chain’s $ASTEROID is based on http://Bags.fm. The girl’s mother has already claimed royalties a few times. 2) This situation puts pressure on http://Pump.fun. A couple of days ago, Pump also launched a feature specifically for charity-related royalties. 3) In terms of market cap, the Solana chain's $ASTEROID is currently fluctuating between 2M-6M, with daily trading volume just shy of 1M. According to this narrative and the current market conditions, there's a little room for hope.
Quick heads up. I’m more focused on observing and verifying. This kind of position isn’t suited for big plays, and the certainty is pretty low. What I mean is, if you’re just looking to research and watch, feel free to see me play without having to dive in yourself.
Remember to DYOR.
1: SCAM (Scam Altman, CA: 6AVAUKa9uxQpruHZUinFECpXEh1usRVtzQWK8N2wpump)
Previously, on the day when Elon Musk @elonmusk pinned a tweet calling Osman a scammer, it peaked at 12M. After Musk unpinned that tweet, the price quickly plummeted by 90%.
Currently, it’s fluctuating between 600K-1.2M.
Daily trading volume is around 1M.
It’s listed on GATE ALPHA and KuCoin Alpha.
My points of focus are: 1) The court trial phase starting from April 28 will last for about 3-4 weeks. During this time, SCAM might see price fluctuations based on the evidence Musk shares and the trial developments. 2) During the trial, Musk should be limited in what he can say on X by legal departments. We’ll see if he mentions this term again. 3) This is an external observation angle; from inside the crypto space, having experienced a pump from 0 to 12M, followed by a drop from 12 to 600K. If there’s a chance of a narrative reversal during this time, investment funds might come in. According to the Solana chain’s play, some people might come in for a second round, but that’s another story.
2: Solana chain's $ASTEROID (CA: 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS)
I certainly don’t think that $ASTEROID on the SOL chain has a high probability of replacing $ASTEROID on the E chain. Clearly, the market cap, trading volume, supported KOLs, and the number of exchanges listed on that side are much greater. The E chain’s $ASTEROID is likely the original and most promising to hold onto this name.
My points of focus: 1) The Solana chain’s $ASTEROID is based on http://Bags.fm. The girl’s mother has already claimed royalties a few times. 2) This situation puts pressure on http://Pump.fun. A couple of days ago, Pump also launched a feature specifically for charity-related royalties. 3) In terms of market cap, the Solana chain's $ASTEROID is currently fluctuating between 2M-6M, with daily trading volume just shy of 1M. According to this narrative and the current market conditions, there's a little room for hope.
Log in to explore more content