#加密市场观察 uses venture capital thinking to deconstruct the "local dog" game: why do 100 targets outperform 1?\n\nMany people mock the "broad net" approach, but forget that Tencent and Sequoia's essence is also probability theory. They invest in hundreds or thousands of projects; as long as one like JD.com or Pinduoduo emerges, they can cover all costs and achieve excess returns.\n\nSince giants can use capital for venture capital, why can't we replicate this model in the cryptocurrency space using fund management?\n【My "100 shares" strategy】\nDivide the principal (e.g., 10,000 USDT) into 100 shares, each worth 100 USDT.\nLook for 100 low-market-cap cryptocurrencies with narrative potential that have not yet exploded (e.g., ASTER, WIFI, AT, XPL, etc.) for ambush.\n\n【Mathematical expectation deduction】\n\n- Worst-case scenario: 80 become worthless, losing 8,000 USDT.\n​\n- Earnings scenario: 10 double, 5 increase tenfold, as long as 1 does a 1,000 times increase like SOL or SHIB.\n​\n- Result: Your total assets will soar from 10,000 USDT to hundreds of thousands of USDT.\n\nIn the cryptocurrency space, value investing is survivor bias; "surviving and capturing that unicorn" is the truth. Has anyone understood this mathematical problem?\n\nI have already started executing this plan. Brothers, help me take a look at these few, and you can also recommend what you think is good. I’ll experiment first; if it succeeds, can’t everyone replicate my experience and model!\n\n\n